scholarly journals The status of the species Bacillus aerius. Request for an Opinion

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (Pt_7) ◽  
pp. 2341-2341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Dunlap
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Licheniformis ◽  
Type Strain ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
The Status ◽  
Type Strains ◽  
Rejected Names

During a recent study assessing the diversity of the species Bacillus licheniformis, it became apparent that the type strain of Bacillus aerius was not available from any established culture collection or from the authors who originally described it. Other authors have reported similar findings when trying to obtain the strain (Lai et al., 2014), therefore, this species cannot currently be included in any further scientific studies. It is proposed that, if suitable replacements for type strains are not found or neotype strains are not proposed within two years following the publication of this Request for an Opinion, the Judicial Commission of the International Committee of Systematics of Prokaryotes place the name B. aerius on the list of rejected names.

scholarly journals The status of the species Bacillus aerophilus and Bacillus stratosphericus. Request for an Opinion

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (Pt_3) ◽  
pp. 1101-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Branquinho ◽  
Günter Klein ◽  
Peter Kämpfer ◽  
Luísa V. Peixe
Keyword(s):  
Type Species ◽  
Bacillus Pumilus ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
The Status ◽  
Type Strains ◽  
Rejected Names

During a study assessing the diversity of the Bacillus pumilus group it became apparent that the type strains of both Bacillus aerophilus and Bacillus stratosphericus were not available from any established culture collection, nor from the authors who originally described them. Therefore, type strains of these species cannot be included in any further scientific studies. It is therefore proposed that the Judicial Commission of the International Committee of Systematics of Prokaryotes place the names Bacillus aerophilus and Bacillus stratosphericus on the list of rejected names, if suitable replacements for the type strains are not found or if neotype strains are not proposed within two years following the publication of this Request for an Opinion.

scholarly journals The status of the species Shewanella irciniae Lee et al. 2006. Request for an opinion

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (Pt_8) ◽  
pp. 2774-2774 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Rameshkumar
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Gene Sequence ◽  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Mangrove Ecosystem ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Gene Sequence Analysis ◽  
The Status ◽  
Agricultural Research Service

During a taxonomic study in describing a novel species of the genus Shewanella from a mangrove ecosystem, it was found that the type strain Shewanella irciniae was not available from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM) and the type strain received from the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) culture collection and from the author who described this species were found to be members of the genus Brevibacillus based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Therefore, this species cannot be included in any further scientific studies. It is therefore proposed that the Judicial Commission of the International Committee of Systematics of Prokaryotes place the name Shewanella irciniae on the list of rejected names, if a suitable replacement for the type strain is not found or a neotype strain is not proposed within two years following the publication of this Request for an Opinion.

scholarly journals The status of the species Leifsonia rubra Reddy et al. 2003. Request for an Opinion

2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 1163-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun-Young An ◽  
Akira Yokota
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Analysis ◽  
16S Rrna ◽  
Type Strain ◽  
Gene Sequence ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Rrna Gene Sequence ◽  
Gene Sequence Analysis ◽  
The Status ◽  
Rejected Names

On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, it is ascertained that the type strain of Leifsonia rubra does not exist in any established culture collection or with the authors who described this species. Therefore, it cannot be included in any scientific study. It is proposed that the Judicial Commission place the name Leifsonia rubra on the list of rejected names if a suitable type strain is not found or a neotype is not proposed within two years following the publication of this Request for an Opinion.

scholarly journals The status of the species Hyphomonas rosenbergii Weiner et al. 2000. Request for an Opinion

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (Pt_1) ◽  
pp. 321-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiliang Lai ◽  
Chongping Li ◽  
Zongze Shao
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Type Species ◽  
Gene Sequence ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Gene Sequence Analysis ◽  
The Status ◽  
Rejected Names

On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and several key phenotypic features, it was ascertained that the culture cited as the type strain of the species Hyphomonas rosenbergii , ATCC 43869T, does not conform to the description of the species, [Weiner, R. M., Melick, M., O’Neill, K. & Quintero, E. (2000). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 459–469]. The type strain does not exist in any other established culture collection or with the authors who described this species. Therefore, it cannot be included in any scientific study. It is proposed that the Judicial Commission place the name Hyphomonas rosenbergii on the list of rejected names if a suitable replacement type strain is not found or a neotype is not proposed within two years following the publication of this Request for an Opinion.

scholarly journals The status of the species Lactobacillus rogosae Holdeman and Moore 1974. Request for an Opinion

2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1903-1904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanna E. Felis ◽  
Sandra Torriani ◽  
Franco Dellaglio
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Scientific Study ◽  
The Status ◽  
History Of

A brief history of the species Lactobacillus rogosae is presented. It was ascertained that the type strain and other existing strains are not available in any established culture collection; therefore, they cannot be included in any scientific study. This matter is referred to the Judicial Commission, asking for an Opinion on the status of the species.

scholarly journals Identification of strains Bacillus aerophilus MTCC 7304T as Bacillus altitudinis and Bacillus stratosphericus MTCC 7305T as a Proteus sp. and the status of the species Bacillus aerius Shivaji et al. 2006. Request for an Opinion

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (Pt_9) ◽  
pp. 3228-3231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
N. Ramesh Kumar ◽  
Qiliang Lai ◽  
Juan Du ◽  
Anatoly P. Dobritsa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Sequence ◽  
Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Phenotypic Traits ◽  
Sequence Analyses ◽  
Bacillus Altitudinis ◽  
The Status ◽  
Type Strains ◽  
Respective Species ◽  
Rejected Names

