scholarly journals Comparison of videolaryngoscope & direct laryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: A Bayesian meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Souvik Maitra ◽  
Anirban Som ◽  
Sulagna Bhattacharjee
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Model ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Credible Interval ◽  
Video Laryngoscope ◽  
Bayesian Methodology ◽  
Direct Laryngoscope ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Intubation Success ◽  
Intubation Success Rate

AbstractPurposeTo identify the benefit of video laryngoscope (VL) over direct laryngoscope (DL) for intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU)Material & MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing VL with DL for intubation in ICU by was conducted in conventional frequentist methodology and also incorporated of the previous evidences from observational studies in Bayesian methodology.ResultsData of 1464 patients from six RCTs have been included in this meta-analysis. In conventional meta-analysis of RCTs, first attempt intubation success rate was similar between VL and DL group [p=0.39]. Rate of esophageal intubation was significantly less with VL [p=0.03] and glottic visualization was significantly improved with VL in comparison to DL [p=0.009]. Time to intubation was similar in both the group [p=0.48]. When evidences from a meta-analysis of observational studies incorporated in Bayesian model, first attempt intubation success is significantly higher with VL [posterior median log OR (95% credible interval) 0.50 (0.06, 1.00)].ConclusionEvidences from both observational studies and RCTs synthesized in Bayesian methodology suggest that use of VL for endotracheal intubation in critically patients may be associated with higher first intubation success when compared to DL.

scholarly journals Strategies for Preventing Endoscopic Recurrence of Crohn’s Disease 1 Year after Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-shan Feng ◽  
Jin-yu Li ◽  
Xiu-yan Chen ◽  
Zheng Yang ◽  
Shang-hai Li
Keyword(s):  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Credible Interval ◽  
Ileal Resection ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Endoscopic Recurrence ◽  
Central Database ◽  
Lactobacillus Gg

Objective. To assess the benefits of different treatments that aim to prevent the endoscopic recurrence of Crohn’s disease (CD) after ileal resection. Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Database. All the included RCTs with an endoscopic recurrence outcome which was defined as Rutgeerts’ score ≥ i2 have a duration of more than 1 year. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Pairwise treatment effects were estimated through a Bayesian random effects network meta-analysis by using the OpenBUGS 1.4 software and reported as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% credible interval (CI). Results. Fourteen RCTs (877 participants) were included. Two strategies were superior to placebo for preventing endoscopic recurrence of CD at 1 year after surgery: infliximab (d, −5.475; 95% CI, −10.47 to –1.632) and adalimumab (d, −7.273; 95% CI, −13.84 to −2.585). Nine strategies were not effective: budesnoid, mesalazine (in both high and low dose), azathioprine, Tripterygium wilfordii, mesalazine + infliximab, ornidazole, untreated intervention, and Lactobacillus GG. Conclusions. Except for infliximab and adalimumab, other strategies included in our analysis were not effective for preventing endoscopic recurrence of CD at 1 year after ileal resection.

scholarly journals SGLT2 inhibitors and the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis among adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Colacci ◽  
John Fralick ◽  
Ayodele Odutayo ◽  
Michael Fralick
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitor ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitors ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Absolute Rate ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Importance: The risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors is unclear. Objective: To examine the risk of DKA with SGLT2 inhibitors in both observational studies and large clinical trials. Data Sources: Searches of PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL (inception to 15 April 2019) without language restrictions; conference proceedings; and reference lists. Study Selection: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that quantified the rate of diabetic ketoacidosis with an SGLT2 inhibitor in comparison to another diabetes medication or placebo. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two independent investigators abstracted study data and assessed the quality of evidence. Data were pooled using random effects models with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method. Main Outcome and Measures: Absolute event rates and hazard ratios for diabetic ketoacidosis were extracted from each study. Results: Seven randomized trials encompassing 42,375 participants and five cohort studies encompassing 318,636 participants were selected. Among the 7 randomized controlled trials, the absolute rate of DKA among patients randomized to an SGLT2 inhibitor ranged from 0.6 to 2.2 events per 1000 person years. Four randomized trials were included in the meta-analysis, and compared to placebo or comparator medication, SGLT2 inhibitors had a 2.4-fold higher risk of DKA (Relative Risk [RR] = 2.46 [95% CI, 1.16-5.21]; I2 = 0%; P = 0.54). Among the 5 observational studies, the absolute rate of DKA associated with SGLT2 inhibitor use ranged from 0.6 to 4.9 per 1000 person years and a 1.7-fold higher rate of DKA compared to another diabetes medication (RR = 1.74 [95% CI, 1.01-2.93]; I2 = 45%; P = 0.12). Conclusions and Relevance: In adults with type 2 diabetes, SGLT2 inhibitors increase the risk of DKA in both observational studies and large randomized clinical trials. Registration: CRD42019146855 Funding Source: None

