scholarly journals Polar-angle representation of saccadic eye movements in human superior colliculus

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricky R Savjani ◽  
Elizabeth Halfen ◽  
Jung Hwan Kim ◽  
David Ress
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Polar Angle ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
List Type ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movement ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Retinotopic Organization

SummaryThe superior colliculus (SC) is a layered midbrain structure involved in directing eye movements and coordinating visual attention. Electrical stimulation and neuronal recordings in the intermediate layers of monkey SC have shown a retinotopic organization for the mediation of saccadic eye-movements. However, in human SC the topography of saccades is unknown. Here, a novel experimental paradigm and highresolution (1.2-mm) functional magnetic resonance imaging methods were used to measure activity evoked by saccadic eye movements within SC. Results provide three critical observations about the topography of the human SC: (1) saccades along the superior-inferior visual axis are mapped across the medial-lateral anatomy of the SC; (2) the saccadic eye-movement representation is in register with the retinotopic organization of visual stimulation; and (3) activity evoked by saccades occurs deeper within SC than that evoked by visual stimulation. These approaches lay the foundation for studying the organization of human subcortical eye-movement mechanisms.HighlightsHigh-resolution functional MRI enabled imaging from intermediate layers of human SCSaccades along superior-inferior visual field are mapped across medial-lateral SCSaccadic eye movement maps lie deeper in SC and are in alignment with retinotopyeTOC BlurbSavjani et al. found the polar angle representation of saccadic eye movements in human SC. The topography is similar in monkey SC, is in register with the retinotopic organization evoked by visual stimulation, but lies within deeper layers. These methods enable investigation of human subcortical eye-movement organization and visual function.

Organization of monkey superior colliculus: intermediate layer cells discharging before eye movements

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 722-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. Mohler ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Intermediate Layer ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Superficial Layer ◽  
Cell Discharge ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Dorsal Edge

1. We investigated the characteristics of cells in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus that increase their rate of discharge before saccadic eye movements. Eye movements were repeatedly elicited by training rhesus monkeys to fixate on a spot of light and to make saccades to other spots of light when the fixation spot was turned off. 2. The eye movement cells showed consistent variations with their depth within the colliculus. The onset of the cell discharge led the eye movement by less time and the duration of the discharge was shorter as the cell was located closer to the dorsal edge of the intermediate layers. The movements fields (that area of the visual field where a saccade into the area is preceded by a burst of cell discharges) of each successive cell also became smaller as the cells were located more dorsally. The profile of peak discharge frequency remained fairly flat throughout the movement field of the cells regardless of depth of the cell within the colliculus. 3. A new type of eye movement-related cell has been found which usually lies at the border between the superficial and intermediate layers. This cell type, the visually triggered movement cell, increased its rate of discharge before saccades made to a visual stimulus but not before spontaneous saccades of equal amplitude made in the light or the dark. A vigorous discharge of these cells before an eye movement was dependent on the presence of a visual target; the cells seemed to combine the visual input of superficial layer cells and the movement-related input of the intermediate layer cells. The size of the movement fields of these cells were about the same size as the visual fields of superficial layer cells just above them...

Use of an extraretinal signal by monkey superior colliculus neurons to distinguish real from self-induced stimulus movement

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 852-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Robinson ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movement ◽  
Background Illumination ◽  
Stimulus Movement ◽  
Stationary Stimulus ◽  
Extraretinal Signal

