scholarly journals Survey on Open Science Practices in Functional Neuroimaging

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Paret ◽  
Nike Unverhau ◽  
Franklin Feingold ◽  
Russell A. Poldrack ◽  
Madita Stirner ◽  
...  

Replicability and reproducibility of scientific findings is paramount for sustainable progress in neuroscience. Preregistration of the hypotheses and methods of an empirical study before analysis, the sharing of primary research data, and compliance with data standards such as the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), are considered effective practices to secure progress and to substantiate quality of research. We investigated the current level of adoption of open science practices in neuroimaging and the difficulties that prevent researchers from using them. Email invitations to participate in the survey were sent to addresses received through a PubMed search of human functional magnetic resonance imaging studies between 2010 and 2020. 283 persons completed the questionnaire. Although half of the participants were experienced with preregistration, the willingness to preregister studies in the future was modest. The majority of participants had experience with the sharing of primary neuroimaging data. Most of the participants were interested in implementing a standardized data structure such as BIDS in their labs. Based on demographic variables, we compared participants on seven subscales, which had been generated through factor analysis. It was found that experienced researchers at lower career level had higher fear of being transparent, researchers with residence in the EU had a higher need for data governance, and researchers at medical faculties as compared to other university faculties reported a higher need for data governance and a more unsupportive environment. The results suggest growing adoption of open science practices but also highlight a number of important impediments.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J Markiewicz ◽  
Krzysztof Jacek Gorgolewski ◽  
Franklin Feingold ◽  
Ross Blair ◽  
Yaroslav O Halchenko ◽  
...  

The sharing of research data is essential to ensure reproducibility and maximize the impact of public investments in scientific research. Here we describe OpenNeuro, a BRAIN Initiative data archive that provides the ability to openly share data from a broad range of brain imaging data types following the FAIR principles for data sharing. We highlight the importance of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) standard for enabling effective curation, sharing, and reuse of data. The archive presently shares more than 500 datasets including data from more than 18,000 participants, comprising multiple species and measurement modalities and a broad range of phenotypes. The impact of the shared data is evident in a growing number of published reuses, currently totalling more than 150 publications. We conclude by describing plans for future development and integration with other ongoing open science efforts.


2022 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Peter Zwiers ◽  
Stefano Moia ◽  
Robert Oostenveld

Analyses of brain function and anatomy using shared neuroimaging data is an important development, and have acquired the potential to be scaled up with the specification of a new Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) standard. To date, a variety of software tools help researchers in converting their source data to BIDS but often require programming skills or are tailored to specific institutes, data sets, or data formats. In this paper, we introduce BIDScoin, a cross-platform, flexible, and user-friendly converter that provides a graphical user interface (GUI) to help users finding their way in BIDS standard. BIDScoin does not require programming skills to be set up and used and supports plugins to extend their functionality. In this paper, we show its design and demonstrate how it can be applied to a downloadable tutorial data set. BIDScoin is distributed as free and open-source software to foster the community-driven effort to promote and facilitate the use of BIDS standard.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Demuru ◽  
Dorien van Blooijs ◽  
Willemiek Zweiphenning ◽  
Dora Hermes ◽  
Frans Leijten ◽  
...  

