scholarly journals PD50-11 CHANGES IN PSA SCREENING RELATIVE TO THE REVISED USPSTF GUIDANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Leapman ◽  
Rong Wang ◽  
Cary Gross ◽  
Xiaomei Ma
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Psa Screening

scholarly journals Prostate cancer screening among family physicians in Ontario: An update on attitudes and current practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. E53-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Paul Akerman ◽  
Christopher B. Allard ◽  
Camilla Tajzler ◽  
Anil Kapoor
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Preventive Health Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Screening Practices ◽  
Psa Screening

Introduction: This study serves as an update of prostate cancer screening practices among family physicians in Ontario, Canada. Since this population was first surveyed in 2010, the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) and the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released recommendations against prostate cancer screening.Methods: An online survey was developed through input from urologists and family practitioners. It was distributed via email to all members of the Ontario Medical Association’s Section on General and Family practice (11 657 family physicians). A reminder email was sent at two weeks and the survey remained active for one month.Results: A total of 1880 family physicians completed surveys (response rate 16.1%). Overall, 80.4% offered prostate cancer screening compared to 91.7% when surveyed in 2010. Physicians new to practice (two years or less) were the most likely to not offer screening (24.6%). A combination of digital rectal exam (DRE) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remained the most common form of screening (58.3%). Following the release of the CTFPHC recommendations, 45.6% of respondents said they now screen fewer patients. Participants were less familiar with national urological society guidelines compared to task force recommendations. The majority (72.6%) of respondents feel PSA screening leads to overdiagnosis and treatment. Those surveyed remained split with respect to PSA utility.Conclusions: Data suggest a decline in screening practices since 2010, with newer graduates less likely to offer screening. CFTPHC and USPSTF recommendations had the greatest impact on clinical practice. Those surveyed were divided with respect to PSA utility. Some additional considerations to PSA screening in the primary care setting, including patient-driven factors, were not captured by our concise survey.

The cost implications of prostate cancer screening in the Medicare population.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6549-6549
Author(s):  
Xiaomei Ma ◽  
Rong Wang ◽  
Jessica B. Long ◽  
Joseph S. Ross ◽  
Pamela R. Soulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
Screening Cost ◽  
Hospital Referral ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Biopsy Complications

6549 Background: Recent debate about prostate specific antigen (PSA)-based testing for prostate cancer screening among older men has rarely considered the cost associated with screening. Methods: We assembled a population-based cohort of male Medicare beneficiaries aged 66-99 years who had never been diagnosed with prostate cancer at the end of 2005 (n = 84,699) and followed them for two years to assess the cost of PSA screening and downstream procedures (biopsy, pathology, and hospitalization due to biopsy complications) at both the national and the hospital referral region (HRR) level. The relation of screening cost to stage of prostate cancer at diagnosis at the HRR level was analyzed using multivariate Poisson models. We also evaluated the initial treatment cost of Medicare fee for service beneficiaries diagnosed with prostate cancer during 2006-2007 (n = 31,653). Results: Approximately 42.8% of the 84,699 men received PSA screening tests during the two-year study period, with 2.4% undergoing biopsy. The annual expenditures by the national fee for service Medicare program were $454 million for screening and $1.79 billion for initial treatment (in 2009 US dollars). The mean annual screening cost at the regional (HRR) level ranged from $16 to $65 per beneficiary. Downstream biopsy-related procedures (biopsy, pathology, and hospitalization due to biopsy complications) accounted for 73% of the overall screening costs and varied significantly across regions. Compared with men residing in HRRs that were in the lowest quartile for screening expenditures, men living in the highest HRR quartile were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer of any stage [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.42] and localized cancer (IRR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.13-1.53). Conclusions: Medicare prostate cancer screening-related expenditures are substantial, vary considerably across regions, and are positively associated with rates of cancer diagnosis.

scholarly journals A Community Jury on PSA screening: what do well-informed men want the government to do about prostate cancer screening—a qualitative analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. e004682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Rychetnik ◽  
Jenny Doust ◽  
Rae Thomas ◽  
Robert Gardiner ◽  
Geraldine MacKenzie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
The Government

scholarly journals Population-Based Patterns and Predictors of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Among Older Men in the United States

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 1736-1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Drazer ◽  
Dezheng Huo ◽  
Mara A. Schonberg ◽  
Aria Razmaria ◽  
Scott E. Eggener
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
United States ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Older Men ◽  
The United States ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Psa Screening

