scholarly journals GRaNIE and GRaNPA: Inference and evaluation of enhancer-mediated gene regulatory networks applied to study macrophages

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aryan Kamal ◽  
Christian Arnold ◽  
Annique Claringbould ◽  
Rim Moussa ◽  
Neha Daga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Open Chromatin ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network Inference ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Tf Gene

Among the biggest challenges in the post-GWAS (genome-wide association studies) era is the interpretation of disease-associated genetic variants in non-coding genomic regions. Enhancers have emerged as key players in mediating the effect of genetic variants on complex traits and diseases. Their activity is regulated by a combination of transcription factors (TFs), epigenetic changes and genetic variants. Several approaches exist to link enhancers to their target genes, and others that infer TF-gene connections. However, we currently lack a framework that systematically integrates enhancers into TF-gene regulatory networks. Furthermore, we lack an unbiased way of assessing whether inferred regulatory interactions are biologically meaningful. Here we present two methods, implemented as user-friendly R-packages, for building and evaluating enhancer-mediated gene regulatory networks (eGRNs) called GRaNIE (Gene Regulatory Network Inference including Enhancers - https://git.embl.de/grp-zaugg/GRaNIE) and GRaNPA (Gene Regulatory Network Performance Analysis - https://git.embl.de/grp-zaugg/GRaNPA), respectively. GRaNIE jointly infers TF-enhancer, enhancer-gene and TF-gene interactions by integrating open chromatin data such as ATAC-Seq or H3K27ac with RNA-seq across a set of samples (e.g. individuals), and optionally also Hi-C data. GRaNPA is a general framework for evaluating the biological relevance of TF-gene GRNs by assessing their performance for predicting cell-type specific differential expression. We demonstrate the power of our tool-suite by investigating gene regulatory mechanisms in macrophages that underlie their response to infection, and their involvement in common genetic diseases including autoimmune diseases.Among the biggest challenges in the post-GWAS (genome-wide association studies) era is the interpretation of disease-associated genetic variants in non-coding genomic regions. Enhancers have emerged as key players in mediating the effect of genetic variants on complex traits and diseases. Their activity is regulated by a combination of transcription factors (TFs), epigenetic changes and genetic variants. Several approaches exist to link enhancers to their target genes, and others that infer TF-gene connections. However, we currently lack a framework that systematically integrates enhancers into TF-gene regulatory networks. Furthermore, we lack an unbiased way of assessing whether inferred regulatory interactions are biologically meaningful. Here we present two methods, implemented as user-friendly R-packages, for building and evaluating enhancer-mediated gene regulatory networks (eGRNs) called GRaNIE (Gene Regulatory Network Inference including Enhancers - https://git.embl.de/grp-zaugg/GRaNIE) and GRaNPA (Gene Regulatory Network Performance Analysis - https://git.embl.de/grp-zaugg/GRaNPA), respectively. GRaNIE jointly infers TF-enhancer, enhancer-gene and TF-gene interactions by integrating open chromatin data such as ATAC-Seq or H3K27ac with RNA-seq across a set of samples (e.g. individuals), and optionally also Hi-C data. GRaNPA is a general framework for evaluating the biological relevance of TF-gene GRNs by assessing their performance for predicting cell-type specific differential expression. We demonstrate the power of our tool-suite by investigating gene regulatory mechanisms in macrophages that underlie their response to infection, and their involvement in common genetic diseases including autoimmune diseases.Among the biggest challenges in the post-GWAS (genome-wide association studies) era is the interpretation of disease-associated genetic variants in non-coding genomic regions. Enhancers have emerged as key players in mediating the effect of genetic variants on complex traits and diseases. Their activity is regulated by a combination of transcription factors (TFs), epigenetic changes and genetic variants. Several approaches exist to link enhancers to their target genes, and others that infer TF-gene connections. However, we currently lack a framework that systematically integrates enhancers into TF-gene regulatory networks. Furthermore, we lack an unbiased way of assessing whether inferred regulatory interactions are biologically meaningful. Here we present two methods, implemented as user-friendly R-packages, for building and evaluating enhancer-mediated gene regulatory networks (eGRNs) called GRaNIE (Gene Regulatory Network Inference including Enhancers - https://git.embl.de/grp-zaugg/GRaNIE) and GRaNPA (Gene Regulatory Network Performance Analysis - https://git.embl.de/grp-zaugg/GRaNPA), respectively. GRaNIE jointly infers TF-enhancer, enhancer-gene and TF-gene interactions by integrating open chromatin data such as ATAC-Seq or H3K27ac with RNA-seq across a set of samples (e.g. individuals), and optionally also Hi-C data. GRaNPA is a general framework for evaluating the biological relevance of TF-gene GRNs by assessing their performance for predicting cell-type specific differential expression. We demonstrate the power of our tool-suite by investigating gene regulatory mechanisms in macrophages that underlie their response to infection, and their involvement in common genetic diseases including autoimmune diseases.

