scholarly journals How do prosthetic stiffness, height and running speed affect the biomechanics of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations?

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (131) ◽  
pp. 20170230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen N. Beck ◽  
Paolo Taboga ◽  
Alena M. Grabowski
Keyword(s):  
Treadmill Running ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Ground Contact ◽  
Step Frequency ◽  
Running Speed ◽  
Leg Stiffness ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Ground Contact Time ◽  
Available Information ◽  
Distance Running Performance

Limited available information describes how running-specific prostheses and running speed affect the biomechanics of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations. Accordingly, we quantified the effects of prosthetic stiffness, height and speed on the biomechanics of five athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations during treadmill running. Each athlete performed a set of running trials with 15 different prosthetic model, stiffness and height combinations. Each set of trials began with the athlete running on a force-measuring treadmill at 3 m s −1 , subsequent trials incremented by 1 m s −1 until they achieved their fastest attainable speed. We collected ground reaction forces (GRFs) during each trial. Prosthetic stiffness, height and running speed each affected biomechanics. Specifically, with stiffer prostheses, athletes exhibited greater peak and stance average vertical GRFs ( β = 0.03; p < 0.001), increased overall leg stiffness ( β = 0.21; p < 0.001), decreased ground contact time ( β = −0.07; p < 0.001) and increased step frequency ( β = 0.042; p < 0.001). Prosthetic height inversely associated with step frequency ( β = −0.021; p < 0.001). Running speed inversely associated with leg stiffness ( β = −0.58; p < 0.001). Moreover, at faster running speeds, the effect of prosthetic stiffness and height on biomechanics was mitigated and unchanged, respectively. Thus, prosthetic stiffness, but not height, likely influences distance running performance more than sprinting performance for athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations.

scholarly journals The biomechanics of the fastest sprinter with a unilateral transtibial amputation

2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 641-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen N. Beck ◽  
Alena M. Grabowski
Keyword(s):  
Treadmill Running ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Functional Abilities ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Transtibial Amputation ◽  
Leg Stiffness ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Leg Amputation ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Forces

People have debated whether athletes with transtibial amputations should compete with nonamputees in track events despite insufficient information regarding how the use of running-specific prostheses (RSPs) affect athletic performance. Thus, we sought to quantify the spatiotemporal variables, ground reaction forces, and spring-mass mechanics of the fastest athlete with a unilateral transtibial amputation using an RSP to reveal how he adapts his biomechanics to achieve elite running speeds. Accordingly, we measured ground reaction forces during treadmill running trials spanning 2.87 to 11.55 m/s of the current male International Paralympic Committee T44 100- and 200-m world record holder. To achieve faster running speeds, the present study’s athlete increased his affected leg (AL) step lengths ( P < 0.001) through longer contact lengths ( P < 0.001) and his unaffected leg (UL) step lengths ( P < 0.001) through longer contact lengths ( P < 0.001) and greater stance average vertical ground reaction forces ( P < 0.001). At faster running speeds, step time decreased for both legs ( P < 0.001) through shorter ground contact and aerial times ( P < 0.001). Unlike athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations, this athlete maintained constant AL and UL stiffness across running speeds ( P ≥ 0.569). Across speeds, AL step lengths were 8% longer ( P < 0.001) despite 16% lower AL stance average vertical ground reaction forces compared with the UL ( P < 0.001). The present study’s athlete exhibited biomechanics that differed from those of athletes with bilateral and without transtibial amputations. Overall, we present the biomechanics of the fastest athlete with a unilateral transtibial amputation, providing insight into the functional abilities of athletes with transtibial amputations using running-specific prostheses.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present study’s athlete achieved the fastest treadmill running trial ever attained by an individual with a leg amputation (11.55 m/s). From 2.87 to 11.55 m/s, the present study’s athlete maintained constant affected and unaffected leg stiffness, which is atypical for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations. Furthermore, the asymmetric vertical ground reaction forces of athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations during running may be the result of leg length discrepancies.

scholarly journals Prosthetic model, but not stiffness or height, affects the metabolic cost of running for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations

2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen N. Beck ◽  
Paolo Taboga ◽  
Alena M. Grabowski
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Ground Contact ◽  
Limb Stiffness ◽  
Leg Stiffness ◽  
In Series ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Forces

Running-specific prostheses enable athletes with lower limb amputations to run by emulating the spring-like function of biological legs. Current prosthetic stiffness and height recommendations aim to mitigate kinematic asymmetries for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations. However, it is unclear how different prosthetic configurations influence the biomechanics and metabolic cost of running. Consequently, we investigated how prosthetic model, stiffness, and height affect the biomechanics and metabolic cost of running. Ten athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations each performed 15 running trials at 2.5 or 3.0 m/s while we measured ground reaction forces and metabolic rates. Athletes ran using three different prosthetic models with five different stiffness category and height combinations per model. Use of an Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter prosthesis reduced metabolic cost by 4.3 and 3.4% compared with use of Freedom Innovations Catapult [fixed effect (β) = −0.177; P < 0.001] and Össur Flex-Run (β = −0.139; P = 0.002) prostheses, respectively. Neither prosthetic stiffness ( P ≥ 0.180) nor height ( P = 0.062) affected the metabolic cost of running. The metabolic cost of running was related to lower peak (β = 0.649; P = 0.001) and stance average (β = 0.772; P = 0.018) vertical ground reaction forces, prolonged ground contact times (β = −4.349; P = 0.012), and decreased leg stiffness (β = 0.071; P < 0.001) averaged from both legs. Metabolic cost was reduced with more symmetric peak vertical ground reaction forces (β = 0.007; P = 0.003) but was unrelated to stride kinematic symmetry ( P ≥ 0.636). Therefore, prosthetic recommendations based on symmetric stride kinematics do not necessarily minimize the metabolic cost of running. Instead, an optimal prosthetic model, which improves overall biomechanics, minimizes the metabolic cost of running for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The metabolic cost of running for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations depends on prosthetic model and is associated with lower peak and stance average vertical ground reaction forces, longer contact times, and reduced leg stiffness. Metabolic cost is unrelated to prosthetic stiffness, height, and stride kinematic symmetry. Unlike nonamputees who decrease leg stiffness with increased in-series surface stiffness, biological limb stiffness for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations is positively correlated with increased in-series (prosthetic) stiffness.

Standardized Lab Shoes Do Not Decrease Loading Rate Variability in Recreational Runners

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 340-344
Author(s):  
Jessica G. Hunter ◽  
Alexander M.B. Smith ◽  
Lena M. Sciarratta ◽  
Stephen Suydam ◽  
Jae Kun Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contact Time ◽  
Loading Rate ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Ground Contact ◽  
Step Rate ◽  
Running Shoes ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Ground Contact Time ◽  
Recreational Runners ◽  
Running Mechanics

Studies of running mechanics often use a standardized lab shoe, ostensibly to reduce variance between subjects; however, this may induce unnatural running mechanics. The purpose of this study was to compare the step rate, vertical average loading rate, and ground contact time when running in standardized lab shoes versus participants’ normal running shoes. Ground reaction forces were measured while the participants ran overground in both shoe conditions at a self-selected speed. The Student’s t-test revealed that the vertical average loading rate magnitude was smaller in lab shoes versus normal shoes (42.09 [11.08] vs 47.35 [10.81] body weight/s, P = .013), while the step rate (170.92 [9.43] vs 168.98 [9.63] steps/min, P = .053) and ground contact time were similar (253 [25] vs 251 [20] ms, P = .5227) and the variance of all outcomes was similar in lab shoes versus normal shoes. Our results indicate that using standardized lab shoes during testing may underestimate the loads runners actually experience during their typical mileage.