Purpose For patients who elect to have prostate cancer screening, the optimal time to discontinue screening is unknown. Our objective was to describe rates and predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening among older men in the United States. Methods Data were extracted from the population-based 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). PSA screening was defined as a PSA test as part of a routine exam within the past year. Demographic, socioeconomic, and functional characteristics were collected, and a validated 5-year estimated life expectancy was calculated. Age-specific rates of PSA screening were determined, and sampling weight-adjusted multivariate regressions were fitted to determine predictors of screening among men age 70 years or older. Results The PSA screening rate was 24.0% in men age 50 to 54 years, and it increased steadily with age until a peak of 45.5% among age 70 to 74 years. Screening rates then gradually declined by age, and 24.6% of men age 85 years or older reported being screened. Among men age 70 years or older, screening rates varied by estimated 5-year life expectancy: rates were 47.3% in men with high life expectancies (≤ 15% probability of 5-year mortality), 39.2% in men with intermediate life expectancies (16% to 48% probability), and 30.7% in men with low life expectancies (> 48% probability; P < .001). In multivariate analysis, estimated life expectancy and age remained independently associated with PSA screening (P < .001 for each). Conclusion Rates of PSA screening in the United States are associated with age and estimated life expectancy, but excessive PSA screening in elderly men with limited life expectancies remains a significant problem. The merits and limitations of PSA should be discussed with all patients considering prostate cancer screening.

scholarly journals Randomized Trial of Community Health Worker-led Decision Coaching to Promote Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening among Black Male Patients and their Providers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danil Makarov ◽  
Zachary Feuer ◽  
Shannon Ciprut ◽  
Natalia Martinez-Lopez ◽  
Angela Fagerlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Black Men ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Decision Quality ◽  
Psa Screening

Abstract Background Black men are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer, the most common non-cutaneous malignancy among men in the U.S. The United States Preventive Services Task Force(USPSTF) encourages prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing decisions to be based on shared decision-making (SDM) clinician professional judgment, and patient preferences. However, evidence suggests that SDM is underutilized in clinical practice, especially among the most vulnerable patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a Community Health Worker (CHW)-led decision-coaching program to facilitate SDM for prostate cancer screening among Black men in the primary care setting, with the ultimate aim of improving/optimizing decision quality. Methods We proposed a CHW-led decision-coaching program to facilitate SDM for prostate cancer screening discussions in Black men at a primary care FQHC. This study enrolled Black men who were patients at the participating clinical site and up to 15 providers who cared for them. We estimated to recruit 228 participants, ages 40-69 to be randomized to either 1) a decision aid along with decision coaching on PSA screening from a CHW or 2) receiving a decision aid along with CHW-led interaction on modifying dietary and lifestyle to serve as an attention control. The independent randomization process was implemented within each provider and we controlled for age by dividing patients into two strata: 40-54 years and 55-69 years. This sample size sufficiently powered the detection differences in the primary study outcomes: knowledge, indicative of decision quality, and differences in PSA screening rates. Primary outcome measures for patients will be decision quality and decision regarding whether to undergo PSA screening. Primary outcome measures for providers will be acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. We will examine how decision coaching about prostate cancer screening impact patient-provider communication. These outcomes will be analyzed quantitatively through objective, validated scales and qualitatively through semi-structured, in-depth interviews and thematic analysis of clinical encounters. Through a conceptual model combining elements of the Preventative Health Care Model (PHM) and Informed Decision-Making Model, we hypothesize that the prostate cancer screening decision coaching intervention will result in a preference-congruent decision and decisional satisfaction. We also hypothesize that this intervention will improve physician satisfaction with counseling patients about prostate cancer screening. Discussion Decision coaching is an evidence-based approach to improve decision quality in many clinical contexts, but its efficacy is incompletely explored for PSA screening among Black men in primary care. Our proposal to evaluate a CHW-led decision-coaching program for PSA screening has high potential for scalability and public health impact. Our results will determine the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of a CHW intervention in a community clinic setting in order to inform subsequent widespread dissemination, a critical research area highlighted by USPSTF.Trial Registration The trial was registered prospectively with the National Institute of Health registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov), registration number NCT03726320, on October 31, 2018; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03726320

scholarly journals Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening: A national survey of Canadian primary care physicians’ opinions and practices

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 396-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell Geoffrey Goldenberg ◽  
Sean C. Skeldon ◽  
Madhur Nayan ◽  
Yegappan Suppiah ◽  
Linda Chow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Psa Screening

