scholarly journals Cervical Conization and Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in the Treatment of Stage I Cervical Cancer: Is Less Enough?

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaagn Andikyan ◽  
Fady Khoury-Collado ◽  
John Denesopolis ◽  
Kay J. Park ◽  
Yaser R. Hussein ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the feasibility of cervical conization and sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping as a fertility-sparing strategy to treat stage I cervical cancer and to estimate the tumor margin status needed to achieve no residual carcinoma in the cervix.MethodsWe identified all patients who desired fertility preservation and underwent SLN mapping with cervical conization for stage I cervical cancer from September 2005 to August 2012. Relevant demographic, clinical, and pathologic information was collected.ResultsTen patients were identified. Median age was 28 years (range, 18–36 years). None of the patients had a grossly visible tumor. The initial diagnosis of invasive carcinoma was made either on a loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cone biopsy. All patients underwent preoperative radiologic evaluation (magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography–computed tomography). None of the patients had evidence of gross tumor or suspicion of lymph node metastasis on imaging. Stage distribution included 7 (70%) patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer with lymphovascular invasion and 3 (30%) patients with microscopic IB1. Histologic diagnosis included 8 (80%) patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 1 (10%) patient with adenocarcinoma, and 1 (10%) patient with clear cell carcinoma. Nine patients underwent repeat cervical conization with SLN mapping, and 1 patient underwent postconization cervical biopsies and SLN mapping. None of the patients had residual tumor identified on the final specimen. The median distance from the invasive carcinoma to the endocervical margin was 2.25 mm, and the distance from the invasive carcinoma to the ectocervical margin was 1.9 mm. All collected lymph nodes were negative for metastasis. After a median follow-up of 17 months (range, 1–83 months), none of the patients’ conditions were diagnosed with recurrent disease and 3 (30%) patients achieved pregnancy.ConclusionsCervical conization and SLN mapping seems to be an acceptable treatment strategy for selected patients with small-volume stage I cervical cancer. Tumor clearance of 2 mm and above seems to correlate well with no residual on repeat conization. A larger sample size and longer follow-up is needed to establish the long-term outcomes of this procedure.

2013 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. e50 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Andikyan ◽  
F. Khoury-Collado ◽  
J. Denesopolis ◽  
S. Sandadi ◽  
K. Park ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nathan R. Brand ◽  
Ronald Wasike ◽  
Khalid Makhdomi ◽  
Rajendra Chauhan ◽  
Zahir Moloo ◽  
...  

Purpose The goal of this study was to describe the pathologic findings and early follow-up experience of patients who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) between 2008 and 2017. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of women with breast cancer who underwent an SLNB at AKUH between 2008 and 2017. The SLNB was performed on patients with stage I and stage II breast cancer, and identification of the sentinel lymph node was made by radioactive tracer, blue dye, or both, per availability and surgeon preference. Demographic, surgical, and pathologic data, including immunohistochemistry of the surgical sample for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, were abstracted from the patient records. Follow-up data were available for a subset of patients. Results Between 2008 and 2017, six surgeons performed SLNBs on 138 women, 129 of whom had complete records and were included in the study. Thirty-one of 129 (24%) had a positive SLNB, including 10 of 73 (14%) with stage I and 21 of 56 (38%) with stage II disease. Seventy-eight patients (60%) received systemic adjuvant chemotherapy and 79 (62%) received radiation therapy, and of the 102 patients who were estrogen receptor positive, 86 (85%) received endocrine therapy. Seventy-nine patients were observed for > 2 years, and, of these, four (5.1%) had a regional recurrence. Conclusion The SLNB positivity rates were similar to those of high-income country (HIC) cohorts. However, preliminary data suggest that recurrence rates are elevated at AKUH as compared with those of HIC cohorts, perhaps because of a lower use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy at AKUH compared with HIC cohorts or because of differences in the characteristics of the primary tumor in patients at AKUH as compared with those in HICs.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5088-5088
Author(s):  
R. G. Moore ◽  
K. Robison ◽  
M. Steinhoff ◽  
L. Brard ◽  
P. Disilvestro ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6006-6006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Balaya ◽  
Benedetta Guani ◽  
Laurent Magaud ◽  
Bonsang-Kitzis Hélène ◽  
Charlotte Ngo ◽  
...  

