scholarly journals Sex-Specific Plasticity Explains Genetic Variation in Sexual Size Dimorphism in Drosophila

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Vea ◽  
Austin S Wilcox ◽  
W Anthony Frankino ◽  
Alexander W Shingleton
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
The Body ◽  
Condition Dependence ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Developmental Genetic ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Genetic Mechanisms

The difference in body size between females and males, or sexual size dimorphism (SSD), is almost ubiquitous, and yet we have a remarkably poor understanding of the developmental-genetic mechanisms that generate it. Such an understanding is important if we are to distinguish between the many theoretical models of SSD evolution. One such model is the condition dependence hypothesis, which proposes that the body size of the larger sex is also more environmentally sensitive, a phenomenon called sex-specific plasticity (SSP). Because SSP generates differences in female and male body size, selection on plasticity may underlie the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. To test this hypothesis, however, we need to know the genetic architecture of both SSD and SSP, which is challenging because both are characteristics of populations not individuals. Here, we overcome this challenge by using isogenic lineages of Drosophila to measure both SSD and SSP for a genotype. We demonstrate extensive genetic variation for SSD among genotypes that is tightly correlated with variation in SSP, indicating that the same developmental-genetic mechanisms regulate both phenomena. These data support the condition dependence hypothesis and suggest that the observed SSD is a consequence of selection on the developmental-genetic mechanisms that regulate SSP.

Sexual size dimorphism in the American rubyspot: male body size predicts male competition and mating success

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Serrano-Meneses ◽  
A. Córdoba-Aguilar ◽  
V. Méndez ◽  
S.J. Layen ◽  
T. Székely
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Mating Success ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Competition ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Body Size

scholarly journals A skeletochronological estimate of age and growth in a large riparian frog from Madagascar (Anura, Mantellidae, Mantidactylus)

Herpetozoa ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio M. Guarino ◽  
Angelica Crottini ◽  
Marcello Mezzasalma ◽  
Jasmin E. Randrianirina ◽  
Franco Andreone
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
The Body ◽  
Age And Growth ◽  
Growth Trajectories ◽  
Growth Coefficient ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Adult Females ◽  
Similar Growth

We characterized the body size (as snout-vent length), age, sexual size dimorphism, and growth rate in a population of one of the larger riparian frog from Madagascar (Mantidactylusgrandidieri) from a rainforest patch close to Vevembe, SE Madagascar. We identified a significant female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Age was estimated using phalangeal skeletochronology and was significantly higher in females than in males. Modal age class turned out to be 4 years in both sexes but a large percentage of adult females (75%) fell in the 5–6 years-old classes, while no male exceeded 4 years. We here report M.grandidieri as a medium-long-lived anuran species. Von Bertalanffy’s model showed similar growth trajectories between the sexes although the growth coefficient in females (k = 0.335) was slightly but not significantly higher than in males (k = 0.329).

Geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of North American Ratsnakes (Pantherophis spp. s.l.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (11) ◽  
pp. 1196-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett A. DeGregorio ◽  
Gabriel Blouin-Demers ◽  
Gerardo L.F. Carfagno ◽  
J. Whitfield Gibbons ◽  
Stephen J. Mullin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Size Variation ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Complex Species ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Body Size Variation ◽  
Female Body Size

Because body size affects nearly all facets of an organism’s life history, ecologists have long been interested in large-scale patterns of body-size variation, as well as why those large-scale patterns often differ between sexes. We explored body-size variation across the range of the sexually dimorphic Ratsnake complex (species of the genus Pantherophis Fitzinger, 1843 s.l.; formerly Elaphe obsoleta (Say in James, 1823)) in North America. We specifically explored whether variation in body size followed latitudinal patterns or varied with climatic variables. We found that body size did not conform to a climatic or latitudinal gradient, but instead, some of the populations with the largest snakes occurred near the core of the geographic range and some with the smallest occurred near the northern, western, and southern peripheries of the range. Males averaged 14% larger than females, although the degree of sexual size dimorphism varied between populations (range: 2%–25%). There was a weak trend for male body size to change in relation to temperature, whereas female body size did not. Our results indicate that relationships between climate and an ectotherm’s body size are more complicated than linear latitudinal clines and likely differ for males and females.

