scholarly journals A free-running oscillator times and executes centriole biogenesis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa G. Aydogan ◽  
Thomas L. Steinacker ◽  
Mohammad Mofatteh ◽  
Lisa Gartenmann ◽  
Alan Wainman ◽  
...  

AbstractThe accurate timing of organelle biogenesis and the precise regulation of organelle size are crucial for cell physiology. Centriole biogenesis initiates exclusively in S-phase, when a daughter centriole emerges from the side of a pre-existing mother and grows until it reaches its mother’s size. This process is regulated by Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4), which is recruited to centrioles in oscillatory waves in flies and human cells 1,2. The nature and function of Plk4 oscillations is, however, unknown. Here we discover that Plk4 forms an adaptive oscillator at the base of the growing centriole, whose function is to time and set the duration of centriole biogenesis in Drosophila embryos. We demonstrate that the Plk4 oscillator is free-running of, but is entrained and calibrated by, the core Cdk/Cyclin cell-cycle oscillator, explaining how centrioles can duplicate independently of the cell cycle 3–5. Mathematical modelling and further experiments indicate that the Plk4 oscillator is generated by a time-delayed negative-feedback loop in which Plk4 recruitment to, and dissociation from, the centriole is monitored via changes in the affinity-state of its centriolar receptor, Asterless. We postulate that such organelle-specific autonomous oscillators could regulate the timing and execution of organelle biogenesis more generally.

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 753-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.S. Detweiler ◽  
J.J. Li

CDC6 is essential for the initiation of DNA replication in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we examine the timing of Cdc6p expression and function during the cell cycle. Cdc6p is expressed primarily between mitosis and Start. This pattern of expression is due in part to posttranscriptional controls, since it is maintained when CDC6 is driven by a constitutively induced promoter. Transcriptional repression of CDC6 or exposure of cdc6-1(ts) cells to the restrictive temperature at mitosis blocks subsequent S phase, demonstrating that the activity of newly synthesized Cdc6p is required each cell cycle for DNA replication. In contrast, similar perturbations imposed on cells arrested in G(1) before Start have moderate or no effects on DNA replication. This suggests that, between mitosis and Start, Cdc6p functions in an early step of initiation, effectively making cells competent for replication. Prolonged exposure of cdc6-1(ts) cells to the restrictive temperature at the pre-Start arrest eventually does cripple S phase, indicating that Cdc6p also functions to maintain this initiation competence during G(1). The requirement for Cdc6p to establish and maintain initiation competence tightly correlates with the requirement for Cdc6p to establish and maintain the pre-replicative complex at a replication origin, strongly suggesting that the pre-replicative complex is an important intermediate for the initiation of DNA replication. Confining assembly of the complex to G(1) by restricting expression of Cdc6p to this period may be one way of ensuring precisely one round of replication per cell cycle.


2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1313-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith E. K. Calvert ◽  
Kristin M. Keck ◽  
Celeste Ptak ◽  
Jeffrey Shabanowitz ◽  
Donald F. Hunt ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the evolutionarily conserved nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein Nap1 is a cofactor for the import of histones H2A and H2B, a chromatin assembly factor and a mitotic factor involved in regulation of bud formation. To understand the mechanism by which Nap1 function is regulated, Nap1-interacting factors were isolated and identified by mass spectrometry. We identified several kinases among these proteins, including casein kinase 2 (CK2), and a new bud neck-associated protein, Nba1. Consistent with our identification of the Nap1-interacting kinases, we showed that Nap1 is phosphorylated in vivo at 11 sites and that Nap1 is phosphorylated by CK2 at three substrate serines. Phosphorylation of these serines was not necessary for normal bud formation, but mutation of these serines to either alanine or aspartic acid resulted in cell cycle changes, including a prolonged S phase, suggesting that reversible phosphorylation by CK2 is important for cell cycle regulation. Nap1 can shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm, and we also showed that CK2 phosphorylation promotes the import of Nap1 into the nucleus. In conclusion, our data show that Nap1 phosphorylation by CK2 appears to regulate Nap1 localization and is required for normal progression through S phase.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debjani Pal ◽  
Adrian E. Torres ◽  
Abbey L. Messina ◽  
Andrew Dickson ◽  
Kuntal De ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe interplay of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) and Skp1-Cul1-F-box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligases is necessary for controlling cell cycle transitions and checkpoint responses, which are critical for maintaining genomic stability. Yet, the mechanisms underlying the coordinated activity of these enzymes are not completely understood. Recently, Cyclin A- and Plk1- mediated phosphorylation of Cdh1 was demonstrated to trigger its ubiquitination by SCFβTRCP at the G1/S transition. However, Cyclin A-Cdk and Plk1 activities peak in G2 so it is unclear why Cdh1 is targeted at G1/S but not in G2. Here, we show that phosphorylation of Cdh1 by Chk1 contributes to its recognition by SCFβTRCP, promotes efficient S-phase entry, and is important for cellular proliferation. Conversely, Chk1 activity in G2 inhibits Cdh1 accumulation. Overall, these data suggest a model whereby the rise and fall of Chk1 activity is a key factor in the feedback loop between APC/CCdh1 and the replication machinery that enhances the G1/S and S/G2 transitions, respectively.


