scholarly journals Topology independent structural matching discovers novel templates for protein interfaces

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Mirabello ◽  
Björn Wallner
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Structural Alignment ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Potential Interaction ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Alignment Algorithms ◽  
Protein Interfaces ◽  
Wide Range

AbstractMotivationProtein-protein interactions (PPI) are essential for the function of the cellular machinery. The rapid growth of protein-protein complexes with known 3D structures offers a unique opportunity to study PPI to gain crucial insights into protein function and the causes of many diseases. In particular, it would be extremely useful to compare interaction surfaces of monomers, as this would enable the pinpointing of potential interaction surfaces based solely on the monomer structure, without the need to predict the complete complex structure. While there are many structural alignment algorithms for individual proteins, very few have been developed for protein interfaces, and none that can align only the interface residues to other interfaces or surfaces of interacting monomer subunits in a topology independent (non-sequential) manner.ResultsWe present InterComp, a method for topology and sequence-order independent structural comparisons. The method is general and can be applied to various structural comparison applications. By representing residues as independent points in space rather than as a sequence of residues, InterComp can can be applied to a wide range of problems including: interface-surface comparisons, interface-interface comparisons and even comparisons of small molecule ligands. We demonstrate a use-case by applying InterComp to find similar protein interfaces on the surface of proteins. We show that InterComp pinpoints the correct interface for almost half of the targets (283 of 586) when considering the top 10 hits, and for 24% of the top 1, even when no templates can be found with the already available sequence-order dependent methods like TM-align.AvailabilityThe program is available from: http://wallnerlab.org/[email protected] informationSupplementary data included in the pdf.

pyDockEneRes: per-residue decomposition of protein–protein docking energy

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 2284-2285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Romero-Durana ◽  
Brian Jiménez-García ◽  
Juan Fernández-Recio
Keyword(s):  
Binding Affinity ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Protein Docking ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Scoring Functions ◽  
Residue Decomposition ◽  
Docking Energy

Abstract Motivation Protein–protein interactions are key to understand biological processes at the molecular level. As a complement to experimental characterization of protein interactions, computational docking methods have become useful tools for the structural and energetics modeling of protein–protein complexes. A key aspect of such algorithms is the use of scoring functions to evaluate the generated docking poses and try to identify the best models. When the scoring functions are based on energetic considerations, they can help not only to provide a reliable structural model for the complex, but also to describe energetic aspects of the interaction. This is the case of the scoring function used in pyDock, a combination of electrostatics, desolvation and van der Waals energy terms. Its correlation with experimental binding affinity values of protein–protein complexes was explored in the past, but the per-residue decomposition of the docking energy was never systematically analyzed. Results Here, we present pyDockEneRes (pyDock Energy per-Residue), a web server that provides pyDock docking energy partitioned at the residue level, giving a much more detailed description of the docking energy landscape. Additionally, pyDockEneRes computes the contribution to the docking energy of the side-chain atoms. This fast approach can be applied to characterize a complex structure in order to identify energetically relevant residues (hot-spots) and estimate binding affinity changes upon mutation to alanine. Availability and implementation The server does not require registration by the user and is freely accessible for academics at https://life.bsc.es/pid/pydockeneres. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

ProAffiMuSeq: sequence-based method to predict the binding free energy change of protein–protein complexes upon mutation using functional classification

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherlyn Jemimah ◽  
Masakazu Sekijima ◽  
M Michael Gromiha
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Binding Free Energy ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Supplementary Information