Introduction: In 2014, the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) recommended against routine prostate cancer screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test.1 We surveyed Canadian primary care physicians (PCPs) to understand their opinions and attitudes towards prostate cancer screening in 2016.Methods: Twenty PCPs piloted the survey to assess its accessibility. We distributed a flyer to 19 633 PCPs as an insert in a large mailed package inviting them to attend a national meeting, and later promoted the survey at the meeting. Multinomial logistic regression models examined factors associated with agreement of key guideline statements and the overall benefit of PSA screening.Results: A total of 1254 PCPs responded (rate of 6.4%); 54.7% of physicians aware of the CTFPHC recommendations report screening less often as a result. Overall, 55.6% of PCPs feel that the risks of PSA screening outweigh the benefits. On multivariable analysis, physicians who did not read the guidelines, did not have an academic appointment, or were in practice for over 20 years were significantly more likely to disagree with the statement that men 55‒69 years old should not be screened for prostate cancer with PSA.Conclusions: Our national survey found that the prostate cancer screening practices of Canadian PCPs varies widely across physician demographic groups, with almost equal numbers for or against. This has significant ethical, medical, and legal implications. The poor response rate to highly incentivized survey request may suggest a reluctance or general apathy towards this subject because of the Task Force recommendations. Future efforts should provide physicians with objective guidance around PSA screening, incorporating input from all stakeholders, including PCPs, urologists, and patients.

scholarly journals PSA screening, prostate biopsy, and treatment of prostate cancer in the years surrounding the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening

Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (13) ◽  
pp. 2733-2739 ◽  
Author(s):  
James T. Kearns ◽  
Sarah K. Holt ◽  
Jonathan L. Wright ◽  
Daniel W. Lin ◽  
Paul H. Lange ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Psa Screening

Contemporary racial disparities in PSA screening in a large, integrated health care system.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
James T. Kearns ◽  
Oluwaseun Adeyemi ◽  
William E. Anderson ◽  
Timothy C. Hetherington ◽  
Yhenneko J. Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
African American ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Racial Disparities ◽  
African American Men ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
Psa Testing ◽  
Caucasian Men ◽  
Clinical Records

308 Background: The USPSTF prostate cancer screening guidelines have changed significantly in the past decade, from a recommendation of do not screen in 2012 to a 2018 recommendation that focuses on shared decision making. Additionally, most guidelines further acknowledge that African American men should be screened more intensively than Caucasian men due to increased incidence of prostate cancer and increased prostate cancer mortality. Our objective was to characterize racial disparities in PSA screening in a large healthcare system with a diverse patient population to understand contemporary trends. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Atrium Health Enterprise Data Warehouse, which includes clinical records from over 900 care locations across North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Participants included all men ≥ 40 years seen in the ambulatory or outpatient setting during 2014-2018. PSA testing was determined through laboratory data. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Between-group comparisons were conducted using generalized estimating equations models to account for within-subject correlation. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: There were 582,846 individual men seen from 2014-2018, including 416,843 Caucasians (71.5%) and 85,773 African Americans (14.7%). Screening rates declined among all groups from 2014-2018 (see table). African American men were screened at a similar or lower rate than Caucasian men in each year (from 18.6% vs 19.0% in 2014 to 11.9% vs 12.2% in 2018, respectively). Conclusions: PSA screening declined significantly between 2014 and 2018. African American men screened at a similar or lower rate than Caucasian men each year. Given the consensus that African American men should be more intensively screened for prostate cancer, significant racial disparities remain in prostate cancer screening. Further study is warranted to understand patient, provider, and system factors that contribute to disparities in prostate cancer care and outcomes.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening in England (1998-2017): a cohort study

2020 ◽  
pp. bjgp20X713957
Author(s):  
Ashley Kieran Clift ◽  
Carol Coupland ◽  
Julia Hippisley-Cox
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Opportunistic Screening ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
Psa Testing

Abstract Background: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Interpretation of results from trials of screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are complex in terms of defining optimal prostate cancer screening policy. Aims: Assess the rates of, and factors associated with the uptake of PSA testing and opportunistic screening (PSA test in absence of symptoms) in England between 1998 and 2017. Estimate the likely rates of pre-randomisation screening and contamination (unscheduled screening in ‘control’ arm) of the UK-based Cluster Randomised Trial of PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer (“CAP”). Design and Setting: Open cohort study of men aged 40-75 years at cohort entry (1998-2017) undertaken using the QResearch database. Method: Eligible men were followed for up to 19-years. Rates of PSA testing and opportunistic PSA screening were calculated and Cox regression was used to estimate associations. Results: The cohort comprised 2,808,477 men, of whom 631,426 had a total of 1,720,855 PSA tests. We identified that 410,751 men had opportunistic PSA screening. Cumulative proportions of uptake of opportunistic screening in the cohort: 10% at 5yrs, 23% at 10yrs, and 44% at 19yrs of follow-up. The potential rate of contamination in the CAP control arm was estimated at 24.5%. Conclusions: A substantial number of men in England opt-in to opportunistic prostate cancer screening despite uncertainty regarding the efficacy and harms. The rate of opportunistic prostate cancer screening in the population is likely to have contaminated the CAP trial making it difficult to interpret the results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document