scholarly journals Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon E. Pearse ◽  
Nicola J. Barson ◽  
Torfinn Nome ◽  
Guangtu Gao ◽  
Matthew A. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rainbow Trout ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Sexual Conflict ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Deleterious Mutation ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Heteromorphic Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Shared Genetic ◽  
Environmental Dependence

AbstractTraits with different fitness optima in males and females cause sexual conflict when they have a shared genetic basis. Heteromorphic sex chromosomes can resolve this conflict and protect sexually antagonistic polymorphisms but accumulate deleterious mutations. However, many taxa lack differentiated sex chromosomes, and how sexual conflict is resolved in these species is largely unknown. Here we present a chromosome-anchored genome assembly for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and characterize a 56 Mb double-inversion supergene that mediates sex-specific migration through sex-dependent dominance, a mechanism that reduces sexual conflict. The double-inversion contains key photosensory, circadian rhythm, adiposity, and sexual differentiation genes and displays frequency clines associated with latitude and temperature, revealing environmental dependence. Our results constitute the first example of sex-dependent dominance across a large autosomal supergene, a novel mechanism for sexual conflict resolution capable of protecting polygenic sexually antagonistic variation while avoiding the homozygous lethality and deleterious mutation load of heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

scholarly journals Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 1731-1742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon E. Pearse ◽  
Nicola J. Barson ◽  
Torfinn Nome ◽  
Guangtu Gao ◽  
Matthew A. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Circadian Rhythm ◽  
Rainbow Trout ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Sexual Conflict ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Alternative Mechanism ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Heteromorphic Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Shared Genetic

AbstractMales and females often differ in their fitness optima for shared traits that have a shared genetic basis, leading to sexual conflict. Morphologically differentiated sex chromosomes can resolve this conflict and protect sexually antagonistic variation, but they accumulate deleterious mutations. However, how sexual conflict is resolved in species that lack differentiated sex chromosomes is largely unknown. Here we present a chromosome-anchored genome assembly for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and characterize a 55-Mb double-inversion supergene that mediates sex-specific migratory tendency through sex-dependent dominance reversal, an alternative mechanism for resolving sexual conflict. The double inversion contains key photosensory, circadian rhythm, adiposity and sex-related genes and displays a latitudinal frequency cline, indicating environmentally dependent selection. Our results show sex-dependent dominance reversal across a large autosomal supergene, a mechanism for sexual conflict resolution capable of protecting sexually antagonistic variation while avoiding the homozygous lethality and deleterious mutations associated with typical heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

scholarly journals Gene Duplication and the Genome Distribution of Sex-Biased Genes

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Gallach ◽  
Susana Domingues ◽  
Esther Betrán
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Gene Duplication ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Evolutionary Patterns ◽  
Single Genome ◽  
Heteromorphic Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Genetic Conflicts

In species that have two sexes, a single genome encodes two morphs, as each sex can be thought of as a distinct morph. This means that the same set of genes are differentially expressed in the different sexes. Many questions emanate from this statement. What proportion of genes contributes to sexual dimorphism? How do they contribute to sexual dimorphism? How is sex-biased expression achieved? Which sex and what tissues contribute the most to sex-biased expression? Do sex-biased genes have the same evolutionary patterns as nonbiased genes? We review the current data on sex-biased expression in species with heteromorphic sex chromosomes and comment on the most important hypotheses suggested to explain the origin, evolution, and distribution patterns of sex-biased genes. In this perspective we emphasize how gene duplication serves as an important molecular mechanism to resolve genomic clashes and genetic conflicts by generating sex-biased genes, often sex-specific genes, and contributes greatly to the underlying genetic basis of sexual dimorphism.

Y chromosome specific markers and the evolution of dioecy in the genus Silene

Genome ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Hi Zhang ◽  
Veronica S Stilio ◽  
Farah Rehman ◽  
Amy Avery ◽  
David Mulcahy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Silene Latifolia ◽  
Dioecious Species ◽  
Sequence Characterized Amplified Region ◽  
Y Chromosomes ◽  
Heteromorphic Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Genus Silene ◽  
Evolution Of Dioecy

Sex determination in plants has been most thoroughly investigated in Silene latifolia, a dioecious species possessing heteromorphic sex chromosomes. We have identified several new Y chromosome linked RAPD markers and converted these to more reliable sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers by cloning the RAPD fragments and developing longer primers. Of the primer pairs for seven SCARs, five amplify a single, unique fragment from the DNA of male S. latifolia. Two sets of primers also amplify additional fragments common to males and females. Homology between the X and Y chromosomes is sufficient to allow the amplification of fragments from females under less stringent PCR conditions. Five of the SCARs also distinguish between the sexes of closely related dioecious taxa of the section Elisanthe, but not between the sexes of distantly related dioecious species. These markers will be useful for continued investigations into the evolution of sex, phylogenetic relationships among taxa, and population dynamics of sex ratios in the genus Silene.Key words: Melandrium, RAPDs, sex chromosomes, SCARs.