Abstract Motivation Protein–protein interactions are essential for the cell and mediate various functions. However, mutations can disrupt these interactions and may cause diseases. Currently available computational methods require a complex structure as input for predicting the change in binding affinity. Further, they have not included the functional class information for the protein–protein complex. To address this, we have developed a method, ProAffiMuSeq, which predicts the change in binding free energy using sequence-based features and functional class. Results Our method shows an average correlation between predicted and experimentally determined ΔΔG of 0.73 and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.86 kcal/mol in 10-fold cross-validation and correlation of 0.75 with MAE of 0.94 kcal/mol in the test dataset. ProAffiMuSeq was also tested on an external validation set and showed results comparable to structure-based methods. Our method can be used for large-scale analysis of disease-causing mutations in protein–protein complexes without structural information. Availability and implementation Users can access the method at https://web.iitm.ac.in/bioinfo2/proaffimuseq/. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Metallocluster transactions: dynamic protein interactions guide the biosynthesis of Fe–S clusters in bacteria

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1593-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenkang Zheng ◽  
Patricia C. Dos Santos
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Specific Protein ◽  
Biological Synthesis ◽  
Cluster Assembly ◽  
Sequence Motifs ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Cysteine Desulfurase ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Domains Of Life

Iron–sulfur (Fe–S) clusters are ubiquitous cofactors present in all domains of life. The chemistries catalyzed by these inorganic cofactors are diverse and their associated enzymes are involved in many cellular processes. Despite the wide range of structures reported for Fe–S clusters inserted into proteins, the biological synthesis of all Fe–S clusters starts with the assembly of simple units of 2Fe–2S and 4Fe–4S clusters. Several systems have been associated with the formation of Fe–S clusters in bacteria with varying phylogenetic origins and number of biosynthetic and regulatory components. All systems, however, construct Fe–S clusters through a similar biosynthetic scheme involving three main steps: (1) sulfur activation by a cysteine desulfurase, (2) cluster assembly by a scaffold protein, and (3) guided delivery of Fe–S units to either final acceptors or biosynthetic enzymes involved in the formation of complex metalloclusters. Another unifying feature on the biological formation of Fe–S clusters in bacteria is that these systems are tightly regulated by a network of protein interactions. Thus, the formation of transient protein complexes among biosynthetic components allows for the direct transfer of reactive sulfur and Fe–S intermediates preventing oxygen damage and reactions with non-physiological targets. Recent studies revealed the importance of reciprocal signature sequence motifs that enable specific protein–protein interactions and consequently guide the transactions between physiological donors and acceptors. Such findings provide insights into strategies used by bacteria to regulate the flow of reactive intermediates and provide protein barcodes to uncover yet-unidentified cellular components involved in Fe–S metabolism.

scholarly journals MONACO: accurate biological network alignment through optimal neighborhood matching between focal nodes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Myung Woo ◽  
Byung-Jun Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Biological Network ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Network Alignment ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Alignment Algorithm ◽  
Computationally Efficient ◽  
Topological Similarity ◽  
Alignment Algorithms ◽  
Multiple Network

Abstract Motivation Alignment of protein–protein interaction networks can be used for the unsupervised prediction of functional modules, such as protein complexes and signaling pathways, that are conserved across different species. To date, various algorithms have been proposed for biological network alignment, many of which attempt to incorporate topological similarity between the networks into the alignment process with the goal of constructing accurate and biologically meaningful alignments. Especially, random walk models have been shown to be effective for quantifying the global topological relatedness between nodes that belong to different networks by diffusing node-level similarity along the interaction edges. However, these schemes are not ideal for capturing the local topological similarity between nodes. Results In this article, we propose MONACO, a novel and versatile network alignment algorithm that finds highly accurate pairwise and multiple network alignments through the iterative optimal matching of ‘local’ neighborhoods around focal nodes. Extensive performance assessment based on real networks as well as synthetic networks, for which the ground truth is known, demonstrates that MONACO clearly and consistently outperforms all other state-of-the-art network alignment algorithms that we have tested, in terms of accuracy, coherence and topological quality of the aligned network regions. Furthermore, despite the sharply enhanced alignment accuracy, MONACO remains computationally efficient and it scales well with increasing size and number of networks. Availability and implementation Matlab implementation is freely available at https://github.com/bjyoontamu/MONACO. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

scholarly journals Conservation of coevolving protein interfaces bridges prokaryote–eukaryote homologies in the twilight zone