AbstractThe neuroscience community increasingly uses the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) to organize data, extending from MRI to electrophysiology data. While automated tools and workflows are developed that help organize MRI data from the scanner to BIDS, these workflows are lacking for clinical intracranial EEG (iEEG data). We present a practical guideline on how to organize full clinical iEEG epilepsy data into BIDS. We present electrophysiological datasets recorded from twelve subjects who underwent intracranial monitoring followed by resective epilepsy surgery at the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, and became seizure-free after surgery. These data include intraoperative electrocorticography recordings from six patients, long-term electrocorticography recordings from three patients and stereo-encephalography recordings from three patients. We describe the 6 steps in the pipeline that are essential to structure the data from these clinical iEEG recordings into BIDS and the challenges during this process. These guidelines enable centers performing clinical iEEG recordings to structure their data to improve accessibility, reusability and interoperability of clinical data.Background & SummaryToday’s era of big data and open science has highlighted the importance of organizing and storing data in keeping with the FAIR Data Principles of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable Data to the neuroscientific community1,2. Over the past five years, a community-driven effort to develop a simple standardized method of organizing, annotating and describing neuroimaging data has resulted in the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS). BIDS was originally developed for magnetic resonance imaging data (MRI3), but now also has extensions for magnetoencephalography (MEG4), electroencephalography (EEG5), and intracranial encephalography (iEEG6). BIDS prescribes rules about the organization of the data itself, with a formalized file/folder structure and naming conventions, and provides standardized templates to store associated metadata in human and machine readable, text-based, JSON and TSV file formats. Software packages analyzing neuroimaging data increasingly support data organized using the BIDS format (https://bids-apps.neuroimaging.io/apps/). However, a major challenge in the use of BIDS is to curate the data from their source format into a BIDS validated set. Several tools exist to convert MRI source data into BIDS datasets7–11, but to our knowledge, there is currently no tool or protocol for iEEG.The University Medical Center in Utrecht, the Netherlands, is a tertiary referral center performing around 150 epilepsy surgeries per year. The success of surgery for treating focal epilepsy depends on accurate prediction of brain tissue that needs to be removed or disconnected to yield full seizure control. People referred for epilepsy surgery undergo an extensive presurgical work-up, starting with MRI and video-EEG and, if needed, PET or ictal SPECT. This noninvasive phase is followed directly by a resection, possibly guided by intraoperative ECoG, or by long-term electrocorticography (ECoG) or stereo-encephalography (SEEG) with electrodes placed on or implanted in the brain12. From January 2008 until December 2019, 560 of the epilepsy surgeries in our center were guided by intraoperative ECoG; 163 surgeries followed after long-term ECoG or SEEG investigation. These iEEG data offer a unique combination of high spatial and temporal resolution measurements of the living human brain and it is important to curate these data in a way such that they can be used by many people in the future to study epilepsy and typical brain dynamics.As part of RESPect (Registry for Epilepsy Surgery Patients, ethical committee approval (18-109)), we started to retrospectively convert raw, unprocessed, clinical iEEG data of patients that underwent epilepsy surgery from January 2008 onwards, to the iEEG-BIDS format and identified 6 critical steps in this process. With this paper, we give a practical workflow of how we collected iEEG data in the UMC Utrecht and converted these data to BIDS. We share our entire pipeline and provide practical examples of six patients with intraoperative ECoG, three patients with long-term ECoG and three patients with SEEG data, demonstrating how BIDS can be used for intraoperative as well as long-term recordings.


Author(s):  
Gorgolewski Krzysztof ◽  
Poline Jean-Baptiste ◽  
Keator David ◽  
Nichols B ◽  
Auer Tibor ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Norgaard ◽  
Granville James Matheson ◽  
Hanne D Hansen ◽  
Adam G Thomas ◽  
Graham Searle ◽  
...  

The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a standard for organizing and describing neuroimaging datasets. It serves not only to facilitate the process of data sharing and aggregation, but also to simplify the application and development of new methods and software for working with neuroimaging data. Here, we present an extension of BIDS to include positron emission tomography (PET) data (PET-BIDS). We describe the PET-BIDS standard in detail and share several open-access datasets curated following PET-BIDS. Additionally, we highlight several tools which are already available for converting, validating and analyzing PET-BIDS datasets.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peer Herholz ◽  
Rita M. Ludwig ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Poline

The amount of neuroimaging data being shared increased exponentially in recent years. While thisdevelopment introduces prominent advantages concerning open, reproducible and sustainable neu-roimaging, the process of data sharing must ensure the privacy of participant data. A requirement fromboth, Ethics Review Boards and data sharing resources, datasets need to be (pseudo-) anonymized priorto sharing in order to limit participant re-identification. Depending on the dataset at hand, this processcan however become cumbersome and prone to errors. Here we introduce BIDSonym, a tool for auto-mated pseudo-anonymization of neuroimaging datasets. BIDSonym supports multiple de-identificationprocedures and operates on neuroimaging, as well as metadata files. In addition, all metadata infor-mation present in the respective files is gathered and evaluated. Its outputs furthermore allow usersto conduct a more in-depth assessment of potentially sensitive information present in a given dataset.Through its workflow and utilization of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), BIDSonym’s appli-cation is reproducible, requires no manual intervention and is agnostic to idiosyncrasies of small andlarge scale datasets.