scholarly journals Sneaker Males Affect Fighter Male Body Size and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Salmon

2016 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura K. Weir ◽  
Holly K. Kindsvater ◽  
Kyle A. Young ◽  
John D. Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Body Size

Testing Rensch’s rule in Acanthoscelides macrophthalmus, a seed-feeding beetle infesting Leucaena leucocephala plants

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 304-311
Author(s):  
M.N. Rossi ◽  
E.B. Haga
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Leucaena Leucocephala ◽  
Morphological Traits ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
The Body ◽  
Rensch’S Rule ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Rensch's Rule ◽  
Males And Females

Rensch’s rule states that males vary more in size than females when body size increases. The main cause of Rensch’s rule has been credited to sexual selection. However, different degrees of plasticity between the sexes have also been proven to be useful for describing variations in sexual size dimorphism, particularly within an intraspecific context. For insects, in general, this rule has rarely been tested within species. Here, we tested whether Acanthoscelides macrophthalmus (Schaeffer, 1907) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) followed Rensch’s rule when individuals emerged from seeds immediately after fruit collection and when they were reared for one generation, by measuring three morphological traits. Rensch’s rule was not followed for any of the morphological traits. Variations in body size were similar in males and females for bruchines that first emerged from seeds and for those that were reared for one generation. These findings suggest that environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, and seasonality) are unlikely to drive differential plasticity in males and females of this seed-feeding beetle. It is possible that changes in the body size of A. macrophthalmus have a genetic basis. However, regardless of whether variations in body size have a genetic basis, our findings provide no support for Rensch’s rule.

Potential mechanisms of phenotypic divergence in body size between Newfoundland and mainland black bear populations

2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 1650-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane P Mahoney ◽  
John A Virgl ◽  
Kim Mawhinney
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Black Bear ◽  
Relative Difference ◽  
Black Bears ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Size Dimorphism

Phenotypic variation in body size and degree of sexual size dimorphism of North American black bears (Ursus americanus) was quantified for populations from New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario, Maine, Alaska, and the island of Newfoundland. Based on a model of island biogeography developed by Case, we predicted that body size should be larger in Newfoundland bears than in mainland populations. The presence of few large predators and minimal competition between herbivore prey on Newfoundland allow an appropriate test of the model (i.e., food availability for bears may differ between populations on the mainland and in Newfoundland). In addition, sexual-selection theory predicts that the coevolution of polygyny and large size will be coupled with an increase in sexual size dimorphism. Therefore, we also predicted that among the six populations, male body mass should scale hyperallometrically with female body mass (i.e., slope > 1). Analysis of deterministic growth curves indicated that bears from Newfoundland attained greater asymptotic body size than populations on the mainland, which supports our first prediction. On average, the relative difference in asymptotic body mass between females from the island and mainland populations was 55%, while the relative difference between males was 37%. However, we found that sexual size dimorphism did not increase disproportionately with body mass among the six populations, which refuted our second prediction. We discuss a range of abiotic and biotic selection pressures possibly responsible for larger body size in Newfoundland bears. We suggest that the ability to exploit seasonally abundant and spatially dispersed dietary protein by female and male black bears on the island has been and is still a primary environmental factor selecting for large body size in Newfoundland bears. Although the relationship between sexual size dimorphism and body size is tenuous (slope [Formula: see text] 1), it does suggest that (an)other adaptive mechanism(s), opposing sexual selection for extreme male size, explain(s) a large amount of the variation in sexual size dimorphism among black bear populations.

