Age-Dependent Sex Differences in Graft Loss After Kidney Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda J. Vinson ◽  
Xun Zhang ◽  
Mourad Dahhou ◽  
Caner Süsal ◽  
Bernd Döhler ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 100625
Author(s):  
Anna Buxeda ◽  
Dolores Redondo-Pachón ◽  
María José Pérez-Sáez ◽  
Marta Crespo ◽  
Julio Pascual

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3237
Author(s):  
Lukas Johannes Lehner ◽  
Robert Öllinger ◽  
Brigitta Globke ◽  
Marcel G. Naik ◽  
Klemens Budde ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation (SPKT) is a standard therapeutic option for patients with diabetes mellitus type I and kidney failure. Early pancreas allograft failure is a complication potentially associated with worse outcomes. (2) Methods: We performed a landmark analysis to assess the impact of early pancreas graft loss within 3 months on mortality and kidney graft survival over 10 years. This retrospective single-center study included 114 adult patients who underwent an SPKT between 2005 and 2018. (3) Results: Pancreas graft survival rate was 85.1% at 3 months. The main causes of early pancreas graft loss were thrombosis (6.1%), necrosis (2.6%), and pancreatitis (2.6%). Early pancreas graft loss was not associated with reduced patient survival (p = 0.168) or major adverse cerebral or cardiovascular events over 10 years (p = 0.741) compared to patients with functioning pancreas, after 3 months. Moreover, kidney graft function (p = 0.494) and survival (p = 0.461) were not significantly influenced by early pancreas graft loss. (4) Conclusion: In this study, using the landmark analysis technique, early pancreas graft loss within 3 months did not significantly impact patient or kidney graft survival over 10 years.


1995 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 1100-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
GEORGE W. BURKE ◽  
ROBERT CIROCCO ◽  
MIKE MARKOU ◽  
ANA VICIANA ◽  
PHILLIP RUIZ ◽  
...  

Hypertension ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco J Puleo ◽  
Alissa A Frame ◽  
Parul Chaudhary ◽  
Richard D Wainford

2014 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 629-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hamed ◽  
L. Pasea ◽  
J. Bradley ◽  
G. Pettigrew ◽  
K. Saeb-Parsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Nelson Leung

Kidney failure is a common sequela of multiple myeloma. Tremendous progress in this disease over the past two decades has resulted in more than doubling of the median survival. Despite that, patients with irreversible kidney failure still have inferior outcomes as compared to those with intact kidney function. Kidney transplantation in these patients remains controversial. In this issue of Journal of Onco-Nephrology, two groups of clinicians caring for these patients debate the pros and cons of kidney transplantation in this population. The improvement of overall survival to 7.7 years in patients under the age of 65 years is a strong arg for kidney transplantation. In addition, the use of fluorescent in situ hybridization in risk assessment and minimal residual disease assessment for hematologic response could substantially improve patient selection for kidney transplantation. On the other hand, myeloma remains incurable and kidney failure itself is a high-risk feature. Despite advances, kidney transplantation in myeloma patients continues to present challenges with multiple myeloma relapse, rejection, and infection resulting in higher number of graft loss and death. Whether kidney transplant should be performed in patients with multiple myeloma currently remains debatable, but it may not be long before overall survival and disease control improve to the point where withholding kidney transplantation would be unethical. The questions in preparation for that day are should myeloma patients be held to the same metrics as patients without myeloma and if no, then what would be an acceptable overall and graft survival? Once the answers have been agreed upon by the experts and the governing bodies for transplantation, then proper clinical trials can be designed so that benefits can be optimized and precious resources not be wasted.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeonsoon Jung ◽  
Jisu Kim ◽  
Haesu Jeon ◽  
Ye Na Kim ◽  
Ho Sik Shin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background African American kidney transplant recipients experience disproportionately high rates of graft loss. The aim of this analysis was to use a UNOS data set that contains detailed baseline and longitudinal clinical data to establish and quantify the impact of the current overall graft loss definition on suppressing the true disparity magnitude in US AA kidney transplant outcomes. Methods Longitudinal cohort study of kidney transplant recipients using a data set created by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), including 266,128 (African American 70,215, Non-African American 195,913) transplant patient between 1987 and December 2016. Multivariable analysis was conducted using 2-stage joint modeling of random and fixed effects of longitudinal data (linear mixed model) with time to event outcomes (Cox regression). Results 195,913 non-African American (AA) (73.6%) were compared with 70,215 AA (26.4%) recipients. 10-year-graft survival of AA in all era is lower than that of non-AA (31% in deceased kidney transplants (DKT) AA recipient and 42% in living kidney transplantation (LKT) non-AA recipient). 10-year-patient survival of AA with functioning graft in all era is similar that of non-AA. Multivariate Cox regression of factors associated with patient survival with functioning graft are acute rejection within 6 months, DM, hypertension and etc. Pre-transplant recipient BMI in AA show the trend as a protective factor in patient survival with functioning graft although not significantly in statistics Conclusions African American kidney transplant recipients experience a substantial disparity in graft loss, but not patient death with functioning graft.


