EFFECT OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION ON CONTROLLING ARTERY-VENOUS FISTULA SIDE EFFECTS IN END STAGE RENAL DISEASE

2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 763
Author(s):  
S M.M. Ghoreishi ◽  
S A. Tabatabaie ◽  
T Ghoraishi ◽  
A A. Beigi ◽  
A Mirmohammadsadeghy ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1075-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Suzuki ◽  
Fumihiko Katagiri ◽  
Fuminori Sato ◽  
Kanako Fujioka ◽  
Yukie Sato ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A192-A192
Author(s):  
Mona Al Mukaddam ◽  
Christopher Hvisdas ◽  
Anisa Sulaj ◽  
Kruti Patel ◽  
Richie Tran

Abstract Background: Romosozumab is a sclerostin inhibitor indicated for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Sclerostin inhibits Wnt/Beta-catenin signaling pathway. When sclerostin is inhibited, stimulation of this pathway leads to increased bone formation and production of osteoprotegerin, which also decreases bone resorption. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) demonstrate increased levels of sclerostin that negatively correlates with the rate of bone formation; however, data is lacking for use of romosozumab in this patient population. The report herein details the experience of use of romosozumab in a patient with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD). Clinical Case: A 37-year-old old African American male was referred after multiple rib fractures and severe non-traumatic T8 compression fracture with nerve compression. His past medical history includes lupus nephritis and cerebritis, ESRD on HD since age 22 status post (s/p) failed renal transplant, and tertiary hyperparathyroidism complicated with fracture in iliac brown tumor and mediastinal parathyromatosis s/p three parathyroid surgeries. Bone mineral density by DXA (g/cm2, Z-score) were as follows: lumbar spine (0.700, -4.0) femoral neck (0.676, -3.8), total hip (0.628,-4.0), 1/3 radius(0.443,-6.2). No prior exposure to antiresorptive or osteoanabolic agents. Pertinent labs included serum calcium 8.5 mg/dL (nl 8.9–10.3 mg/dl), albumin 4.2 g/dL, alkaline phosphatase 319 U/L (nl 38–126), Phosphorus 3.1 mg/dL (2.4–4.7), Creatinine 5.62 mg/dl, 25-OH Vitamin D 31 ng/mL (nl 25 - 80), intact parathyroid hormone 17.9 pmol/L (nl 1.6–6.9). Patient was in excruciating pain and not a surgical candidate due to poor bone quality. Osteoanabolic therapy was recommended given the severity of osteoporosis; however, teriparatide and abaloparaitde were contraindicated given comorbidities. The patient was offered off-label use of Romosozumab with clear understanding that the drug is not approved for this indication and safety/efficacy data in ESRD is not known. The boxed warning regarding increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction and death were discussed and patient was willing to proceed. Repeat DXA after eleven monthly doses of Romosozumab resulted in a remarkable improvement in bone mineral density at all sites: lumbar spine (+47%), femoral neck (+41%), total hip (+28%), 1/3 radius (+20%). Patient tolerated medication with no side effects or fractures. Serum calcium was monitored prior to initiation and before every dose. No doses were held due to abnormal laboratory values or side effects. Conclusion: This case report summarizes successful experience with the use of Romosozumab in one patient with ESRD on HD with favorable outcomes.


Immunology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Schaier ◽  
Angele Leick ◽  
Lorenz Uhlmann ◽  
Florian Kälble ◽  
Christian Morath ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Kaló ◽  
Jeno Járay ◽  
Júlia Nagy

Background— Kidney transplantation is generally acknowledged as the more clinically effective and more cost-effective option in managing patients with end-stage renal disease, compared with dialysis. This study looked for confirmatory evidence in a Hungarian population. Methods— Patients (n = 242) with end-stage renal disease who received cadaveric kidney transplantation during 1994 were followed up for 3 years. They were compared with patients (n = 840) receiving hemodialysis who were on a waiting list for transplantation. Data were collected retrospectively. Treatments were compared for clinical efficacy and for cost-effectiveness. Results— At month 36, the standard mortality hazard function was 3.5 times higher in the group receiving hemodialysis ( P<.0001) than in the transplant recipients. Average treatment costs per patient over the 3 years were also significantly higher ( P<.0001) in the hemodialysis group than in the group that received transplants. The cost of 1 year gained by transplantation was significantly less ( P<.0001) than the cost associated with hemodialysis. Conclusions— Compared with hemodialysis, kidney transplantation provides greater survival benefits to patients with end-stage renal disease, at less cost.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Jeong Ko ◽  
Jaeseok Yang ◽  
Curie Ahn ◽  
Myoung Soo Kim ◽  
Duck Jong Han ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 166
Author(s):  
C. Bachelet-Rousseau ◽  
A. Kearney-Schwartz ◽  
L. Frimat ◽  
M. Kessler ◽  
A. Benetos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document