scholarly journals Yeast Securin is trafficked through the endomembrane system to regulate cell cycle arrest during the DNA damage response

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda R. Lemos ◽  
David P. Waterman ◽  
James E. Haber

AbstractThe yeast securin protein, Pds1, belongs to a class of highly conserved eukaryotic proteins that regulate the timing of chromatid segregation during mitosis by inhibiting separase, Esp1. During the metaphase to anaphase transition Pds1 is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the nucleus, unleashing Esp1’s protease activity to cleave cohesin surrounding sister chromatids. In response to DNA damage Pds1 is phosphorylated and stabilized, stalling mitotic progression to preserve genomic integrity. In addition, during the DNA damage checkpoint response, securin and separase are partially localized in the vacuole. Here we genetically dissect the requirements for securin’s vacuolar localization and find that it is dependent on the Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) endosomal transport pathway but not autophagy. Blocking retrograde traffic between the Golgi and the endoplasmic reticulum, by inhibiting COPI vesicle transport, drives Pds1 into the vacuole, whereas inhibiting antegrade transport by disrupting COPII-mediated traffic, results in the unexpected loss of Pds1 and the extinction of DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest. We report that the induction of ER stress, either genetically or by treating cells with dithiothreitol, is sufficient to extinguish the DNA damage checkpoint, suggesting crosstalk between these two pathways. These data highlight new ways in which Pds1 and Esp1 are regulated during a DNA damage induced G2/M arrest and its requirement in the maintenance of the DNA damage checkpoint response.

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimi Arima ◽  
Toru Hirota ◽  
Christian Bronner ◽  
Marc Mousli ◽  
Toshiyoshi Fujiwara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongwoon Jung ◽  
Pavel Kraikivski

AbstractCancer and normal cells can respond differently to the same stressful conditions. Their dynamic responses under normal and stressful conditions are governed by complex molecular regulatory networks. We developed a computational model of G2-M DNA damage checkpoint regulation to study normal and cancer cell cycle progression under normal and stressful conditions. Our model is successful in explaining cancer cell cycle arrest in conditions when some cell cycle and DNA damage checkpoint regulators are inhibited, whereas the same conditions only delay entry into mitosis in normal cells. We use the model to explain known phenotypes of gene deletion mutants and predict phenotypes of yet uncharacterized mutants in normal and cancer cells. We also use sensitive analyses to identify the ranges of model parameter values that lead to the cell cycle arrest in cancer cells. Our results can be used to predict the effect of a potential treatment on cell cycle progression of normal and cancer cells.


2000 ◽  
Vol 276 (7) ◽  
pp. 5296-5302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ximena Cortes-Bratti ◽  
Christina Karlsson ◽  
Teresa Lagergård ◽  
Monica Thelestam ◽  
Teresa Frisan

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1453
Author(s):  
Haoran Wang ◽  
Jianhua Wei ◽  
Hong Jiang ◽  
Ye Zhang ◽  
Caina Jiang ◽  
...  

The use of cisplatin is severely limited by its toxic side-effects, which has spurred chemists to employ different strategies in the development of new metal-based anticancer agents. Here, three novel dehydroabietyl piperazine dithiocarbamate ruthenium (II) polypyridyl complexes (6a–6c) were synthesized as antitumor agents. Compounds 6a and 6c exhibited better in vitro antiproliferative activity against seven tumor cell lines than cisplatin, they displayed no evident resistance in the cisplatin-resistant cell line A549/DPP. Importantly, 6a effectively inhibited tumor growth in the T-24 xenograft mouse model in comparison with cisplatin. Gel electrophoresis assay indicated that DNA was the potential targets of 6a and 6c, and the upregulation of p-H2AX confirmed this result. Cell cycle arrest studies demonstrated that 6a and 6c arrested the cell cycle at G1 phase, accompanied by the upregulation of the expression levels of the antioncogene p27 and the down-regulation of the expression levels of cyclin E. In addition, 6a and 6c caused the apoptosis of tumor cells along with the upregulation of the expression of Bax, caspase-9, cytochrome c, intracellular Ca2+ release, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and the downregulation of Bcl-2. These mechanistic study results suggested that 6a and 6c exerted their antitumor activity by inducing DNA damage, and consequently causing G1 stage arrest and the induction of apoptosis.


2002 ◽  
Vol 277 (23) ◽  
pp. 21110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damu Tang ◽  
Dongcheng Wu ◽  
Atsushi Hirao ◽  
Jill M. Lahti ◽  
Lieqi Liu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S346
Author(s):  
Md Mohiuddin ◽  
Hideharu Kimura ◽  
Takashi Sone ◽  
Hiroki Matsuoka ◽  
Keigo Saeki ◽  
...  

Molecules ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 7241-7254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-Iong Yang ◽  
Chi-Chen Yeh ◽  
Jin-Ching Lee ◽  
Szu-Cheng Yi ◽  
Hurng-Wern Huang ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 109805
Author(s):  
Xin-ge Ke ◽  
Yi-yi Xiong ◽  
Bing Yu ◽  
Chong Yuan ◽  
Peng-yu Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document