Critical Care Interventions for Asthmatic Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 385-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Michelle Cundiff ◽  
James M. Gerard ◽  
Robert G. Flood
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Asthmatic Patients

The Burden of Burnout Syndrome in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Pediatric Emergency Department

2019 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Mutlu Uysal Yazici ◽  
Ozlem Teksam ◽  
Hasan Agin ◽  
Nilgun Erkek ◽  
Ali Ertug Arslankoylu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Burnout Syndrome ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Department

Parent Advocacy Group for Events of Resuscitation

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 58-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy Ann Pasek ◽  
Jodi Licata
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Advocacy Group ◽  
Family Presence ◽  
Nurse Caring ◽  
Belief Scale ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Nurses

BACKGROUNDThe presence of patients’ families during resuscitation has been an important practice issue. An American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) practice alert “Family Presence During Resuscitation and Invasive Procedures” supports family members of patients undergoing resuscitation being given the option of bedside presence. Parent Advocacy Group for Events of Resuscitation (PAGER) is an interdisciplinary collaborative in the pediatric intensive care unit.OBJECTIVESTo ensure that patients’ families are provided the option of being with their child during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.METHODSResuscitation data were collected for 12 months by using the AACN practice alert audit tool. The Family Nurse Caring Belief Scale was administered to 150 pediatric intensive care unit nurses. PAGER nurses received crisis education.RESULTSPediatric intensive care unit nurses were supportive of providing the option of family presence during resuscitation. Family Nurse Caring Belief Scale data revealed areas for improvement in family caring practices. PAGER was implemented with positive outcomes for 2 families.CONCLUSIONSPAGER has improved the care of families whose children experience cardiopulmonary resuscitation and should be implemented in pediatric critical care units. PAGER nurses are prepared to serve as role models in providing family-sensitive care during crisis.

scholarly journals Incidence and predictors of mortality among children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at the University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, northwest Ethiopia: A prospective observational cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahom Worku Teshager ◽  
Ashenafi Tazebew Amare ◽  
koku Tamirat
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality

Abstract Background Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) tremendously improves the success of saving patients having potentially life-threatening illness. An accurate estimate of lives saved through pediatric critical care intervention is important to evaluate the quality of the health care system. Data on pediatric critical care in developing countries remain scarce yet is much needed to improve clinical practices and outcomes. This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of mortality in the pediatric intensive care unit in the study setting.Method An institution based prospective cohort study was conducted from February 2018 to July 2019. We collected data by interview, chart and registration book review. Life table was used to estimate the cumulative survival of patients and Log rank test was used to compare survival curves between different categories of the explanatory variables. Survival trend over the follow up time was described using the Kaplan Meier graph. Bivariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model were used to identify predictors.Result Based on the 10 th version of international classifications of disease (ICD) of WHO, neurologic disorders (22.7%) infectious disease (18.8%) and environmental hazards (11.8%) account for the top three diagnoses. The median observation time was 3 days with IQR of 1 to 6 days. Of the total of 313 participants, 102 (32.6%) died during the follow-up time. This gives the incidence of mortality of 6.9 deaths per 100 person day observation. Caregivers’ occupation of government-employed (AHR=0.35, 95%CI: 0.14, 0.89), weekend admission (AHR=1.63, 95%CI: 1.02, 2.62), critical illness (AHR=1.79, 95%CI: 1.13, 2.85) Mechanical ventilation AHR=2.36,95%CI: 1.39, 4.01)and PIM2 score (AHR=1.53, 95%CI: 1.36, 1.72) were predictors of mortality in the pediatric ICU.Conclusion Neurologic disorder was the leading causes of admission followed by infectious diseases, and environmental hazards. Rate of mortality was high and admission over weekends, caregivers' occupation, mechanical ventilation, critical illness diagnosis, and higher PIM2 scores were found to be significant and independent predictors of mortality at the PICU. This suggests that ICU medical equipment, diagnostics, and interventions should be available up to the standard. Intensivist and full staffing around the clock has to be available in the PICU.

