scholarly journals A Facilitated Peer Mentoring Program for Junior Faculty to Promote Professional Development and Peer Networking

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey M. Fleming ◽  
Jill H. Simmons ◽  
Meng Xu ◽  
Sabina B. Gesell ◽  
Rebekah F. Brown ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Anne Landsberger ◽  
Eric L. Scott ◽  
Christopher J. McDougle ◽  
Leslie A. Hulvershorn ◽  
Kristine M. Chapleau ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kat McConnell ◽  
Rachel Louise Geesa ◽  
Kendra Lowery

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discover peer mentors’ perspectives of an education doctoral (Doctorate of Education) peer mentoring program implemented in a mid-sized public institution. Design/methodology/approach Data from one focus group and an interview collected from peer mentors as part of a larger case study of mentors and mentees in a peer mentoring program for education doctoral students are presented. Four (n=4) peer mentors participated in a focus group (n=3) and an interview (n=1). Participants were asked about their perceptions of the program and their experiences as mentors. Findings Four themes were discovered within the data: mentors relate to social, emotional and academic life balances of mentees, mentors provide support and reassurance to mentees, mentors guide mentees to focus on the future, and mentors gain personal and professional growth from the peer mentoring program. Results indicated that mentors believed that the program was helpful for their mentees and beneficial to their own personal and professional development. Research limitations/implications Limitations of this study include the small sample size (n=4) and the short period of time in which participants were asked to be a part of the mentoring program and reflect in focus groups and interview (one academic year). Implications of this study include the benefits of peer mentoring for both mentors and mentees alike. Originality/value In contrast to many other studies of peer mentoring programs, this peer mentoring program targeted scholar-practitioner students who were balancing full-time careers with their coursework and family lives. Thus, peer mentors focused more on career and work-life balance with mentees than mentors may in other programs, as well as finding benefit to their own professional development.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna M LaChenaye ◽  
Ayesha S. Boyce ◽  
Jenna Van Draanen ◽  
Kristin Everett

The majority of evaluation practitioners begin their career in allied fields and stumble into evaluation. As such, university offerings and evaluation professional development sessions have become increasingly popular. As the field continues to professionalize and new mentoring programs emerge, empirical work examining teaching and training in evaluation has gained traction. However, little is known about the role that opportunities such as mentoring play in evaluation training. The purpose of this article is to explore the expected and unexpected benefits of our experiences as participants in an evaluation mentoring program, lessons learned, and logistical and structural promoters of success in peer-mentoring.


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 844-P
Author(s):  
ASHBY F. WALKER ◽  
CATHRYN JOHNSON ◽  
CLAUDIA ANEZ-ZABALA ◽  
SARAH R. DORVIL ◽  
MICHAEL J. HALLER ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document