scholarly journals Predicting genotype-specific gene regulatory networks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Weighill ◽  
Marouen Ben Guebila ◽  
Kimberly Glass ◽  
John Quackenbush ◽  
John Platig
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Disease Etiology ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe majority of disease-associated genetic variants are thought to have regulatory effects, including the disruption of transcription factor (TF) binding and the alteration of downstream gene expression. Identifying how a person’s genotype affects their individual gene regulatory network has the potential to provide important insights into disease etiology and to enable improved genotype-specific disease risk assessments and treatments. However, the impact of genetic variants is generally not considered when constructing gene regulatory networks. To address this unmet need, we developed EGRET (Estimating the Genetic Regulatory Effect on TFs), which infers a genotype-specific gene regulatory network (GRN) for each individual in a study population by using message passing to integrate genotype-informed TF motif predictions - derived from individual genotype data, the predicted effects of variants on TF binding and gene expression, and TF motif predictions - with TF protein-protein interactions and gene expression. Comparing EGRET networks for two blood-derived cell lines identified genotype-associated cell-line specific regulatory differences which were subsequently validated using allele-specific expression, chromatin accessibility QTLs, and differential TF binding from ChIP-seq. In addition, EGRET GRNs for three cell types across 119 individuals captured regulatory differences associated with disease in a cell-type-specific manner. Our analyses demonstrate that EGRET networks can capture the impact of genetic variants on complex phenotypes, supporting a novel fine-scale stratification of individuals based on their genetic background. EGRET is available through the Network Zoo R package (netZooR v0.9; netzoo.github.io).

scholarly journals Improving gene regulatory network structure using redundancy reduction in the MRNET algorithm

RSC Advances ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (37) ◽  
pp. 23222-23233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Wen Zhu ◽  
Bo Liao ◽  
Haowen Chen ◽  
Siqi Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systems Biology ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Network Structure ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Central Problem ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Redundancy Reduction ◽  
Gene Regulatory

Inferring gene regulatory networks from expression data is a central problem in systems biology.

scholarly journals Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Morgan ◽  
Matthew Studham ◽  
Andreas Tjärnberg ◽  
Holger Weishaupt ◽  
Fredrik J. Swartling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Network Inference ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network Inference ◽  
Validation Data ◽  
Regulatory Interactions ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Novel Interactions

AbstractThe gene regulatory network (GRN) of human cells encodes mechanisms to ensure proper functioning. However, if this GRN is dysregulated, the cell may enter into a disease state such as cancer. Understanding the GRN as a system can therefore help identify novel mechanisms underlying disease, which can lead to new therapies. Reliable inference of GRNs is however still a major challenge in systems biology.To deduce regulatory interactions relevant to cancer, we applied a recent computational inference framework to data from perturbation experiments in squamous carcinoma cell line A431. GRNs were inferred using several methods, and the false discovery rate was controlled by the NestBoot framework. We developed a novel approach to assess the predictiveness of inferred GRNs against validation data, despite the lack of a gold standard. The best GRN was significantly more predictive than the null model, both in crossvalidated benchmarks and for an independent dataset of the same genes under a different perturbation design. It agrees with many known links, in addition to predicting a large number of novel interactions from which a subset was experimentally validated. The inferred GRN captures regulatory interactions central to cancer-relevant processes and thus provides mechanistic insights that are useful for future cancer research.Data available at GSE125958Inferred GRNs and inference statistics available at https://dcolin.shinyapps.io/CancerGRN/ Software available at https://bitbucket.org/sonnhammergrni/genespider/src/BFECV/Author SummaryCancer is the second most common cause of death globally, and although cancer treatments have improved in recent years, we need to understand how regulatory mechanisms are altered in cancer to combat the disease efficiently. By applying gene perturbations and inference of gene regulatory networks to 40 genes known or suspected to have a role in cancer due to interactions with the oncogene MYC, we deduce their underlying regulatory interactions. Using a recent computational framework for inference together with a novel method for cross validation, we infer a reliable regulatory model of this system in a completely data driven manner, not reliant on literature or priors. The novel interactions add to the understanding of the progressive oncogenic regulatory process and may provide new targets for therapy.

