826 Geographic Mapping to Target Adult Burn Prevention for an Urban Burn Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S252-S252
Author(s):  
Mathangi A Chandramouli ◽  
Angela Rabbitts ◽  
Jamie Heffernan ◽  
Philip Chang
Keyword(s):  
Catchment Area ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Data Mapping ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Unequal Distribution ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Burn Prevention ◽  
National Trends ◽  
Zip Code

Abstract Introduction Burn prevention is one of the core missions of burn centers. Geomapping has been instrumental for police departments to target resources for crime prevention. Similarly, geomapping could assist burn specialists in identifying “hotspots” of injury. The purpose of this study is to visually identify the incidence and location of adult burn injury within the catchment area of a single tertiary urban regional burn center. Data mapping can thus then be used to target burn outreach and prevention efforts. Methods Demographic and deidentified clinical data was collected from a single institution over a 3 year period. 1986 burn patients were admitted between 1/2016 and 12/2018. 1360 patients were 16 years of age or greater. Geriatric patients were defined as age 60 or greater to facilitate comparison with National Burn Repository data which breaks down age by decades. The patients were mapped by their home zip code. Results 1360 burn patients 16 years or older were admitted to this single tertiary burn center between 1/2016 and 12/2018 with an age range from 16–101. 393 patients were 60 years or older (28.9% of the adult population compared to 19.8% of the NBR population) 6 zip codes within the catchment area were identified as “hotspots” as having more than 30 inpatients listing that zip code as their home address (see figure). The results show an unequal distribution of patients over the burn center’s catchment area with hotspots (defined by > 30 burn admissions during the study period) in 6 zip codes. Conclusions The local demographics of this inpatient adult burn population follow national trends in etiology but differ with regards to age and race. The geomapping tool visualizes burn incidence by geography. Based on this analysis, outreach and prevention efforts should target elderly populations especially in the “hotspots.” Applicability of Research to Practice This research will inform targeted efforts towards burn prevention and education outreach.

Follow up after burn injury is disturbingly low and linked with social factors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina P Karashchuk ◽  
Eve A Solomon ◽  
David G Greenhalgh ◽  
Soman Sen ◽  
Tina L Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social History ◽  
Drug Dependence ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Zip Code

Abstract For medical and social reasons, it is important that burn patients attend follow up appointments (FUAs). Our goal was to examine the factors leading to missed FUAs in burn patients. A retrospective chart review was conducted of adult patients admitted to the burn center from 2016-2018. Data collected included burn characteristics, social history, and zip code. Data analysis was conducted using chi-square, Wilcox Rank Sum tests, and multivariate regression models. A total of 878 patients were analyzed, with 224 (25.5%) failing to attend any FUAs and 492 (56.0%) missing at least one appointment (MA). Patients who did not attend any FUAs had smaller burns (4.5 (8)% vs. 6.5 (11)% median (inter quartile range)), traveled farther (70.2 (111.8) vs. 52.5 (76.7) miles), and were more likely to be homeless (22.8% vs. 6.9%) and have drug dependence (47.3% vs. 27.2%). Patients who had at least one MA were younger (42 (26) vs. 46 (28) years) and more likely to be homeless (17.5% vs. 2.6%) and have drug dependence (42.5% vs. 19.4%). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with never attending a FUA were: distance from hospital (odds ratio (OR) 1.004), burn size (OR 0.96), and homelessness (OR 0.33). Factors associated with missing at least one FUA : age (OR 0.99), drug dependence (OR 0.46), homelessness (OR 0.22), and ED visits (OR 0.56). A high percentage of patients fail to make any appointment following their injury and/or have at least one MA. Both FUAs and MAs are influenced by social determinants of health.

scholarly journals Surviving Burn Injury: Drivers of Length of Hospital Stay

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chimdimma Noelyn Onah ◽  
Richard Allmendinger ◽  
Julia Handl ◽  
Ken W Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Mental Status ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Effective Care ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Unitary Model ◽  
Hospital Resources

