Profile of Self-Inflicted Burn Patients Treated at a Tertiary Burn Center in Istanbul

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Uygur ◽  
Celalettin Sever ◽  
Sinan Öksüz ◽  
Haluk Duman
Keyword(s):  
Burns ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raimo Palmu ◽  
Timo Partonen ◽  
Kirsi Suominen ◽  
Jyrki Vuola ◽  
Erkki Isometsä

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Sajid Rashid

It has been reported from china that burn centers have the highest risk of COVID-19 infection. The virus is highly contagious and damaging and mortality rate as high as 61.5% has been reported. Burn patients have low level of immunity, lack skin barrier and are prone to infections. Due to these facts, they have less ability to fight against the corona virus, so surgical practices for management of burn patients should be modified to prevent the spread of infection and decrease mortality. Keeping these facts in mind, we adopted certain changes in the protocols for management of burn patients at Rawalian burn center, Rawalpindi Pakistan. We are presenting new recommendations which were followed at the burn center during COVID-19 pandemic. These are the first ever recommendations from any burn center of Pakistan since the start of recent pandemic. With help of literature search we identified risk factors for infection during the course of treatment of burn patients. These recommendations include alterations in structural layout, administration procedures, burn patient care like the introduction of telemedicine, online appointment system and use of online messaging applications i.e., WhatsApp, staff training and strategies like online learning system to provide new knowledge regarding COVID-19 continuously. Issues of staff like over work, availability of personal protective equipment (PPEs), and their health-related anxiety and fear should be addressed properly for the prevention of burn out syndrome in them.


Author(s):  
Salsabilla Gina Rania ◽  
Lynda Hariani ◽  
Helmia Hasan ◽  
Iswinarno Doso Saputro

Introduction: Inhalation injury is one of burns impact. Airway burns due to inhalation injury is a non-specific term which refer to all respiratory tract injuries occurred due to irritative chemicals, including heat and smoke during inspiration. Inhalation injury increases the risk of death in burns. Pneumonia is one of burns-related inhalation injury complications.Methods: This was a descriptive retrospective study aiming to determine the incidence of pneumonia in burn patients with inhalation injury using secondary data at Burn Center Dr. Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya in the period of January 2015 - December 2018.Results: There were 5 cases of pneumonia in 14 burn cases with inhalation injury (35.71%). Respectively, 2 and 3 cases were found in 2017 and 2018. There were 2 female (40%) and 3 male (60%) patients, with age varied within 28-73 years old. The burn area of burn patients with inhalation injury and pneumonia were found by 15%, 20%, 24%, 32% and 71%, or within the classification of 11-20% burn area, and most complication found was hypoalbuminemia, as much as 3 cases (60%).\Conclusion: Most pneumonia in burn cases with inhalation injury was occurred in 2018, dominated by male patients. The age of the patient were ranging from early adulthood to elderly. Most burns were in the range of 11-20% burn area with the most complication found was hypoalbuminemia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S132-S132
Author(s):  
Shana M Henry ◽  
Nicole M Kopari ◽  
Mary Wolfe