2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 1033-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia Morgan ◽  
Zahrah Goolam-Mahomed ◽  
James Hodson ◽  
Jay Nath ◽  
Adnan Sharif

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyam Bansal ◽  
Ashwini Gade

Abstract Background and Aims There are many barriers to kidney transplant and one of them is presence of donor specific antibodies (DSAs) in the recipients. Presence of strong DSA is considered a relative contraindication for kidney transplantation, however, if DSAs are of weak to moderate then desensitization is attempted in many centres with good success rate. Desensitizing such patients can be an acceptable approach to increase the donor pool and facilitating transplants. This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent desensitization at our centre after availability of luminex single antigen (LSA) assay Method Between April 2014 and December 2018, 825 patients underwent kidney transplantation at our centre. Patients who were CDC negative but positive FCXM were further analysed with LSA to know the presence and strength of DSAs. Our protocol for desensitization consisted of plasmapheresis (PP) 1.5 volume by double filtration on alternate day and low dose IV IG 100 mg/kg after each PP. Whenever MFI was <1000 and/or FCXM was negative, patient was taken for transplant with thymoglobulin induction of 1.5 mg/kg for 2-3 doses. All patients were maintained on triple immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. We did not routinely followed DSAs in these patients post-transplant if there was no clinical indication. All adverse events during follow up including new onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT), infections, acute rejections (AR), graft loss and death Results Out of 825 patients, 15 underwent HLA incompatible transplants, of which, 8 were males. All patients were first transplant and 11/13 had history of some sensitizing events in the form of blood transfusion and/or pregnancy. The mean dialysis duration was 8.6 ±14.6 months. FCXM was positive in all the patients with 5 patients had T cell flow positive, 8 had B cell flow positive and 2 had both T & B cell FCXM positivity. Most patients had weak to moderate positive flow cross match. On further evaluation by LSA, all these patients had DSAs, with 3/15 had MFI <1000, 6 had MFI between1000-2000, and remaining 6 had MFI >2000, out of which one patient had MFI of 7195 and six patients had multiple DSAs. These patients underwent desensitization with PP and IVIG and the end point of treatment was either MFI < 1000 or FCXM negative. Post- transplant DSAs were done in patients with high MFI or clinically indicated. Two patients had increase in post-transplant DSA titres requiring post-transplant plasmapheresis. The mean follow up was 29±6 months. On follow up, only 1 patient developed borderline cellular rejection one year after transplant, which responded with pulse steroids. Three patients had biopsy for asymptomatic rise in creatinine but it showed patchy ATN with no evidence of rejection.. One patient developed transient CMV viremia, one patient developed lymph node tuberculosis (TB) and two patients had UTI, all of them responded to treatment. There was no graft or patient loss till last follow up. Conclusion This study shows that HLA desensitisation is feasible and successful in if patients are selected carefully and evaluate thoroughly. HLA incompatible transplant can provide a new lease of life to those patients who would otherwise not get a kidney due to lack of paired exchange and deceased donor program


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document