scholarly journals Future perspectives for glycolipid research in medicine

2003 ◽  
Vol 358 (1433) ◽  
pp. 967-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Cox

Medical interest in glycolipids has been mainly directed to the rare and complex glycosphingolipid storage disorders that are principally caused by unitary deficiencies of lysosomal acid hydrolases. However, glycolipids are critical components of cell membranes and occur within newly described membrane domains known as lipid rafts. Glycolipids are components of important antigen systems and membrane receptors; they participate in intracellular signalling mechanisms and may be presented to the immune system in the context of the novel CD1 molecules present on T lymphocytes. A knowledge of their mechanism of action in the control of cell growth and survival as well as developmental pathways is likely to shed light on the pathogenesis of the glycosphingolipid storage disorders as well as the role of lipid second messengers in controlling cell mobility and in the mobilization of intracellular calcium stores (a biological role widely postulated particularly for the lysosphingolipid metabolite sphingosine 1–phosphate). Other sphingolipid metabolites such as ceramide 1–phosphate may be involved in apoptotic responses and in phagocytosis and synaptic vesicle formation. The extraordinary pharmaceutical success of enzymatic complementation for Gaucher's disease using macrophage–targeted human glucocerebrosidase has focused further commercial interest in other glycolipid storage diseases: the cost of targeted enzyme therapy and its failure to restore lysosomal enzymatic deficiencies in the brain has also stimulated interest in the concept of substrate reduction therapy using diffusible inhibitory molecules. Successful clinical trials of the iminosugar N –butyldeoxynojirimycin in type 1 Gaucher's disease prove the principle of substrate reduction therapy and have attracted attention to this therapeutic method. They will also foster important further experiments into the use of glycolipid synthesis inhibitors for the severe neuronopathic glycosphingolipidoses, for which no definitive treatment is otherwise available. Future glycolipid research in medicine will be directed to experiments that shed light on the role of sphingolipids in signalling pathways, and in the comprehensive characterization and their secretory products in relation to the molecular pathogenesis of the storage disorders; experiments of use to improve the efficiency of complementing enzymatic delivery to the lysosomal compartment of storage cells are also needed. Further systematic screening for inhibitory compounds with specific actions in the pathways of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis will undoubtedly lead to clinical trials in the neuronopathic storage disorders and to wider applications in the fields of immunity and cancer biology.

2003 ◽  
Vol 358 (1433) ◽  
pp. 927-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry D. Butters ◽  
Howard R. Mellor ◽  
Keishi Narita ◽  
Raymond A. Dwek ◽  
Frances M. Platt

Glycosphingolipid (GSL) lysosomal storage disorders are a small but challenging group of human diseases to treat. Although these disorders appear to be monogenic in origin, where the catalytic activity of enzymes in GSL catabolism is impaired, the clinical presentation and severity of disease are heterogeneous. Present attitudes to treatment demand individual therapeutics designed to match the specific disease–related gene defect; this is an acceptable approach for those diseases with high frequency, but it lacks viability for extremely rare conditions. An alternative therapeutic approach termed ‘substrate deprivation’ or ‘substrate reduction therapy’ (SRT) aims to balance cellular GSL biosynthesis with the impairment in catalytic activity seen in lysosomal storage disorders. The development of N–alkylated iminosugars that have inhibitory activity against the first enzyme in the pathway for glucosylating sphingolipid in eukaryotic cells, ceramide–specific glucosyltransferase, offers a generic therapeutic for the treatment of all glucosphingolipidoses. The successful use of N–alkylated iminosugars to establish SRT as an alternative therapeutic strategy has been demonstrated in in vitro , in vivo and in clinical trials for type 1 Gaucher disease. The implications of these studies and the prospects of improvement to the design of iminosugar compounds for treating Gaucher and other GSL lysosomal storage disorders will be discussed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Preeti Bajaj ◽  
Jyoti Kasture ◽  
Balbir Singh Shah

Gaucher's Disease (GD) is an autosomal recessive systemic lysosomal storage disorder which is characterized by glucocerebroside deposition in cells of the macrophage-monocyte system as a result of a deficiency in lysosomal P-glycosidase (glucocerebrosidase). GD is a rare genetic disorder. It is the most common amongst the lysosomal storage disorders. GD has been categorised into three types based on the presence of central nervous involvement1. Type 1 is a non-neuronopathic form that presents in childhood or early adulthood. Type 2 is acute neuronopathic form that presents in childhood. It progresses rapidly and is fatal. Type 3 is chronic non-neuronopathic form that presents in childhood but is slowly progressive. Here we describe a case of a three and a half year old male child in whom a diagnosis of Gaucher's disease was made based on bone marrow biopsy and later confirmed by glucocerebrosidase levels estimation.


