Acute Pain Management: Operative or Medical Procedures and Trauma. Clinical Practice Guideline.

1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Kathleen Moran
1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1068-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheryl L Follin ◽  
Scott L Charland

Objective To review the topics presented in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Pain Management and provide updated information on therapeutic issues as necessary. Data Sources AHCPR Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Pain Management: Operative or Medical Procedures and Trauma. A MEDLINE search (1990 to June 1996) of English-language literature pertaining to pain assessment and management was performed. Reference lists from relevant articles also served as a literature source. Study Selection and Data Extraction All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated. Relevant information, as determined by the authors, was included in the review. Data Synthesis Inadequate acute pain management continues to be recognized as a problem due to limited health professional education on the treatment of pain, inadequate patient empowerment, negative connotations associated with opioid analgesics (e.g., fear of “addiction”), federal regulations associated with prescribing opioid analgesics, and difficulty in assessing pain. The widespread inadequacy in pain management prompted the development of the AHCPR Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Pain Management, which was published in 1992. In addition to reviewing the pain guideline, this article includes updated information on ketorolac tromethamine, tramadol, local anesthetics, sedation, regional anesthetic techniques, and the management of opioid adverse effects. Conclusions The AHCPR Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Pain Management is a comprehensive, yet functional, review for clinicians. Most issues relating to acute pain assessment and management are adequately discussed. Overall, this guideline is a worthwhile general resource to clinicians. It is important, however, for clinicians managing acute pain issues to supplement this guideline with more detailed and current information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (5-6) ◽  
pp. e573-e578
Author(s):  
Sandeep T Dhanjal ◽  
Kalyn C Jannace ◽  
Nicholas A Giordano ◽  
Krista B Highland

Abstract Introduction The 2017 Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline for Pain, Anxiety, and Delirium (JTS CPG) provides an evidence-based framework for managing pain, anxiety, and delirium in combat settings. In this study, we evaluate the use of multimodal analgesia and assess pain outcomes, as indicated by the JTS CPG, at the combat support hospital (CSH). Materials and Methods In this quality improvement project, data were collected for all patients, presenting to the CSH in Baghdad, Iraq, who received consultation from the acute pain service from October 10, 2017 to February 27, 2018. Univariate analyses described patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) scores, physical therapy completion, and sleep duration were recorded for each patient daily. Correlations assessed relationships between variables, including clinical characteristics and DVPRS scores. Results 34 patients were included in this study. About 65% of the patients included in this study were Iraqi military, while the other 35% were U.S. or Coalition Forces. Over half received more than one class of analgesic medication. The majority of patients received regional anesthesia, with 17 different techniques utilized. The DVPRS had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80, 0.95). There was a significant difference in median DVPRS pain intensity scores between those who met physical therapy goals and those who did not. Sleep duration was negatively correlated with both the DVPRS pain intensity and sleep scores. Conclusions This report indicates that acute pain service teams integrated in a CSH can feasibly implement JTS CPGs using a team-based approach. Given the military’s emphasis on managing complex pain and disability among survivors beginning in the combat environment, it is imperative that innovations and best practices, like the JTS CPG, be assessed in the combat setting.


1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 805A
Author(s):  
R.S. Lagasse ◽  
E.M. Kitain ◽  
M. Jakubowski ◽  
K. Ciccone ◽  
J. Jiang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1089-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernie Garrett ◽  
Tarnia Taverner ◽  
Wendy Masinde ◽  
Diane Gromala ◽  
Chris Shaw ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S34-S34
Author(s):  
E DURAND ◽  
C CNRNET ◽  
F FMNERENR ◽  
T ONEILL ◽  
P MERTES ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jeremy N. Cashman

Pain measurement is essential in evaluating response to analgesic therapy. The oral route is the route of choice for analgesics in non-fasting patients. Administering opioids by the neuraxial route provides superior analgesia to the same drug administered by parenteral routes. Clinical practice guidelines may be useful in acute pain management. Acute Pain Services improve the quality of post-operative pain management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document