2003 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 535-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Gromley ◽  
Agata Jurczyk ◽  
James Sillibourne ◽  
Ensar Halilovic ◽  
Mette Mogensen ◽  
...  

Centrosomes nucleate microtubules and contribute to mitotic spindle organization and function. They also participate in cytokinesis and cell cycle progression in ways that are poorly understood. Here we describe a novel human protein called centriolin that localizes to the maternal centriole and functions in both cytokinesis and cell cycle progression. Centriolin silencing induces cytokinesis failure by a novel mechanism whereby cells remain interconnected by long intercellular bridges. Most cells continue to cycle, reenter mitosis, and form multicellular syncytia. Some ultimately divide or undergo apoptosis specifically during the protracted period of cytokinesis. At later times, viable cells arrest in G1/G0. The cytokinesis activity is localized to a centriolin domain that shares homology with Nud1p and Cdc11p, budding and fission yeast proteins that anchor regulatory pathways involved in progression through the late stages of mitosis. The Nud1p-like domain of centriolin binds Bub2p, another component of the budding yeast pathway. We conclude that centriolin is required for a late stage of vertebrate cytokinesis, perhaps the final cell cleavage event, and plays a role in progression into S phase.


1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1587-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Young ◽  
B K Tye

The Mcm2-7 proteins are a family of conserved proteins whose functions are essential for the initiation of DNA synthesis in all eukaryotes. These patients are constitutively present in high abundance in actively proliferating cells. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the intracellular concentrations of Mcms are between 100 and 500 times the number of replication origins. However, these proteins are limiting for the initiation of DNA synthesis at replication origins. Our studies indicate that only a small fraction of Mcm2 and Mcm3 tightly associates with chromatin, from late M phase to the beginning of the S phase. The rest of the Mcm2 and Mcm3 proteins are disturbed to both the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm in relatively constant levels throughout the cell cycle. We also show that S. cerevisiae Mcm3 is a phosphoprotein that exists in multiple isoforms and that distinct isoforms of Mcm2 and Mcm3 can be detected at specific stages of the cell cycle. These results suggest that the localization and function of the Mcm proteins are regulated by posttranslational phosphorylation in a manner that is consistent with a role for the Mcm proteins in restricting DNA replication to once per cell cycle.


2005 ◽  
Vol 171 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaozhong Zou ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Yujie Bai ◽  
William T. Gunning ◽  
David E. Wazer ◽  
...  

In mammalian cells, the centrosome consists of a pair of centrioles and amorphous pericentriolar material. The pair of centrioles, which are the core components of the centrosome, duplicate once per cell cycle. Centrosomes play a pivotal role in orchestrating the formation of the bipolar spindle during mitosis. Recent studies have linked centrosomal activity on centrioles or centriole-associated structures to cytokinesis and cell cycle progression through G1 into the S phase. In this study, we have identified centrobin as a centriole-associated protein that asymmetrically localizes to the daughter centriole. The silencing of centrobin expression by small interfering RNA inhibited centriole duplication and resulted in centrosomes with one or no centriole, demonstrating that centrobin is required for centriole duplication. Furthermore, inhibition of centriole duplication by centrobin depletion led to impaired cytokinesis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Mita ◽  
Jef D. Boeke

