Toxicity and Outcome of Children and Adolescents Participating in Phase I/II Trials of Novel Anticancer Drugs

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Morgenstern ◽  
Darren Hargrave ◽  
Lynley V. Marshall ◽  
Susanne A. Gatz ◽  
Giuseppe Barone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Anticancer Drugs

scholarly journals Bone marrow transplantation for peripheral T-cell lymphoma in children and adolescents

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 2938-2942 ◽  
Author(s):  
BG Gordon ◽  
PI Warkentin ◽  
DD Weisenburger ◽  
JM Vose ◽  
WG Sanger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Bone Marrow Transplantation ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The Other ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma

Abstract We report nine children with relapsed (n = 8) or high-risk (n = 1) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who underwent autologous (n = 6) or allogeneic (n = 3) bone marrow transplantation (BMT). These children received transplants as part of a prospective phase I/II study of thioTEPA (TT) and total body irradiation (TBI) with escalating doses of VP-16. The median age of these patients at time of BMT was 6.5 years (range 2.5 years to 14 years). Three were transplanted with active disease after failing salvage chemotherapy. Of the other six, one was transplanted in first complete remission (CR) and five in second or subsequent CR. Of these nine patients, eight are free of disease a median of 25 months after BMT (range, 6 to 48 months), with an estimated 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) of 89%. Six of these eight patients have been followed for 12 or more months after BMT, and in each their current remission exceeds their longest previous remission duration. The toxicity of the TT/TBI +/- VP-16 regimens was significant but manageable, predominantly consisting of severe mucositis. For a comparison, we reviewed retrospective data on the six additional children and adolescents with PTCL who underwent BMT during the 3-year period preceding this phase I/II study. The median age at BMT of these six patients was 19 years (range 15.5 years to 20 years). These patients were prepared for BMT with a variety of other regimens. One had no response to BMT and the other five relapsed at 1.5 to 5 months after BMT (median, 3 months) with an RFS of 0%. Our data suggest that thioTEPA plus TBI, with or without VP-16, is an effective preparative regimen for BMT for young patients with relapsed or high-stage PTCL and leads to prolonged RFS.

scholarly journals Use of Expansion Cohorts in Phase I Trials and Probability of Success in Phase II for 381 Anticancer Drugs

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (15) ◽  
pp. 4020-4026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo D.G. Bugano ◽  
Kenneth Hess ◽  
Denis L.F. Jardim ◽  
Alona Zer ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Anticancer Drugs ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Trials ◽  
Probability Of Success

Phase I study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 3037-3043 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Nicholson ◽  
M Krailo ◽  
M M Ames ◽  
N L Seibel ◽  
J M Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PURPOSE The Children's Cancer Group conducted a phase I trial of temozolomide stratified by prior craniospinal irradiation (CSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS Children and adolescents with recurrent or progressive cancer were enrolled. Temozolomide was administered orally daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses administered every 21 to 28 days after full hematologic recovery. Dose levels tested included 100, 150, 180, 215, 245, and 260 mg/m2 daily. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients on the non-CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. During the first three dose levels (100, 150, and 180 mg/m2 daily), only grades 1 and 2 hematologic toxicity occurred. One patient at 215 mg/m2 daily had grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Three of eight patients (38%) treated at 245 to 260 mg/m2 daily had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which included both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Twenty-two patients on the CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. Hematologic DLT occurred in one of six patients (17%) at 100 mg/m2 daily and in two of four patients (50%) at 215 mg/m2 daily. No nonhematologic DLT occurred; nausea and vomiting occurred in more than half of the patients. After two courses of temozolomide, 10 patients had stable disease (SD), and three patients had a partial response (PR), one of whom subsequently had a complete response (CR) that persists through 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide for children and adolescents without prior CSI is 215 mg/m2 daily and for those with prior CSI is 180 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses that begin on day 28. Temozolomide is well tolerated and should undergo phase II testing in children and adolescents.

scholarly journals Phase I study of CI-958 in children and adolescents with recurrent solid tumors

Cancer ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 1166-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carola A. S. Arndt ◽  
Mark D. Krailo ◽  
Wen Liu-Mares ◽  
Peter M. Anderson ◽  
Gregory H. Reaman
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study

INFORM2 exploratory multinational phase I/II combination study of nivolumab and entinostat in children and adolescents with refractory high-risk malignancies: INFORM2 NivEnt.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS10065-TPS10065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelis Martinus van Tilburg ◽  
Ruth Witt ◽  
Kristian W. Pajtler ◽  
Plass Christoph ◽  
Isabel Poschke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Mutational Load ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label