scholarly journals Sex ratio and the evolution of aggression in fruit flies

2021 ◽  
Vol 288 (1947) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor Bath ◽  
Danielle Edmunds ◽  
Jessica Norman ◽  
Charlotte Atkins ◽  
Lucy Harper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Environment ◽  
Experimental Evolution ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Female Aggression ◽  
Female Competition ◽  
Sexual Competition ◽  
The Social ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Competition For Resources ◽  
Shared Genetic

Aggressive behaviours are among the most striking displayed by animals, and aggression strongly impacts fitness in many species. Aggression varies plastically in response to the social environment, but we lack direct tests of how aggression evolves in response to intra-sexual competition. We investigated how aggression in both sexes evolves in response to the competitive environment, using populations of Drosophila melanogaster that we experimentally evolved under female-biased, equal, and male-biased sex ratios. We found that after evolution in a female-biased environment—with less male competition for mates—males fought less often on food patches, although the total frequency and duration of aggressive behaviour did not change. In females, evolution in a female-biased environment—where female competition for resources is higher—resulted in more frequent aggressive interactions among mated females, along with a greater increase in post-mating aggression. These changes in female aggression could not be attributed solely to evolution either in females or in male stimulation of female aggression, suggesting that coevolved interactions between the sexes determine female post-mating aggression. We found evidence consistent with a positive genetic correlation for aggression between males and females, suggesting a shared genetic basis. This study demonstrates the experimental evolution of a behaviour strongly linked to fitness, and the potential for the social environment to shape the evolution of contest behaviours.

scholarly journals Investigating the interaction between inter-locus and intra-locus sexual conflict using hemiclonal analysis in Drosophila melanogaster

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manas Geeta Arun ◽  
Tejinder Singh Chechi ◽  
Rakesh Meena ◽  
Shradha Dattaraya Bhosle ◽  
Srishti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Sex Ratio ◽  
Genetic Correlation ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Sexual Conflict ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Operational Sex Ratio ◽  
Female Fitness ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Males And Females

Divergence in the evolutionary interests of males and females leads to sexual conflict. Traditionally, sexual conflict has been classified into two types: inter-locus sexual conflict (IeSC) and intra-locus sexual conflict (IaSC). IeSC is modeled as a conflict over outcomes of intersexual reproductive interactions mediated by loci that are sex-limited in their effects. IaSC is thought to be a product of selection acting in opposite directions in males and females on traits with a common underlying genetic basis. While in their canonical formalisms IaSC and IeSC are mutually exclusive, there is growing support for the idea that the two may interact. Empirical evidence for such interactions, however, is limited. Here, we investigated the interaction between IeSC and IaSC in Drosophila melanogaster. Using hemiclonal analysis, we sampled 39 hemigenomes from a laboratory-adapted population of D. melanogaster. We measured the contribution of each hemigenome to adult male and female fitness at three different intensities of IeSC, obtained by varying the operational sex-ratio. Subsequently, we estimated the intensity of IaSC at each sex-ratio by calculating the intersexual genetic correlation for fitness and the proportion of sexually antagonistic fitness-variation. Our results indicate a statistically non-significant trend suggesting that increasing the strength of IeSC ameliorates IaSC in the population.

scholarly journals A deleterious mutation-sheltering theory for the evolution of sex chromosomes and supergenes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Jay ◽  
Tatiana Giraud ◽  
Emilie Tezenas
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Modeling ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Deleterious Mutation ◽  
Stochastic Simulations ◽  
Recessive Mutation ◽  
Deleterious Mutations ◽  
Evolution Of Sex ◽  
Mutation Load ◽  
Recombination Suppression ◽  
Chromosomal Inversions

Many organisms have sex chromosomes with large non-recombining regions having expanded stepwise, the reason why being still poorly understood. Theories proposed so far rely on differences between sexes but are poorly supported by empirical data and cannot account for the stepwise suppression of recombination around sex chromosomes in organisms without sexual dimorphism. We show here, by mathematical modeling and stochastic simulations, that recombination suppression in sex chromosomes can evolve simply because it shelters recessive deleterious mutations, which are ubiquitous in genomes. The permanent heterozygosity of sex-determining alleles protects linked chromosomal inversions against expression of their recessive mutation load, leading to an accumulation of inversions around these loci, as observed in nature. We provide here a testable and widely applicable theory to explain the evolution of sex chromosomes and of supergenes in general.