1. In order to see whether cells in the superficial layers of the monkey superior colliculus can differentiate between real stimulus movement and self-induced stimulus movement we compared the discharge of these cells to stimulus movement in front of the stationary eye with stimulus movement generated by eye movements across a stationary stimulus. 2. Most of the cells recorded (65% of 231 cells) responded to stimulus velocities in front of the stationary eye as fast as those occurring during the peak velocity of a saccadic eye movement. Those cells that do respond usually have weak inhibitory regions and tend to have receptive fields further from fovea. 3. Move (61% of 105 cells) of the cells that did respond to rapid stimulus movement did not respond when an eye movement swept the receptive field over a stationary stimulus. 4. About half of these cells differentiated between these stimulus conditions when we used stimuli at least 1 log unit above background illumination; the remaining cells differentiated for stimuli 2 and 3 log units above background. Many cells differentiated between the two stimulus conditions over a wide range of directions of movement and the effect appears with about equal frequency in receptive fields at all distances from the fovea. 5. The differentiation is present for most cells even when the background illumination is reduced, indicating that visual factors are not the cause of the effect on these cells but may modify the response of other cells. 6. The suppression of background activity accompanying eye movements in the light is present following eye movements made in total darkness; the suppression, therefore, must result from an extraretinal signal. 4. The failure of these cells to respond to visual stimulation during eye movements is due to the same extraretinal signal that produces the suppression since a) the cells that show this suppression tend to be those that fail to respond to stimuli during eye movements, b) the time course of the suppression matches the time at which the effects of visual stimulation during an eye movement would reach the colliculus, and c) the cells which differentiate also show a decreased responsiveness to visual stimulation during the time of background suppression. While this extraretinal signal has the characteristics one would expect of a corollary discharge, proprioception as a source of the signal cannot be excluded. 8. Cells which differentiate between the two stimulus conditions usually also show an enhanced response to a visual stimulus in their receptive field when it is to be the target for a saccadic eye movement. These cells in the superior colliculus receive an extraretinal input which permits them to differentiate betweent real stimulus movements and stimulus movements resulting from the monkey's own eye movements. This differentiation would provide an uncontaminated visual movement signal and facilitate the detection of real movement in the environment...

Phantom array and stroboscopic effects of a time-modulated moving light source during saccadic eye movement

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 772-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
C-S Lee ◽  
J-H Lee ◽  
H Pak ◽  
SW Park ◽  
D-W Song
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Light Source ◽  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Movement Speed ◽  
Light Sources ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movement ◽  
Modulated Light ◽  
Source Motion

This paper evaluates the detectability of the phantom array and stroboscopic effects during light source motion, eye movement and their combination, using time modulated light-emitting diode light sources. It is well known that the phantom array can be observed when time-modulated light sources are observed during saccadic eye movements. We investigated whether light source motion can cause similar effects when the subject has fixed eyes. In addition, we estimated the detectability threshold frequency for the combination of stroboscopic effect and the phantom array, which is named the stroboscopic-phantom array effect, during two eye movements in opposite directions under one directional rotating light source with variable speed. Our results indicate that one of the most important factors for the stroboscopic-phantom array effect is eye movement speed relative to the speed of the light source. Therefore, time-modulated moving light sources induce a stroboscopic effect in subjects with fixed eyes that is similar to the stroboscopic-phantom array effect observed during saccadic eye movement. Our findings are likely to be useful for predicting the stroboscopic effect and the stroboscopic-phantom array effect during the fast motion of time-modulated LED light sources, like multi-functional rear lamps, in automotive lighting applications.

Visual Fatigue and Saccadic Eye Movement Parameters

1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 728-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Megaw ◽  
Tayyar Sen
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Cognitive Task ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Tracking Task ◽  
Frequency Of Occurrence ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movement ◽  
Visual Fatigue ◽  
Movement Parameters

It has been suggested by Bahill and Stark (1975) that visual fatigue can be identified by changes in some of the saccadic eye movement parameters. These include increases in the frequency of occurrence of glissades and overlapping saccades and reductions in the peak velocity and duration of saccades. In their study, fatigue was induced by the same step tracking task that was used to evaluate the changes in saccadic parameters. However, there is evidence that subjects experience extreme feelings of fatigue while performing such a task and that somehow the task is unnatural. The present study was designed to assess whether there are any differences in the various saccadic parameters obtained while subjects perform a step tracking task and a cognitive task involving the comparison of number strings. Both tasks were presented on a VDU screen. The second objective was to establish whether there are any changes in the parameters for either task as a result of prolonged performance. The results showed no major differences in the saccadic eye movements between the two tasks and no consistent changes resulting from prolonged performance.

scholarly journals Saccadic Eye Movements as a Marker of Mental Disorders

2016 ◽  
pp. S365-S371 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. JAGLA
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Motor Program ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movement ◽  
Analytical Processing ◽  
Short Comment ◽  
The Brain

It is accepted that the formulation of the motor program in the brain is not only the perceptual and motor function but also the cognitive one. Therefore it is not surprising that the execution of saccadic eye movements can by substantially affected be the on-going mental activity of a given person. Not only the distribution of attention, but also the focusing the attention may influence the main gain of saccades, their accuracy. Patients suffering from mental disorders have strongly engaged their attention focused at their mental processes. The nature of their problems may be linked to perceptual and/or analytical processing. Such so-called mental set may significantly affect their oculomotor activity in the course of their saccadic eye movement examinations. This short comment points out not only to the influence of the contextually guided and generated saccadic eye movements upon their accuracy but also to the distribution and focusing the attention. The effect of the functional brain asymmetry upon the visually generated saccades and the possible effect of biologically active substances upon the voluntary generated saccades are briefly mentioned. All these influences should be taken into account when planning the saccadic eye movement task. It may be concluded that the repetition of the same oculomotor task in a given person has to be introduced. This may help to follow the effect of complex therapy namely.

