scholarly journals Nurse-physician Communication around Identifying Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Home Residents

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny T. van der Steen ◽  
Esmée Jongen ◽  
Natashe Lemos Dekker ◽  
Lotje Bagchus ◽  
H. Roeline W. Pasman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

Objective: To assess experiences of medical practitioners who are on the staff of nursing homes with communication with nursing staff about identifying emerging and changing (palliative) care needs of residents of nursing homes in the Netherlands. Design: Qualitative interview study. Setting and Participants: Fifteen physicians and two nurse practitioners employed by eight care organizations in the western urbanized region of the Netherlands. Methods: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews in 2018 informed by a topic list that was based on a qualitative dataset about facilitators to palliative care in dementia reported by elderly care physicians. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with Atlas.ti. We used both deductive and inductive coding adding refined codes related to communication. Results: All interviewees expressed appreciation for nursing staff on whom they relied to communicate palliative care needs, yet they reported a variety of communication challenges around important changes in the condition of the residents which were covered by two themes. (1) Teamwork was facilitated or impeded by team size and structure, quality of relationships and clarity in hierarchical relationships. (2) Continuity of information was affected by (in)effective routes of consultation and (lack of) detail in communicating observations. Conclusions and Implications: Also in the case of on-staff physicians, functioning of the multidisciplinary team and accurate sharing of observed changes in the condition of nursing home residents are crucial for physicians to be able to address palliative care needs. The expressions of the physicians of how they would favor nursing staff to communicate can inspire interprofessional training, such as reporting objective observations and phrasing a clear request for help while avoiding overly demanding appeals.

scholarly journals A New Approach to the Identification of Palliative Care Needs and Advanced Chronic Patients among Nursing Home Residents

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 3171
Author(s):  
Ana A. Esteban-Burgos ◽  
María José Lozano-Terrón ◽  
Daniel Puente-Fernandez ◽  
César Hueso-Montoro ◽  
Rafael Montoya-Juárez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Surprise Question ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

Background: Proper planning of Palliative Care in nursing homes requires advanced knowledge of the care needs that residents show. The aim of the study was to evaluate Palliative Needs and other conditions such as fragility, complexity, and prognosis and also to suggest new indicators for the establishment of the resident’s advanced chronic condition. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted in 149 nursing homes Complex Chronic residents evaluated by trained professionals. Palliative Care Needs, assessed by the NECPAL ICO-CCOMS© tool, and fragility, case and palliative complexity and prognosis were evaluate through a comprehensive assessment. Descriptive analyses and association measures were performed setting the statistical significance at 0.05. Results: More than 50% of the residents had positive Surprise Question and other Palliative Needs and were classified as Advanced Chronic Patients. Distress and/or Severe Adaptative Disorder was the most frequent need shown by the residents and significant differences in levels of frailty and other characteristics, were found between the Positive and the Negative Surprise Question Groups. Statistically significant correlations were also found between aspects of both groups. Conclusions: Nursing homes residents show Palliative Needs regardless of the response to the Surprise Question of the NECPAL tool. Other characteristics such as presence of an intermediate level of frailty are suggested as a new perspective to identify advanced chronic patients among nursing homes residents.