scholarly journals Neural Gene Network Constructor: A Neural Based Model for Reconstructing Gene Regulatory Network

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhang Zhang ◽  
Lifei Wang ◽  
Shuo Wang ◽  
Ruyi Tao ◽  
Jingshu Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Network Structure ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Regulatory

SummaryReconstructing gene regulatory networks (GRNs) and inferring the gene dynamics are important to understand the behavior and the fate of the normal and abnormal cells. Gene regulatory networks could be reconstructed by experimental methods or from gene expression data. Recent advances in Single Cell RNA sequencing technology and the computational method to reconstruct trajectory have generated huge scRNA-seq data tagged with additional time labels. Here, we present a deep learning model “Neural Gene Network Constructor” (NGNC), for inferring gene regulatory network and reconstructing the gene dynamics simultaneously from time series gene expression data. NGNC is a model-free heterogenous model, which can reconstruct any network structure and non-linear dynamics. It consists of two parts: a network generator which incorporating gumbel softmax technique to generate candidate network structure, and a dynamics learner which adopting multiple feedforward neural networks to predict the dynamics. We compare our model with other well-known frameworks on the data set generated by GeneNetWeaver, and achieve the state of the arts results both on network reconstruction and dynamics learning.

Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks from Genetical Genomics Data

2010 ◽  
pp. 79-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Liu ◽  
Ina Hoeschele ◽  
Alberto de la Fuente
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Network Inference ◽  
Dna Marker ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Genetical Genomics ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network Inference ◽  
Gene Regulatory

In this chapter, we review the current state of Gene Regulatory Network inference based on ‘Genetical Genomics’ experiments (Brem & Kruglyak, 2005; Brem, Yvert, Clinton & Kruglyak, 2002; Jansen, 2003; Jansen & Nap, 2001; Schadt et al., 2003) as a special case of causal network inference in ‘Systems Genetics’ (Threadgill, 2006). In a Genetical Genomics experiment, a segregating or genetically randomized population is DNA marker genotyped and gene-expression profiled on a genomewide scale. The genotypes are regarded as natural, multifactorial perturbations resulting in different gene-expression ‘phenotypes’, and causal relationships can therefore be established between the measured genotypes and the gene-expression phenotypes. In this chapter, we review different computational approaches to Gene Regulatory Network inference based on the joint analysis of DNA marker and expression data and additionally of DNA sequence information if available. This includes different methods for expression QTL mapping, selection of regulator-target pairs, construction of an encompassing network, which strongly constrains the network search space, and pairwise and multivariate methods for Gene Regulatory Network inference, such as Bayesian Networks and Structural Equation Modeling.

