Secondary Cancer Prevention During Follow-up for Endometrial Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 790-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice S. Kwon ◽  
Laurie Elit ◽  
Refik Saskin ◽  
David Hodgson ◽  
Eva Grunfeld
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31) ◽  
pp. 3951-3956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Onsrud ◽  
Milada Cvancarova ◽  
Taran P. Hellebust ◽  
Claes G. Tropé ◽  
Gunnar B. Kristensen ◽  
...  

Purpose This follow-up of a randomized study was conducted to assess the long-term effects of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the adjuvant treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer. Patients and Methods Between 1968 and 1974, 568 patients with stage I endometrial cancer were included. After primary surgery, patients were randomly assigned to either vaginal radium brachytherapy followed by EBRT (n = 288) or brachytherapy alone (n = 280). Overall survival was analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. We also conducted analyses stratified by age groups. Results After median 20.5 years (range, 0 to 43.4 years) of follow-up, no statistically significant difference was revealed in overall survival (P = .186) between treatment groups. However, women younger than age 60 years had significantly higher mortality rates after EBRT (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.76) than the control group. The risk of secondary cancer increased after EBRT, especially in women younger than age 60 years (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.15). Conclusion We observed no survival benefit of external pelvic radiation in early-stage endometrial carcinoma. In women younger than age 60 years, pelvic radiation decreased survival and increased the risk of secondary cancer. Adjuvant EBRT should be used with caution, especially in women with a long life expectancy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
Giorgio Bogani ◽  
Maria Grazia Tibiletti ◽  
Maria Teresa Ricci ◽  
Ileana Carnevali ◽  
Viola Liberale ◽  
...  

ObjectiveWomen with Lynch syndrome have a risk up to 40–60% of developing endometrial cancer, which is higher than their risk of developing colorectal or ovarian cancer. To date, no data on the outcomes of patients with Lynch syndrome diagnosed with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer are available. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with Lynch syndrome diagnosed with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.MethodsData from consecutive patients diagnosed with Lynch syndrome and with a histological diagnosis of non-endometrioid endometrial cancer were retrospectively collected in two referral institutes in Italy. A case–control comparison (applying a propensity matching algorithm) was performed in order to compare patients with proven Lynch syndrome and controls. Inclusion criteria were: (a) histologically-proven endometrial cancer; (b) detection of a germline pathogenic variant in one of the MMR genes; (c) adequate follow-up. Only carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (ie, class 5 and 4 according to the InSiGHT classification) were included in the study. Survival outcomes were assessed using KaplanMeier and Cox models.ResultsOverall, 137 patients with Lynch syndrome were collected. Mean patient age was 49.2 (10.9) years. Genes involved in the Lynch syndrome included MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in 43%, 39%, and 18% of cases, respectively. The study population included 27 patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, who were matched 1:2 with patients with sporadic cancers using a propensity matching algorithm. After a median follow-up of 134 months (range 1–295), 2 (7.4%) of the 27 patients developed recurrent disease (3 and 36 months) and subsequently died of disease (7 and 91 months). Patients diagnosed with Lynch syndrome experienced better disease-free survival (HR 7.86 (95% CI 1.79 to 34.5); p=0.006) and overall survival (HR 5.33 (95% CI 1.18 to 23.9); p=0.029) than controls.ConclusionsNon-endometrioid endometrial cancer occurring in patients with Lynch syndrome might be associated with improved oncologic outcomes compared with controls. Genetic/molecular profiling should be investigated in order to better understand the mechanism underlying the prognosis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Naaman ◽  
T Hodge ◽  
A Jones ◽  
F Chin ◽  
D Neesham ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii460-iii460
Author(s):  
Mayuko Miyata ◽  
Masahiro Nonaka ◽  
Akio Asai

Abstract BACKGROUND If new lesions are observed during follow-up of the malignant tumor after treatment, it is difficult to distinguish whether the tumor is a recurrent lesion, secondary cancer, or radiation necrosis of the brain. We have encountered a patient with symptomatic radiation necrosis of the cerebellum 16 years after treatment of medulloblastoma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 24-year-old man who had received a tumor resection and chemoradiotherapy for cerebellar medulloblastoma at the age of 8 presented with dizziness. For the past 16 years, there was no recurrence of the tumor. He subsequently underwent MRI scan, and T1-Gd image showed enhanced lesion in the right cerebellar peduncle. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology analysis was negative for tumor. We suspected tumor reccurence or secondary cancer, and performed lesion biopsy. The result of the pathological examination was radiation necrosis of the cerebellum. DISCUSSION: The interval of radiation necrosis of the brain and radiotherapy can vary from months to more than 10 years. So, whenever a new lesion is identified, radiation brain necrosis must be envisioned. According to guidelines in Japan, there is no absolute examination for discriminating tumor recurrence from radiation brain necrosis and diagnosis by biopsy may be required. CONCLUSION We experienced a case of symptomatic radiation necrosis of the cerebellum 16 years after treatment. In patients showing new lesion after long periods of time, the possibility of radiation necrosis to be considered.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Barakat ◽  
Brian N. Bundy ◽  
Nick M. Spirtos ◽  
Jeffrey Bell ◽  
Robert S. Mannel

Purpose To determine the effect of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on recurrence rate and survival in women who have undergone surgery for stage I or II endometrial cancer. Patients and Methods After surgery, eligible patients were allocated to therapy with ERT or placebo after undergoing hysterectomy with or without pelvic and aortic nodal sampling. Planned duration of hormonal versus placebo treatment was 3 years, with an additional 2 years of follow-up. Results The median follow-up time for all 1,236 eligible and assessable patients was 35.7 months. Stage, grade, histologic subtype, and percentage of patients receiving adjuvant therapy were similarly distributed between the groups. The median age at diagnosis for the 618 patients randomly assigned to ERT was 57 years (range, 26 to 91 years). Two hundred fifty-one patients (41.1%) were compliant with ERT for the entire treatment period. Disease recurrence was experienced in 14 patients (2.3%). Eight patients (1.3%) developed a new malignancy. There were 26 deaths (4.2%), and five deaths (0.8%) were a result of endometrial cancer. The median age at diagnosis for the 618 patients in the placebo group was 57 years (range, 30 to 88 years). Twelve patients (1.9%) experienced disease recurrence. Ten patients (1.6%) developed a new malignancy. There were 9 deaths (3.1%) in the placebo group, and four deaths (0.6%) were a result of endometrial cancer. Conclusion Although this incomplete study cannot conclusively refute or support the safety of exogenous estrogen with regard to risk of endometrial recurrence, it is noteworthy that the absolute recurrence rate (2.1%) and the incidence of new malignancy were low.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document