Use of interrupted saccade paradigm to study spatial and temporal dynamics of saccadic burst cells in superior colliculus in monkey

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 2754-2770 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Keller ◽  
J. A. Edelman
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Motor Error

1. We recorded the spatial and temporal dynamics of saccade-related burst neurons (SRBNs) found in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC) in the alert, behaving monkey. These burst cells are normally the first neurons recorded during radially directed microelectrode penetrations of the SC after the electrode has left the more dorsally situated visual layers. They have spatially delimited movement fields whose centers describe the well-studied motor map of the SC. They have a rather sharp, saccade-locked burst of activity that peaks just before saccade onset and then declines steeply during the saccade. Many of these cells, when recorded during saccade trials, also have an early, transient visual response and an irregular prelude of presaccadic activity. 2. Because saccadic eye movements normally have very stereotyped durations and velocity trajectories that vary systematically with saccade size, it has been difficult in the past to establish quantitatively whether the activity of SRBNs temporally codes dynamic saccadic control signals, e.g., dynamic motor error or eye velocity, where dynamic motor error is defined as a signal proportional to the instantaneous difference between desired final eye position and the actual eye position during a saccade. It has also not been unequivocally established whether SRBNs participate in an organized spatial shift of ensemble activity in the intermediate layers of the SC during saccadic eye movements. 3. To address these issues, we studied the activity of SRBNs using an interrupted saccade paradigm. Saccades were interrupted with pulsatile electrical stimulation through a microelectrode implanted in the omnipauser region of the brain stem while recordings were made simultaneously from single SRBNs in the SC. 4. Shortly after the beginning of the stimulation (which was electronically triggered at saccade onset), the eyes decelerated rapidly and stopped completely. When the high-frequency (typically 300-400 pulses per second) stimulation was terminated (average duration 12 ms), the eye movement was reinitiated and a resumed saccade was made accurately to the location of the target. 5. When we recorded from SRBNs in the more caudal colliculus, which were active for large saccades, cell discharge was powerfully and rapidly suppressed by the stimulation (average latency = 3.8 ms). Activity in the same cells started again just before the onset of the resumed saccade and continued during this saccade even though it has a much smaller amplitude than would normally be associated with significant discharge for caudal SC cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Modulation of Presaccadic Activity in the Frontal Eye Field by the Superior Colliculus

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 2934-2942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Berman ◽  
Wilsaan M. Joiner ◽  
James Cavanaugh ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Cortex ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movement ◽  
Reversible Inactivation ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Neuronal Processing

A cascade of neuronal signals precedes each saccadic eye movement to targets in the visual scene. In the cerebral cortex, this neuronal processing culminates in the frontal eye field (FEF), where neurons have bursts of activity before the saccade. This presaccadic activity is typically considered to drive downstream activity in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC), which receives direct projections from FEF. Consequently, the FEF activity is thought to be determined solely by earlier cortical processing and unaffected by activity in the SC. Recent evidence of an ascending path from the SC to FEF raises the possibility, however, that presaccadic activity in the FEF may also depend on input from the SC. Here we tested this possibility by recording from single FEF neurons during the reversible inactivation of SC. Our results indicate that presaccadic activity in the FEF does not require SC input: we never observed a significant reduction in FEF presaccadic activity when the SC was inactivated. Unexpectedly, in a third of experiments, SC inactivation elicited a significant increase in FEF presaccadic activity. The passive visual response of FEF neurons, in contrast, was virtually unaffected by inactivation of the SC. These findings show that presaccadic activity in the FEF does not originate in the SC but nevertheless may be influenced by modulatory signals ascending from the SC.