GigaScience ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Clark ◽  
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski ◽  
R. Cameron Craddock

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason F. Smith ◽  
Juyoen Hur ◽  
Claire M. Kaplan ◽  
Alexander J. Shackman

ABSTRACTSpatial normalization—the process of aligning anatomical or functional data acquired from different individuals to a common stereotaxic atlas—is routinely used in the vast majority of functional neuroimaging studies, with important consequences for scientific inference and reproducibility. Although several approaches exist, multi-step techniques that leverage the superior contrast and spatial resolution afforded by T1-weighted anatomical images to normalize echo planar imaging (EPI) functional data acquired from the same individuals (T1EPI) is now standard. Yet, recent work suggests that direct alignment of functional data to a T2*-weighted template without recourse to an anatomical image—an EPI only (EPIO) approach—enhances normalization precision. This counterintuitive claim is intriguing, suggesting that a change in standard practices may be warranted. Here, we re-visit these conclusions, extending prior work to encompass newly developed measures of normalization precision, accuracy, and ‘real-world’ statistical performance for the standard EPIO and T1EPI pipelines implemented in SPM12, a recently developed variant of the EPIO pipeline, and a novel T1EPI pipeline incorporating ‘best practice’ tools from multiple software packages. The multi-tool T1EPI pipeline was consistently the most precise, most accurate, and resulted in the largest t values at the group level, in some cases dramatically so. The three SPM-based pipelines exhibited more modest and variable differences in performance relative to each another, with the widely used T1EPI pipeline showing the second best overall precision and accuracy, and the recently developed EPIO pipeline generally showing the poorest overall performance. The results demonstrate that standard pipelines can be easily improved and we encourage researchers to invest the resources necessary to do so. The multi-tool pipeline presented here provides a framework for doing so. In addition, the novel performance metrics described here should prove useful for reporting and validating future methods for pre-processing functional neuroimaging data.


F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Ming ◽  
Eric Verner ◽  
Anand Sarwate ◽  
Ross Kelly ◽  
Cory Reed ◽  
...  

In the era of Big Data, sharing neuroimaging data across multiple sites has become increasingly important. However, researchers who want to engage in centralized, large-scale data sharing and analysis must often contend with problems such as high database cost, long data transfer time, extensive manual effort, and privacy issues for sensitive data. To remove these barriers to enable easier data sharing and analysis, we introduced a new, decentralized, privacy-enabled infrastructure model for brain imaging data called COINSTAC in 2016. We have continued development of COINSTAC since this model was first introduced. One of the challenges with such a model is adapting the required algorithms to function within a decentralized framework. In this paper, we report on how we are solving this problem, along with our progress on several fronts, including additional decentralized algorithms implementation, user interface enhancement, decentralized regression statistic calculation, and complete pipeline specifications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kay A. Robbins ◽  
Dung Truong ◽  
Stefan Appelhoff ◽  
Arnaud Delorme ◽  
Scott Makeig

Because of the central role that event-related data analysis plays in EEG and MEG (MEEG) experiments, choices about which events to report and how to annotate their full natures can significantly influence the reliability, reproducibility, and value of MEEG datasets for further analysis. Current, more powerful annotation strategies combine robust event description with details of experiment design and metadata in a human-readable as well as machine-actionable form, making event annotation relevant to the full range of neuroimaging and other time series data. This paper dissects the event design and annotation process using as a case study the well-known multi-subject, multimodal dataset of Wakeman and Henson (openneuro.org, ds000117) shared by its authors using Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) formatting (bids.neuroimaging.io). We propose a set of best practices and guidelines for event handling in MEEG research, examine the impact of various design decisions, and provide a working template for organizing events in MEEG and other neuroimaging data. We demonstrate how annotations using the new third-generation formulation of the Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED-3G) framework and tools (hedtags.org) can document events occurring during neuroimaging experiments and their interrelationships, providing machine-actionable annotation enabling automated both within- and across-study comparisons and analysis, and point to a more complete BIDS formatted, HED-3G annotated edition of the MEEG portion of the Wakeman and Henson dataset (OpenNeuro ds003645).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document