scholarly journals Stress fibers are embedded in a contractile cortical network

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothée Vignaud ◽  
Calina Copos ◽  
Christophe Leterrier ◽  
Qingzong Tseng ◽  
Laurent Blanchoin ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTContractile actomyosin networks generate intracellular forces essential for the regulation of cell shape, migration, and cell-fate decisions, ultimately leading to the remodeling and patterning of tissues. Although actin filaments aligned in bundles represent the main source of traction-force production in adherent cells, there is increasing evidence that these bundles form interconnected and interconvertible structures with the rest of the intracellular actin network. In this study, we explored how these bundles are connected to the surrounding cortical network and the mechanical impact of these interconnected structures on the production and distribution of traction forces on the extracellular matrix and throughout the cell. By using a combination of hydrogel micropatterning, traction-force microscopy and laser photoablation, we measured the relaxation of the cellular traction field in response to local photoablations at various positions within the cell. Our experimental results and modeling of the mechanical response of the network revealed that bundles were fully embedded along their entire length in a continuous and contractile network of cortical filaments. Moreover, the propagation of the contraction of these bundles throughout the entire cell was dependent on this embedding. In addition, these bundles appeared to originate from the alignment and coalescence of thin and unattached cortical actin filaments from the surrounding mesh.

1990 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 1949-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
S R Heidemann ◽  
P Lamoureux ◽  
R E Buxbaum

The growth cone must push its substrate rearward via some traction force in order to propel itself forward. To determine which growth cone behaviors produce traction force, we observed chick sensory growth cones under conditions in which force production was accommodated by movement of obstacles in the environment, namely, neurites of other sensory neurons or glass fibers. The movements of these obstacles occurred via three, different, stereotyped growth cone behaviors: (a) filopodial contractions, (b) smooth rearward movement on the dorsal surface of the growth cone, and (c) interactions with ruffling lamellipodia. More than 70% of the obstacle movements were caused by filopodial contractions in which the obstacle attached at the extreme distal end of a filopodium and moved only as the filopodium changed its extension. Filopodial contractions were characterized by frequent changes of obstacle velocity and direction. Contraction of a single filopodium is estimated to exert 50-90 microdyn of force, which can account for the pull exerted by chick sensory growth cones. Importantly, all five cases of growth cones growing over the top of obstacle neurites (i.e., geometry that mimics the usual growth cone/substrate interaction), were of the filopodial contraction type. Some 25% of obstacle movements occurred by a smooth backward movement along the top surface of growth cones. Both the appearance and rate of movements were similar to that reported for retrograde flow of cortical actin near the dorsal growth cone surface. Although these retrograde flow movements also exerted enough force to account for growth cone pulling, we did not observe such movements on ventral growth cone surfaces. Occasionally obstacles were moved by interaction with ruffling lamellipodia. However, we obtained no evidence for attachment of the obstacles to ruffling lamellipodia or for directed obstacle movements by this mechanism. These data suggest that chick sensory growth cones move forward by contractile activity of filopodia, i.e., isometric contraction on a rigid substrate. Our data argue against retrograde flow of actin producing traction force.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document