With a reduction in the mortality rate of burn patients, patient length of stay (LOS) is increasingly adopted as an outcome measure. Some studies have attempted to identify factors that explain a burn patient's expected LOS. However, few have investigated the association between LOS and a patient's mental and socioeconomic status. There is anecdotal evidence for links between these factors and uncovering these will aid in better addressing the specific physical and emotional needs of burn patients, and facilitate the planning of scarce hospital resources. Here, we employ machine learning (clustering) and statistical models (regression) to investigate whether a segmentation by socioeconomic/mental status can improve the performance and interpretability of an upstream predictive model, relative to a unitary model derived for the full adult population of patients. Although we found no significant difference in the performance of the unitary model and segment-specific models, the interpretation of the segment-specific models reveals a reduced impact of burn severity in LOS prediction with increasing adverse socioeconomic and mental status. Furthermore, the models for the socioeconomic segments highlight an increased influence of living circumstances and source of injury on LOS. These findings suggest that, in addition to ensuring that the physical needs of patients are met, management of their mental status is crucial for delivering an effective care plan.

122 Prevalence and Associated Predictors for Patients Developing Chronic, Neuropathic Pain Following Burns

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S81-S82
Author(s):  
Kevin M Klifto ◽  
C Scott Hultman
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Direct Result ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Chronic Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Burn Unit

Abstract Introduction Chronic pain, unrelated to the burn itself, can manifest as a long-term complication in patients sustaining burn injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and compare burn characteristics between burn patients who developed chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) and burn patients without CNP treated at a Burn Center. Methods A single-center, retrospective analysis of 1880 patients admitted to the adult Burn Center was performed from January 1, 2014 through January 1, 2019. Patients included were over the age of fifteen years, sustained a burn injury and were admitted to the Burn Unit. CNP was diagnosed clinically following burn injury. Patients were excluded from the definition of CNP if their pain was due to an underlying medical illness or medication. Comparisons between patients admitted to the Burn Unit with no pain and patients admitted to the Burn Unit who developed CNP were performed. Results One hundred thirteen (n=113) of the 1880 burn patients developed CNP as a direct result of burn injury over five years with a prevalence of 6%. Patients who developed CNP were a significantly older median age [54 vs. 46, p=0.002], abused alcohol [29% vs. 8.5%, p< 0.001], abused substances [31% vs. 9%, p< 0.001], were current everyday smokers [73% vs. 34%, p< 0.001], suffered more full-thickness burns [58% vs. 43%, p< 0.001], greater median %TBSA burns [6 vs. 3.5, p< 0.001], were more often intubated on mechanical ventilation [33% vs. 14%, p< 0.001], greater median number of surgeries [2 vs. 0, p< 0.001] and longer median hospital length of stay (LOS) [10 vs. 3 days, p< 0.001], compared to those who did not develop CNP, respectively. Median patient follow-up was 27 months. Conclusions The prevalence of CNP over five years was 6% in the Burn Center. Older ages, alcohol abuse, substance abuse, current everyday smoking, greater %TBSA burns, third degree burns, being intubated on mechanical ventilation, having more surgeries and longer hospital LOS were associated with developing CNP following burn injury. Applicability of Research to Practice The largest study to date assessing the prevalence of chronic nerve pain following burns. Identified new independent predictors for chronic neuropathic pain following burn injury, not previously assessed in the literature.

Fireworks and Seafood Boils: The Epidemiology of Burns in Louisiana

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan M Johnson ◽  
Levi J White ◽  
Jameson Gilstrap ◽  
Tracee C Short
Keyword(s):  
Burn Injury ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Burn Prevention ◽  
Temporal Relationships ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Demographical Data ◽  
Epidemiological Trends ◽  
Outpatient Settings