TPS10065 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition in children has shown limited success rates until now. This is most likely due to the fact that the vast majority of pediatric cancers are so-called immunologic cold tumors, and that patients have been enrolled in an unselected manner in single agent trials. Recently, it has been shown that the class I selective HDAC inhibitor entinostat has significant immune enhancing activity in vitro and in vivo. This is mediated through multiple mechanisms including depletion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, activation of neoantigen transcription and increase of MHC expression. Methods: INFORM2 NivEnt is an exploratory nonrandomized, open-label, multinational and multicenter seamless phase I/II basket trial of nivolumab and entinostat in children and adolescents with relapsed, refractory or progressive high-risk solid and CNS tumors. Patients aged 6-21 will be allocated to the following biomarker-defined groups: high mutational load ( > 100 somatic SNVs/exome; group A), high PD-L1 mRNA expression (RPKM > 3; group B), focal MYC(N) amplification (group C), low mutational load and low PD-L1 mRNA expression and no MYC(N) amplification (Biomarker low group D). Phase I determines the recommended phase 2 dose for the combination for the age groups 6-11 and 12-21 years. Patients will receive nivolumab 3mg/kg every 2 weeks. Entinostat has 2 dose levels: 2mg/m2 and 4mg/m2 once per week. Patients can seamlessly enter the phase II which investigates activity (defined as best response during the first 6 cycles) in the 4 biomarker groups A-D. The duration of treatment is 12 cycles, preceded by 1 entinostat priming week. Interim analyses for futility will be performed after every 10 patients in each group. The study will enroll a maximum of 128 patients in Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden, France, Australia and additional countries under discussion. A comprehensive accompanying biomarker program will investigate a series of immune and epigenetic pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT03838042.

scholarly journals Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: A Study of the Pediatric Oncology Experimental Therapeutic Investigators' Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (30) ◽  
pp. 5102-5108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya M. Trippett ◽  
Cynthia Herzog ◽  
James A. Whitlock ◽  
Johannes Wolff ◽  
John Kuttesch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Cns Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

Purpose To determine the dose of cetuximab that can be safely combined with irinotecan for treatment of pediatric and adolescent patients with refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods This open-label, phase I study enrolled patients ages 1 to 18 years with advanced refractory solid tumors, including tumors of the CNS. Patient cohorts by age group (children, ages 1 to 12 years; adolescents, ages 13 to 18 years) received escalating weekly doses of cetuximab (75, 150, 250 mg/m2) in a 3 + 3 design, plus irinotecan (16 or 20 mg/m2/d) for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks every 21 days. The primary end points were establishing the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RPIID), and pharmacokinetics of the combination. Preliminary safety and efficacy data were also collected. Results Twenty-seven children and 19 adolescents received a median of 7.1 and 6.0 weeks of cetuximab therapy, respectively. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly plus irinotecan 16 mg/m2/d (pediatric) or 20 mg/m2/d (adolescent) have been established as the MTD/RPIID. Dose-limiting toxicities included diarrhea and neutropenia. Mild to moderate (grade 1 to 2) acneiform rash occurred in a majority of patients; no grade 3 to 4 rashes were observed. Cetuximab demonstrated dose-dependent clearance in both children and adolescents, similar to that in adults. There were two confirmed partial responses, both in patients with CNS tumors. Stable disease was achieved in 18 patients overall, including 10 patients with CNS tumors (38.5%). Conclusion The cetuximab/irinotecan combination can be given safely to children and adolescents with cancer. Promising activity, particularly in CNS tumors, warrants phase II evaluation of this regimen.

Phase I trials of targeted anticancer drugs: a need to refocus

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 889-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest C. Borden ◽  
Afshin Dowlati
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Anticancer Drugs ◽  
Phase I Trials

scholarly journals Using the drug repositioning approach to develop a novel therapy, tipepidine hibenzate sustained-release tablet (TS-141), for children and adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Saito ◽  
Yushiro Yamashita ◽  
Akemi Tomoda ◽  
Takashi Okada ◽  
Hideo Umeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Sustained Release ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Drug Repositioning ◽  
Release Profile ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Cyp2d6 Phenotype

Abstract Background Asverin® (tipepidine hibenzate) has been used as an antitussive for >50 years in Japan. Studies revealed that tipepidine modulates monoamine levels, by inhibiting G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels, expecting the potential therapeutic effects of tipepidine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in recent years. In this study, TS-141, a sustained-release tablet of tipepidine, was developed for the treatment of ADHD through a drug repositioning approach. Methods The sustained-release profile of TS-141 in healthy adults was investigated, and tipepidine exposure in the plasma after the TS-141 administration was compared to that of Asverin in the phase I study. Phase II study was conducted to examine the effects of TS-141 30 (once a day), 60 (once a day), 120 mg (60 mg twice a day), or placebo, that is within the exposure in the maximum dosage of Asverin, in children and adolescents with ADHD, and was designed as an 8-week treatment, randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial recruiting 6–17-year-old children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD. A total of 216 patients were randomized according to the CYP2D6 phenotype. The primary end-point was ADHD Rating Scale IV-J changes. Furthermore, effects of CYP2D6 phenotype on the efficacy in the subgroup analysis were investigated. Results TS-141 had the sustained-release profile, and the CYP2D6 phenotype had effects on the plasma exposure of tipepidine. ADHD RS-IV-J scores in all TS-141 dosages decreased from their baseline scores; however, no significant difference was observed in ADHD RS-IV-J score changes between the placebo and TS-141-administered groups. In patients with intermediate metabolizer CYP2D6, ADHD RS-IV-J score changes in the 120 mg group tended to be larger than that in the placebo group. Conclusions ADHD RS-IV-J changes on TS-141 may depend on the interaction between the TS-141 dose and CYP2D6 phenotype, suggesting that further clinical trials should be conducted with careful consideration of polymorphism. Drug repositioning approach of TS-141 was attempted at the same dose as that of antitussive; however, dose setting according to the indication was necessary. Trial Registration Phase I study: JapicCTI-205235 (Registered 25 March 2020), Phase II study: JapicCTI-163244 (Registered 9 May 2016), https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/cti-user/trial/Show.jsp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document