Reduced prosthetic stiffness lowers the metabolic cost of running for athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations

2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 976-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen N. Beck ◽  
Paolo Taboga ◽  
Alena M. Grabowski
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Metabolic Rates ◽  
Distance Running ◽  
Cost Of Transport ◽  
Leg Stiffness ◽  
Metabolic Costs ◽  
In Series ◽  
Reaction Forces

Inspired by the springlike action of biological legs, running-specific prostheses are designed to enable athletes with lower-limb amputations to run. However, manufacturer’s recommendations for prosthetic stiffness and height may not optimize running performance. Therefore, we investigated the effects of using different prosthetic configurations on the metabolic cost and biomechanics of running. Five athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations each performed 15 trials on a force-measuring treadmill at 2.5 or 3.0 m/s. Athletes ran using each of 3 different prosthetic models (Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, Össur Flex-Run, and Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter) with 5 combinations of stiffness categories (manufacturer’s recommended and ± 1) and heights (International Paralympic Committee’s maximum competition height and ± 2 cm) while we measured metabolic rates and ground reaction forces. Overall, prosthetic stiffness [fixed effect (β) = 0.036; P = 0.008] but not height ( P ≥ 0.089) affected the net metabolic cost of transport; less stiff prostheses reduced metabolic cost. While controlling for prosthetic stiffness (in kilonewtons per meter), using the Flex-Run (β = −0.139; P = 0.044) and 1E90 Sprinter prostheses (β = −0.176; P = 0.009) reduced net metabolic costs by 4.3–4.9% compared with using the Catapult prostheses. The metabolic cost of running improved when athletes used prosthetic configurations that decreased peak horizontal braking ground reaction forces (β = 2.786; P = 0.001), stride frequencies (β = 0.911; P < 0.001), and leg stiffness values (β = 0.053; P = 0.009). Remarkably, athletes did not maintain overall leg stiffness across prosthetic stiffness conditions. Rather, the in-series prosthetic stiffness governed overall leg stiffness. The metabolic cost of running in athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations is influenced by prosthetic model and stiffness but not height. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We measured the metabolic rates and biomechanics of five athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations while running with different prosthetic configurations. The metabolic cost of running for these athletes is minimized by using an optimal prosthetic model and reducing prosthetic stiffness. The metabolic cost of running was independent of prosthetic height, suggesting that longer legs are not advantageous for distance running. Moreover, the in-series prosthetic stiffness governs the leg stiffness of athletes with bilateral leg amputations.

Predicting ground reaction and tibiotalar contact forces after total ankle arthroplasty during walking

2020 ◽  
Vol 234 (12) ◽  
pp. 1432-1444
Author(s):  
Yanwei Zhang ◽  
Zhenxian Chen ◽  
Yinghu Peng ◽  
Hongmou Zhao ◽  
Xiaojun Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Multibody Dynamics ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Contact Model ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Ground Contact ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Reaction Forces

The motion capture and force plates data are essential inputs for musculoskeletal multibody dynamics models to predict in vivo tibiotalar contact forces. However, it could be almost impossible to obtain valid force plates data in old patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty under some circumstances, such as smaller gait strides and inconsistent walking speeds during gait analysis. To remove the dependence of force plates, this study has established a patient-specific musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model with total ankle arthroplasty by combining a foot-ground contact model based on elastic contact elements. And the established model could predict ground reaction forces, ground reaction moments and tibiotalar contact forces simultaneously. Three patients’ motion capture and force plates data during their normal walking were used to establish the patient-specific musculoskeletal models and evaluate the predicted ground reaction forces and ground reaction moments. Reasonable accuracies were achieved for the predicted and measured ground reaction forces and ground reaction moments. The predicted tibiotalar contact forces for all patients using the foot-ground contact model had good consistency with those using force plates data. These findings suggested that the foot-ground contact model could take the place of the force plates data for predicting the tibiotalar contact forces in other total ankle arthroplasty patients, thus providing a simplified and valid platform for further study of the patient-specific prosthetic designs and clinical problems of total ankle arthroplasty in the absence of force plates data.

