scholarly journals Evaluating mono and combination therapy of meropenem and amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minyon L Avent ◽  
Kate L. McCarthy ◽  
Fekade Sime ◽  
saiyuri naicker ◽  
Aaron James Heffernan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Initial Inoculum ◽  
Potential Synergy

Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied extent of bacterial killing and resistance emergence of meropenem and amikacin as monotherapy and as a combination therapy against susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from bacteremic patients using the dynamic in vitro hollow-fiber infection model. Three P. aeruginosa isolates (meropenem MICs 0.125, 0.25 & 64 mg/L) were used simulating bacteremia with an initial inoculum ~ 1×105 CFU/mL and the expected pharmacokinetics of meropenem and amikacin in critically ill patients. For isolates susceptible to amikacin and meropenem (isolates 1 and 2), the rate of bacterial killing was increased with the combination regimen when compared with monotherapy of either antibiotic. Both the combination and meropenem monotherapy were able to sustain bacterial killing throughout the seven-day treatment course, whereas regrowth of bacteria occurred with amikacin monotherapy after 12 hours. For the meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate (isolate 3), only the combination regimen demonstrated bacterial killing. Given that tailored antibiotic regimens can maximize potential synergy against some isolates, future studies should explore the benefit of combination therapy against resistant P. aeruginosa.

scholarly journals Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid Exposures of Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Dynamic In Vitro Hollow-Fiber Infection Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Heffernan ◽  
Fekade B. Sime ◽  
Derek S. Sarovich ◽  
Michael Neely ◽  
Yarmarly Guerra-Valero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Epithelial Lining ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Epithelial Lining Fluid ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Initial Inoculum

ABSTRACT Given that aminoglycosides, such as amikacin, may be used for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, optimization of therapy is paramount for improved treatment outcomes. This study aims to investigate the pharmacodynamics of different simulated intravenous amikacin doses on susceptible P. aeruginosa to inform ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and sepsis treatment choices. A hollow-fiber infection model with two P. aeruginosa isolates (MICs of 2 and 8 mg/liter) with an initial inoculum of ∼108 CFU/ml was used to test different amikacin dosing regimens. Three regimens (15, 25, and 50 mg/kg) were tested to simulate a blood exposure, while a 30 mg/kg regimen simulated the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for potential respiratory tract infection. Data were described using a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Whole-genome sequencing was used to identify mutations associated with resistance emergence. While bacterial density was reduced by >6 logs within the first 12 h in simulated blood exposures following this initial bacterial kill, there was amplification of a resistant subpopulation with ribosomal mutations that were likely mediating amikacin resistance. No appreciable bacterial killing occurred with subsequent doses. There was less (<5 log) bacterial killing in the simulated ELF exposure for either isolate tested. Simulation studies suggested that a dose of 30 and 50 mg/kg may provide maximal bacterial killing for bloodstream and VAP infections, respectively. Our results suggest that amikacin efficacy may be improved with the use of high-dose therapy to rapidly eliminate susceptible bacteria. Subsequent doses may have reduced efficacy given the rapid amplification of less-susceptible bacterial subpopulations with amikacin monotherapy.

scholarly journals The Combination of Meropenem and Levofloxacin Is Synergistic with Respect to both Pseudomonas aeruginosa Kill Rate and Resistance Suppression

2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 2646-2654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Louie ◽  
Caroline Grasso ◽  
Nadzeya Bahniuk ◽  
Brian Van Scoy ◽  
David L. Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Cell Kill ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT New approaches are needed for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. All available single agents are suboptimal, especially for resistance suppression. Classical β-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations are not used often enough at least in part because of concern for nephrotoxicity. We evaluated the combination of meropenem and levofloxacin against the P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type and its isogenic MexAB pump-overexpressed mutant. The drugs were studied using an in vitro hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic infection model. There were 16 different regimens evaluated for both isolates. Both total population and resistant subpopulations were quantified. Drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The impact of monotherapy versus that of combination therapy for attainment of a 3-log cell kill and for resistance suppression was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Drug exposures were calculated by fitting the concentration-time data using the ADAPT II package of programs. For both isolates, monotherapy allowed resistance emergence with all but the largest exposure or with all exposures. In contrast, there was no resistance emergence with any combination regimen. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in time to attainment of a 3-log cell kill as well as time to resistance emergence for monotherapy and combination therapy for both isolates, in favor of the combination regimens. Determination of the pharmacodynamic indices associated with resistance suppression demonstrated a 2- to 3-fold reduction with the use of combinations. Combination therapy with meropenem and levofloxacin provides a significantly faster time to attain a 3-log cell kill and significantly better resistance suppression than does either monotherapy. This combination should be evaluated in a clinical trial.