Effects of body size and mass on running speed of male yellow-pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus)

2002 ◽  
Vol 80 (9) ◽  
pp. 1584-1587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albrecht I Schulte-Hostedde ◽  
John S Millar
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Mating Success ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Small Male ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Running Speed ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Body Size ◽  
Tamias Amoenus ◽  
Yellow Pine

Male-biased sexual size dimorphism in mammals is usually attributed to the success of large males in intrasexual combat for mates. However, mating success may be determined by contests that are not combative. In the mating chase of the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus), a mammalian species with female-biased sexual size dimorphism, fast males may have an advantage in acquiring matings with estrous females. However, the effects of intraspecific variation in body size on running speed are not obvious; heavy individuals may run more slowly than light individuals because excess mass can be a hindrance to locomotion, but individuals that are structurally large may run faster than small individuals because of longer stride length. We examined the effects of both body mass and structural size on running speed in male yellow-pine chipmunks using manipulated runs in which male chipmunks were chased over a known distance. Structurally large male chipmunks had faster running speeds than small males, potentially giving large males an advantage when chasing estrous females. However, small male chipmunks are known to be aggressively dominant over large males. This leads to a potential trade-off in male body size between two behavioural components of mating success (running speed and dominance) that may constrain the evolution of male body size, ultimately leading to female-biased sexual size dimorphism.

scholarly journals Limited male incubation ability and the evolution of egg size in shorebirds

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terje Lislevand ◽  
Gavin H Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Egg Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Bird Species ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Size Evolution ◽  
Female Body Mass ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Relationship

In bird species where males incubate but are smaller than females, egg size may be constrained by male body size, and hence ability to incubate the eggs. Using data from 71 such shorebird species, we show that egg size decreases as the degree of female-biased sexual size dimorphism increases, after controlling for female body mass. Relative egg size was not related to mean clutch size. However, when controlling for mating system, the relationship between female-biased sexual size dimorphism and relative egg size was only significant in polyandrous species. The relatively small eggs of socially polyandrous shorebirds have previously been explained as an energy-saving strategy associated with the production of multiple clutches. Our findings suggest that egg size evolution is better explained by male incubation limitation in these birds.

Mating pattern, female reproduction and sexual size dimorphism in a narrow-mouthed frog (Microhyla fissipes)

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-257
Author(s):  
Guo-Hua Ding ◽  
Yun Tang ◽  
Zhi-Hua Lin ◽  
Xiao-Li Fan ◽  
Li Wei
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Dry Mass ◽  
Fertilization Rate ◽  
The Body ◽  
Mating Pattern ◽  
Female Reproduction ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
The Difference

Abstract The difference in body size and/or shape between males and females, called sexual size dimorphism, is widely accepted as the evolutionary consequence of the difference between reproductive roles. To study the mating pattern, female reproduction and sexual size dimorphism in a population of Microhyla fissipes, amplexus pairs were collected, and the snout-vent length of males and females, female reproductive traits and fertilization rate were measured. If the body size of amplexed females is larger than that of amplectant males, this is referred to as a female-larger pair, a phenomenon that was often observed for M. fissipes in this study. Interestingly, snout-vent length of males in male-larger pairs was greater than that in female-larger pairs, however the post-spawning body mass, clutch size, egg dry mass and clutch dry mass did not differ between both types of pairs. Snout-vent length of males was positively related to that of females in each amplexus pair. After accounting for the snout-vent lengths of females, we showed that snout-vent lengths of males in male-larger pairs were greater than those of females in female-larger pairs. The snout-vent length ratio of males and females was not related to fertilization rate in each amplexus pair. The mean fertilization rate was not different between both amplexus pairs. These results suggest that (1) M. fissipes displays female-biased sexual size dimorphism and has two amplexus types with size-assortative mating; (2) the snout-vent length ratio of males and females in each amplexus type was consistent with the inverse of Rensch’s rule, and was driven by the combined effect of sexual selection and fecundity selection; (3) females with a larger body size were preferred by males due to their higher fecundity, while the body size of males was not important for fertilization success.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document