The LINE-1/L1 retrotransposon is a transposable element still active in the human genome. Most retrotransposons in the genome are inactive or repressed by several host mechanisms. In specific contexts, active L1 retrotransposons may evade repression and copy themselves into new genomic loci. Despite a general knowledge of the L1 life cycle, little was known about the dynamics of L1 proteins and function during the different stages of the host cell cycle. Our work highlighted a well-orchestrated localization of L1 proteins and mRNA that take advantage of mitotic nuclear membrane breakdown. Once in the nucleus, L1 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) are able to retrotranspose during the S phase when L1 retrotransposition peaks. Our conclusions highlight previously unappreciated features of the L1 life cycle, such as the differences between cytoplasmic and nuclear RNPs and the cycling of L1 ORF1 protein and L1 activity during progression through the cell cycle. These new observations are discussed here in light of the evolutionary arms race between L1 retrotransposons and the host cell.


1998 ◽  
Vol 111 (16) ◽  
pp. 2445-2453 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lammer ◽  
S. Wagerer ◽  
R. Saffrich ◽  
D. Mertens ◽  
W. Ansorge ◽  
...  

Cdc25 phosphatases play key roles in cell cycle progression by activating cyclin-dependent kinases. In human cells, cdc25 proteins are encoded by a multigene family, consisting of cdc25A, cdc25B and cdc25C. While cdc25A plays a crucial role at the G1/S phase transition, cdc25C is involved in the dephosphorylation and activation of the mitotic kinase, cdc2/cyclinB. In addition, cdc25C itself is regulated by cdc2/cyclinB which then creates a positive feedback loop that controls entry into mitosis. In this study we show that the activity of cdc25B appears during late S phase and peaks during G2 phase. Both in vitro and in vivo cdc25B is activated through phosphorylation during S-phase. Using a cell duplication, microinjection assay we show that ablation of cdc25B function by specific antibodies blocks cell cycle progression in Hs68 cells by inhibition of entry into mitosis. Cdc25B function neither plays a role in later stages of mitosis nor for the inititation of DNA replication. These results indicate that cdc25B is a mitotic regulator that might act as a ‘starter phosphatase’ to initiate the positive feedback loop at the entry into M phase.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1286-1287
Author(s):  
Heide Schatten ◽  
Christopher N. Hueser ◽  
Amitabha Chakrabarti

The formation of abnormal mitosis associated with cancer has been intriguing for many decades. While microtubules had been the focus of previous studies, recent research has focused on centrosomes, microtubule organizing centers which organize the mitotic apparatus during cell division. During normal mitosis centrosomes form two poles but in cancer, centrosomes can form three, four, or more poles, and organize tripolar, quadripolar, and multipolar mitoses, respectively. This has severe consequences for genomic stability because chromosomes are separated unequally to three, four, or more poles. This can result in aneuploidy and gene amplifications with multiple defects in cellular regulation. It can result in malignancy that is accompanied by cell cycle imbalances and abnormal cell proliferation. While radiation and chemical agents are known to damage DNA and can lead to cell cycle abnormalities, the damage of centrosome structure leading to abnormal mitosis deserves also consideration.


Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 465
Author(s):  
Colleen A. Mangold ◽  
David P. Hughes

Many organisms are able to elicit behavioral change in other organisms. Examples include different microbes (e.g., viruses and fungi), parasites (e.g., hairworms and trematodes), and parasitoid wasps. In most cases, the mechanisms underlying host behavioral change remain relatively unclear. There is a growing body of literature linking alterations in immune signaling with neuron health, communication, and function; however, there is a paucity of data detailing the effects of altered neuroimmune signaling on insect neuron function and how glial cells may contribute toward neuron dysregulation. It is important to consider the potential impacts of altered neuroimmune communication on host behavior and reflect on its potential role as an important tool in the “neuro-engineer” toolkit. In this review, we examine what is known about the relationships between the insect immune and nervous systems. We highlight organisms that are able to influence insect behavior and discuss possible mechanisms of behavioral manipulation, including potentially dysregulated neuroimmune communication. We close by identifying opportunities for integrating research in insect innate immunity, glial cell physiology, and neurobiology in the investigation of behavioral manipulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document