Abstract Introduction California’s Creek Fire is not only the largest single wildfire in a state known for huge and destructive blazes, it spawned two rare fire tornados with winds over 100mph, a day after the fire started in early September. Huntington Lake and Mammoth Pool were the sites of these rare events leading to hundreds of trapped campers. An air rescue operation airlifted hundreds of trapped people to safety. Twenty days after the start of the fire, it had burned >300,000 acres with only 36% containment by fire crews. This review is an evaluation of our hospitals response team and the events surrounding that night. Methods Our on-call surgeon had called in the back-up surgeon to run a second trauma operating room. It was at this time, the news had reported trapped campers near Mammoth Pool. The burn surgeon was notified and reported to the emergency department (ED) as word of 65 possible victims spread. Local disaster response planning was initiated with an ED physician triaging patients at the regional airport. Initial calls were made to the division chief and burn medical director. The nursing director was notified along with any available nursing staff with 8 ICU nurses volunteering to report. Immediately, lateral transfer orders were placed for all burn patients housed in the burn center which has 10 ICU bed capabilities. Results The first helicopter landed with 5 of the burn victims presenting to our hospital. 4 of the victims were male and 1 female with ages ranging from 17 to 27. Total body surface area burn was estimated on each with 2 minor burns < 10% and 3 moderate sized burns of roughly 25%. These patients were quickly triaged in the ED and traumatic injuries evaluated. 3 of the patients were placed in ICU level care with the 2 remaining patients housed in the ED as word trickled in about another rescue effort with an additional 95 people. By morning, an additional 2 patients were transferred to our burn center from the surrounding hospitals and another 2 patients evaluated for burns sustained in separate events. All patients were taken to the operating room over the next 24–48 hours for excision and autologous spray on skin cells (ASCS) in combination with widely meshed skin grafts or ASCS alone. Conclusions Communication, teamwork, and personnel that are dedicated to the care of burn patients made this tragic incident manageable. The Creek Fire hit home for many of the burn staff not only because of the patients that were cared for, but because this area of California was a beloved respite for many. A debriefing with a chaplain, grief counselor, and psychotherapist, was held within 2 weeks of the incident to provide support to the staff during this devastating time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S252-S252
Author(s):  
Mathangi A Chandramouli ◽  
Angela Rabbitts ◽  
Jamie Heffernan ◽  
Philip Chang

Abstract Introduction Burn prevention is one of the core missions of burn centers. Geomapping has been instrumental for police departments to target resources for crime prevention. Similarly, geomapping could assist burn specialists in identifying “hotspots” of injury. The purpose of this study is to visually identify the incidence and location of adult burn injury within the catchment area of a single tertiary urban regional burn center. Data mapping can thus then be used to target burn outreach and prevention efforts. Methods Demographic and deidentified clinical data was collected from a single institution over a 3 year period. 1986 burn patients were admitted between 1/2016 and 12/2018. 1360 patients were 16 years of age or greater. Geriatric patients were defined as age 60 or greater to facilitate comparison with National Burn Repository data which breaks down age by decades. The patients were mapped by their home zip code. Results 1360 burn patients 16 years or older were admitted to this single tertiary burn center between 1/2016 and 12/2018 with an age range from 16–101. 393 patients were 60 years or older (28.9% of the adult population compared to 19.8% of the NBR population) 6 zip codes within the catchment area were identified as “hotspots” as having more than 30 inpatients listing that zip code as their home address (see figure). The results show an unequal distribution of patients over the burn center’s catchment area with hotspots (defined by > 30 burn admissions during the study period) in 6 zip codes. Conclusions The local demographics of this inpatient adult burn population follow national trends in etiology but differ with regards to age and race. The geomapping tool visualizes burn incidence by geography. Based on this analysis, outreach and prevention efforts should target elderly populations especially in the “hotspots.” Applicability of Research to Practice This research will inform targeted efforts towards burn prevention and education outreach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 951-955
Author(s):  
Matthew Eisenberg ◽  
Paul Chestovich ◽  
Syed F Saquib

Abstract Burns from contact with hot pavement are a common mechanism treated at burn centers located in desert climates. Previous work has shown increased risk of pavement burns as ambient temperatures rise above 95 degrees. In direct sunlight, pavement absorbs radiant energy causing the temperature to rise high enough to cause second-degree burns in seconds. The goal of this study is to review the mechanisms and outcomes of patients suffering pavement burns and to compare patients who presented with hyperthermia to their normothermia counterparts. A retrospective chart review was performed on pavement burns at an ABA-verified Burn Center for 5 years from 2014 to 2018. A total of 195 patients were identified. It was found that 50.5% of admitted pavement burn patients required burn excision and 35.9% required split-thickness skin grafting. The leading causes of pavement burn admissions were found down by EMS and walking on pavement at 21.6% each, followed by mechanical falls at 15.1%. We found that patients with recorded hyperthermia had statistically significant increase in 30-day hospital mortality, intensive care unit days, surgical procedures, and %TBSA. Data provided from this study can be used for a public health initiative to help patients who may be at risk of acquiring pavement burns. The data may also be helpful for clinicians gaining information about the management, mechanism, and outcomes of pavement burn patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S149-S150
Author(s):  
Amanda Rose ◽  
Alan D Gilbertson ◽  
Heather Belacic ◽  
John Crow