scholarly journals The Combination of Fosfomycin plus Meropenem Is Synergistic for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. L. Drusano ◽  
M. N. Neely ◽  
W. M. Yamada ◽  
Brandon Duncanson ◽  
David Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
The United States ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT Treating high-density bacterial infections is a challenging clinical problem. We have a paucity of new agents that can address this problem. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a particularly difficult pathogen to treat effectively because of the plethora of resistance mechanisms it carries. Fosfomycin is an agent discovered circa 40 years ago. Recently, it has been resurrected in the United States and studied for intravenous therapy. We hypothesized that, to maximize its utility, it would require combination chemotherapy when used in a clinical circumstance in high-bacterial-burden infections. We chose to examine the combination of meropenem plus fosfomycin. These agents were studied in the hollow-fiber infection model. We utilized a fully factorial study design, looking at 2 doses of meropenem alone (1 and 2 g 8-hourly) and two doses of fosfomycin alone (6 and 8 g 8-hourly), as well as all possible combinations plus a no-treatment control. We used a high-dimensional model of 5 inhomogeneous differential equations with 5 system outputs to analyze all data simultaneously. Combination therapy outperformed all monotherapy regimens, with all combinations driving >6 log10 CFU/ml of bacterial killing. Combination therapy was able to counterselect resistance emergence (meropenem mutants being killed by the combination, as well as fosfomycin mutants being killed by the combination) in all regimens studied. The analysis demonstrated that the combination was significantly synergistic for bacterial cell killing and resistance suppression. Meropenem plus fosfomycin is a promising combination for therapy of high-burden Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections and requires further study.

scholarly journals Determination of the Dynamically Linked Indices of Fosfomycin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Hollow Fiber Infection Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Louie ◽  
Michael Maynard ◽  
Brandon Duncanson ◽  
Jocelyn Nole ◽  
Michael Vicchiarelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
The United States ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Minimum Concentration ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT Fosfomycin is the only expoxide antimicrobial and is currently under development in the United States as an intravenously administered product. We were interested in identifying the exposure indices most closely linked to its ability to kill bacterial cells and to suppress amplification of less susceptible subpopulations. We employed the hollow fiber infection model for this investigation and studied wild-type strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Because of anticipated rapid resistance emergence, we shortened the study duration to 24 h but sampled the system more intensively. Doses of 12 and 18 g/day and schedules of daily administration, administration every 8 h, and administration by continuous infusion for each daily dose were studied. We measured fosfomycin concentrations (by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry), the total bacterial burden, and the burden of less susceptible isolates. We applied a mathematical model to all the data simultaneously. There was a rapid emergence of resistance with all doses and schedules. Prior to resistance emergence, an initial kill of 2 to 3 log 10 (CFU/ml) was observed. The model demonstrated that the area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio was linked to total bacterial kill, while the time that the concentration remained above the MIC (or, equivalently, the minimum concentration/MIC ratio) was linked to resistance suppression. These findings were also seen in other investigations with Enterobacteriaceae ( in vitro systems) and P. aeruginosa (murine system). We conclude that for serious infections with high bacterial burdens, fosfomycin may be of value as a new therapeutic and may be optimized by administering the agent as a continuous or prolonged infusion or by use of a short dosing interval. For indications such as ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, it may be prudent to administer fosfomycin as part of a combination regimen.

scholarly journals Levofloxacin-ceftazidime administration regimens combat Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the hollow-fiber infection model simulating abnormal renal function in critically ill patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Xiaobing Li ◽  
Xiaojing He ◽  
Lingyan Jian
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
Abnormal Renal Function