On the basis of 16S rRNA, rpoB, gyrB and pycA gene sequence analyses, characterization of biochemical features and other phenotypic traits and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) fingerprinting, it was ascertained that strains Bacillus aerius MTCC 7303T, Bacillus aerophilus MTCC 7304T and Bacillus stratosphericus MTCC 7305T do not conform to the descriptions of the type strains of the respective species. Strains MTCC 7303T and MTCC 7304T were indistinguishable from Bacillus altitudinis DSM 21631T, while strain MTCC 7305T should be classified as a representative of a Proteus sp. Our attempts to find other deposits of the type strains of these species were unsuccessful. Therefore, the results support the Request for an Opinion on the status of the species Bacillus aerophilus and Bacillus stratosphericus by Branquinho et al. [Branquinho, R., Klein, G., Kämpfer, P. & Peixe, L. V. (2015). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65, 1101]. It is also proposed that the Judicial Commission should place the name Bacillus aerius on the list of rejected names if a suitable replacement type strain cannot be found or a neotype is not proposed within two years following the publication of this Request (Rule 18c).

scholarly journals The status of the species Beijerinckia fluminensis Döbereiner and Ruschel 1958. Request for an Opinion

2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 1757-1759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monike Oggerin ◽  
Víctor Rubio ◽  
Irma Marín ◽  
David R. Arahal
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Previous Article ◽  
Genotypic Differences ◽  
Rhizobium Radiobacter ◽  
Nomenclatural Type ◽  
The Status ◽  
Rejected Names

In a previous article [Oggerin M., Arahal, D. R., Rubio, V. & Marin, I. (2009). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59, 2323–2328], it has been shown that strain Beijerinckia fluminensis UQM 1685T and its derived equivalent B. fluminensis CIP 106281T do not conform to the description of the type strain of Beijerinckia fluminensis Döbereiner and Ruschel 1958. Indeed, both strains were identified as members of the species Rhizobium radiobacter and exhibited marked phenotypic and genotypic differences with members of the genus Beijerinckia. It was concluded that both strains, and any other equivalents derived from them, do not descend from the nomenclatural type. Since then, our attempts to find older deposits of the type strain, hopefully derived from the original isolate, or other existing strains of Beijerinckia fluminensis that could be proposed as a neotype strain, have been in vain. It is therefore proposed that the Judicial Commission should place the name Beijerinckia fluminensis Döbereiner and Ruschel 1958 on the list of rejected names if a suitable replacement type strain or a neotype cannot be found within two years following the publication of this Request (Rule 18c).

scholarly journals The status of the species Lactobacillus fornicalis Dicks et al. 2000. Request for an opinion

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 3953-3954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Gonçalves Ribeiro ◽  
Joana Rocha ◽  
Magdalena Ksiezarek ◽  
Svetlana Ugarcina Perovic ◽  
Filipa Grosso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Lactobacillus Plantarum ◽  
Cell Cultures ◽  
Type Strain ◽  
Type Species ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
The Status ◽  
Online Catalogue

During a recent study on members of the genus Lactobacillus we realized that cultures of Lactobacillus fornicalis TV 1018T (=DSM 13171T=ATCC 700934T) are no longer available from the online catalogue of the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, being displayed as Lactobacillus plantarum at the American Type Culture Collection. Based on data currently available, the organism deposited as ATCC 700934T is a member of the species Lactobacillus plantarum subs. plantarum. Therefore, the type strain of Lactobacillus fornicalis cannot be included in any further scientific comparative study. This matter is referred to the Judicial Commission, asking for an opinion on the status of the species.

scholarly journals The status of the name Lactobacillus rogosae Holdeman and Moore 1974. Opinion 88.Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (Pt_10) ◽  
pp. 3578-3579 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Tindall
Keyword(s):  
Type Strain ◽  
Type Species ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Strain Atcc ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Link Type ◽  
The Status

The Judicial Commission affirms that the combination Lactobacillus rogosae Holdeman and Moore 1974 represented by the type strain ATCC 27753 listed on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names does not appear to be currently represented by an extant type strain. Further work is needed to determine whether a derivative of the original type can be found or whether a neotype can be designated.

Development of mutants of Gliocladium virens tolerant to benomyl

1990 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 484-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. Papavizas ◽  
D. P. Roberts ◽  
K. K. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Source ◽  
Type Strain ◽  
Wild Type Strain ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Sclerotium Rolfsii ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Gliocladium Virens ◽  
Rhizosphere Competence ◽  
Filter Paper Cellulase ◽  
Type Strains

Aqueous suspensions of conidia of Gliocladium virens strains Gl-3 and Gl-21 were exposed to both ultraviolet radiation and ethyl methanesulfonate. Two mutants of Gl-3 and three of Gl-21 were selected for tolerance to benomyl at 10 μg∙mL−1, as indicated by growth and conidial germination on benomyl-amended potato dextrose agar. The mutants differed considerably from their respective wild-type strains in appearance, growth habit, sporulation, carbon-source utilization, and enzyme activity profiles. Of 10 carbon sources tested, cellobiose, xylose, and xylan were the best for growth, galactose and glucose were intermediate, and arabinose, ribose, and rhamnose were poor sources of carbon. The wild-type strains and the mutants did not utilize cellulose as the sole carbon source for growth. Two benomyl-tolerant mutants of Gl-3 produced less cellulase (β-1,4-glucosidase, carboxymethylcellulase, filter-paper cellulase) than Gl-3. In contrast, mutants of Gl-21 produced more cellulase than the wild-type strain. Only Gl-3 provided control of blight on snapbean caused by Sclerotium rolfsii. Wild-type strain Gl-21 and all mutants from both strains were ineffective biocontrol agents. Key words: Gliocladium, benomyl tolerance, Sclerotium, rhizosphere competence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document