Using clinical registries, administrative data and electronic medical records to improve medication safety and effectiveness in dementia

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni Ilomäki ◽  
Edward Chia-Cheng Lai ◽  
J. Simon Bell
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. S45
Author(s):  
Alanna Weisman ◽  
Karen Tu ◽  
Jacqueline Young ◽  
Matthew Kumar ◽  
Peter C. Austin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt ◽  
Karl Huang ◽  
Solomon B. Makgoeng ◽  
Gheorghe Luta ◽  
Jun X. Song ◽  
...  

If validated in other samples and health care settings, algorithms to capture toxicity could be useful in comparative and cost effectiveness evaluations of community practice–delivered treatment.


Author(s):  
Karen Tang ◽  
Kelsey Lucyk ◽  
Hude Quan

ABSTRACTObjectives Administrative data are widely used in research, health policy, and the evaluation of health service delivery. We undertook a qualitative study to explore the barriers to high quality coding of chart information to administrative data, at the level of coders in Canada. ApproachOur study design is qualitative. We recruited professional medical chart coders and data users working across Alberta, Canada, using a multimodal recruitment strategy. We conducted an in-depth, semi-structured interview with each participant. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. We conducted thematic analysis (e.g., line-by-line open coding) of interview transcripts. Codes were then collated into themes and compared across our dataset to ensure accurate interpretations of the data. The study team met to discuss, modify, and interpret emergent themes in the context of the barriers to coding administrative data. ResultsWe recruited 28 coding specialists. In general, coders had high job satisfaction and sense of collegiality, as well as sufficient resources to address their coding questions. They believed themselves to be adequately trained and consistently put in the extra effort when searching charts to find additional information that accurately reflected the patient journey. Barriers to high quality coding from the coder perspective included: 1) Incomplete and inaccurate information in physician progress notes and discharge summaries; 2) Difficulty navigating a complex hybrid of paper and electronic medical records; 3) Focus on productivity rather than quality by the employer, which at times resulted in inconsistent instructions for coding secondary diagnoses and discordant expectations between the employer and the coders’ professional standards. ConclusionFuture interventions to improve the quality of administrative data should focus on physician education of necessary components in charting, evaluation of electronic medical records from the perspectives of those who play a key role in abstracting data, and evaluation of productivity guidelines for coders and their effects on data quality.


Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdalla ◽  
Hong Lu ◽  
Bogdan Pinzaru ◽  
Liisa Jaakkimainen

IntroductionReliable information about the time spent waiting for health care services is a critical metric for measuring health system performance. Wait times are a useful measure of access to various health care sectors. Alongside the increased adoption of electronic medical records (EMR) by Canadian family physicians (FP), is the secondary use of FP EMR data for research. However, using FP EMR data can be challenging in its unstructured, free-text format. Objectives and ApproachOur objective was to identify the target specialist physician type from the EMR FP referral note and then calculate wait times from a FP referral to a specialist physician visit. We used FP EMR data and linked to Ontario, Canada health administrative data (called EMRPC). EMRPC collects the entire clinical record from patients including the content of FP referral notes. We used machine learning (ML) methods to identify the type of specialist physician in which the referral was intended. Labels to test the ML methods were created from physicians’ claims data. Wait times were calculated from the FP EMR referral note date to the specialist physician claim date in administrative data. ResultsOur ML models’ ability to classify 2016 FP EMR referral notes to selected medical and surgical specialists achieved sensitivity and positive predictive values ranging from the high 70s to low 80s.Compared to earlier analyses from 2008, we observed a similar relative ordering to see specific specialist physicians. Overall, the median wait times have increased by 14 days on average, with a maximum increase of 28 days to see a gastroenterologist. Conclusion / ImplicationsThe accuracy of ML on unstructured FP EMR data is high, thereby providing a mechanism to “codifying” information in a timely manner. This information can help inform decision makers and providers about which patients or FP practices are experiencing long wait times in seeing specialist physicians.


CMAJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. E205-E212 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Widdifield ◽  
S. Bernatsky ◽  
J. C. Thorne ◽  
C. Bombardier ◽  
R. L. Jaakkimainen ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. McKenna ◽  
B. Gaines ◽  
C. Hatfield ◽  
S. Helman ◽  
L. Meyer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document