scholarly journals Drug-Eluting Balloons versus Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Treating In-Stent Restenosis in Coronary Heart Disease after PCI: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Juan Xiu ◽  
Hai-Tao Yang ◽  
Ying-Ying Zheng ◽  
Yi-Tong Ma ◽  
Xiang Xie
Keyword(s):  
Observational Studies ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Drug Eluting Stents ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
In Stent Restenosis

Background. In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a common problem following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the best treatment strategy remains uncertain. There is some controversy over the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) for treating ISR. Methods. A meta-analysis was used to compare the efficacy of the DEB and second-generation DES in the treatment of ISR. The primary endpoint is the incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoint is the occurrence of target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause death (ACM), cardiac death (CD), major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), minimum luminal diameter (MLD), late luminal loss (LLL), binary restenosis (BR), and percent diameter stenosis (DS%). Results. A total of 12 studies (4 randomized controlled trials and 8 observational studies) including 2020 patients with a follow-up of 6–25 months were included in the present study. There was a significant difference in the MLD between the two groups during follow-up (P=0.007, RR = 0.23, and 95% CI: 0.06–0.4 mm). There was no significant difference in LLL, BR, or DS% and the overall incidence of MACEs between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of primary and secondary endpoints when considering RCTs or observational studies only. Conclusions. The efficacy of the DEB and second-generation DES in the treatment of ISR is comparable. However, our results need further verification through multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Optimal initial antibiotic regimen for the treatment of acute appendicitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with surgical intervention as the common comparator

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Hung Wang ◽  
Chi-Chun Yang ◽  
Wan-Ting Hsu ◽  
Frank Qian ◽  
Julia Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Credible Interval ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Antibiotic Regimen ◽  
Paediatric Patients ◽  
Inhibitor Combination ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor

Abstract Background The optimal antibiotic regimen for the medical management of acute appendicitis remains unknown due to a lack of head-to-head comparisons between different antibiotic regimens. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from their inception through to August 2020. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing antibiotic therapy and appendectomy as the initial treatment for adult or paediatric patients with acute appendicitis. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to obtain the indirect comparison results between different antibiotic regimens by employing the group managed by surgery as a common comparator. Antibiotic regimens were classified into three categories: those including a carbapenem; those including a cephalosporin; and those including a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. Results A total of 9 RCTs (adults, n = 8; paediatrics, n = 1) and 12 observational studies (adults, n = 3; paediatrics, n = 9) were included in the NMA, with a total of 4551 patients. The most commonly administered regimen was a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination (9/21; 43%), followed by a cephalosporin (7/21; 33%) or a carbapenem (5/21; 24%). The NMA indicated that surgery significantly increased 1 year treatment success, compared with cephalosporins [OR: 16.79; 95% credible interval: 3.8–127.64] or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (OR: 19.99; 95% credible interval: 4.87–187.57), but not carbapenems (OR: 3.50, 95% credible interval: 0.55–38.63). In contrast, carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment-related complications compared with surgery (OR: 0.12; 95% credible interval: 0.01–0.85). Conclusions Carbapenems might be recommended as the initial antibiotic regimen for the non-operative management of adult patients with acute appendicitis. Nevertheless, due to the imprecise estimates in our NMA, additional RCTs are needed to corroborate these findings, especially for paediatric patients.

