scholarly journals Diagnostic value of self-report compared with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in screening of depression

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehran zarghami ◽  
Fatemeh Taghizadeh ◽  
Mahmood mousazadeh
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Beck Depression Inventory ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Total Population ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Case Group ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

AbstractBackgroundDepression is a common cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. To detect depression, we compared Beck Depression Inventory scoring as a valid tool with participants self-reporting depression.MethodologyThis cross-sectional study aimed to explore the diagnostic values of self-reporting in patients’ with depression comparing to Beck Depression Inventory scoring in Mazandaran Persian cohort study, with a total of 1300 samples. The sample size was determined to include 155 participants through the census method. In order to increase the test power, 310 healthy participants were included in the study through random selection. In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of self-reporting, BDI-II was completed by blind interviewing to the case group as well as to another group who reported that they were not depressed, as control.ResultsSensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false positive, false negative, positive and negative predictive values of self-reporting was calculated 58.4%, 79.1%,73.4%, 20.8%, 41.6%, 51.8%, and 83.2% for the total population respectively, as well as, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of self-report in males were 83.3%, 77.2%, 77.1%, 43.8% and 95.6% and 53.7%, 78.1%, 71.2%, 49.2%, and 81.1% for females, respectively.ConclusionThe positive predictive value and sensitivity of self-reporting are insufficient in total population and females, and therefore self-reporting cannot detect depressed patients, but regarding to its average positive predictive value, perhaps, it can be used to identify non-depressant individuals.

scholarly journals Pre-Procedural Surveillance Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in an Asymptomatic Population Shows Low Rates of Positivity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A Mays ◽  
Alexander L Greninger ◽  
Keith R Jerome ◽  
John B Lynch ◽  
Patrick C Mathias
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Beck Depression Inventory ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Total Population ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Case Group ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Depression is a common cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. To detect depression, we compared Beck Depression Inventory scoring as a valid tool with participants self-reporting depression.Methodology: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the diagnostic values of self-reporting in patients' with depression comparing to Beck Depression Inventory scoring in Mazandaran Persian cohort study, with a total of 1300 samples. The sample size was determined to include 155 participants through the census method. In order to increase the test power, 310 healthy participants were included in the study through random selection. In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of self-reporting, BDI-II was completed by blind interviewing to the case group as well as to another group who reported that they were not depressed, as control.Results: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false positive, false negative, positive and negative predictive values of self-reporting was calculated 58.4%, 79.1%,73.4%, 20.8%, 41.6%, 51.8%, and 83.2% for the total population respectively, as well as, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of self-report in males were 83.3%, 77.2%, 77.1%, 43.8% and 95.6% and 53.7%, 78.1%, 71.2%, 49.2%, and 81.1% for females, respectively.Conclusion: The positive predictive value and sensitivity of self-reporting are insufficient in total population and females, and therefore self-reporting cannot detect depressed patients, but regarding to its average positive predictive value, perhaps, it can be used to identify non-depressant individuals.

scholarly journals TP8.1.12 Diagnostic Utility of MRI in the Evaluation of Potential Malignancy in Patients Presented with Nipple Discharge

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nixon Phua Cher Yang ◽  
Muhammad Adeel Javed Butt ◽  
Parmvir Singh Nijjar ◽  
Saung Phyu ◽  
Musa Barkeji
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Nipple Discharge ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Imaging Tool ◽  
Additional Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Aims Nipple discharge is a presentation commonly seen at breast clinics. It is conventionally evaluated with physical examination and sonography( or mammography). The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an additional imaging tool in the evaluation of potential malignancy in patients presented with nipple discharge. Methods A retrospective evaluation of 85 patients with nipple discharge who underwent breast ultrasound (USS) and MRI between 04/06/2008 and 25/10/2019 was conducted. Clinical notes, radiographic reports and biopsy results were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of USS and MRI were calculated. Results Out of the 85 patients (all female; mean age 45.33 +/- 12.93 years old) with nipple discharge, 11 were found to have biopsy-proven malignancy (invasive ductal carcinoma/ ductal carcinoma in situ; 12.94% risk). USS failed to identify seven malignancies (27.27% sensitivity) while MRI missed three malignancies (72.72% sensitivity). USS falsely identified four malignancies from 74 patients with no malignancy (94.59% specificity) while MRI only falsely identified one case (98.65% specificity). For patients with negative USS results (U1/U2/U3) or negative MRI results (BI-RADS category 1,2 or 3), the negative predictive values of USS is 89.74% while that of MRI is 96.05%. The positive predictive values of USS and MRI are 42.86% and 88.88% respectively. Conclusion Compared to USS, MRI has a higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and predictive value. It will be a valuable addition to the standard nipple discharge evaluation workup to help rule out malignancy.