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (52) ◽  
pp. 15018-15023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Rodriguez-Rivas ◽  
Simone Marsili ◽  
David Juan ◽  
Alfonso Valencia
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Twilight Zone ◽  
Sequence Information ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Sequence Alignments ◽  
Multiple Sequence ◽  
Protein Interfaces ◽  
Recent Developments

Protein–protein interactions are fundamental for the proper functioning of the cell. As a result, protein interaction surfaces are subject to strong evolutionary constraints. Recent developments have shown that residue coevolution provides accurate predictions of heterodimeric protein interfaces from sequence information. So far these approaches have been limited to the analysis of families of prokaryotic complexes for which large multiple sequence alignments of homologous sequences can be compiled. We explore the hypothesis that coevolution points to structurally conserved contacts at protein–protein interfaces, which can be reliably projected to homologous complexes with distantly related sequences. We introduce a domain-centered protocol to study the interplay between residue coevolution and structural conservation of protein–protein interfaces. We show that sequence-based coevolutionary analysis systematically identifies residue contacts at prokaryotic interfaces that are structurally conserved at the interface of their eukaryotic counterparts. In turn, this allows the prediction of conserved contacts at eukaryotic protein–protein interfaces with high confidence using solely mutational patterns extracted from prokaryotic genomes. Even in the context of high divergence in sequence (the twilight zone), where standard homology modeling of protein complexes is unreliable, our approach provides sequence-based accurate information about specific details of protein interactions at the residue level. Selected examples of the application of prokaryotic coevolutionary analysis to the prediction of eukaryotic interfaces further illustrate the potential of this approach.

scholarly journals Interface Refinement of Low-to-Medium Resolution Cryo-EM Complexes using HADDOCK2.4

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Neijenhuis ◽  
Siri C. van Keulen ◽  
Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin
Keyword(s):  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Protein Assemblies ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Protein Interfaces ◽  
Density Maps ◽  
Medium Resolution ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Multimeric Protein

A wide range of cellular processes require the formation of multimeric protein complexes. The rise of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has enabled the structural characterization of these protein assemblies. The produced density maps can, however, still suffer from limited resolution, impeding the process of resolving structures at atomic resolution. In order to solve this issue, monomers can be fitted into low-to-medium resolution maps. Unfortunately, the produced models frequently contain atomic clashes at the protein-protein interfaces (PPIs) as intermolecular interactions are typically not considered during monomer fitting. Here, we present a refinement approach based on HADDOCK2.4 to remove intermolecular clashes and optimize PPIs. A dataset of 14 cryo-EM complexes was used to test eight protocols. The best performing protocol, consisting of a semi-flexible simulated annealing refinement with restraints on the centroids of the monomers, was able to decrease intermolecular atomic clashes by 98% without significantly deteriorating the quality of the cryo-EM density fit.

scholarly journals InterPep2: global peptide–protein docking using interaction surface templates

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 2458-2465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isak Johansson-Åkhe ◽  
Claudio Mirabello ◽  
Björn Wallner
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Protein Docking ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Peptide Ligand ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Improved Performance

Abstract Motivation Interactions between proteins and peptides or peptide-like intrinsically disordered regions are involved in many important biological processes, such as gene expression and cell life-cycle regulation. Experimentally determining the structure of such interactions is time-consuming and difficult because of the inherent flexibility of the peptide ligand. Although several prediction-methods exist, most are limited in performance or availability. Results InterPep2 is a freely available method for predicting the structure of peptide–protein interactions. Improved performance is obtained by using templates from both peptide–protein and regular protein–protein interactions, and by a random forest trained to predict the DockQ-score for a given template using sequence and structural features. When tested on 252 bound peptide–protein complexes from structures deposited after the complexes used in the construction of the training and templates sets of InterPep2, InterPep2-Refined correctly positioned 67 peptides within 4.0 Å LRMSD among top10, similar to another state-of-the-art template-based method which positioned 54 peptides correctly. However, InterPep2 displays a superior ability to evaluate the quality of its own predictions. On a previously established set of 27 non-redundant unbound-to-bound peptide–protein complexes, InterPep2 performs on-par with leading methods. The extended InterPep2-Refined protocol managed to correctly model 15 of these complexes within 4.0 Å LRMSD among top10, without using templates from homologs. In addition, combining the template-based predictions from InterPep2 with ab initio predictions from PIPER-FlexPepDock resulted in 22% more near-native predictions compared to the best single method (22 versus 18). Availability and implementation The program is available from: http://wallnerlab.org/InterPep2. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

