Creation of a Tool for Assessing Knowledge in Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Practicing Health Care Providers

Background Changing the culture of information use, which is one of the transformation agendas of the Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, cannot become real unless health care providers are committed to using locally collected data for evidence-based decision making. The commitment of health care providers has paramount influence on district health information system 2 (DHIS2) data utilization for decision making. Evidence is limited on health care providers’ level of commitment to using DHIS2 data in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aims to fill this evidence gap. Objective This study aimed to assess the levels of commitment of health care providers and the factors influencing their commitment levels in using DHIS2 data for decision making at public health care facilities in the Ilu Aba Bora zone of the Oromia national regional state, Ethiopia in 2020. Methods The cross-sectional quantitative study supplemented by qualitative methods was conducted from February 26, 2020 to April 17, 2020. A total of 264 participants were approached. SPSS version 20 software was used for data entry and analysis. Descriptive and analytical statistics, including bivariable and multivariable analyses, were performed. Thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data. Results Of the 264 respondents, 121 (45.8%, 95% CI 40.0%-52.8%) respondents showed high commitment levels to use DHIS2 data. The variables associated with the level of commitment to use DHIS2 data were found to be provision of feedback for DHIS2 data use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.85, 95% CI 1.02-3.33), regular supervision and managerial support (AOR 2.84, 95% CI 1.50-5.37), information use culture (AOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.03-3.59), motivation to use DHIS2 data (AOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.00-3.25), health needs (AOR 3.96, 95% CI 2.11-7.41), and competency in DHIS2 tasks (AOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.27-4.55). Conclusions In general, less than half of the study participants showed high commitment levels to use DHIS2 data for decision making in health care. Providing regular supportive supervision and feedback and increasing the motivation and competency of the health care providers in performing DHIS2 data tasks will help in promoting their levels of commitment that can result in the cultural transformation of data use for evidence-based decision making in health care.

Download Full-text

Commitment Levels of Health Care Providers in Using the District Health Information System and the Associated Factors for Decision Making in Resource-Limited Settings: Cross-sectional Survey Study (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.23951 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Shuma G Kanfe ◽

Berhanu F Endehabtu ◽

Mohammedjud H Ahmed ◽

Nebyu D Mengestie ◽

Binyam Tilahun

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Decision Making ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Data Use ◽

Health Information System ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Care Providers ◽

District Health ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Evidence Based Decision Making

BACKGROUND Changing the culture of information use, which is one of the transformation agendas of the Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, cannot become real unless health care providers are committed to using locally collected data for evidence-based decision making. The commitment of health care providers has paramount influence on district health information system 2 (DHIS2) data utilization for decision making. Evidence is limited on health care providers’ level of commitment to using DHIS2 data in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aims to fill this evidence gap. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the levels of commitment of health care providers and the factors influencing their commitment levels in using DHIS2 data for decision making at public health care facilities in the Ilu Aba Bora zone of the Oromia national regional state, Ethiopia in 2020. METHODS The cross-sectional quantitative study supplemented by qualitative methods was conducted from February 26, 2020 to April 17, 2020. A total of 264 participants were approached. SPSS version 20 software was used for data entry and analysis. Descriptive and analytical statistics, including bivariable and multivariable analyses, were performed. Thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data. RESULTS Of the 264 respondents, 121 (45.8%, 95% CI 40.0%-52.8%) respondents showed high commitment levels to use DHIS2 data. The variables associated with the level of commitment to use DHIS2 data were found to be provision of feedback for DHIS2 data use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.85, 95% CI 1.02-3.33), regular supervision and managerial support (AOR 2.84, 95% CI 1.50-5.37), information use culture (AOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.03-3.59), motivation to use DHIS2 data (AOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.00-3.25), health needs (AOR 3.96, 95% CI 2.11-7.41), and competency in DHIS2 tasks (AOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.27-4.55). CONCLUSIONS In general, less than half of the study participants showed high commitment levels to use DHIS2 data for decision making in health care. Providing regular supportive supervision and feedback and increasing the motivation and competency of the health care providers in performing DHIS2 data tasks will help in promoting their levels of commitment that can result in the cultural transformation of data use for evidence-based decision making in health care.

Download Full-text

Conditional Recommendations for Specific Dietary Ingredients as an Approach to Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Evidence-Based Decision Aid for Health Care Providers, Participants, and Policy Makers

Pain Medicine ◽

10.1093/pm/pnz051 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 20 (7) ◽

pp. 1430-1448 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Courtney Boyd ◽

Cindy Crawford ◽

Kevin Berry ◽

Patricia Deuster ◽

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Decision Making ◽

Musculoskeletal Pain ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Self Care ◽

Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain ◽

Sufficient Evidence ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Minimal Risk ◽

Care Providers

Abstract Objective Approximately 55–76% of Service members use dietary supplements for various reasons; although such use has become popular for a wide range of pain conditions, decisions to use supplements are often driven by information that is not evidence-based. This work evaluates whether the current research on dietary ingredients for chronic musculoskeletal pain provides sufficient evidence to inform decisions for practice and self-care, specifically for Special Operations Forces personnel. Methods A steering committee convened to develop research questions and factors required for decision-making. Key databases were searched through August 2016. Eligible systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials were assessed for methodological quality. Meta-analysis was applied where feasible. GRADE was used to determine confidence in the effect estimates. A decision table was constructed to make evidence-informed judgments across factors required for decision-making, and recommendations were made for practice and self-care use. Results Nineteen dietary ingredients were included. Conditional evidence-based recommendations were made for the use of avocado soybean unsaponifiables, capsaicin, curcuma, ginger, glucosamine, melatonin, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and vitamin D. In these cases, desirable effects outweighed undesirable effects, but there was uncertainty about the trade-offs, either because the evidence was low quality or because benefits and downsides were closely balanced. Conclusions The evidence showed that certain dietary ingredients, when taken as part of a balanced diet and/or as a supplement (e.g., pill, tablet, capsule, cream), may alleviate musculoskeletal pain with no to minimal risk of harm. This finding emphasizes and reinforces the critical importance of shared decision-making between Operators and their health care providers.