Mechanical Thromboprophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 402-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Limpus ◽  
Wendy Chaboyer ◽  
Ellen McDonald ◽  
Lukman Thalib
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Intensive Care Patients ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Confounding Variables

• Objective To systematically review the randomized trials, observational studies, and survey evidence on compression and pneumatic devices for thromboprophylaxis in intensive care patients. • Methods Published studies on the use of compression and pneumatic devices in intensive care patients were assessed. A meta-analysis was conducted by using the randomized controlled trials. • Results A total of 21 relevant studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 13 observational studies, and 3 surveys) were found. A total of 811 patients were randomized in the 5 randomized controlled trials; 3421 patients participated in the observational studies. Trauma patients only were enrolled in 4 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies. Meta-analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials with similar populations and outcomes revealed that use of compression and pneumatic devices did not reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism. The pooled risk ratio was 2.37, indicative of favoring the control over the intervention in reducing the deep venous thrombosis; however, the 95% CI of 0.57 to 9.90 indicated no significant differences between the intervention and the control. A range of methodological issues, including bias and confounding variables, make meaningful interpretation of the observational studies difficult. • Conclusions The limited evidence suggests that use of compressive and pneumatic devices yields results not significantly different from results obtained with no treatment or use of low-molecular-weight heparin. Until large randomized controlled trials are conducted, the role of mechanical approaches to thromboprophylaxis for intensive care patients remains uncertain.

Pro: Vascular access surveillance in mature fistulas: is it worthwhile?

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1102-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Tessitore ◽  
Albino Poli
Keyword(s):  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Regular Screening ◽  
Fold Reduction ◽  
Screening Strategies ◽  
Stenosis Detection ◽  
Loss Rates

Abstract Guidelines recommend regular screening of mature arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for preemptive repair of significant stenosis (≥50% lumen reduction) at high risk of thrombosis, identifiable from clinical signs of access dysfunction (monitoring) or by measuring access blood flow (Qa surveillance), which also enables stenosis detection in functional accesses. To compare the value of Qa surveillance versus monitoring, a meta-analysis was performed on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the two screening strategies. It emerged that correcting stenosis identified by Qa surveillance significantly halved the risk of thrombosis [relative risk (RR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35–0.73] and access loss (RR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.28–0.80) in comparison with intervention prompted by clinical signs of access dysfunction. One small RCT aiming to identify an optimal Qa threshold showed that stenosis repair at Qa >500 mL/min produced a significant 3-fold reduction in the risk of thrombosis (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.12–0.97) and access loss (RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.09–0.99) in comparison with intervening when Qa dropped to <400 mL/min as per guidelines. To test the real-world benefits of Qa surveillance, the expected RCT-based thrombosis and access loss rates with Qa surveillance were compared with the rates with monitoring reported in observational studies: the expected thrombosis and access loss rates with surveillance were only lower than with monitoring when a Qa >500 mL/min was considered (2.4, 95% CI 1.0–4.6 and 2.2, 95% CI 0.7–5.0 versus 9.4, 95% CI 7.4–11.3 and 10.3, 95% CI 7.7–13.4 events per 100 AVFs-year, P ≤ 0.024), suggesting that in clinical practice adopting Qa surveillance may only be worthwhile at centres with high thrombosis and access loss rates associated with monitoring, and adopting Qa thresholds >500 mL/min for elective stenosis repair.

