Dose Reduction Protocol for Full Spine X-ray Examination Using Copper Filters in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaori Minehiro ◽  
Satoru Demura ◽  
Katsuhiro Ichikawa ◽  
Takeshi Sasagawa ◽  
Naoki Takahashi ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52
Author(s):  
Raden Candra ◽  
Fika Trifani

Skoliosis adalah kelengkungan tulang belakang ke lateral yang melebihi 10 derajat. Tinjauan lapangan pada klinik dan rumah sakit di Indonesia menunjukan banyaknya kasus pasien Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) yang telah ditangani dengan penggunaan skoliosis brace. In-brace correction (IBR) merupakan cara menilai kualitas skoliosis brace secara cepat setelah brace dipasangkan kepada pasien dengan metode X-Ray dengan menggunakan brace. Akan tetapi, hasil IBR tersebut sering ditemukan berbeda dari satu pasien dengan yang lainnya sehingga dibutuhkan untuk mengetahui faktor yang dapat menyebabkan perbedaan tersebut. Oleh karena itu, tujuan pada penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai apakah terdapat hubungan antara tipe kurva dan besaran kurva terhadap IBR pada pasien AIS. Analisis retrospective sebanyak 120 data sekunder telah digunakan dalam penelitian ini melalui rekam medis pasien yang menggunakan scoliosis brace dari tahun 2016 - 2018. Data yang diambil berupa Cobb angle tanpa menggunakan brace, In-Brace Cobb angle, dan tipe kurva skoliosis. Rata-rata IBR adalah 56,0% pada besaran kurva ringan (20°-29°), 37,2% pada besaran kurva sedang (30° - 40°), 36,7% pada besaran kurva parah (>40°). Sedangkan, rata-rata IBR tertinggi adalah pada tipe kurva ganda dimana lumbar > thoraks yaitu sebesar 50,3%, lalu disusul dengan kurva tunggal thoraks dan kurva ganda thoraks > lumbar sebesar 40,3% dan 39,1% secara berurutan. terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan IBR bedasarkan Besaran Kurva dan Tipe Kurva pada pasien adolescent idiopatik skoliosis dengan p value 0,000 dan 0,029 secara berurutan. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa tipe dan besaran kurva scoliosis merupakan faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi hasil IBR secara signifikan


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Alvarez ◽  
Kiley Poppino ◽  
Lori Karol ◽  
Amy L McIntosh

Abstract BackgroundIn-brace correction and brace compliance with Thoraco-Lumbo-Sacral Orthotic (TLSO) braces are associated with successful treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). This paper compares patients who had consistent radiographic documentation of in-brace correction to those who did not.MethodsAll skeletally immature (Risser 0–2) patients were treated for AIS (25°-45°) with full-time TLSO braces that had compliance temperature monitors. All patients wore their braces at least 12 hours a day. Brace failure was defined as curve progression to a surgical magnitude (≥ 50°). All patients were followed until brace discontinuation.Results90 patients (F:82, M:8) with an average age of 12.1(10.1–15.0) years, Risser grade 0(0–2), BMI percentile 48.5(0.0-98.8), and daily brace wear of 16.5(12.1–21.6) hrs/day were treated for 24.3(8.0-66.6) months. Patients went through 1.7(1–4) braces on average. 42/90(46.7%) patients had some amount of brace time with an unknown in-brace correction, which, on average, was 66.1% of their total treatment course (11.5–100). On univariate analysis, patients that did not have a repeat in-brace x-ray with major brace adjustments or new brace fabrication tended to be more skeletally immature (Risser 0 and tri-radiate open, p = 0.028), wear more braces throughout their treatment (2.0 vs 1.4, p < 0.001), were treated for a longer period of time (27 vs 22 months, p = 0.022), and failed bracing more often (47.6% vs 22.9%, p = 0.014).ConclusionsPatients who did not have new in-brace x-rays with major brace adjustments and/or new brace fabrication were 3.1(95% CI 1.2–7.6) times more likely to fail bracing than patients who were re-checked with new in-brace x-rays.Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT02412137, Initial Registration Date April 2015


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 632-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Bekki ◽  
Katsumi Harimaya ◽  
Yoshihiro Matsumoto ◽  
Kenichi Kawaguchi ◽  
Mitsumasa Hayashida ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Omar Abdelmegid ◽  
Hesham Elsaghir ◽  
Yasser Allam ◽  
Adel Ramadan

Author(s):  
Max Prost ◽  
Joachim Windolf ◽  
Markus Rafael Konieczny

Abstract Purpose There is no data that show if it is possible to determine if a curve is structural or non-structural or to assess flexibility of an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by recumbent images like a CT scan (CTS) instead of bending radiographs (BR). We investigated if the results of BR may be compared to those of CTS. Methods We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of patients with AIS in whom a selective spinal fusion was performed and in whom a CTS, BR, and full spine x-rays were made preoperatively. We measured the Cobb angles of the main and the minor curve in full spine x-ray, BR, and CTS. Results After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 39 patients were included. We found a strong correlation (r = 0.806, p < 0.01) between the Cobb angle of the main curve in BR and the Cobb angle of the main curve in the CTS and between the Cobb angle of the minor curve in BR and the Cobb angle of the minor curve in the CTS (r = 0.601, p < 0.01). All patients with a minor curve of less than 25 degrees in the BR had a Cobb angle of less than 35 degrees in the CTS. Conclusion Spinal curves showed a significant correlation between bending radiographs and recumbent images (CTS). In our group of patients, a Cobb angle of the minor curve of less than 35 degrees in the CTS indicated that this minor curve was non-structural.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Alvarez ◽  
Kiley Poppino ◽  
Lori Karol ◽  
Amy L. McIntosh

Abstract Background In-brace correction and brace compliance with thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthotic (TLSO) braces are associated with successful treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This paper compares patients who had consistent radiographic documentation of in-brace correction to those who did not. Methods All skeletally immature (Risser 0-2) patients were treated for AIS (25-45°) with full-time TLSO braces that had compliance temperature monitors. All patients wore their braces at least 12 h a day. Brace failure was defined as curve progression to a surgical magnitude (≥ 50°). All patients were followed until brace discontinuation. Results Ninety patients (F 82, M 8) with an average age of 12.1 (10.1-15.0) years, Risser grade 0 (0-2), BMI percentile 48.5 (0.0-98.8), and daily brace wear of 16.5 (12.1-21.6) h/day were treated for 24.3 (8.0-66.6) months. Patients went through 1.7 (1-4) braces on average. Forty-two out of 90 (46.7%) patients had some amount of brace time with an unknown in-brace correction, which, on average, was 66.1% of their total treatment course (11.5-100). On univariate analysis, patients that did not have a repeat in-brace x-ray with major brace adjustments or new brace fabrication tended to be more skeletally immature (Risser 0 and tri-radiate open, p = 0.028), wear more braces throughout their treatment (2.0 vs 1.4, p < 0.001), were treated for a longer period of time (27 vs 22 months, p = 0.022), and failed bracing more often (47.6% vs 22.9%, p = 0.014). Conclusions Patients who did not have new in-brace x-rays with major brace adjustments and/or new brace fabrication were 3.1 (95% CI 1.2-7.6) times more likely to fail bracing than patients who were re-checked with new in-brace x-rays. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov—NCT02412137, initial registration date April 2015 Level of evidence III


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document