Guidelines and Levels of Care for Pediatric Intensive Care Units

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
American Academy ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Hospital Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
American Academy Of Pediatrics

Pediatric critical care medicine has matured dramatically during the past two decades. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of life-threatening processes and the technologic capacity to monitor and treat pediatric patients suffering from them have advanced rapidly during this period. Along with the scientific and technical advances has been the evolution of the pediatric intensive care unt (PICU), where the special needs of critically ill or injured children can be met by pediatric specialists. In 1985, the American Board of Pediatrics recognized the new subspecialty of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine and established criteria for subspecialty certification. The American Boards of Medicine, Surgery, and Anesthesiology gave similar recognition to the subspecialty. In 1990, the Residency Review Committee of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education completed its first accreditation of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Training Programs. In view of these developments, the Pediatric Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Critical Care Medicine and Committee on Hospital Care believe that existing published1 guidelines should now be revised for the pediatric intensive care unit. This policy represents the consensus of the three above-mentioned groups who believe the recommendations that follow are current, necessary, and attainable in 1993. The guidelines are not intended as a statement of the ideal or ultimate requirements for PICUs. We expect standards for PICUs to rise as critical care medicine continues to develop and appropriately trained providers become more readily available. In view of these developments, the Pediatric Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Critical Care Medicine and Committee on Hospital Care believe that existing published1 guidelines should now be revised for the pediatric intensive care unit.

Mortality Review of Children Admitted in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Over One Year in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1369-1372
Author(s):  
Pun Narayan Shrestha ◽  
Sumit Agrawal ◽  
Kosh Raj R C ◽  
Prakash Joshi ◽  
Ajit Rayamajhi
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Female Ratio

Introduction: Childhood mortality is still high in developing countries. This can be reduced with good preventive and curative services especially with critical care. The treatment of critically ill children must be focused for better outcome. The pediatrics deaths audit and review provide feedback to health workers and to the institution. The outcome measures of critical care medicine include mortality, morbidity and disability rate. Objectives: The aim of this study is to review the causes and mode of death in children and length of PICU (pediatric intensive care unit) stay. Methodology: A retrospective study was conducted of the patients who were admitted and died within the period of 16 July 2019 to 15 July, 2020 at PICU of Kanti Children Hospital (KCH). Variables recorded were patient's demography, diagnosis, co- morbidities, complications, length of PICU stay (LOS), mode and time of death. Data were tabulated into MS Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 23. Result: Out of 718 admitted children, 99 (13.78%) died with male to female ratio of 1.8:1. The maximum death (75%) was observed in less than five year of age and most of them were from outside the Kathmandu valley. The leading causes of death were pneumonia (28%), sepsis (20%) and congenital heart diseases (21%). The common complications seen were disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), multi- organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), acute kidney injury (AKI) (5.1 %) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (6.1%) and co- morbidities were congenital heart disease (CHD) (18.2%) and global developmental delay (GDD) (9.1%). Mechanical ventilation was needed in 80.8%. Most of the cases (86%) died despite active treatment and (75%) during off hours (4pm-9am). Conclusion: Pneumonia, sepsis and CHD were the main reason of death and most of them were from outside the valley. 

The Utility of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
pp. 088506662110478
Author(s):  
Laura A. Watkins ◽  
Sharon P. Dial ◽  
Seth J. Koenig ◽  
Dalibor N. Kurepa ◽  
Paul H. Mayo
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
New Therapy

Objectives: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in adult critical care environments has become the standard of care in many hospitals. A robust literature shows its benefits for both diagnosis and delivery of care. The utility of POCUS in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), however, is understudied. This study describes in a series of PICU patients the clinical indications, protocols, findings and impact of pediatric POCUS on clinical management. Design: Retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive POCUS scans performed by a PICU physician. Patients: Pediatric critical care patients who required POCUS scans over a 15-month period. Setting: The pediatric and cardiac ICUs at a tertiary pediatric care center. Interventions: Performance of a POCUS scan by a pediatric critical care attending with advanced training in ultrasonography. Measurement and Main Results: A total of 200 POCUS scans comprised of one or more protocols (lung and pleura, cardiac, abdominal, or vascular diagnostic protocols) were performed on 155 patients over a 15-month period. The protocols used for each scan reflected the clinical question to be answered. These 200 scans included 133 thoracic protocols, 110 cardiac protocols, 77 abdominal protocols, and 4 vascular protocols. In this series, 42% of scans identified pathology that required a change in therapy, 26% confirmed pathology consistent with the ongoing plans for new therapy, and 32% identified pathology that did not result in initiation of a new therapy. Conclusions: POCUS performed by a trained pediatric intensivist provided useful clinical information to guide patient management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document