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the bactericidal effects of levofloxacin and ceftazidime as both monotherapy and combination therapy, and to determine their effects on resistance suppression in patients with normal and abnormal (Ccr:16–20 mL/min) renal function. Common clinical administration regimens to provide reference values were also evaluated. Methods: The 7-d hollow-fiber infection model was used to inject the Pseudomonas aeruginosa standard strain (ATCC27853). This simulated common clinical administration regimens for patients with different renal function. Ten regimens were stratified into 2 categories based on renal function, and each category contained 3 monotherapy regimens and 2 combination therapy regimens. The total and resistant populations were quantified. Drug concentrations were determined by High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results: Monotherapy regimens resulted in about 0.5-log-CFU/mL bacterial kill in the total population at 6 or 8h, whilst combination regimens resulted in 2- to 3-log-CFU/mL within 2 days. For levofloxacin monotherapy regimens in patients with normal renal function, resistance emergence was seen after 6h, and was seen at 0h in the ceftazidime monotherapy regimen, as well as in all regimens of patients with abnormal renal function. Although resistant subpopulation in combination regimens with abnormal renal function began to increase at 0h, there was a certain downward trend after 8h, while resistant population in the normal renal function group increased after 16h. Conclusions: Combination therapy had greater bactericidal efficacy and resistance inhibition compared with monotherapy. Studying combination regimens in randomized clinical trials is warranted.

scholarly journals Meropenem-Tobramycin Combination Regimens Combat Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model Simulating Augmented Renal Clearance in Critically Ill Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajbharan Yadav ◽  
Phillip J. Bergen ◽  
Kate E. Rogers ◽  
Carl M. J. Kirkpatrick ◽  
Steven C. Wallis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Augmented Renal Clearance ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
Rapid Regrowth

ABSTRACT Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is common in critically ill patients and is associated with subtherapeutic concentrations of renally eliminated antibiotics. We investigated the impact of ARC on bacterial killing and resistance amplification for meropenem and tobramycin regimens in monotherapy and combination. Two carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were studied in static-concentration time-kill studies. One isolate was examined comprehensively in a 7-day hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Pharmacokinetic profiles representing substantial ARC (creatinine clearance of 250 ml/min) were generated in the HFIM for meropenem (1 g or 2 g administered every 8 h as 30-min infusion and 3 g/day or 6 g/day as continuous infusion [CI]) and tobramycin (7 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h as 30-min infusion) regimens. The time courses of total and less-susceptible bacterial populations and MICs were determined for the monotherapies and all four combination regimens. Mechanism-based mathematical modeling (MBM) was performed. In the HFIM, maximum bacterial killing with any meropenem monotherapy was ∼3 log10 CFU/ml at 7 h, followed by rapid regrowth with increases in resistant populations by 24 h (meropenem MIC of up to 128 mg/liter). Tobramycin monotherapy produced extensive initial killing (∼7 log10 at 4 h) with rapid regrowth by 24 h, including substantial increases in resistant populations (tobramycin MIC of 32 mg/liter). Combination regimens containing meropenem administered intermittently or as a 3-g/day CI suppressed regrowth for ∼1 to 3 days, with rapid regrowth of resistant bacteria. Only a 6-g/day CI of meropenem combined with tobramycin suppressed regrowth and resistance over 7 days. MBM described bacterial killing and regrowth for all regimens well. The mode of meropenem administration was critical for the combination to be maximally effective against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa.

scholarly journals New Dosing Strategies for an Old Antibiotic: Pharmacodynamics of Front-Loaded Regimens of Colistin at Simulated Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Kidney or Liver Disease

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 1381-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gauri G. Rao ◽  
Neang S. Ly ◽  
Curtis E. Haas ◽  
Samira Garonzik ◽  
Alan Forrest ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Viable Count ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTIncreasing evidence suggests that colistin monotherapy is suboptimal at currently recommended doses. We hypothesized that front-loading provides an improved dosing strategy for polymyxin antibiotics to maximize killing and minimize total exposure. Here, we utilized anin vitropharmacodynamic model to examine the impact of front-loaded colistin regimens against a high bacterial density (108CFU/ml) ofPseudomonas aeruginosa. The pharmacokinetics were simulated for patients with hepatic (half-life [t1/2] of 3.2 h) or renal (t1/2of 14.8 h) disease. Front-loaded regimens (n= 5) demonstrated improvement in bacterial killing, with reduced overall free drug areas under the concentration-time curve (fAUC) compared to those with traditional dosing regimens (n= 14) with various dosing frequencies (every 12 h [q12h] and q24h). In the renal failure simulations, front-loaded regimens at lower exposures (fAUC of 143 mg · h/liter) obtained killing activity similar to that of traditional regimens (fAUC of 268 mg · h/liter), with an ∼97% reduction in the area under the viable count curve over 48 h. In hepatic failure simulations, front-loaded regimens yielded rapid initial killing by up to 7 log10within 2 h, but considerable regrowth occurred for both front-loaded and traditional regimens. No regimen eradicated the high bacterial inoculum ofP. aeruginosa. The current study, which utilizes anin vitropharmacodynamic infection model, demonstrates the potential benefits of front-loading strategies for polymyxins simulating differential pharmacokinetics in patients with hepatic and renal failure at a range of doses. Our findings may have important clinical implications, as front-loading polymyxins as a part of a combination regimen may be a viable strategy for aggressive treatment of high-bacterial-burden infections.

