Effect of mild hyperisulinemia on conduit vessel endothelial function

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 720-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Morgantini ◽  
Francesco Stea ◽  
Beatrice Boldrini ◽  
Emiliano Duranti ◽  
Lorenzo Ghiadoni ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S24
Author(s):  
V. Cox ◽  
A. Nelson ◽  
J. Richardson ◽  
D. Wong ◽  
A. Bertaso ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig CHEETHAM ◽  
Gerard O’DRISCOLL ◽  
Kim STANTON ◽  
Roger TAYLOR ◽  
Daniel GREEN

1994 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Chowienczyk ◽  
J. R. Cockcroft ◽  
J. M. Ritter

1. Acetylcholine relaxes human resistance vessels and releases nitric oxide and other factors from the endothelium. Comparison of responses to acetylcholine with those to an endothelium-independent vasodilator (such as nitroprusside) forms the basis of the so-called acetylcholine test of endothelial function. However, when this test is applied in vivo by intraarterial infusion, the metabolic instability of acetylcholine may result in differential responses to these drugs arising from anatomical rather than functional differences. 2. Vasodilator responses to brachial Artery infusions of acetylcholine (41 and 83 nmol/min) and sodium nitroprusside (11 and 38 nmol/min) were measured in 30 healthy human subjects using venous occlusion plethysmography. 3. Responses to acetylcholine showed a greater dependence on resting blood flow (P < 0.05) and on forearm length (P < 0.05) than those to sodium nitroprusside (results predicted by a simple blood flow model). 4. Correction for forearm length abolished an apparent difference of 59% between responses to acetylcholine in men and women. Conduit vessel geometry and resting blood flow influence the acetylcholine test of endothelial function.


2000 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig CHEETHAM ◽  
Gerard O'DRISCOLL ◽  
Kim STANTON ◽  
Roger TAYLOR ◽  
Daniel GREEN

We have demonstrated previously that inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) with enalapril and angiotensin II blockade with losartan improve acetylcholine-dependent endothelial function in resistance vessels of patients with Type II diabetes. It was therefore of interest to examine the effect of losartan on conduit vessel function in this group. The influence of losartan (50 mg daily for 4 weeks) on endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilator function was determined in 12 subjects with Type II diabetes using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover protocol. Conduit vessel endothelial function was assessed using high-resolution ultrasound and the brachial artery response to reactive hyperaemia (flow-mediated dilation; FMD); glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) was used as a non-endothelium-dependent dilator. Losartan administration significantly increased the FMD response from 5.2±0.7% (mean±S.E.M.) to 7.4±0.6% of vessel diameter (P < 0.05; paired t-test). There was no effect of losartan on the endothelium-independent responses to GTN (17.8±1.8% to 17.6±1.2%). Consistent with our previous findings in resistance vessels, administration of 50 mg of losartan daily improves NO-mediated dilation in the conduit vessels of subjects with Type II diabetes. Together with the findings that both ACE inhibition and angiotensin II blockade improve resistance vessel function in this group, it is likely that at least some of the beneficial effect is mediated through the angiotensin II/type 1 receptor pathway. A type 1 receptor antagonist seems a reasonable alternative to an ACE inhibitor to maintain conduit vessel endothelial function in Type II diabetic subjects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document