scholarly journals The Transition From Pediatric to Adult Diabetes Care Services

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Hanna ◽  
Jason Woodward
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Butalia ◽  
K. Ashlee McGuire ◽  
David Dyjur ◽  
Julia Mercer ◽  
Daniele Pacaud

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinaytosh Mishra ◽  
Cherian Samuel ◽  
S. K. Sharma

Diabetes is rising like an epidemic in India. The prevalence of diabetes in India has reached an alarming level of 72.95 millions. The purpose of this article is to assess the relative importance of various health care service attributes in diabetes care. Our study uses secondary research and focus group discussion to identify the attributes of a diabetes specialty clinic. The attributes included in the questionnaire were the quality of the care provide by the health care givers, spend per visit, hospitalization expense, waiting time and the distance to the hospital. Conjoint analysis was used to assess the relative importance of the attributes. It was found that the hospital’s quality was the most important attribute while the distance to the hospital was the attribute with the least importance. Although the quality of the hospital is the most important criterion in selecting a hospital in diabetes care, factors like waiting time, spend per visit, and hospitalization expense play an important role in the selection. We assess the relative importance of these factors for the diabetic patients in India. The study is first of its kind and could help policy makers in designing better health care services in diabetes care.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
David V Wagner ◽  
Jenae Ulrich ◽  
Ines Guttmann-Bauman ◽  
Danny C Duke

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carine de Beaufort ◽  
Przemyslawa Jarosz-Chobot ◽  
Marcia Frank ◽  
Jennifer de Bart ◽  
Grazyna Deja
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayzel Shulman ◽  
Ian Zenlea ◽  
Baiju R. Shah ◽  
Cheril Clarson ◽  
Jennifer Harrington ◽  
...  

Abstract Background When young adults transfer from pediatric to adult diabetes care they are at risk for deterioration of glycemic control, putting them at an increased risk of developing both acute and chronic complications. Despite increased awareness of these risks, there are gaps in care delivery during this vulnerable time and variability in the implementation of recommended transition practice. Audit and feedback (AF) interventions have a positive but variable effect on implementation of best practices. An expert group identified specific suggestions for optimizing the effectiveness of AF interventions. We aim to test an AF-based intervention incorporating these specific suggestions to improve transition practices and glycemic control in the first year after transfer from pediatric to adult diabetes care. Methods This is a pragmatic quasi-experimental study; a series of three cohort studies (pre-implementation, early-implementation, and post-implementation) to compare the baseline adjusted hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in the 12 months after the final pediatric visit in five pediatric diabetes centres within the Ontario Pediatric Diabetes Network in Ontario, Canada. The intervention includes three components: 1) centre-level feedback reports compiling data from chart abstraction, linked provincial administrative datasets, and patient-reported experience measures; 2) webinars for facilitated conversations/coaching about the feedback; and 3) online repository of curated transition resources for providers. The primary outcome will be analyzed using a multivariable linear regression model. We will conduct a qualitative process evaluation to understand intervention fidelity and to provide insight into the mechanisms of action of our results. Discussion There is a need to develop an innovative system-level approach to improve outcomes and the quality of care for young adults with type 1 diabetes during the vulnerable time when they transfer to adult care. Our research team, a collaboration of health services, implementation science, and quality improvement researchers, are designing, implementing, and evaluating an AF-based intervention using recommendations about how to optimize effectiveness. This knowledge will be generalizable to other care networks that aim to deliver uniformly high-quality care in diverse care settings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03781973. Registered 13 December 2018. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: June 1, 2019.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document