Chromosome studies of three families of pelagic heteropod molluscs (Atlantidae, Carinariidae, and Pterotracheidae) from Hawaiian waters

1997 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Thiriot-Quiévreux ◽  
Roger R. Seapy
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Number ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Diploid Number ◽  
Diploid Chromosome Number ◽  
Striking Difference ◽  
Evolutionary Trends ◽  
Air Drying ◽  
Submetacentric Chromosome ◽  
Heteromorphic Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Males And Females

Chromosome number and morphology were studied in gonadal tissue of 11 species of Atlantidae, 2 species of Carinariidae, and 3 species of Pterotracheidae, using an air-drying technique and Giemsa staining. In the Atlantidae the diploid chromosome number was the same in males and females and there were no heteromorphic chromosomes. The diploid chromosome number in nine species of Atlanta was 30 and the majority of chromosome pairs were metacentric and submetacentric. In Protatlanta souleyeti the diploid number was 28, and included five metacentric, six submetacentric, and three subtelocentric chromosome pairs. Oxygyrus keraudreni had a diploid chromosome number of 32, with 10 metacentric and 6 submetacentric chromosome pairs. A striking difference between the Atlantidae and the Carinariidae and Pterotracheidae was the presence of heteromorphic sex chromosomes in the latter two families. Male Pterosoma planum (2n = 32) had simple XY sex chromosomes, but males of Carinaria japonica (2n = 33), Pterotrachea scutata (2n = 33), Pterotrachea hippocampus (2n = 31), and Firoloida desmaresti (2n = 31) showed three heteromorphic chromosomes, suggesting a multiple sex-determining mechanism, X1X2Y. The locations of the female sex chromosomes in the karyotypes of female Pterotrachea hippocampus (2n = 32) and Firoloida desmaresti (2n = 32) were tentatively proposed. Cytogenetic features observed among the three families are supportive of previous interpretations of evolutionary trends in the Heteropoda based on morphology, i.e., that the Atlantidae are the most primitive family and gave rise to the Carinariidae and Pterotracheidae.

Reproductive behavior

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Olzer ◽  
Rebecca L. Ehrlich ◽  
Justa L. Heinen-Kay ◽  
Jessie Tanner ◽  
Marlene Zuk
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sexual Conflict ◽  
Female Choice ◽  
Reproductive Behavior ◽  
Mating Systems ◽  
Insect Behavior ◽  
Sequential Approach ◽  
Evolutionary Mechanisms ◽  
Anatomy And Physiology ◽  
Males And Females

Sex and reproduction lie at the heart of studies of insect behavior. We begin by providing a brief overview of insect anatomy and physiology, followed by an introduction to the overarching themes of parental investment, sexual selection, and mating systems. We then take a sequential approach to illustrate the diversity of phenomena and concepts behind insect reproductive behavior from pre-copulatory mate signalling through copulatory sperm transfer, mating positions, and sexual conflict, to post-copulatory sperm competition, and cryptic female choice. We provide an overview of the evolutionary mechanisms driving reproductive behavior. These events are linked by the economic defendability of mates or resources, and how these are allocated in each sex. Under the framework of economic defendability, the reader can better understand how sexual antagonistic behaviors arise as the result of competing optimal fitness strategies between males and females.

scholarly journals The Diversity and Evolution of Sex Chromosomes in Frogs

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 483
Author(s):  
Wen-Juan Ma ◽  
Paris Veltsos
Keyword(s):  
Sex Determination ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Evolution ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Comparative Genomic ◽  
Ancestral State ◽  
Heteromorphic Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Genomic Studies ◽  
Evolutionary Trajectories ◽  
Heterogametic Sex

Frogs are ideal organisms for studying sex chromosome evolution because of their diversity in sex chromosome differentiation and sex-determination systems. We review 222 anuran frogs, spanning ~220 Myr of divergence, with characterized sex chromosomes, and discuss their evolution, phylogenetic distribution and transitions between homomorphic and heteromorphic states, as well as between sex-determination systems. Most (~75%) anurans have homomorphic sex chromosomes, with XY systems being three times more common than ZW systems. Most remaining anurans (~25%) have heteromorphic sex chromosomes, with XY and ZW systems almost equally represented. There are Y-autosome fusions in 11 species, and no W-/Z-/X-autosome fusions are known. The phylogeny represents at least 19 transitions between sex-determination systems and at least 16 cases of independent evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes from homomorphy, the likely ancestral state. Five lineages mostly have heteromorphic sex chromosomes, which might have evolved due to demographic and sexual selection attributes of those lineages. Males do not recombine over most of their genome, regardless of which is the heterogametic sex. Nevertheless, telomere-restricted recombination between ZW chromosomes has evolved at least once. More comparative genomic studies are needed to understand the evolutionary trajectories of sex chromosomes among frog lineages, especially in the ZW systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document