Abstract Introduction In response to NIH recommendations and ABA verification standards, a protocol was initiated to screen adult burn patients in an outpatient verified burn center for depression and suicidality. It utilized the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a widely recognized depression screening tool. The protocol dictated patients scoring 10 or greater, or endorsing the suicide risk question would require further assessment. This project was part of a quality improvement initiative to assess initiating the protocol, identifying at-risk patients, and making appropriate referrals. Methods The initial visit of adults (ages 19 and over) seen over a one year period were retrospectively reviewed. For adults screening positive in the EMR, a Data Collection Form was completed gathering information on PHQ-9 scores, mental health treatment and diagnosis, and burn injuries. Results There were 748 adults seen for an initial visit at the burn center, ages 19–85, 61% men and 39% women. Of those patients, 572 had a PHQ-9 score documented in the EMR, demonstrating a 76% compliance rate with administration. Of those screened, 52 met criteria for inclusion by scoring 10 or greater or endorsing the suicide risk question on the PHQ-9. Scoring ranges on the PHQ-9 were as follows (N=52): 15.4% mild; 50% moderate; 19.2% moderate-severe; and 15.4% severe. Sixty percent of patients endorsed some suicidal ideation. Fifty two percent of patients were documented clearly as being on psychotropic medication or in specialized mental health services. Results were reviewed or discussed with patients in 81% of the initial visit notes. Nineteen of the 52 patients were offered a referral for mental health services. Conclusions Initiating this protocol creates an opportunity to begin conversations about mental health and offer additional support to patients. Approximately 9% of the outpatients screened at the burn center endorsed significant symptoms of depression and or suicidal ideation. Nearly half of these patients were not actively receiving treatment for these symptoms and could potentially benefit from mental health services. This project highlighted that compliance with administering and documenting the PHQ-9 and referral for follow-up services could be improved at this institution. Applicability of Research to Practice This protocol supports the need for continued evaluation and screening for depression and suicide risk in adult burn patients. Consideration should be given for monitoring other mental health conditions that could create barriers to care or compliance with treatment, such as anxiety, PTSD, psychosis, etc.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S137-S137
Author(s):  
Emily Helmold ◽  
Niknam Eshraghi

Abstract Introduction A burn center is defined by the American College of Surgeons as a program that facilitates the provision of specialized multidisciplinary care in a designated setting. The Children’s Hospital Association states that pediatric patients need age specific health care delivered by specialty trained clinicians in an environment designed just for kids. When these two different specialty areas within one organization cross paths, how does the organization determine all the factors that go into determining the standard of care? One burn center found itself at the heart of this question when asked to determine the best location and how to care for pediatric burn patients. Methods An email survey was sent to burn centers verified with the American Burn Association (ABA) to care for both adult and pediatric patients and located within their region or with a similar volume. The questions included: Results Thirteen burn centers responded. Nine of the thirteen were located within the western region, two in the mid-west, one each in the south and northeast regions. Eight burn centers were categorized as academic and the other five as teaching hospitals. Bed size ranged from 8–44 with an average of 18 beds. Eighty-five percent of the respondents stated they admitted most if not all pediatric burn patients to the burn unit with two of those centers being the only location within their hospital for pediatric patients. Over seventy-five percent provided 24/7 provider coverage. There was more variability in answers regarding rate of pediatrician consultation, code blue team response, and geographic proximity to a children’s hospital however pediatric consultation was obtained in the majority of cases. Conclusions The survey responses were helpful to communicate some degree of burn center community standard although more centers and increased specificity would have strengthened the argument for a burn center remaining the preferred location for all pediatric burn admissions. Applicability of Research to Practice Sharing of our experience and recommendation that the ABA establish a burn community standard, especially one that takes how to manage competing specialties into consideration, will be helpful to all burn centers who could face this same challenge.


2000 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S210
Author(s):  
S. Hartsell ◽  
J. Shelby ◽  
T. Parks ◽  
L. Edelman ◽  
J. Saffle
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document