scholarly journals Comparison of Auramine Phenol and ZN Staining in Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis with GeneXpert MTB/RIF as Gold Standard

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-194
Author(s):  
Naureen Saeed ◽  
Fatima-tuz-zuhra ◽  
Nadeem Ikram ◽  
Farhana Shaukat ◽  
Fareeha Sardar
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Tuberculosis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Sputum Sample ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Smear Microscopy ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Pulmonary Tb ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Pakistan faces an immense burden of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) due to large number of cases and limited resources. Despite the recent advancement in the diagnostic techniques for pulmonary TB, smear microscopy is still a useful technique for the diagnosis of this disease. This study was conducted in order to compare the diagnostic value of Auramine stain with the conventional Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain on the sputum smear for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB, keeping GeneXpert MTB/RIF as the gold standard. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 356 suspected patients of pulmonary TB referred to the Pathology laboratory from TB ward and OPD of District Head Quarter (DHQ) teaching hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Sputum specimen were collected and two smears were prepared from each sputum sample on which Auramine phenol and Ziehl-Neelsen staining were carried out as per WHO recommendations. All these samples were further tested using Gene Xpert MTB/RIF technique. The sensitivity, specificity, Positive predictive value (PPV) and Negative predictive values (NPV) of ZN and Auramine stain were calculated and compared with GeneXpert MTB/RIF technique. Results: Out of the total 356 samples, 64(18%) were positive and 291(82%) were negative by GeneXpert which was taken as the gold standard. On comparison with GeneXpert, percentage of true positive was greater in case of Auramine than ZN stained samples (16.29% versus 12.92%), while the percentage of false positive was same for both staining techniques (0.28%). There were lesser false negative cases observed in samples stained by Auramine as compared to the ones stained by ZN (1.68% versus 5.05%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 97.87%, 94.17%, 71.88 and 99.66%, respectively for the ZN staining and 98.31%, 97.98%, 90.63% and 99.66% respectively, for the Auramine phenol staining. Conclusion: Smear microscopy using Auramine phenol stain is a useful technique for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB. The Auramine phenol staining with fluorescent microscopy is found to be superior to ZN staining because of higher sensitivity and specificity. Keywords: Auramine phenol, Fluorescence microscopy, GeneXpert, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Ziehl-Neelsen

scholarly journals 273. Low Positive Predictive Value of β-d-Glucan in Hematology Patients Receiving Antimold Prophylaxis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S150-S151
Author(s):  
Eui Jin Chang ◽  
Kang Il Jun ◽  
Song Mi Moon ◽  
Wan Beom Park ◽  
Ji Hwan Bang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Diagnostic Purpose ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Graft Vs Host Disease ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Low Prevalence

Abstract Background Detection of β-D-glucan (BDG) in serum is recognized as the mycological evidence in the diagnosis of invasive fungal infection (IFI). However, its diagnostic value in low prevalence of IFI has not been elucidated. We aimed to examine the performance of BDG in hematology patients receiving antimold prophylaxis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all BDG results performed for the purpose of diagnosis or surveillance for IFI in hematology patients receiving posaconazole or micafungin prophylaxis from January 2017 to February 2019 in a tertiary hospital. At least two consecutive positive results of BDG were regarded as positive BDG. All the episodes were classified into true-positive (TP, positive BDG with probable/proven IFI), true-negative (TN, negative BDG without probable/proven IFI), false-positive (FP, positive BDG without probable/proven IFI), false-negative (FN, negative BDG with probable/proven IFI), and nonevaluable (could not be determined for the occurrence of breakthrough IFI). When BDG test was performed in the setting of persistent fever ≥72 hours in spite of broad-spectrum antibiotics or with a suspicion of IFI, it was defined as a diagnostic BDG episode, while others were defined as a surveillance BDG episode. Results Of a total of 140 episodes, 24 episodes were non-evaluable. Among 116 evaluable episodes, 75 received induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome, 35 underwent stem cell transplantation, and 10 had intensive treatment for graft-vs.-host disease. There were three episodes of probable/proven IFI (2.6%). Ninety-one (78.4%) were performed with diagnostic purpose, while 25 (21.6%) were performed for surveillance. TP, TN, FP, and FN were 2 (1.7%), 91, 22, and 1, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were 66.7%, 80.5%, 8.3% and 98.9%, respectively. PPV was 13.3% and 0% in diagnostic and surveillance BDG episodes, respectively. Conclusion The PPV of BDG was low in hematology patients receiving antimold prophylaxis, even in the diagnostic-driven episodes. The routine screening of BDG is not helpful, and the BDG test may be used for exclusion of IFI rather than for diagnosis in these patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Limited Positive Predictive Value of β-d-Glucan in Hematologic Patients Receiving Antimold Prophylaxis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Euijin Chang ◽  
Taek Soo Kim ◽  
Chang Kyung Kang ◽  
Kang Il Jun ◽  
Dongyeop Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
True Positive ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Cell Transplants ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Low Prevalence