scholarly journals Nursing home staff’s perspective on end-of-life care of German nursing home residents: a cross-sectional survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anke Strautmann ◽  
Katharina Allers ◽  
Alexander Maximilian Fassmer ◽  
Falk Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Background Nursing homes are becoming more important for end-of-life care. Within the industrialised world, Germany is among the countries with the most end-of-life hospitalizations in nursing home residents. To improve end-of-life care, investigation in the status quo is required. The objective was to gain a better understanding of the perspectives of nursing home staff on the current situation of end-of-life care in Germany. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted as a postal survey among a random sample of 1069 German nursing homes in 2019. The survey was primarily addressed to nursing staff management. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Staff was asked to rate different items regarding common practices and potential deficits of end-of-life care on a 5-point-Likert-scale. Estimations of the proportions of in-hospital deaths, residents with advance directives (AD), cases in which documented ADs were ignored, and most important measures for improvement of end-of-life care were requested. Results 486 (45.5%) questionnaires were returned, mostly by nursing staff managers (64.7%) and nursing home directors (29.9%). 64.4% of the respondents rated end-of-life care rather good, the remainder rated it as rather bad. The prevalence of in-hospital death was estimated by the respondents at 31.5% (SD: 19.9). Approximately a third suggested that residents receive hospital treatments too frequently. Respondents estimated that 45.9% (SD: 21.6) of the residents held ADs and that 28.4% (SD: 26.8) of available ADs are not being considered. Increased staffing, better qualification, closer involvement of general practitioners and better availability of palliative care concepts were the most important measures for improvement. Conclusions Together with higher staffing, better availability and integration of palliative care concepts may well improve end-of-life care. Prerequisite for stronger ties between nursing home and palliative care is high-quality education of those involved in end-of-life care.

scholarly journals Experiences with the Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient in nursing home residents: a mixed-method study to assess physicians’ and nurse practitioners’ perceptions

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maartje S. Klapwijk ◽  
Natashe Lemos Dekker ◽  
Monique A. A. Caljouw ◽  
Wilco P. Achterberg ◽  
Jenny T. van der Steen
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Dying Patient

Abstract Background The Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient (LCP) is a multidisciplinary tool developed for the dying phase for use in palliative care settings. The literature reports divergent experiences with its application in a nursing home setting related to its implementation and staff competencies. The aim of this study is to understand how the LCP is being used in the context of the nursing home, including for residents with dementia, and experienced from the perspectives of those responsible for medical treatment in nursing homes. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used, consisting of a survey followed by interviews. A link to a 9-item online survey with closed and open-ended questions was emailed to all physicians and nurse practitioners of 33 care organisations with nursing homes in three regions of the Netherlands (North, West and South). In addition, 10 respondents with particularly positive or negative experiences were selected for semi-structured interviews. Results The survey was completed by 159 physicians and nurse practitioners. The respondents were very positive on the content and less positive on the use of the LCP, although they reported difficulties identifying the right time to start the LCP, especially in case of dementia. Also using the LCP was more complicated after the implementation of the electronic health record. The LCP was judged to be a marker of quality for the assessment of symptoms in the dying phase and communication with relatives. Conclusion An instrument that prompts regular assessment of a dying person was perceived by those responsible for (medical) care to contribute to good care. As such, the LCP was valued, but there was a clear need to start it earlier than in the last days or hours of life, a need for a shorter version, and for integration of the LCP in the electronic health record. Regular assessments with an instrument that focusses on quality of care and good symptom control can improve palliative care for nursing home residents with and without dementia.

Palliative care needs of chronically ill nursing home residents in Germany: focusing on living, not dying

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Strohbuecker ◽  
Yvonne Eisenmann ◽  
Maren Galushko ◽  
Thomas Montag ◽  
Raymond Voltz
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Chronically Ill ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

scholarly journals Nurse-Physician Communication Around Identifying Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Home Residents

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny T. van der Steen ◽  
Esmée A. Jongen ◽  
Natashe Lemos Dekker ◽  
Lotje Bagchus ◽  
H. Roeline W. Pasman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Physician Communication ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

scholarly journals Palliative care needs and symptoms of nursing home residents with and without dementia: A cross-sectional study

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1501-1507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Hermans ◽  
Joachim Cohen ◽  
Nele Spruytte ◽  
Chantal Van Audenhove ◽  
Anja Declercq
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

scholarly journals Frailty, Complexity, and Priorities in the Use of Advanced Palliative Care Resources in Nursing Homes

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Emilio Mota-Romero ◽  
Beatriz Tallón-Martín ◽  
María P. García-Ruiz ◽  
Daniel Puente-Fernandez ◽  
María P. García-Caro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Diagnostic Instrument ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Clinical Complexity ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

