Implementation of a Psychoeducational Program for Cancer Survivors and Family Caregivers at a Cancer Support Community Affiliate

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie Dockham ◽  
Ann Schafenacker ◽  
Hyojin Yoon ◽  
David L. Ronis ◽  
Trace Kershaw ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
pp. 130-148
Author(s):  
Laurel Northouse ◽  
Clayton Shuman ◽  
Moira Visovatti ◽  
Bonnie Dockham ◽  
Marita Titler

This chapter describes the development and testing of the FOCUS program with patient-caregiver dyads (i.e., pairs) as the unit of care. The chapter reviews studies that examined (1) the efficacy of the FOCUS program when tested in randomized clinical trials, (2) the effectiveness of the program when implemented in Cancer Support Community affiliates in three states, and (3) outcomes when translated to a tailored, web-based program. Results indicate that FOCUS consistently produced positive outcomes for cancer patients and their caregivers in these studies. The program also improved patient and caregiver outcomes when delivered to patients with different types and stages of cancer, to spousal and nonspousal family caregivers, and in various intervention doses (three-, five-, and six-session programs). The chapter concludes with plans for further implementation of FOCUS and existing dissemination activities.


Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 126 (8) ◽  
pp. 1784-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emi Takeuchi ◽  
Youngmee Kim ◽  
Kelly M. Shaffer ◽  
Rachel S. Cannady ◽  
Charles S. Carver

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siqi Liu ◽  
Mingzhu Su ◽  
Nengliang Yao ◽  
Nan Zhang ◽  
Jialin Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Family caregivers (FCGs) play a key role in the plan of care provision for long-term cancer survivors, yet few studies have been conducted on the impact of long-term caregiving on FCGs and their employment patterns. This study aims to further our understanding of the effect that caregiving role has on FCGs by identifying what cancer-related characteristics influence reduction of employment hours among FCGs in the post-treatment phase in China. Methods A total of 1155 cancer survivors participated in this study. Patients reported changes in the employment patterns of their FCGs. Descriptive analysis looked at demographic and cancer-related characteristics of cancer survivors and types of FCGs’ employment changes in both primary- and post-treatment phases. Chi-square test was used to statistically test the association between survivors’ characteristics and changes in FCGs’ hours of labor force work in post-treatment phase. Separate multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between cancer-related characteristics of participants and employment reduction patterns among FCGs in post-treatment phase while controlling for demographic factors. Results In the primary-treatment phase, 45.6% of all FCGs reduced their working hours and 17.4% stopped working altogether. In the post-treatment phase, 25.2% of FCGs worked fewer hours and 6.6% left the workforce completely. The results show that a higher probability of change in employment hours among FCGs is associated with the following patient characteristics: having comorbidities, receiving chemotherapy treatment, limited ability to perform physical tasks, limited ability to perform mental tasks, and diagnosis of stage II of cancer. Conclusions Care for cancer patients in both primary- and post- treatment phases may have substantial impacts on hours of formal employment of Chinese FCGs. Interventions helping FCGs balance caregiving duties with labor force work are warranted.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 618-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wonshik Chee ◽  
Yaelim Lee ◽  
Eun-Ok Im ◽  
Eunice Chee ◽  
Hsiu-Min Tsai ◽  
...  

Introduction The necessity of culturally competent Internet Cancer Support Groups (ICSGs) for ethnic minorities has recently been highlighted in order to increase its attractiveness and usage. The purpose of this study was to determine the preliminary efficacy of a culturally tailored registered-nurse-moderated ICSG for Asian American breast cancer survivors in enhancing the women’s breast cancer survivorship experience. Methods The study included two phases: (a) a usability test and an expert review; and (b) a randomized controlled pilot intervention study. The usability test was conducted among five Asian American breast cancer survivors using a one-month online forum, and the expert review was conducted among five experts using the Cognitive Walkthrough method. The randomized controlled pilot intervention study (a pre-test and post-test design) was conducted among 65 Asian American breast cancer survivors. The data were analysed using content analysis and descriptive and inferential statistics including the repeated ANOVA. Results All users and experts positively evaluated the program and provided their suggestions for the display, educational contents, and user-friendly structure. There were significant positive changes in the support care needs and physical and psychological symptoms ( p < 0.05) of the control group. There were significant negative changes in the uncertainty level of the intervention group ( p < 0.10). Controlling for background and disease factors, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements than the control group in physical and psychological symptoms and quality of life ( p < 0.10). Discussion The findings supported the positive effects of ICSGs on support care needs, psychological and physical symptoms, and quality of life.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9599-9599
Author(s):  
Melissa F Miller ◽  
C. Daniel Mullins ◽  
Ebere Onukwugha ◽  
Christopher Gayer ◽  
Mitch Golant ◽  
...  

