THE IMPACT OF OBESITY ON AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE PROFILES IN HYPERTENSIVE SUBJECTS IS AGE DEPENDENT: PP.3.104

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. e79
Author(s):  
S Hoshide ◽  
Y Yano ◽  
M Shimizu ◽  
T Kabutoya ◽  
Y Matsui ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Delia Tulbă ◽  
Liviu Cozma ◽  
Paul Bălănescu ◽  
Adrian Buzea ◽  
Cristian Băicuș ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction is a non-motor feature in Parkinson’s disease with negative impact on functionality and life expectancy, prompting early detection and proper management. We aimed to describe the blood pressure patterns reported in patients with Parkinson’s disease, as measured by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. (2) Methods: We conducted a systematic search on the PubMed database. Studies enrolling patients with Parkinson’s disease undergoing 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were included. Data regarding study population, Parkinson’s disease course, vasoactive drugs, blood pressure profiles, and measurements were recorded. (3) Results: The search identified 172 studies. Forty studies eventually fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with 3090 patients enrolled. Abnormal blood pressure profiles were commonly encountered: high blood pressure in 38.13% of patients (938/2460), orthostatic hypotension in 38.68% (941/2433), supine hypertension in 27.76% (445/1603) and nocturnal hypertension in 38.91% (737/1894). Dipping status was also altered often, 40.46% of patients (477/1179) being reverse dippers and 35.67% (310/869) reduced dippers. All these patterns were correlated with negative clinical and imaging outcomes. (4) Conclusion: Patients with Parkinson’s disease have significantly altered blood pressure patterns that carry a negative prognosis. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring should be validated as a biomarker of PD-associated cardiovascular dysautonomia and a tool for assisting therapeutic interventions.


1993 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 1033-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Duprez ◽  
Marc De Buyzere ◽  
Johan De Sutter ◽  
Tine De Backer ◽  
Denis L. Clement

Hypertension ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Cluett ◽  
Anthony Ishak ◽  
Kenneth J Mukamal ◽  
Stephen P Juraschek

Background: Prescription stimulant medications are an important cause of secondary hypertension (HTN) and use is increasing in US adults. Although stimulants are known to increase blood pressure (BP), a systematic approach to assess impact in individual patients is lacking. Further, treating HTN secondary to stimulant use may differ from treatment of essential HTN. Objective: To develop a protocol using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) to differentiate HTN secondary to stimulant use from essential HTN. Methods: We used ABPM to evaluate pre- and post-stimulant systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) for patients referred to the BIDMC Hypertension Center. Patient charts were reviewed by a clinical pharmacist to ensure the safety of holding the stimulant medication and to determine the duration of action. Average daytime BP on day 1 (off stimulant) was compared to day 2 (on stimulant) to assess the impact of stimulant on BP. We defined normotension as BP <135/<85 on both days, sustained HTN as BP ≥135/≥85 on both days and stimulant-induced HTN as BP <135/<85 on Day 1 and ≥135/≥85 on Day 2. We also defined an increase of SBP≥10 and/or DBP≥ 5 while taking the stimulant as a clinically significant effect on BP. Results: Eleven patients were assessed (see Table). Four had sustained normotension, six had sustained HTN, and one had stimulant-induced HTN. In addition, four of the patients had a clinically significant increase in their BP while on a stimulant. Overall, average increase in SBP was 6.7 mmHg and average increase in DBP was 3.2 mmHg. Conclusion: This novel ABPM protocol was useful for differentiating secondary HTN from stimulant use from essential HTN.


1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolaus Lingens ◽  
Eva Dobos ◽  
Klaus Witte ◽  
Christopher Busch ◽  
Björn Lemmer ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5124-5124
Author(s):  
Angelika Pyszel ◽  
Monika Biedron ◽  
Rafal Poreba ◽  
Tomasz Wrobel ◽  
Grzegorz Mazur ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are still a cornerstone in multiple myeloma (MM) therapy, both as a single agent and as a part of many protocols, including VAD regimen (vincristine, adriblastine, dexamethasone). Corticosteroids are known to be involved in blood pressure (BP) regulation and to affect this parameter. The impact of dexamethasone (Dex) administration on BP in MM patients during VAD protocol treatment is poorly documented. AIM: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the blood pressure changes during Dex administration in patients treated with VAD protocol due to MM. METHODS: Thirteen patients with MM (7 men and 6 women; mean age 62,45 ± 8,14) were assessed. Primary hypertensive patients (7 persons) were not excluded. They were administered Dex in standard dose of 40 mg (day 1–4, 9–12, 17–21) according to VAD protocol. Blood pressure was assessed by the use of commercially available instruments of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM). The BP recordings lasted 48 hours, were started on the day before the first day of VAD and were obtained every 10 minutes during mornings, every 15 minutes during the rest of days and every 20 minutes during nights. Average of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) were estimated for the 2-hour time before Dex and for the 14-hour time in the 2-hour periods after Dex. Minimal and maximal range of SBP/DBP increase and the mean amount of SBP/DBP increase were also determined. RESULTS: 48-hour BP recordings revealed a significant increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure after Dex administration in all patients. SBP and DBP began to increase after 3 hours after Dex, then rose continually and reached the peak in the period from 6 to 10 hour after Dex. In comparison to 2-hour period before Dex, in which SBP/DBP amounted 139,63/82,92 ± 23,47/9,38 mmHg, the mean SBP/DBP increase rate was: in the 2–4 hour period after Dex - 146,68/88,15 ± 24,38/10,51 mmHg (p&lt;0,05), in the 6–8 – 148,07/92,66 ± 14,07/9,04 mmHg (ns), in the 8–10 – 147,8/87,99 ± 14,07/9,04 mmHg (p&lt;0,01), in the 10–12 – 143,44/86,12 ± 17,22/9,77 mmHg (p&lt;0,05) and in the 12–14 – 144,47/88,59 ± 17,04/12,54 mmHg (p&lt;0,01). The minimal range of SBP/DBP increase was 10,50/−2,00 mmHg, maximal range of SBP/DBP increase was 35,43/40,00 mmHg and the mean amount of SBP/DBP increase was 20,06/11,6 ± 8,36/14,23 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary study revealed that Dex administration causes an increase in BP in all patients. The mean increase in BP amounted 20,06/11,6 ± 8,36/14,23 mmHg and was similar in all patients, regardless their initial value of BP. So our study demonstrates the need of individualized hypertension treatment with strict control of BP in hypertensive patients when corticosteroid therapy is indicated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document