Divergent Influence of Different Type A Dimensions on Job Strain and Effort-Reward Imbalance

2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taina Hintsa ◽  
Mirka Hintsanen ◽  
Markus Jokela ◽  
Laura Pulkki-Råback ◽  
Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen
Keyword(s):  
Job Strain ◽  
Type A ◽  
Effort Reward Imbalance ◽  
Reward Imbalance

Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and neck, shoulder and wrist symptoms among Chinese workers

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanfa Yu ◽  
Akinori Nakata ◽  
GuiZhen Gu ◽  
Naomi G. Swanson ◽  
Lihua He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Job Strain ◽  
Effort Reward Imbalance ◽  
Chinese Workers ◽  
Reward Imbalance

Job strain, effort–reward imbalance, and coronary risk factors—complementary job stress models in risk estimation?

2002 ◽  
Vol 1241 ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Peter ◽  
L Alfredsson ◽  
N Hammar ◽  
J Siegrist ◽  
T Theorell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Job Stress ◽  
Job Strain ◽  
Risk Estimation ◽  
Coronary Risk Factors ◽  
Coronary Risk ◽  
Effort Reward Imbalance ◽  
Reward Imbalance ◽  
Stress Models

Messung psychischer Belastungen am Arbeitsplatz

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Nübling
Keyword(s):  
Job Strain ◽  
Psychische Belastungen ◽  
Job Strain Model ◽  
Effort Reward Imbalance ◽  
Reward Imbalance ◽  
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire ◽  
Demand Control ◽  
Strain Model ◽  
Support Model

EinleitungAuf Grund gesetzlicher Verpflichtungen und wegen des starken Ansteigens der Arbeitsunfähigkeitstage und –fälle mit psychischen Diagnosen in den letzten 20 Jahren ist das Thema psychische Belastungen am Arbeitsplatz mehr und mehr in den Fokus von Wissenschaft und Praxis gerückt.Die zwei führenden Theorien der letzten Jahrzehnte waren das job-strain-model (demand-control-support model, DCS) und das effort-reward imbalance model (ERI).In jüngerer Zeit wurden Instrumente entwickelt, die durch eine breitere Palette der Aspekte versuchen, ein möglichst vollständiges Bild der psychosozialen Faktoren am Arbeitsplatz zu zeichnen- ein Beispiel hierfür ist der COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire). Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass diese zusätzlichen Aspekte auch einen höheren Varianzanteil in den Belastungsfolgen (outcomes) erklären können.Da für die Bewertung der psychischen Belastungen keine cutoff-Werte existieren, ist im praktischen Einsatz solcher Verfahren im Rahmen der Gefährdungsbeurteilung die Verfügbarkeit von tätigkeitsspezifischen Referenzwerten für die Interpretation von Ergebnissen und die Ableitung von Präventionsmaßnahmen hilfreich bzw. notwendig.

The fruits of ones labor: Effort–reward imbalance but not job strain is related to heart rate variability across the day in 35–44-year-old workers

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Loerbroks ◽  
Oliver Schilling ◽  
Volker Haxsen ◽  
Marc N. Jarczok ◽  
Julian F. Thayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
Job Strain ◽  
Effort Reward Imbalance ◽  
Reward Imbalance

Job Strain, Effort???Reward Imbalance, and Heavy Drinking: A Study in 40,851 Employees

2005 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Kouvonen ◽  
Mika Kivim??ki ◽  
Sara J. Cox ◽  
Kari Poikolainen ◽  
Tom Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Job Strain ◽  
Heavy Drinking ◽  
Effort Reward Imbalance ◽  
Reward Imbalance

scholarly journals 1175Work stress and loss of years lived without chronic disease; an 18-year prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeppe K. Sørensen ◽  
Elisabeth Framke ◽  
Jacob Pedersen ◽  
Kristina Alexanderson ◽  
Jens P. Bonde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Work Stress ◽  
Job Strain ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Effort Reward Imbalance ◽  
Reward Imbalance ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Background Aim: To examine the association of work stress with future chronic disease incidence and loss of chronic disease-free life years in the Danish workforce. Method A population-based prospective register-based cohort study of all employees aged 30-59 in 2000 in Denmark, without chronic diseases at baseline (n = 1,592,491). Using job exposure matrices, we assessed exposure to work stress by a combined measure of job strain and effort-reward imbalance. We estimated the risk of incident hospital-diagnosed chronic disease or death (i.e., type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and dementia) during 18 years of follow-up and corresponding chronic disease-free life expectancy. Results Individuals working in occupations with high risk of both job strain and effort-reward imbalance had a slightly higher risk of future incident chronic disease compared to those in occupations with low risk of both stressors. The hazard ratio was 1.04 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.05) in women and 1.12 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.14) in men. The corresponding loss in chronic disease-free life expectancy was 0.25 years in women and 0.84 years in men. Conclusion Working in occupations with a high risk of work stress was associated with a small loss of years lived without chronic disease compared to working in occupations with low risk of work stress. Key messages According to our findings, employees in occupations with high risk of work stress live slightly shorter lives free of chronic diseases compared to employees in occupations with low risk of work stress.

Psychosocial factors in the prevention of cardiovascular disease

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Töres Theorell ◽  
Chantal Brisson ◽  
Michel Vézina ◽  
Alain Milot ◽  
Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Psychosocial Factors ◽  
Job Strain ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Psychosocial Interventions ◽  
Theoretical Work ◽  
Socioeconomic Conditions ◽  
Effort Reward Imbalance ◽  
Reward Imbalance ◽  
And Coping

The chapter starts with a theoretical sociological, psychological, and physiological framework for the relationships between psychosocial factors and coronary heart disease (CHD). This is followed by a review of the scientific evidence supporting such an association. Individual behaviours and coping mechanisms as well as environmental conditions of relevance for CHD are described. In particular, type A and D behaviour, depressive states, covert coping, social support and social network, socioeconomic conditions, as well as theoretical work environment models of relevance for CHD (job strain, effort-reward imbalance, organizational justice and leadership) are discussed. The remaining part of the chapter surveys the results from controlled studies of the effects of psychosocial interventions. There is accumulating evidence from such controlled studies that risk factors for CHD can be favourably influenced.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document