Abstract Epidemiological trends provide a means for targeting efforts in burn prevention. There have been but few regional-specific studies concerning burns in the southern United States. This study describes burn injury trends experienced by a single burn center in Louisiana. We also investigate the temporal relationships of several activities informally known for having a high risk for burn injury among local providers. Data were retrospectively extracted from the records of all patients treated for burn injuries at the regional burn center from 2012 to 2018 in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Demographical data and burn injury characteristics were noted. A total of 6,498 patients were included (1,593 inpatient, 4,905 outpatient). The most common burn etiologies were scald and flame, with flame being associated with more severe injuries. Overall incidence was disproportionally high in males and children less than 4 years of age. Total incidence was highest in Caucasians, though African Americans held the highest annual incidence rate specific to this population. The most common situation at the time of burn injury involved the consumption or preparation of food or beverages. Significant variation was observed in the rates of different injury situations throughout the year. Notably, burns related to seafood, heating, and firework activity occurred more often during crawfish season, colder months, and the months of January and July, respectively. In addition to establishing preliminary trends, these data may be useful in guiding the development of future evidence-based prevention efforts to target the most detrimental burn injuries in this population.

592 Medwatch: A Public Service Media Outlet Promoting Burn Prevention and Survivor Awareness

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S147-S148
Author(s):  
Shana M Henry ◽  
Nicole M Kopari
Keyword(s):  
Fire Safety ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Interactive Television ◽  
Outreach Program ◽  
Fire Prevention ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Local News ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Burn Prevention ◽  
Media Platform

Abstract Introduction The American Burn Association estimates 486,000 burn injuries occur each year. Inability to receive specialized treatment from a verified burn center can negatively impact long term outcomes and survival rates for burn survivors. The burn team has a multidisciplinary approach to meeting the physical and emotional needs of burn patients and their families. Ongoing education and outreach programs are key elements in preventing fire tragedies. We identified an opportunity to incorporate burn and fire prevention education as well as burn survivor testimonies into a pre-existing media platform. Methods We identified burn injury trends, at an American Burn Associated Verified Burn Center, via the burn registry and determined the most common etiologies of injuries treated at our center. We utilized an established relationship with burn prevention community partners, our hospitals communication department, and local news station. Our aftercare and burn prevention coordinator partnered with these established relationships to produce 10-minute television segments on burn and fire safety topics. The interactive television sessions were aired during the local news. Within each segment, viewers were provided with safety tips, preventative strategies, and/or burn survivor testimony. Results 30 news segments over the past 3 years have been produced reaching an average of 58,000 people per year spanning 7 local counties. This health and wellness tool has provided education regarding pet fire safety, scald/contact burn prevention, outdoor/BBQ burn/fire prevention, car fire safety, honey oil explosion education, and holiday burn prevention. We have also had segments focusing on smoke alarm awareness/education and home/fire escape planning to make our communities safer. We have been able to promote our successful aftercare programs by highlighting our support groups, burn survivor activities, and grateful patient stories sharing burn survivor testimony. Conclusions We identified burn prevention topics as well as grateful patients to spread awareness of burns within our community. We partnered with the hospital communications department and local news stations to produce directed educational television segments. These segments were designed to educate the community as well as highlight our successful multidisciplinary approach to managing burn patients. This media platform is one component of our burn centers ongoing burn prevention and outreach program.

scholarly journals Comparison of PRE and POST COVID-19 Pandemic burn statistics: Initial experience from Rawalian Burn Center, Holy Family Hospital, RMU, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-52
Author(s):  
Sajid Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Surgery Department

Objectives: To determine the change in the trend of burn patient epidemiology after the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of frequency of burn injury and mortality rate.Material and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out at Rawalian burn center, Plastic Surgery Department, Holy Family Hospital RMU Rawalpindi from 1st March to 31st July over a period of 05 months. All burn patients reporting to the Rawalian burn center during the specified period were included in this study by consecutive sampling. Patients were mainly admitted from emergency and some from OPD following the standard admission, inclusion, and exclusion criteriaResults: Mean age of patients in the pre-COVID (Control) period March to July 2019 was 28.84 years with an SD of ±3.73. There were 63% females and 37% males. The total burn surface area range was 8-65% during this period. Whereas in the post-COVID period, March to July 2020 mean age of patients was 29.13 years with an SD of ±4.06. There were 60% females and 40% males. Whereas the total burn surface area range was 10-61% during this period. Frequency per month of burn injury progressively reduced to 58 patients and mortality rate to 1 in July 2020 (post-COVID period). The overall frequency of burn injury (n) during the control period was 367 patients whereas in the post-COVID period is reduced to 326 patients. So there was an 11.17% reduction as compared to the control period. A Chi-square test was applied and was found significant.Conclusion: Based on the current study it can be concluded that there is a progressive fall in frequency of burn injury and mortality rate during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as compared to the PRE-COVID period however further studies are needed to explore the cause of this falling trend.  