EVIDENCE OF SCALE-FREE TOPOLOGY IN GENE REGULATORY NETWORK OF HUMAN TISSUES

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
pp. 283-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. ANDRECUT ◽  
S. A. KAUFFMAN ◽  
A. M. MADNI
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Gene ◽  
Human Tissues ◽  
Scale Free ◽  
The Common ◽  
Gene Regulatory

We report the reconstruction of the topology of gene regulatory network in human tissues. The results show that the connectivity of the regulatory gene network is characterized by a scale-free distribution. This result supports the hypothesis that scale-free networks may represent the common blueprint for gene regulatory networks.

scholarly journals Gene regulatory network reconstruction using single-cell RNA sequencing of barcoded genotypes in diverse environments

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A Jackson ◽  
Dayanne M Castro ◽  
Giuseppe-Antonio Saldi ◽  
Richard Bonneau ◽  
David Gresham
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Rna Sequencing ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Single Cell Rna Sequencing ◽  
Gene Regulatory

Understanding how gene expression programs are controlled requires identifying regulatory relationships between transcription factors and target genes. Gene regulatory networks are typically constructed from gene expression data acquired following genetic perturbation or environmental stimulus. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) captures the gene expression state of thousands of individual cells in a single experiment, offering advantages in combinatorial experimental design, large numbers of independent measurements, and accessing the interaction between the cell cycle and environmental responses that is hidden by population-level analysis of gene expression. To leverage these advantages, we developed a method for scRNAseq in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). We pooled diverse transcriptionally barcoded gene deletion mutants in 11 different environmental conditions and determined their expression state by sequencing 38,285 individual cells. We benchmarked a framework for learning gene regulatory networks from scRNAseq data that incorporates multitask learning and constructed a global gene regulatory network comprising 12,228 interactions.

scholarly journals Backward evolution from gene network dynamics

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merzu Kebede Belete ◽  
Daniel A. Charlebois ◽  
Gábor Balázsi
Keyword(s):  
Population Dynamics ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Network Dynamics ◽  
Regulator Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Population Fitness

AbstractGene expression is controlled by regulator genes that together with effector genes form gene regulatory networks. How mutation in the genes comprising gene regulatory networks influences cell population dynamics has not been adequately investigated. In this study, we develop mathematical models to study how a mutation in a regulator gene that reaches the effector gene with a time delay affects short-term and long-term population growth. Using theory and experiment, we find a paradoxical outcome of evolution where a mutation in a regulator gene leads to an interaction between gene regulatory network and population dynamics, causing in certain cases a permanent decrease in population fitness in a constant environment.Significance StatementThe properties of a cell are largely the products of its proteins, synthesized at rates depending on the regulation of protein coding genes. Single-cell measurements show that genetically identical cells can differ radically in their protein levels, partially due to the random production and degradation of proteins. It is currently unknown how mutants arise and spread in populations affected by such biological variability. We use computer simulations and evolution experiments to study how a mutant spreads in a population that carries a synthetic drug resistance gene network. Our results show for the first time a paradoxical outcome of evolution, where an initially beneficial mutation can interact with gene regulatory network dynamics and cause a permanent decrease in population fitness in the same environment.

TIGRNCRN: Trustful inference of gene regulatory network using clustering and refining the network

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 1950018
Author(s):  
Jamshid Pirgazi ◽  
Ali Reza Khanteymoori ◽  
Maryam Jalilkhani
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Biological Significance ◽  
Biological Knowledge ◽  
Learning Networks ◽  
Modeling Process ◽  
Gene Regulatory

In this study, in order to deal with the noise and uncertainty in gene expression data, learning networks, especially Bayesian networks, that have the ability to use prior knowledge, were used to infer gene regulatory network. Learning networks are methods that have the structure of the network and a learning process to obtain relationships. One of the methods which have been used for measuring the relationship between genes is the correlation metrics, but the high correlated genes not necessarily mean that they have causal effect on each other. Studies on common methods in inference of gene regulatory networks are yet to pay attention to their biological importance and as such, predictions by these methods are less accurate in terms of biological significance. Hence, in the proposed method, genes with high correlation were identified in one cluster using clustering, and the existence of edge between the genes in the cluster was prevented. Finally, after the Bayesian network modeling, based on knowledge gained from clustering, the refining phase and improving regulatory interactions using biological correlation were done. In order to show the efficiency, the proposed method has been compared with several common methods in this area including GENIE3 and BMALR. The results of the evaluation indicate that the proposed method recognized regulatory relations in Bayesian modeling process well, due to using of biological knowledge which is hidden in the data collection, and is able to recognize gene regulatory networks align with important methods in this field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document