6006 Background: The goal of this study was to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent bilateral sentinel lymph node (BSLN) biopsy alone versus bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy (BPL). Methods: An ancillary analysis of two prospective multicentric trials on SLN biopsy for cervical cancer (SENTICOL I and II) was performed. All patients with early stage cervical cancer (IA to IIB FIGO stage), negative SLN after ultrastaging and negative non-SLN after final pathologic examination were included. Risk-factors of recurrency and disease-specific deaths were determined by Cox proportional hazard models. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared by applying log-rank test. Results: Between January 2005 and July 2012, 259 patients met the inclusion criteria: 85 patients underwent only bilateral SLN biopsy whereas 174 patients underwent BPL. None had positive SLN at ultrastaging or positive non-SLN at final pathologic examination. Between the both groups, there was no differences in histology, final FIGO stage and type of surgical approach. In the BPL group, patients had more frequently tumor size larger than 20 mm (22.9% vs 10.7%, p = 0.02) and postoperative radiochemotherapy (10.7% vs 1.6%, p = 0.01). The median follow-up was 47 months (4-127). During the follow-up, 21 patients (8.1%) experienced reccurencies, including 4 nodal recurrences (1.9%), and 9 patients (3.5%) died of cervical cancer. The 5-year DFS and the DSS were similar between BSLN and BPL groups, 94.1% vs 97.7%, p = 0.14 and 88.2% vs 93.7%, p = 0.14 respectively. After controlling for final FIGO stage and margin status, BSLN compared to BPL was not associated with DFS (HR = 1.76, 95%CI = [0.69 – 4.53], p = 0.24) and DSS (HR = 2.5, 95%CI = [0.64 – 9.83], p = 0.19). Only final FIGO stage was independent predictor of DSS. Conclusions: SLN biopsy alone is oncologically safe in early-stage cervical cancer. Full lymphadenectomy could be omitted in case of bilateral negative SLN. Worse prognosis was associated with higher FIGO stage disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-451
Author(s):  
Andra Nica ◽  
Zbigniew Marchocki ◽  
Lilian T Gien ◽  
Rachel Kupets ◽  
Danielle Vicus ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThere has been a contemporary shift in clinical practice towards tailoring treatment in patients with early cervical cancer and low-risk features to non-radical surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the oncologic, fertility, and obstetric outcomes after cervical conization and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with early stage low-risk cervical cancer.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review in patients with early cervical cancer treated with cervical conization and lymph node assessment between November 2008 and February 2020. Eligibility criteria included patients with a histologic diagnosis of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IA1 with positive lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), stage IA2, or stage IB1 (≤2 cm) with less than two-thirds (<10 mm) cervical stromal invasion.ResultsA total of 44 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 31 years (range 19–61) and 20 patients (45%) were nulliparous. One patient had a 25 mm tumor while the remaining patients had tumors smaller than 20 mm. Eighteen (41%) patients had LVSI. Median follow-up was 44 months (range 6–137). A total of 17 (39%) patients had negative margins on the diagnostic excisional procedure, and none had residual disease on the repeat cone biopsy. Three (6.8%) patients had micrometastases detected in the SLNs and underwent ipsilateral lymphadenectomy; all remaining non-SLN lymph nodes were negative. Six (13.6%) patients required more definitive surgical or adjuvant treatment due to high-risk pathologic features. There were no recurrences documented. Three patients developed cervical stenosis. The live birth rate was 85% and 16 (94%) of 17 patients had live births at term.ConclusionCervical conization with SLN biopsy appears to be a safe treatment option in selected patients with early cervical cancer. Future results of prospective trials may shed definitive light on fertility-sparing options in this group of patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-386
Author(s):  
Florencia Noll ◽  
Ana Tatiana Palacios Torres ◽  
Pablo Pecci ◽  
Sergio Martin Lucchini ◽  
Fernando Heredia