scholarly journals Severe burn injury in late pregnancy: a case report and literature review

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Shi ◽  
Xiong Zhang ◽  
Bo-Gao Huang ◽  
Wen-Kui Wang ◽  
Yan Liu
Keyword(s):  
Burn Injury ◽  
Late Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Severe Burn ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Maternal Survival ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Severe Burn Injury

Abstract The management of serious burn injuries during pregnancy is an unsolved clinical problem because of the low incidence of this disease. Although it has been documented that the effect of burns on fetal and maternal survival is detrimental, there have been conflicting reports among the different burn centers regarding the mortality of burned pregnant women and the management of burn patients during pregnancy. We report a case of severe burn in late pregnancy treated at our burn center. Additionally, we searched and summarized the literature concerning the management of pregnant patients to provide useful information for their treatment.

587 DVT Screening in Lower Extremity Burns

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S135-S136
Author(s):  
Cameron J Gibson ◽  
Aakanksha Gupta ◽  
Abraham Houng
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Burn Unit ◽  
Screening Protocol

Abstract Introduction Burn patients are at in increased risk for developing deep vein thromboses (DVT), with rates as high as 6%. Known risk factors include large burn size, use of central lines, increasing age, male, active smoker or alcoholic, increased blood transfusions and surgeries. No study to date has looked specifically at burn location as a possible risk factor. We hypothesized that lower extremity burns with delayed presentation to our burn center are at in increased risk for DVT formation. Methods A DVT screening protocol was developed and implemented for all burn patients admitted to our burn unit starting in May 2017. Patients who presented with lower extremity burns >48 hours from their injury time underwent screening ultrasounds at admission to evaluate for DVT in the affected extremity. Data was collected from May 2017 through December 2018 for all lower extremity patients. Screened patients were identified by reviewing the burn registry for patients admitted >2 days from their injury date and then reviewing the electronic medical record for screening US. DVT rates were compared between screened patients and the overall rate for all admissions during the study period. Results There were 1041 patients admitted to the burn unit during the study period, including 445 lower extremity burns with 118 admitted >48 hours after their burn injury. The overall compliance rate with the screening protocol was 41.5% (49/118). There were a total of 4 DVT’s diagnosed among all admitted patients during the study period (1 lower extremity, 3 upper extremity), giving an overall rate of 0.5% for our unit. No DVT’s were identified in the delayed presentation group (p=0.46). Conclusions Our overall DVT rate was much lower than quoted rates in the literature. Patients with lower extremity burns and delayed presentation to a burn center do not appear to be at increased risk for DVT. Compliance with our screening protocol was relatively poor, which may be due to short hospital stays and unavailability of ultrasound on weekends for non-urgent studies. Applicability of Research to Practice Patients with lower extremity burns should receive routine DVT prophylaxis (chemical and mechanical) similar to other burn patients.

784 Automated SIRS Alert Systems Are Ineffective at Predicting Sepsis in Burn Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S226-S226
Author(s):  
Melissa Grigsby ◽  
Tina L Palmieri ◽  
Soman Sen ◽  
Kathleen S Romanowski ◽  
David G Greenhalgh
Keyword(s):  
Burn Injury ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Clinical Suspicion ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Burn Surgery ◽  
Sirs Criteria ◽  
Order Set