scholarly journals Protein interactions and ligand binding: From protein subfamilies to functional specificity

2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 1995-2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Rausell ◽  
David Juan ◽  
Florencio Pazos ◽  
Alfonso Valencia
Keyword(s):  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Protein Families ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Large Scale Analysis ◽  
Protein Interfaces ◽  
Specificity Determining Positions

The divergence accumulated during the evolution of protein families translates into their internal organization as subfamilies, and it is directly reflected in the characteristic patterns of differentially conserved residues. These specifically conserved positions in protein subfamilies are known as “specificity determining positions” (SDPs). Previous studies have limited their analysis to the study of the relationship between these positions and ligand-binding specificity, demonstrating significant yet limited predictive capacity. We have systematically extended this observation to include the role of differential protein interactions in the segregation of protein subfamilies and explored in detail the structural distribution of SDPs at protein interfaces. Our results show the extensive influence of protein interactions in the evolution of protein families and the widespread association of SDPs with protein interfaces. The combined analysis of SDPs in interfaces and ligand-binding sites provides a more complete picture of the organization of protein families, constituting the necessary framework for a large scale analysis of the evolution of protein function.

A HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL FOR PREDICTING PROTEIN INTERFACES

2007 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 739-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
CAO NGUYEN ◽  
KATHELEEN J. GARDINER ◽  
KRZYSZTOF J. CIOS
Keyword(s):  
Markov Model ◽  
Hidden Markov Model ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Hidden Markov ◽  
Transition Probability ◽  
Accessible Surface Area ◽  
Protein Chain

Protein–protein interactions play a defining role in protein function. Identifying the sites of interaction in a protein is a critical problem for understanding its functional mechanisms, as well as for drug design. To predict sites within a protein chain that participate in protein complexes, we have developed a novel method based on the Hidden Markov Model, which combines several biological characteristics of the sequences neighboring a target residue: structural information, accessible surface area, and transition probability among amino acids. We have evaluated the method using 5-fold cross-validation on 139 unique proteins and demonstrated precision of 66% and recall of 61% in identifying interfaces. These results are better than those achieved by other methods used for identification of interfaces.

The emergence of protein complexes: quaternary structure, dynamics and allostery

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Perica ◽  
Joseph A. Marsh ◽  
Filipa L. Sousa ◽  
Eviatar Natan ◽  
Lucy J. Colwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Biological Networks ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Quaternary Structure ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Protein Structures ◽  
Allosteric Communication ◽  
Physical Interactions ◽  
Correlated Mutations ◽  
Analytical Approaches

All proteins require physical interactions with other proteins in order to perform their functions. Most of them oligomerize into homomers, and a vast majority of these homomers interact with other proteins, at least part of the time, forming transient or obligate heteromers. In the present paper, we review the structural, biophysical and evolutionary aspects of these protein interactions. We discuss how protein function and stability benefit from oligomerization, as well as evolutionary pathways by which oligomers emerge, mostly from the perspective of homomers. Finally, we emphasize the specificities of heteromeric complexes and their structure and evolution. We also discuss two analytical approaches increasingly being used to study protein structures as well as their interactions. First, we review the use of the biological networks and graph theory for analysis of protein interactions and structure. Secondly, we discuss recent advances in techniques for detecting correlated mutations, with the emphasis on their role in identifying pathways of allosteric communication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document