ILAR Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Regan ◽  
Kelly Garcia ◽  
Douglas Thamm

Abstract The role of comparative oncology in translational research is receiving increasing attention from drug developers and the greater biomedical research community. Pet dogs with spontaneous cancer are important and underutilized translational models, owing to dogs’ large size and relative outbreeding, combined with their high incidence of certain tumor histotypes with significant biological, genetic, and histological similarities to their human tumor counterparts. Dogs with spontaneous tumors naturally develop therapy resistance and spontaneous metastasis, all in the context of an intact immune system. These fundamental features of cancer biology are often lacking in induced or genetically engineered preclinical tumor models and likely contribute to their poor predictive value and the associated overall high failure rate in oncology drug development. Thus, the conduct of clinical trials in pet dogs with naturally occurring cancer represents a viable surrogate and valuable intermediary step that should be increasingly incorporated into the cancer drug discovery and development pipeline. The development of molecular-targeted therapies has resulted in an expanded role of the pathologist in human oncology trials, and similarly the expertise of veterinary pathologists will be increasingly valuable to all phases of comparative oncology trial design and conduct. In this review, we provide a framework of clinical, ethical, and pathology-focused considerations for the increasing integration of translational research investigations in dogs with spontaneous cancer as a means to accelerate clinical cancer discovery and drug development.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1465-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Lachmann

There are over 70 human diseases that are caused by defects in various aspects of lysosomal function. Until 20 years ago, the only specific therapy available for lysosomal storage disorders was allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Over the last two decades, there has been remarkable progress and there are now licensed treatments for seven of these diseases. In some cases, a choice of agents is available. For selected enzyme-deficiency disordes, ERT (enzyme-replacement therapy) has proved to be highly effective. In other cases, ERT has been less impressive, and it seems that it is not possible to efficiently deliver recombinant enzyme to all tissues. These difficulties have led to the development of other small-molecule-based therapies, and a drug for SRT (substrate-reduction therapy) is now licensed and potential chaperone molecules for ERT are in the late stages of clinical development. Nonetheless, there is still significant unmet clinical need, particularly when it comes to treating LSDs which affect the brain. LSDs have led the way in the development of treatment for genetic disorders, and it seems likely that there will be further therapeutic innovations in the future.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Scott D Gelfand

In this essay, I suggest that a slightly modified version of Freedman’s formulation of the clinical equipoise requirement is justified. I begin this essay with a brief discussion of the equipoise requirement. In the second and third sections, I discuss several objections to the clinical equipoise requirement as well as two attempts to justify the equipoise requirement. In the fourth section, in order to gain some insight into what it means to say that a physician has an obligation to act in the best interest of her patient, I examine a similar obligation, namely, a parent’s obligation to act in her child’s best interest. I claim that there are several uncontroversial exceptions to this obligation, and these exceptions arise when a parent occupies a role more complex than the role of parent simpliciter. In the fifth section, I explore whether the exceptions to a parent’s obligation to act in her child’s best interest may shed light on some exceptions to a physician–researcher’s obligation to act in the best interest of her patient. These exceptions, I suggest, arise when a physician occupies a role more complex than physician simpliciter, and they ground a permission to conduct randomized clinical trials, even if doing so is not in the best interest of a physician–researcher’s patients. I furthermore claim that these exceptions provide justification for a modified formulation of the clinical equipoise requirement.


2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 449-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes M. F. G. Aerts ◽  
Carla E. M. Hollak ◽  
Rolf G. Boot ◽  
Johanna E. M. Groener ◽  
Mario Maas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document