scholarly journals Virologic Failure and Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Children in South Africa—The IeDEA Southern Africa Collaboration

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary-Ann Davies ◽  
Harry Moultrie ◽  
Brian Eley ◽  
Helena Rabie ◽  
Gilles Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e32144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie H. Levison ◽  
Catherine Orrell ◽  
Sébastien Gallien ◽  
Daniel R. Kuritzkes ◽  
Naishin Fu ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Orrell ◽  
Julie Levison ◽  
Andrea Ciaranello ◽  
Linda-Gail Bekker ◽  
Daniel R. Kuritzkes ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1131-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Fox ◽  
Rebecca Berhanu ◽  
Kim Steegen ◽  
Cindy Firnhaber ◽  
Prudence Ive ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Evans ◽  
M Maskwe ◽  
C Heneger ◽  
I Sanne

In South Africa, abacavir (ABC) is currently recommended as part of first- and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-positive paediatric patients. Concerns about overprescribing of the drug, particularly to adults, led to an analysis of ABC use in public sector ART programmes. We investigated current prescription of the drug to adults and children accessing ART in 4 public sector programmes across Gauteng Province, South Africa. ABC was almost exclusively prescribed to children initiating ART and adults requiring regimen changes due to drug toxicities. Patterns of ABC use among HIV-positive paediatric patients followed national ART treatment guidelines on the application of the drug. Although ABC is commonly used in the private sector for adults, the current national ART treatment guidelines for adults and adolescents should include ABC as an alternative to standard first- or second-line ART.


AIDS ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 915-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Long ◽  
Matthew Fox ◽  
Ian Sanne ◽  
Sydney Rosen

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. e170-e177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole L Wallis ◽  
Michael D Hughes ◽  
Justin Ritz ◽  
Raquel Viana ◽  
Carlos Silva de Jesus ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance profiles are needed to optimize individual patient management and to develop treatment guidelines. Resistance profiles are not well defined among individuals on failing second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Methods Resistance genotypes were performed during screening for enrollment into a trial of third-line ART (AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 5288). Prior exposure to both nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-NRTIs and confirmed virologic failure on a protease inhibitor–containing regimen were required. Associations of drug resistance with sex, age, treatment history, plasma HIV RNA, nadir CD4+T-cell count, HIV subtype, and country were investigated. Results Plasma HIV genotypes were analyzed for 653 screened candidates; most had resistance (508 of 653; 78%) to 1 or more drugs. Genotypes from 133 (20%) showed resistance to at least 1 drug in a drug class, from 206 (32%) showed resistance to at least 1 drug in 2 drug classes, and from 169 (26%) showed resistance to at least 1 drug in all 3 commonly available drug classes. Susceptibility to at least 1 second-line regimen was preserved in 59%, as were susceptibility to etravirine (78%) and darunavir/ritonavir (97%). Susceptibility to a second-line regimen was significantly higher among women, younger individuals, those with higher nadir CD4+ T-cell counts, and those who had received lopinavir/ritonavir, but was lower among prior nevirapine recipients. Conclusions Highly divergent HIV drug resistance profiles were observed among candidates screened for third-line ART in LMIC, ranging from no resistance to resistance to 3 drug classes. These findings underscore the need for access to resistance testing and newer antiretrovirals for the optimal management of third-line ART in LMIC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document