Hypertonic saline for treating raised intracranial pressure: literature review with meta-analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin M. Mortazavi ◽  
Andrew K. Romeo ◽  
Aman Deep ◽  
Christoph J. Griessenauer ◽  
Mohammadali M. Shoja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Hypertonic Saline ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Effective Agent ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Retrospective Comparison ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Pubmed Search

Object Currently, mannitol is the recommended first choice for a hyperosmolar agent for use in patients with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Some authors have argued that hypertonic saline (HTS) might be a more effective agent; however, there is no consensus as to appropriate indications for use, the best concentration, and the best method of delivery. To answer these questions better, the authors performed a review of the literature regarding the use of HTS for ICP reduction. Methods A PubMed search was performed to locate all papers pertaining to HTS use. This search was then narrowed to locate only those clinical studies relating to the use of HTS for ICP reduction. Results A total of 36 articles were selected for review. Ten were prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was prospective and nonrandomized, 15 were prospective observational trials, and 10 were retrospective trials. The authors did not distinguish between retrospective observational studies and retrospective comparison trials. Prospective studies were considered observational if the effects of a treatment were evaluated over time but not compared with another treatment. Conclusions The available data are limited by low patient numbers, limited RCTs, and inconsistent methods between studies. However, a greater part of the data suggest that HTS given as either a bolus or continuous infusion can be more effective than mannitol in reducing episodes of elevated ICP. A meta-analysis of 8 prospective RCTs showed a higher rate of treatment failure or insufficiency with mannitol or normal saline versus HTS.

Changing evidence over time: updated meta-analysis regarding anti-TNF efficacy in childhood chronic uveitis

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Maccora ◽  
Eleonora Fusco ◽  
Edoardo Marrani ◽  
Athimalaipet V Ramanan ◽  
Gabriele Simonini
Keyword(s):  
Observational Studies ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Systemic Steroid ◽  
Biologic Treatment ◽  
Chronic Uveitis ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Objective To summarize evidence regarding efficacy of anti-TNFα in childhood chronic uveitis, refractory to common DMARDs. Methods An updated systematic search was conducted between November 2012 and January 2020. Studies investigating the efficacy of anti-TNFα therapy, in children of ages &lt;16 years, as the first biologic treatment for childhood chronic uveitis, refractory to topical and/or systemic steroid and at least one DMARD were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome measure was the improvement of intraocular inflammation according to Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group criteria. A combined estimate of the proportion of children responding to etanercept (ETA), infliximab (INF), and adalimumab (ADA) was determined. Results We identified 1677 articles of which 37 articles were eligible. Three were randomized controlled trials, one on ETA and two on ADA, and were excluded from pooled analysis. From the observational studies, a total of 487 children were identified: 226 received ADA, 213 INF and 48 ETA. The proportion of responding children was 86% (95% CI: 76%, 95%) for ADA, 68% (95% CI: 50%, 85%) for INF and 36% (95% CI: 9%, 67%) for ETA. Pooled analysis showed clear differences (χ2 = 32.2, P &lt; 0.0001): ADA and INF were both significantly superior to ETA (χ2 = 26.8, P &lt; 0.0001, and χ2 = 7.41, P &lt; 0.006, respectively), ADA significantly superior to INF (χ2 = 13.4, P &lt; 0.0002). Conclusion This meta-analysis, consistent with recent randomized controlled trial data, suggests the efficacy of ADA and INF in childhood chronic uveitis treatment. However, ADA results were superior to those of INF in this clinical setting.

Dietary saturated fat and heart disease: a narrative review

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffery L Heileson
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Saturated Fat ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disease Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract The American Heart Association (AHA) recently published a meta-analysis that confirmed their 60-year-old recommendation to limit saturated fat (SFA, saturated fatty acid) and replace it with polyunsaturated fat to reduce the risk of heart disease based on the strength of 4 Core Trials. To assess the evidence for this recommendation, meta-analyses on the effect of SFA consumption on heart disease outcomes were reviewed. Nineteen meta-analyses addressing this topic were identified: 9 observational studies and 10 randomized controlled trials. Meta-analyses of observational studies found no association between SFA intake and heart disease, while meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials were inconsistent but tended to show a lack of an association. The inconsistency seems to have been mediated by the differing clinical trials included. For example, the AHA meta-analysis only included 4 trials (the Core Trials), and those trials contained design and methodological flaws and did not meet all the predefined inclusion criteria. The AHA stance regarding the strength of the evidence for the recommendation to limit SFAs for heart disease prevention may be overstated and in need of reevaluation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document