Abstract Background Diagnostic value of β-d-glucan (BDG) in populations with low prevalence of invasive fungal infection (IFI), such as hematologic patients receiving antimold prophylaxis, should be re-evaluated. Methods We retrospectively reviewed episodes with BDG results in hematologic patients receiving antimold prophylaxis from January 2017 to August 2019 in a tertiary hospital. The episodes were classified as true positive ([TP] positive BDG with IFI), true negative ([TN] negative BDG without IFI), false positive ([FP] positive BDG without IFI), false negative ([FN] negative BDG with IFI), and nonevaluable. Results A total of 203 episodes were analyzed: 101 episodes (49.8%) were from stem cell transplants, 89 (43.8%) were from induction chemotherapy, and 13 (6.4%) were from graft-versus-host disease treatment. There were 62 nonevaluable episodes. Among 141 evaluable ones, there were 8 (5.7%) episodes of probable/proven IFI. True positive, TN, FP, and FN cases were 4 (2.8%), 112 (79.4%), 21 (14.9%), and 4 (2.8%) episodes, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 50.0%, 84.2%, 16.1%, and 96.5%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 26.7% and 0.0% in diagnostic and surveillance episodes, respectively. Conclusions β-d-glucan test should be used to exclude IFI rather than for diagnosis in these patients.

scholarly journals Comparison of Nuclear Matrix Protein-22 and Urine Cytology in Diagnosing Bladder Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Mohamad Adi Soedarso ◽  
YinYin Wahyuni ◽  
Maria Immaculata Tjahjati
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Nuclear Matrix ◽  
Bladder Carcinoma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Matrix Protein ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Urine Cytology ◽  
Nuclear Matrix Protein ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Urine cytology (UC) is a classic marker used to detect bladder malignancy through urine examination microscopically at the presence of malignant transitional cells that are released. UC  is also used to evaluate recurrence after past treatment. A new method that is simpler, faster and easier is by measuring protein in urine produced by malignant cells, namely nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP-22). The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of NMP-22 and UC to histopathological biopsy in diagnosing bladder carcinoma and to evaluate whether the NMP-22 test could be used for bladder carcinoma screening and recurrence monitoring.Methods: Diagnostic tests on 24 suspected bladder malignancies were performed by taking urine samples for NMP22 examination and UC. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative NMP-22 and UC on histopathological biopsy were analyzed.Results: Positive results were obtained in 21 (87.5%) and negative in 3 (12.5%) NMP22 examinations. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of NMP-22 on histopathological biopsy were 95%; 67%, 95%, 67%. Sensitivity, specificity,positive predictive value and negative UC on histopathological biopsy were 38.1%; 100%, 100%, 18.8%.Conclusions: NMP-22 sensitivity is higher than UC in diagnosing bladder carcinoma. NMP-22 can be used for bladder carcinoma screening and for recurrence monitoring

scholarly journals Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 503
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Monaghan ◽  
Syed N. Rahman ◽  
Christina W. Agudelo ◽  
Alan J. Wein ◽  
Jason M. Lazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Medical Literature ◽  
Disease Prevalence ◽  
Positive Test Result ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Test Probability

Sensitivity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a positive assignment out of all subjects who are actually positive for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly have the outcome of interest. Specificity, which denotes the proportion of subjects correctly given a negative assignment out of all subjects who are actually negative for the outcome, indicates how well a test can classify subjects who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Positive predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a positive test result who truly have the outcome of interest. Negative predictive value reflects the proportion of subjects with a negative test result who truly do not have the outcome of interest. Sensitivity and specificity are inversely related, wherein one increases as the other decreases, but are generally considered stable for a given test, whereas positive and negative predictive values do inherently vary with pre-test probability (e.g., changes in population disease prevalence). This article will further detail the concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using a recent real-world example from the medical literature.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of CK19, HBME-1 and TROP2 Biomarkers in Identification of Different Types of Thyroid Follicular Neoplasms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shohreh Vojuhi ◽  
Masoud Mohebbi ◽  
Zohreh Mousavi ◽  
Mohammadali Yaghoubi ◽  
Reza Ziaolhagh
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Papillary Carcinoma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Follicular Adenoma ◽  
Thyroid Neoplasms ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Different Types