Sex and stride length impact leg stiffness and ground reaction forces when running with body borne load

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 96-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Lobb ◽  
AuraLea C. Fain ◽  
Kayla D. Seymore ◽  
Tyler N. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Stride Length ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Leg Stiffness ◽  
Reaction Forces

Ground reaction forces in shallow water running are affected by immersion level, running speed and gender

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Haupenthal ◽  
Heiliane de Brito Fontana ◽  
Caroline Ruschel ◽  
Daniela Pacheco dos Santos ◽  
Helio Roesler
Keyword(s):  
Shallow Water ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Running Speed ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Level Running

scholarly journals Effects of Velocity and Weight Support on Ground Reaction Forces and Metabolic Power during Running

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alena M. Grabowski ◽  
Rodger Kram
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Treadmill Running ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Metabolic Power ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Weight Support ◽  
Scientific Goal ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Support Body Weight

The biomechanical and metabolic demands of human running are distinctly affected by velocity and body weight. As runners increase velocity, ground reaction forces (GRF) increase, which may increase the risk of an overuse injury, and more metabolic power is required to produce greater rates of muscular force generation. Running with weight support attenuates GRFs, but demands less metabolic power than normal weight running. We used a recently developed device (G-trainer) that uses positive air pressure around the lower body to support body weight during treadmill running. Our scientific goal was to quantify the separate and combined effects of running velocity and weight support on GRFs and metabolic power. After obtaining this basic data set, we identified velocity and weight support combinations that resulted in different peak GRFs, yet demanded the same metabolic power. Ideal combinations of velocity and weight could potentially reduce biomechanical risks by attenuating peak GRFs while maintaining aerobic and neuromuscular benefits. Indeed, we found many combinations that decreased peak vertical GRFs yet demanded the same metabolic power as running slower at normal weight. This approach of manipulating velocity and weight during running may prove effective as a training and/or rehabilitation strategy.

scholarly journals Spring-like leg behaviour, musculoskeletal mechanics and control in maximum and submaximum height human hopping

2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1570) ◽  
pp. 1516-1529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten F. Bobbert ◽  
L. J. Richard Casius
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Centre Of Mass ◽  
Leg Stiffness ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of this study was to understand how humans regulate their ‘leg stiffness’ in hopping, and to determine whether this regulation is intended to minimize energy expenditure. ‘Leg stiffness’ is the slope of the relationship between ground reaction force and displacement of the centre of mass (CM). Variations in leg stiffness were achieved in six subjects by having them hop at maximum and submaximum heights at a frequency of 1.7 Hz. Kinematics, ground reaction forces and electromyograms were measured. Leg stiffness decreased with hopping height, from 350 N m −1 kg −1 at 26 cm to 150 N m −1 kg −1 at 14 cm. Subjects reduced hopping height primarily by reducing the amplitude of muscle activation. Experimental results were reproduced with a model of the musculoskeletal system comprising four body segments and nine Hill-type muscles, with muscle stimulation STIM( t ) as only input. Correspondence between simulated hops and experimental hops was poor when STIM( t ) was optimized to minimize mechanical energy expenditure, but good when an objective function was used that penalized jerk of CM motion, suggesting that hopping subjects are not minimizing energy expenditure. Instead, we speculated, subjects are using a simple control strategy that results in smooth movements and a decrease in leg stiffness with hopping height.

scholarly journals Using Ground Reaction Forces To Predict Fatigue In Treadmill Running: A Machine Learning Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Baldo Junior ◽  
Thiago Faria dos Santos ◽  
Renato Tinós ◽  
Paulo Roberto Pereira Santiago
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Good Accuracy ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Treadmill Running ◽  
Ground Reaction Forces ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Approach ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Interesting Alternative

Abstract The analysis of running patterns, especially those associated with fatigue, can help specialists in designing more efficient workouts and preventing injuries in high-performance sports. However, classifying running patterns is not trivial for humans. An interesting alternative is to use Machine Learning methods, such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), to classify running patterns. In this work, ground reaction forces are measured by sensors coupled to the base of a low-cost open-source treadmill. ANNs are used to classify the force signals and to indicate the occurrence of fatigue. Different features, extracted from the force signals, are proposed and investigated. A Genetic Algorithm (GA) is used to select the best features. The experimental results indicate that the ANN is able to classify the running patterns with good accuracy. In addition, some features selected by the GA provide important information regarding the identification of fatigue in treadmill running.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document