Background and objectives: This study aimed to determine the frailty, prognosis, complexity, and palliative care complexity of nursing home residents with palliative care needs and define the characteristics of the cases eligible for receiving advanced palliative care according to the resources available at each nursing home. Materials and Methods: In this multi-centre, descriptive, and cross-sectional study, trained nurses from eight nursing homes in southern Spain selected 149 residents with palliative care needs. The following instruments were used: the Frail-VIG index, the case complexity index (CCI), the Diagnostic Instrument of Complexity in Palliative Care (IDC-Pal), the palliative prognosis index, the Barthel index (dependency), Pfeiffer’s test (cognitive impairment), and the Charlson comorbidity index. A consensus was reached on the complexity criteria of the Diagnostic Instrument of Complexity in Palliative Care that could be addressed in the nursing home (no priority) and those that required a one-off (priority 2) or full (priority 1) intervention of advanced palliative care resources. Non-parametric tests were used to compare non-priority patients and patients with some kind of priority. Results: A high percentage of residents presented frailty (80.6%), clinical complexity (80.5%), and palliative care complexity (65.8%). A lower percentage of residents had a poor prognosis (10.1%) and an extremely poor prognosis (2%). Twelve priority 1 and 14 priority 2 elements were identified as not matching the palliative care complexity elements that had been previously identified. Of the studied cases, 20.1% had priority 1 status and 38.3% had priority 2 status. Residents with some kind of priority had greater levels of dependency (p < 0.001), cognitive impairment (p < 0.001), and poorer prognoses (p < 0.001). Priority 1 patients exhibited higher rates of refractory delirium (p = 0.003), skin ulcers (p = 0.041), and dyspnoea (p = 0.020). Conclusions: The results indicate that there are high levels of frailty, clinical complexity, and palliative care complexity in nursing homes. The resources available at each nursing home must be considered to determine when advanced palliative care resources are required.

scholarly journals Impact of Roommates on MDRO Spread in Nursing Homes

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s66-s67
Author(s):  
Gabrielle M. Gussin ◽  
Ken Kleinman ◽  
Raveena D. Singh ◽  
Raheeb Saavedra ◽  
Lauren Heim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Intervention ◽  
Odds Ratios ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Environmental Cleaning ◽  
The Impact

Background: Addressing the high burden of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes is a public health priority. High interfacility transmission may be attributed to inadequate infection prevention practices, shared living spaces, and frequent care needs. We assessed the contribution of roommates to the likelihood of MDRO carriage in nursing homes. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the SHIELD OC (Shared Healthcare Intervention to Eliminate Life-threatening Dissemination of MDROs in Orange County, CA) Project, a CDC-funded regional decolonization intervention to reduce MDROs among 38 regional facilities (18 nursing homes, 3 long-term acute-care hospitals, and 17 hospitals). Decolonization in participating nursing homes involved routine chlorhexidine bathing plus nasal iodophor (Monday through Friday, twice daily every other week) from April 2017 through July 2019. MDRO point-prevalence assessments involving all residents at 16 nursing homes conducted at the end of the intervention period were used to determine whether having a roommate was associated with MDRO carriage. Nares, bilateral axilla/groin, and perirectal swabs were processed for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacteriaceae, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Generalized linear mixed models assessed the impact of maximum room occupancy on MDRO prevalence when clustering by room and hallway, and adjusting for the following factors: nursing home facility, age, gender, length-of-stay at time of swabbing, bedbound status, known MDRO history, and presence of urinary or gastrointestinal devices. CRE models were not run due to low counts. Results: During the intervention phase, 1,451 residents were sampled across 16 nursing homes. Overall MDRO prevalence was 49%. In multivariable models, we detected a significant increasing association of maximum room occupants and MDRO carriage for MRSA but not other MDROs. For MRSA, the adjusted odds ratios for quadruple-, triple-, and double-occupancy rooms were 3.5, 3.6, and 2.8, respectively, compared to residents in single rooms (P = .013). For VRE, these adjusted odds ratios were 0.3, 0.3, and 0.4, respectively, compared to residents in single rooms (P = NS). For ESBL, the adjusted odds ratios were 0.9, 1.1, and 1.5, respectively, compared to residents in single rooms (P = nonsignificant). Conclusions: Nursing home residents in shared rooms were more likely to harbor MRSA, suggesting MRSA transmission between roommates. Although decolonization was previously shown to reduce MDRO prevalence by 22% in SHIELD nursing homes, this strategy did not appear to prevent all MRSA transmission between roommates. Additional efforts involving high adherence hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and judicious use of contact precautions are likely needed to reduce transmission between roommates in nursing homes.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Gabrielle M. Gussin, Stryker (Sage Products): Conducting studies in which contributed antiseptic product is provided to participating hospitals and nursing homes. Clorox: Conducting studies in which contributed antiseptic product is provided to participating hospitals and nursing homes. Medline: Conducting studies in which contributed antiseptic product is provided to participating hospitals and nursing homes. Xttrium: Conducting studies in which contributed antiseptic product is provided to participating hospitals and nursing homes.