Thyroid malignancies are found in 7% to 15% of all thyroid nodules. Immunohistochemical markers, including CK19, HBME-1and TROP2, have shown an effective role in identifying these malignancies. Hence, due to the lack of appropriate diagnostic tests for the identification of thyroid neoplasms, in this study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic value of these biomarkers in the identification of different types of follicular thyroid neoplasms. In this cross-sectional study, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from the surgical resection of patients with thyroid nodules, referring to Imam Reza and Razavi Hospitals of Mashhad in 2017, were studied. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of these biomarkers for the identification of different types of follicular thyroid neoplasms were also studied. 129 patients with a mean age of 44.65±12.59 years participated in this study, of whom 101 (78.29%) were women. The most common type of follicular thyroid neoplasm was papillary carcinoma (60.47%). The highest sensitivity (94.87%) and positive predictive value (68.51%) in the detection of follicular neoplasms was observed by CK19 in papillary carcinoma. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of TROP2 in the detection of papillary neoplasms was 93.58% and 75.25%, respectively. In addition, HBME-1 had the highest specificity (72.54 %) and positive predictive value (81.57%) in identifying this neoplasm. The results of this study showed that CK19, HBME-1, and TROP2 had high diagnostic value in the detection of papillary thyroid neoplasms. Although these biomarkers had low diagnostic value in identifying follicular adenoma and carcinoma, given the high negative predictive value, they can be considered as powerful markers in identifying negative cases.

scholarly journals Clinical Performance of the Spot Vision Photo Screener before and after Induction of Cycloplegia in Children

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konuralp Yakar
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Vision Screener

Aim. To compare the clinical performance of the Spot Vision Screener used to detect amblyopia risk factors (ARFs) in children before and after induction of cycloplegia; the children were referred because they met the screening criteria of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). Methods. The Spot Vision Screener and a standard autorefractometer were used to examine 200 eyes of 100 children aged 3–10 years, before and after cycloplegia induction, in terms of ARFs. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the detection of significant refractive errors were measured using the AAPOS referral criteria. It was explored that Spot Screener data were affected by cycloplegia. The extent of agreement between cycloplegic/noncycloplegic photoscreening data and cycloplegic autorefraction measurements was assessed using Wilcoxon and Spearman correlation analyses. Results. The Spot’s sensitivity was improved from 60.9% to 85.3% and specificity from 94.9% to 87.4% with cycloplegia compared to cycloplegic standard autorefractometer results. The positive predictive value of Spot was 75.7%, and the negative predictive value was 90.4% without cycloplegia. With cycloplegia, the positive predictive value of Spot was 63.6% and the negative predictive value was 95.8%. Conclusions. The Spot Screener afforded moderate sensitivity and high specificity prior to cycloplegia. The sensitivity and negative predictive value improved after induction of cycloplegia. Examiners should be aware of the effects of cycloplegia on their findings.

scholarly journals An assessment of chromosomal alterations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation in pancreatobiliary tract malignancy

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Pu ◽  
Hongwei Zheng ◽  
Xin Yang ◽  
Qing Ye ◽  
Zhiwen Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded ◽  
9P21 Locus ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) to detect any gain of chromosomes 3, 7, or 17 and loss of the 9p21 locus has been proven to be sensitive in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tumors. However, both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the pathogenesis of pancreatobiliary tumors. Therefore, it is unknown whether this method is suitable for Chinese patients with pancreatobiliary tumors. This study aims to compare the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy of cytology, ERCP/MRCP and FISH based on Chinese patients with pancreatobiliary tumors,and to analyze differences between brushing-based and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE)-based FISH. Methods A total of 66 brush cytology specimens obtained during ERCP were detected by FISH and cytology test respectively to compare the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy. Besides, FFPE-based FISH was performed on 46 corresponding paraffin sections of pancreatobiliary tumors obtained by surgical resection. Results Our findings demonstrate that FISH greatly improves diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value compared to ERCP/MRCP and cytology without much reduction in specificity and positive predictive value. However, our results also indicate that FFPE-based FISH could not effectively identify the false-negative of brushing-based FISH. Conclusions We believe that FISH can effectively distinguish true positive and false positive results of cytological or radiological suspicions of malignancy. However, FFPE-based FISH still does not precisely recognize the false-negative of brushing-based FISH. Both cytology-based and PPFE-based FISH had limitation in some specimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document