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy before fertility-sparing surgery is an accepted option for patients with cervical tumors between 2 cm and 4 cm. There is a paucity of data regarding its role in patients with tumors <2 cm. Our objective was to compare the oncological and obstetrical outcomes between patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cervical conization versus upfront cervical conization in patients with cervical cancer with tumors <2 cm.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (from 1995 to March 2020) using the terms: uterine cervix neoplasms, cervical cancer, fertility-sparing surgery, fertility preservation, conization, cone biopsy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We included manuscripts with information on patients with tumor size <2 cm, lymph node status, follow-up, oncological and obstetrical outcome, and toxicity related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We excluded review articles or articles with duplicated patient information.ResultsWe identified 12 articles, including 579 patients. For final analysis, 261 patients met inclusion criteria. The most common histology was non-squamous cell carcinoma (62%). Median follow-up time was 63.5 (range 7–122) months for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 48 (range 12–184) months for the upfront cervical conization group. There was no difference in either overall survival (neoadjuvant chemotherapy group 100% vs upfront cervical conization 99.7%, p=0.79) or disease-free survival (neoadjuvant chemotherapy 100% vs upfront cervical conization 98.9%, p=0.59) between the groups. Fertility preservation rate was 81.4% versus 99.1% (p<0.001) favoring upfront cervical conization. No statistically significant differences were seen in live birth rate or pregnancy loss. Also, we found that all neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients reported chemotherapy-related toxicity (30.7% grade 3 and 69.2% grade 1–2).ConclusionsThere was no difference in disease-free survival or overall survival between patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization and upfront cervical conization. Patients who underwent upfront cervical conization had a higher fertility preservation rate.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4049-4049
Author(s):  
M. L. Arora ◽  
S. Saha ◽  
S. Sirop ◽  
B. Chakravarty ◽  
A. Korant ◽  
...  

4049 Background: Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping (SLNM) in colon Cancerc (Cca) has been shown to be successful, sensitive and accurate. We aimed to evaluate the recurrence rates in patients(pts) with Cca after SLNM and correlate it to the number of positive(+ve) LNs. Methods: Between 1996 and 2006, pts diagnosed with Cca were enrolled in a prospective trial and underwent SLNM and oncologic resection including regional LNs. The primary outcome was development of recurrence with minimum follow-up (f/u) of 24 months. For recurrence analysis, exclusion criteria included: stage IV disease, benign pathology, lost to follow-up, refusal of indicated chemotherapy, non cancer related death or second cancer. A retrospective matched control (diagnosed with Cca undergoing standard colon resection without SLNM, gp B) from our own institution were analyzed and compared to the SLNM group for the same period. Results: A total of 486 pts with Cca were included. Of these, 272 consecutive pts underwent SLNM between 1996–2006. SLNM was successful in 99.8% of pts, with a sensitivity, negative (-ve) predictive value, and overall accuracy of 85.3%, 91.7% and 94.4% respectively. The nodal positivity was 46.0%; of these, 15.1% had micrometastasis. The average number of LNs resected / pt was 15.0 and the average number of SLNs / pt was 2.4. For recurrence analysis, 153/272 pts with minimum f/u 2 years were included. Of these, 49 had stage I, 46 had stage II and 58 had stage III disease. The recurrence rates were 4.1%, 8.6% and 15.5% in stage I, II, and III disease respectively. The recurrence rates were significantly lower when our 153 pts were compared to 214 matched controls ( table 1 ). The recurrence rates increased from 6.3% in pts with no +ve LNs to 11.5% when one LN was +ve, 16.7% when 2 LNs were +ve and 20% when 3 or more LNs were +ve. Conclusions: SLNM in Cca is associated with decreased rates of recurrence as compared to conventional therapy. The number of positive LNs is an independent risk factor for recurrence. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document