9599 Background: Distress screening and integrated psychosocial care is imperative for cancer patients, yet no tools are specifically tailored for the community provider setting where the majority of US patients are treated. Any screening tool must be validated and effective at discriminating those at risk for greater distress and the associated poorer health outcomes. The study objective was to test the discriminatory power of a 25-item distress screening tool CancerSupportSource for use among cancer survivors. Methods: A total of 251 members (90% female, median age 57 years; mixed diagnoses, 46% breast, 9% gynecologic, 7% blood, 6% colorectal, 32% other) of a community-based cancer support network completed a web-based distress screening tool. Participants were asked to rate each of 25 items according to the question “Today, how concerned are you about…?” using a five-point scale (0 not at all to 4 very seriously concerned). A summary score was calculated as the count of items rated ≥2 and the item discrimination index (IDI) as the difference between proportions of high and low scorers rating an item≥2. Cut-points at 13 and 4 yielded equal-sized groups and were used to classify participants as high (n=59) and low scorers (n=60). Results: Items with the greatest discriminatory power (IDI≥0.8) were: changes or disruptions in work, school or home life; worrying about the future and what lies ahead; feeling too tired to do the things you need or want to do; feeling sad or depressed; ability to exercise or be physically active; and feeling nervous or afraid. Conversely, items with the lowest IDI included: eating and nutrition; tobacco or substance use; transportation to treatment and appointments; considering taking your own life. Conclusions: The results highlight, among 25 items of a distress screening tool, those items with the greatest discriminatory power to identify cancer survivors with psychosocial distress. Results suggest priority areas for distress screening and referral for support services.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1227-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurel Northouse ◽  
Anna-leila Williams ◽  
Barbara Given ◽  
Ruth McCorkle

Purpose To understand family caregivers' needs for better preparation and care, this state-of-the-science review examines the effect of caregiving on the health and well-being of caregivers, the efficacy of research-tested interventions on patient and caregiver outcomes, implications of the research on policy and practice, and recommendations for practice and future research. Methods We reviewed research that described the multiple effects of cancer on caregivers' well-being. Five meta-analyses were analyzed to determine the effect of interventions with caregivers on patient and caregiver outcomes. In addition, we reviewed legislation such as the Affordable Care Act and the Family Leave Act along with current primary care practice to determine whether family caregivers' needs have been addressed. Results Research findings indicate that caregiver stress can lead to psychological and sleep disturbances and changes in caregivers' physical health, immune function, and financial well-being. Research-tested interventions delivered to caregivers of patients with cancer or other chronic illnesses can reduce many of these negative effects and improve caregivers' coping skills, knowledge, and quality of life. Although these interventions also decrease patients' symptoms, reduce mortality (non-dementia patients), and improve patients' physical and mental health, they are seldom implemented in practice. Conclusion Recommendations for practice include development of standardized guidelines that address caregiver assessment, education, and resources; identification of “caregiver champions” in practice settings; provision of referrals to established support organizations for caregivers (eg, Cancer Support Community, Cancer Care); and collaboration among caregiving, professional, and cancer-related organizations to advocate policy and practice changes for family caregivers.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 573-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youngmee Kim ◽  
Deborah A. Kashy ◽  
Rachel L. Spillers ◽  
Tekla V. Evans

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document