Abstract Introduction Burn injury patients represent a population at particularly high risk for sepsis and sepsis mortality due to the severe immunological insult. Because of the unique nature of burn injury, this population has largely been excluded from studies developing protocols for identification and treatment of sepsis. In our institution, the protocolized approach to sepsis starts with an alert if two SIRS criteria are met, regardless of the patient’s diagnosis. We examined whether the SIRS alert was an effective way to identify and treat sepsis in burn patients. Methods Patients admitted to the burn surgery service at an academic regional burn center were identified by querying the “SIRS alert” dashboard from the hospital’s quality and safety department. The dashboard is a record of every patient whose clinical status triggered a SIRS alert during hospital admission, and whether a screening order set was opened. The SIRS alert and order set usage data were analyzed directly from the dashboard. Each patient’s chart was then reviewed to decide whether there was clinical suspicion of sepsis at the time an order set was released. We determined that there was clinical suspicion of sepsis if antibiotics were initiated or escalated within 6 hours of a SIRS screening order set being opened. Results From January 1, 2019 until September 14, 2019 there were 225 patients admitted to the burn surgery service at an academic regional burn center. 70 patients, specifically receiving treatment in the burn ICU, met the criteria to trigger a SIRS alert at least once in that time. Across those 70 patients, a total of 1381 SIRS alerts were acknowledged by the nursing staff. Due to a lack of clinical suspicion for sepsis, the SIRS screening order set was opened 8.5% of the time an alert was acknowledged. Only two times in the 1381 alerts was an order set opened and then followed by the initiation or escalation of antibiotics within 6 hours. Conclusions SIRS criteria appear to be ineffective at helping clinicians to identify and treat sepsis in the burn patient population. This is consistent with the fact that burn patients are in a virtually constant state of inflammation, making SIRS alerts futile at picking up subtle changes that could indicate early sepsis. Applicability of Research to Practice Hospitals should abandon the use of the standard SIRS criteria as a starting point for sepsis protocols when treating burn patients. There does not yet exist a validated criteria set to replace the standard SIRS criteria. In the meantime, the Burn Sepsis Consensus Conference definitions could be used as a guideline to modify the criteria, and future research should continue seeking to identify early predictors of sepsis in the burn population.

771 Psychiatric Illness Among Burn Patients: Experience at a Single ABA Verified Burn Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S219-S220
Author(s):  
Spogmai Komak ◽  
James Cross
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Psychiatric Diagnosis ◽  
Psychiatric Illness ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Operative Intervention ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Psychiatric Consultation ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Burn Unit

Abstract Introduction Burn injury is uniquely characterized by the initial traumatic event in addition to the psychiatric component associated with physical change and recovery. Recent work has highlighted the importance of pre-existing psychiatric illness on both recovery and final outcomes in burn patients (Tarrier et al 2005, Hudson et al 2017, Wisely et al 2009). We examined the prevalence and association of psychiatric illness in our ABA verified burn unit. Knowledge of this information is critical in allocation of limited resources aimed toward addressing both the physical and mental aspect of burn injury. Methods The burn registry at a single verified burn center was examined from July 2017-July 2018. All consecutive burn patients with psychiatric illness who were admitted were included. Psychiatric illness was broken down into: depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and delirium. Need for psychiatric consultation, %TBSA, length of hospital stay, and operative intervention was also examined. Results 416 patients were admitted during the study period—44 pts (10.5%) had a psychiatric diagnosis on admission. Seventy-five percent of pts were male. The average TBSA burned was 15.3%. Seventy-five percent of patients required psychiatric consultation, and 57% required operative intervention (Table 1). The most common psychiatric condition was anxiety (50%), followed by depression (36%), bipolar disorder (27%), schizophrenia (23%), and delirium (18%). Forty-eight percent of patients had multiple (>1) psychiatric conditions. Female patients had a significant less TBSA burn (5.8%) vs. male (18.2%), P=.001, as well as a shorter LOS (12.1 dys vs. 31.5 dys) p=.004. Conclusions The association between burn injury and pre-existing psychiatric illness is well known (Hudson et al 2017, Wisely et al 2009). We found that over 10% of pts admitted to our burn unit had a psychiatric diagnosis, and a large number of these required further inpatient psychiatry consultation. More than half of patients required operative intervention indicating that severity of burn injury was high, with optimization of pre-existing conditions especially important. Additionally, psychiatric illness did not occur in isolation--48% of pts had >1 psychiatric diagnosis —a finding which has implications for resource allocation for mental health/ dedicated psychiatrist for burn patients. Applicability of Research to Practice Implications for resource allocations for dedicated burn psychiatrist/ resources for mental health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document