Neurons in the monkey superior colliculus predict the visual result of impending saccadic eye movements

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1988-2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Walker ◽  
E. J. Fitzgibbon ◽  
M. E. Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Superficial Layer ◽  
Saccade Target ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Movement Field

1. Previous experiments have shown that visual neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) respond predictively to stimuli outside their classical receptive fields when an impending saccade will bring those stimuli into their receptive fields. Because LIP projects strongly to the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus, we sought to demonstrate similar predictive responses in the monkey colliculus. 2. We studied the behavior of 90 visually responsive neurons in the superficial and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus of two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) when visual stimuli or the locations of remembered stimuli were brought into their receptive fields by a saccade. 3. Thirty percent (18/60) of intermediate layer visuomovement cells responded predictively before a saccade outside the movement field of the neuron when that saccade would bring the location of a stimulus into the receptive field. Each of these neurons did not respond to the stimulus unless an eye movement brought it into its receptive field, nor did it discharge in association with the eye movement unless it brought a stimulus into its receptive field. 4. These neurons were located in the deeper parts of the intermediate layers and had relatively larger receptive fields and movement fields than the cells at the top of the intermediate layers. 5. The predictive responses of most of these neurons (16/18, 89%) did not require that the stimulus be relevant to the monkey's rewarded behavior. However, for some neurons the predictive response was enhanced when the stimulus was the target of a subsequent saccade into the neuron's movement field. 6. Most neurons with predictive responses responded with a similar magnitude and latency to a continuous stimulus that remained on after the saccade, and to the same stimulus when it was only flashed for 50 ms coincident with the onset of the saccade target and thus never appeared within the cell's classical receptive field. 7. The visual response of neurons in the intermediate layers of the colliculus is suppressed during the saccade itself. Neurons that showed predictive responses began to discharge before the saccade, were suppressed during the saccade, and usually resumed discharging after the saccade. 8. Three neurons in the intermediate layers responded tonically from stimulus appearance to saccade without a presaccadic burst. These neurons responded predictively to a stimulus that was going to be the target for a second saccade, but not to an irrelevant flashed stimulus. 9. No superficial layer neuron (0/27) responded predictively when a stimulus would not be brought into their receptive fields by a saccade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Polar-angle representation of saccadic eye movements in human superior colliculus

NeuroImage ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 199-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricky R. Savjani ◽  
Sucharit Katyal ◽  
Elizabeth Halfen ◽  
Jung Hwan Kim ◽  
David Ress
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Polar Angle ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements

Lateral Inhibitory Interactions in the Intermediate Layers of the Monkey Superior Colliculus

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 1193-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas P. Munoz ◽  
Peter J. Istvan
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Action Potentials ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Fixation ◽  
Inhibitory Interneurons ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Inhibitory Interactions ◽  
Stimulation Of

Munoz, Douglas P. and Peter J. Istvan. Lateral inhibitory interactions in the intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1193–1209, 1998. The intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus (SC) contain neurons the discharges of which are modulated by visual fixation and saccadic eye movements. Fixation neurons, located in the rostral pole of the SC, discharge action potentials tonically during visual fixation and pause for most saccades. Saccade neurons, located throughout the remainder of the intermediate layers of the SC, discharge action potentials for saccades to a restricted region of the visual field. We defined the fixation zone as that region of the rostral SC containing fixation neurons and the saccade zone as the remainder of the SC. It recently has been hypothesized that a network of local inhibitory interneurons may help shape the reciprocal discharge pattern of fixation and saccade neurons. To test this hypothesis, we combined extracellular recording and microstimulation techniques in awake monkeys trained to perform oculomotor paradigms that enabled us to classify collicular fixation and saccade neurons. Microstimulation was used to electrically activate the fixation and saccade zones of the ipsilateral and contralateral SC to test for inhibitory and excitatory inputs onto fixation and saccade neurons. Saccade neurons were inhibited at short latencies following electrical stimulation of either the ipsilateral (1–5 ms) or contralateral (2–7 ms) fixation or saccade zones. Fixation neurons were inhibited 1–4 ms after electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral saccade zone. Stimulation of the contralateral saccade zone led to much weaker inhibition of fixation neurons. Stimulation of the contralateral fixation zone led to short-latency (1–2 ms) excitation of fixation neurons. Only a small percentage of saccade and fixation neurons were activated by the electrical stimulation (latency: 0.5–2.0 ms). These responses were confirmed as either orthodromic or antidromic responses using collision testing. The results suggest that a local network of inhibitory interneurons may help shape not only the reciprocal discharge pattern of fixation and saccade neurons but also permit lateral interactions between all regions of the ipsilateral and contralateral SC. These interactions therefore may be critical for maintaining stable visual fixation, suppressing unwanted saccades, and initiating saccadic eye movements to targets of interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document