scholarly journals Nursing Staff Knowledge and Beliefs about Pain in Elderly Nursing Home Residents with Dementia

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra MG Zwakhalen ◽  
Jan PH Hamers ◽  
Rieneke HA Peijnenburg ◽  
Martijn PF Berger
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Educational Level ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Knowledge And Beliefs ◽  
Pain Prevalence ◽  
Knowledge Deficits

BACKGROUND: Aging is known to be associated with a high prevalence (up to 80%) of persistent pain among residents of nursing homes. However, even with high pain prevalence rates, nursing home residents are at risk for undertreatment. Knowledge deficits and beliefs among nurses influence staff behaviour in pain assessment and management.OBJECTIVES: To develop a psychometrically sound questionnaire and to gather information about knowledge and beliefs of nursing staff regarding various aspects of pain in elderly patients with dementia. In addition, the differences among several categories of nurses (based on educational level and work experience) with respect to beliefs about pain were investigated.METHODS: Participants were 123 staff members of psychogeriatric wards in two nursing homes in the Netherlands (mean of 11.4 years of experience). Their results were compared with those of two groups of nurses, one consisting of 25 registered nurse PhD students in nursing science and the other consisting of 20 trainee pain nurse specialists.RESULTS: The main findings indicate that nursing home staff respondents showed knowledge deficits about several aspects of pain, even though they were satisfied about the way pain was assessed and treated at their wards. Specific knowledge deficits were found regarding pain treatment and medication in elderly nursing home residents. Staff educational level seemed to influence their beliefs and knowledge about pain in elderly nursing home patients.

scholarly journals No Other Safe Care Option: Nursing Home Admission as a Last Resort Strategy

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 1504-1514
Author(s):  
Heather J Campbell-Enns ◽  
Megan Campbell ◽  
Kendra L Rieger ◽  
Genevieve N Thompson ◽  
Malcolm B Doupe
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Nursing Home Admission ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Field Notes ◽  
Care Nursing

Abstract Background and Objectives Nursing homes are intended for older adults with the highest care needs. However, approximately 12% of all nursing home residents have similar care needs as older adults who live in the community and the reasons they are admitted to nursing homes is largely unstudied. The purpose of this study was to explore the reasons why lower-care nursing home residents are living in nursing homes. Research Design and Methods A qualitative interpretive description methodology was used to gather and analyze data describing lower-care nursing home resident and family member perspectives regarding factors influencing nursing home admission, including the facilitators and barriers to living in a community setting. Data were collected via semistructured interviews and field notes. Data were coded and sorted, and patterns were identified. This resulted in themes describing this experience. Results The main problem experienced by lower-care residents was living alone in the community. Residents and family members used many strategies to avoid safety crises in the community but experienced multiple care breakdowns in both community and health care settings. Nursing home admission was a strategy used to avoid a crisis when residents did not receive the needed support to remain in the community. Discussion and Implications To successfully remain in the community, older adults require specialized supports targeting mental health and substance use needs, as well as enhanced hospital discharge plans and improved information about community-based care options. Implications involve reforming policies and practices in both hospital and community-based care settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document