scholarly journals Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Gentamicin against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 2626-2631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent H. Tam ◽  
Samer Kabbara ◽  
Giao Vo ◽  
Amy N. Schilling ◽  
Elizabeth A. Coyle
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Dose Fractionation ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Bacterial Burden ◽  
Bacterial Strains ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Optimal Dosing

ABSTRACT Aminoglycosides are often used to treat severe infections with gram-positive organisms. Previous studies have shown concentration-dependent killing by aminoglycosides of gram-negative bacteria, but limited data are available for gram-positive bacteria. We compared the in vitro pharmacodynamics of gentamicin against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Five S. aureus strains were examined (ATCC 29213 and four clinical isolates). Time-kill studies (TKS) in duplicate (baseline inocula of 107 CFU/ml) were conducted to evaluate bacterial killing in relation to increasing gentamicin concentrations (0 to 16 times the MIC). Serial samples were obtained over 24 h to quantify bacterial burden. Similar TKS with P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were conducted, and the time courses of the all bacterial strains were mathematically modeled for quantitative comparison. A dose fractionation study (using identical daily doses of gentamicin) in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) over 5 days was subsequently used for data validation for the two ATCC strains. Model fits to the data were satisfactory; r 2 values for the S. aureus and P. aeruginosa ATCC strains were 0.915 and 0.956, respectively. Gentamicin was found to have a partially concentration-dependent killing effect against S. aureus; concentrations beyond four to 8 times the MIC did not result in significantly faster bacterial killing. In contrast, a concentration-dependent profile was demonstrated in suppressing P. aeruginosa regrowth after initial decline in bacterial burden. In HFIM, thrice-daily gentamicin dosing appeared to be superior to once-daily dosing for S. aureus, but they were similar for P. aeruginosa. Different killing profiles of gentamicin were demonstrated against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. These results may guide optimal dosing strategies of gentamicin in S. aureus infections and warrant further investigations.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Meropenem Regimens Suppressing Emergence of Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii with Human Simulated Exposure in anIn VitroIntravenous-Infusion Hollow-Fiber Infection Model

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 6773-6781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Li ◽  
Lin Wang ◽  
Xian-Jia Zhang ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Wei-Tao Gong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
Dosage Interval ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Dosage Regimens ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Emergence Of Resistance

ABSTRACTThe emergence of resistance to carbapenems inPseudomonas aeruginosacan be suppressed by optimizing the administration of meropenem. However, whether the same is true forAcinetobacter baumanniiis not fully understood. We assessed the bactericidal activity of meropenem and its potency to suppress the emergence of resistance inA. baumanniiwith human simulated exposure in anin vitrointravenous-infusion hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Two clinical strains of carbapenem-susceptible multidrug-resistantA. baumannii(CS-MDRAB), CSRA24 and CSRA91, were used, and their MICs and mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) were determined. Six meropenem dosage regimens (0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 g given every 8 h [q8h] with a 0.5-h or 3-h infusion for seven consecutive days) were simulated and then evaluated in the HFIM. Both the total population and resistant subpopulations of the two strains were quantified. Drug concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. All dosage regimens, except for the lowest dosage (0.5 g for both the 0.5-h and 3-h infusions), showed 3-log CFU/ml bacterial killing. Dosage regimens of 2.0 g with 0.5-h and 3-h infusions exhibited an obvious bactericidal effect and suppressed resistance. Selective amplification of subpopulations with reduced susceptibility to meropenem was suppressed with a percentage of the dosage interval in which meropenem concentrations exceeded the MPC (T>MPC) of ≥20% or with a ratio ofT>MPC to the percentage of the dosage interval in which drug concentrations are within the mutant selection window of ≥0.25. Ourin vitrodata support the use of a high dosage of meropenem (2.0 g q8h) for the treatment of severe infection caused by CS-MDRAB.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document