Assessment of the Scientific Basis for Genetic Testing of Railroad Workers with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2003 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 592-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Schulte ◽  
Geoffrey Lomax
1988 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Gelherman ◽  
Bjorn L. Rydevik ◽  
Gary M. Pess ◽  
Robert M. Szabo ◽  
Goran Lundborg

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Keller ◽  
K Shah ◽  
D Delgado ◽  
A Vallakati ◽  
O Akinboboye ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hATTR; ATTRv) is a progressive, fatal disease caused by mutations in the transthyretin gene (TTR) that results in deposition of amyloid throughout the body, including in the heart. The p.V142I and p.T80A mutations typically manifest with a cardiomyopathy (CM) phenotype. Early diagnosis, which can be facilitated by genetic testing, is key to achieving optimal patient outcomes. Purpose To characterise the clinical profile and symptom burden of patients with hereditary transthyretin mutations associated primarily with a CM phenotype and rare hereditary transthyretin mutations. Methods This analysis used data from hATTR Compass, a genetic testing programme in the United States and Canada for patients suspected of having hATTR with polyneuropathy (PN) and patients with a family history of hATTR. Sequencing was performed using a TTR single-gene test, a gene panel of inherited cardiovascular disorders (CardioNext), or a gene panel of inherited neuromuscular disorders (NeuropathySelect). Akcea is aware of isolated data quality issues. Importantly, these do not affect the conclusions of this analysis. Results Cardiology specialists referred 466 patients with p.V142I, 15 with p.T80A, and 28 with rare TTR mutations to this programme. Of patients who reported sex, 57%, 53%, and 52% with p.V142I, p.T80A, and rare mutations, respectively, were male. Of patients who reported ethnicity, most with p.V142I were African American (94%), whereas the majority of patients with p.T80A and rare TTR mutations were Caucasian (100% and 69%, respectively). 24%, 60%, and 50%, of patients with p.V142I, p.T80A, and rare TTR mutations, respectively, had a family history of hATTR. The majority of patients with p.V142I (74%), p.T80A (53%), and rare TTR (54%) mutations were 65 years of age or older. Although most patients with p.V142I, p.T80A, and rare TTR mutations experienced symptoms/manifestations of heart disease (94% vs 100% vs 85%), many also presented with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (23% vs 44% vs 30%) and with sensory (27% vs 44% vs 65%), motor (15% vs 11% vs 25%), and autonomic (19% vs 11% vs 30%) dysfunction. Conclusion Most patients with the p.V142I mutation were African American, whereas many with p.T80A and other rare TTR mutations were Caucasian. Family history of hATTR was more common among patients with p.T80A and other rare TTR mutations than among patients with p.V142I. Regardless of the underlying mutation variant, many hATTR patients can present with various symptoms/manifestations aside from CM, such as PN and bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Recognising the neurological symptoms that can occur alongside CM and performing subsequent genetic testing facilitates diagnosis of hATTR. Early diagnosis is critical in hATTR because it is progressive and fatal, and early initiation of disease-modifying therapy is essential to optimising patient outcomes. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): This study was sponsored by Akcea Therapeutics, an affiliate of Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Author(s):  
James L. Cosgrove ◽  
Peter Chase ◽  
Norman Mast

2002 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Cosgrove ◽  
Peter M. Chase ◽  
Norman J. Mast ◽  
Richard Reeves

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
James B. Talmage

Abstract Permanent impairment cannot be assessed until the patient is at maximum medical improvement (MMI), but the proper time to test following carpal tunnel release often is not clear. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) states: “Factors affecting nerve recovery in compression lesions include nerve fiber pathology, level of injury, duration of injury, and status of end organs,” but age is not prognostic. The AMA Guides clarifies: “High axonotmesis lesions may take 1 to 2 years for maximum recovery, whereas even lesions at the wrist may take 6 to 9 months for maximal recovery of nerve function.” The authors review 3 studies that followed patients’ long-term recovery of hand function after open carpal tunnel release surgery and found that estimates of MMI ranged from 25 weeks to 24 months (for “significant improvement”) to 18 to 24 months. The authors suggest that if the early results of surgery suggest a patient's improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) and an examination shows few or no symptoms, the result can be assessed early. If major symptoms and ADL problems persist, the examiner should wait at least 6 to 12 months, until symptoms appear to stop improving. A patient with carpal tunnel syndrome who declines a release can be rated for impairment, and, as appropriate, the physician may wish to make a written note of this in the medical evaluation report.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 5-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mark Melhorn

Abstract Medical evidence is drawn from observation, is multifactorial, and relies on the laws of probability rather than a single cause, but, in law, finding causation between a wrongful act and harm is essential to the attribution of legal responsibility. These different perspectives often result in dissatisfaction for litigants, uncertainty for judges, and friction between health care and legal professionals. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) provides an example: Popular notions suggest that CTS results from occupational arm or hand use, but medical factors range from congenital or acquired anatomic structure, age, sex, and body mass index, and perhaps also involving hormonal disorders, diabetes, pregnancy, and others. The law separately considers two separate components of causation: cause in fact (a cause-and-effect relationship exists) and proximate or legal cause (two events are so closely related that liability can be attached to the first event). Workers’ compensation systems are a genuine, no-fault form of insurance, and evaluators should be aware of the relevant thresholds and legal definitions for the jurisdiction in which they provide an opinion. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment contains a large number of specific references and outlines the methodology to evaluate CTS, including both occupational and nonoccupational risk factors and assigning one of four levels of evidence that supports the conclusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document