scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of Stockholm3 test and magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer screening: a microsimulation study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Hao ◽  
Emelie Heintz ◽  
Ellinor Östensson ◽  
Andrea Discacciati ◽  
Fredrik Jäderling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Screening Strategies ◽  
Reflex Threshold

AbstractObjectiveAssess the cost-effectiveness of no screening and quadrennial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based screening for prostate cancer using either Stockholm3 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test as a reflex test.MethodsTest characteristics were estimated from the STHLM3-MR study (NCT03377881). A cost-utility analysis was conducted from a lifetime societal perspective using a microsimulation model for men aged 55-69 in Sweden for no screening and three quadrennial screening strategies, including: PSA≥3ng/mL; and Stockholm3 with reflex test thresholds of PSA≥1.5 and 2ng/mL. Men with a positive test had an MRI, and those MRI positive had combined targeted and systematic biopsies. Predictions included the number of tests, cancer incidence and mortality, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Uncertainties in key parameters were assessed using sensitivity analyses.ResultsCompared with no screening, the screening strategies were predicted to reduce prostate cancer deaths by 7-9% across a lifetime and were considered to be moderate costs per QALY gained in Sweden. Using Stockholm3 with a reflex threshold of PSA≥2ng/mL resulted in a 60% reduction in MRI compared with screening using PSA. This Stockholm3 strategy was cost-effective with a probability of 70% at a cost-effectiveness threshold of €47,218 (500,000 SEK).ConclusionsAll screening strategies were considered to be moderate costs per QALY gained compared with no screening. Screening with Stockholm3 test at a reflex threshold of PSA≥2ng/mL and MRI was predicted to be cost-effective in Sweden. Use of the Stockholm3 test may reduce screening-related harms and costs while maintaining the health benefits from early detection.

scholarly journals Is non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging cost-effective for screening of hepatocellular carcinoma?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
GJ Tan ◽  
CH Lee ◽  
Y Sun ◽  
CH Tan
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Markov Modelling ◽  
Life Years

Introduction: Ultrasound (US) is current standard of care for imaging surveillance in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been explored as an alternative, given the higher sensitivity of MRI, although this comes at a higher cost. We performed a cost-effective analysis comparing US and a dual-sequence non-contrast MRI (NCEMRI) for HCC surveillance, in the local setting. Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis of no surveillance, US surveillance and NCEMRI surveillance was performed using Markov modelling and microsimulation. At-risk patient cohort was simulated and followed-up for 40 years to estimate their disease status, direct medical costs, and effectiveness. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost effectiveness ratio were calculated. Results: 482,000 patients with an average age of 40 years were simulated and followed up for 40 years. The average total costs and QALYs for the three scenarios – no surveillance, US surveillance and NCEMRI surveillance were S$1,193/7.460 QALYs; S$8,099/11.195 QALYs; S$9,720/11.366 QALYs, respectively. Conclusion: Despite NCEMRI having a superior diagnostic accuracy, it is a less cost-effective strategy than US for HCC surveillance in the general at-risk population. Future local cost-effectiveness analyses should include stratifying surveillance methods with a variety of imaging techniques (US, NCEMRI, CEMRI) based on patients’ risk profiles.

The decision of targeted, systematic or combined biopsy in a biopsy naïve patient for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, can be made on the basis of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-204
Author(s):  
Debashis Sarkar ◽  
Debashis Nandi ◽  
Sameer Gangoli ◽  
James Hicks ◽  
Paul Carter
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Current Trend ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Naive Patient ◽  
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Introduction: The current trend to implement multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided targeted biopsy (TB) as primary biopsy for the diagnosis of suspected prostate cancer and to avoid systematic biopsy (SB) is growing. However, concern remains regarding missing clinically significant (Cs) cancer on the normal mpMRI areas of the prostate. Therefore, we compared the normal and abnormal areas from mpMRI at the same prostate biopsy, using simultaneous SB and TB technique. Methods: A prospective, comparative effectiveness study included 134 patients initially referred for primary biopsy (from October 2017 to June 2018); 100 men were selected, mean age 68 years, with a median level of prostate specific antigen of 7.6, with average prostate volume of 52 cm3 (T3 disease and prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score < 3 were excluded). All underwent six cores TB (median), from an average of two lesions on mpMRI and also eight cores SB (median) from normal mpMRI areas of the prostate after informed consent. Results: The combined (SB + TB) biopsy cancer detection rate was 67%, 51% having Cs disease. For Cs cancer, 35 patients were detected by both techniques. TB missed four Cs cancer (95% confidence interval (CI), p < 0.0001). Fewer men in the TB group than in the SB group were found to have clinically insignificant (Ci) cancer (95% CI, p < 0.0001). No Cs cancer diagnosis was missed on TB from PI-RADS 5 lesion. Overall, 4% Cs cancers were missed on TB and avoided over diagnosis of 9% Ci cancer. Conclusions: Cognitive TB didn’t miss any Cs cancer from PI-RADS 5 lesion found on mpMRI. Only doing Cognitive TB on PI-RADS 5 lesion would save time, reduce workload and will be cost effective both for Urology and Pathology. PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions on mpMRI will benefit from adding systematic samples. Level of evidence: 4 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM).

Cost-effectiveness analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 25-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Ingham ◽  
Matthew Mossanen ◽  
Ye Wang ◽  
Steven Lee Chang
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Fusion Biopsy

25 Background: We sought to determine if the reported improved performance of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound (MRI-US) fusion biopsy over systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS) in the detection of prostate cancer justifies the added cost of the MR imaging. Methods: A decision-analytic Markov model with a lifetime horizon of 10 years was developed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy, long-term health outcomes, costs, and quality-of-life of two strategies (i.e., TRUS versus MRI-US fusion biopsy [prostate MRI followed potentially by MRI-US fusion biopsy]) as the initial diagnostic test in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen ( > 4 ng/ml) without prior evaluation. Probabilities of clinical events were obtained from published literature. Direct medical costs, including diagnostic and treatment-related costs, were derived from the Premier Hospital Database. Costs were inflated to 2015 US dollars and discounted at an annual rate of 3%. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which were determined based on published literature and expert opinion. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and performed sensitivity analyses to assess uncertainty. Results: The MRI-US fusion biopsy strategy yielded a lower average discounted cost ($5,358 versus $6,372) and higher total QALYs-gained (7.21 versus 7.19) than TRUS. The reduced expenditures associated with MRI-US fusion biopsy was primarily due to avoiding intervention for clinically insignificant prostate cancer. The results were robust with the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: For men in the United States with an elevated PSA, the use of MRI-US fusion biopsy in the evaluation for prostate cancer represents a greater value than TRUS, the standard of care option. Widespread adoption of MRI-US fusion biopsy may serve to reduce the economic burden of prostate cancer.

Cost-effectiveness of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. S24-S27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis P. Langlotz ◽  
Mitchell D. Schnall ◽  
S. Bruce Malkowicz ◽  
J. Sanford Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Resonance Imaging
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document