Download Full-text

873-P: "I Had Nobody to Represent Me"—How Patient Perceptions of Diabetes Health Care Providers' Age, Gender, and Ethnicity Impact Shared Decision-Making

Diabetes ◽

10.2337/db19-873-p ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 873-P

Author(s):

TEHMINA AHMAD ◽

SHRIYA HARI ◽

DEVIN E. CLEARY ◽

C. YU

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Decision Making ◽

Shared Decision Making ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Patient Perceptions ◽

Shared Decision ◽

Care Providers

Download Full-text

Improving Communications With Patients and Families in Geriatric Care. The How, When, and What

Journal of Patient Experience ◽

10.1177/23743735211034047 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. 237437352110340

Author(s):

Shirley Chien-Chieh Huang ◽

Alden Morgan ◽

Vanessa Peck ◽

Lara Khoury

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Decision Making ◽

Family Caregivers ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Care Providers ◽

Telephone Interviews ◽

Written Information ◽

Geriatric Unit ◽

Patient Health

There has been little published literature examining the unique communication challenges older adults pose for health care providers. Using an explanatory mixed-methods design, this study explored patients’ and their family/caregivers’ experiences communicating with health care providers on a Canadian tertiary care, inpatient Geriatric unit between March and September 2018. In part 1, the modified patient–health care provider communication scale was used and responses scored using a 5-point scale. In part 2, one-on-one telephone interviews were conducted and responses transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed. Thirteen patients and 7 family/caregivers completed part 1. Both groups scored items pertaining to adequacy of information sharing and involvement in decision-making in the lowest 25th percentile. Two patients and 4 family/caregivers participated in telephone interviews in part 2. Interview transcript analysis resulted in key themes that fit into the “How, When, and What” framework outlining the aspects of communication most important to the participants. Patients and family/caregivers identified strategic use of written information and predischarge family meetings as potentially valuable tools to improve communication and shared decision-making.

Download Full-text

Plain Language Summary: Opioid Prescribing for Analgesia After Common Otolaryngology Operations

Otolaryngology ◽

10.1177/0194599821996313 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 164 (4) ◽

pp. 704-711

Author(s):

Samantha Anne ◽

Sandra A. Finestone ◽

Allison Paisley ◽

Taskin M. Monjur

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Decision Making ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Pain Management ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Clinical Practice Guideline ◽

Shared Decision ◽

Care Providers ◽

Plain Language ◽

Opioid Prescribing

This plain language summary explains pain management and careful use of opioids after common otolaryngology operations. The summary applies to patients of any age who need treatment for pain within 30 days after having a common otolaryngologic operation (having to do with the ear, nose, or throat). It is based on the 2021 “Clinical Practice Guideline: Opioid Prescribing for Analgesia After Common Otolaryngology Operations.” This guideline uses available research to best advise health care providers, and it includes recommendations that are explained in this summary. Recommendations may not apply to every patient but can be used to facilitate shared decision making between patients and their health care providers.

Download Full-text

A Study Protocol for Increasing Access to Smoking Cessation Treatments for Low-Income Minority Smokers

Frontiers in Public Health ◽

10.3389/fpubh.2021.762784 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 ◽

Author(s):

Alicia K. Matthews ◽

Karriem S. Watson ◽

Cherdsak Duang ◽

Alana Steffen ◽

Robert Winn

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Smoking Cessation ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Low Income ◽

Access To Health Care ◽

Social Determinant ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Patient Portal ◽

Care Providers ◽

Access To Health

Background: Smoking rates among low-income patients are double those of the general population. Access to health care is an essential social determinant of health. Federally qualified health care centers (FQHC) are government-supported and community-based centers to increase access to health care for non-insured and underinsured patients. However, barriers to implementation impact adherence and sustainability of evidence-based smoking cessation within FQHC settings. To address this implementation barrier, our multi-disciplinary team proposes Mi QUIT CARE (Mile Square QUITCommunity-Access-Referral-Expansion) to establish the acceptability, feasibility, and capacity of an FQHC system to deliver an evidence-based and multi-level intervention to increase patient engagement with a state tobacco quitline.Methods: A mixed-method approach, rooted in an implementation science framework of RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance), will be used in this hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of a novel delivery system (patient portal) for increasing access to smoking cessation treatment. In preparation for a future randomized clinical trial of Mi QUIT CARE, we will conduct the following developmental research: (1) Examine the burden of tobacco among patient populations served by our partner FQHC, (2) Evaluate among FQHC patients and health care providers, knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators related to smoking cessation and our intervention components, (3) Evaluate the use of tailored communication strategies and patient navigation to increase patient portal uptake among patients, and (4) To test the acceptability, feasibility, and capacity of the partner FQHC to deliver Mi QUIT CARE.Discussion: This study provides a model for developing and implementing smoking and other health promotion interventions for low-income patients delivered via patient health portals. If successful, the intervention has important implications for addressing a critical social determinant of cancer and other tobacco-related morbidities.Trial Registration: U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials, NCT04827420, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04827420.

Download Full-text