scholarly journals Cost of preterm birth during initial hospitalization: A care provider’s perspective

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadzri Zainal ◽  
Maznah Dahlui ◽  
Shahrul Aiman Soelar ◽  
Tin Tin Su

ABSTRACTPreterm birth incidence has risen globally and remains a major cause of neonatal mortality despite improved survival. The demand and cost of initial hospitalization has also increased. This study assessed care provider cost in neonatal intensive care units of two hospitals in the state of Kedah, Malaysia. It utilized universal sampling and prospectively followed up preterm infants till discharge. Care provider cost was assessed using mixed method of top down approach and activity based costing. A total of 112 preterm infants were recruited from intensive care (93 infants) and minimal care (19 infants). Majority were from the moderate (23%) and late (36%) preterm groups followed by very preterm (32%) and extreme preterm (9%). Mean total cost per infant increased with level of care and degree of prematurity from MYR 2,751 (MYR 374 - MYR 10,103) for preterm minimal care, MYR 8,478 (MYR 817 - MYR 47,354) for late preterm intensive care to MYR 41,598 (MYR 25,351- MYR 58,828) for extreme preterm intensive care. Mean cost per infant per day increased from MYR 401 (MYR 363- MYR 534), MYR 444 (MYR 354 – MYR 916) to MYR 532 (MYR 443-MYR 939) respectively. Cost was dominated by overhead (fixed) costs for general (hospital), intermediate (clinical support services) and final (NICU) cost centers where it constituted at least three quarters of mean admission cost per infant while the remainder was consumables (variable) costs. Breakdown of overhead cost showed NICU specific overhead contributing at least two thirds of mean admission cost per infant. Personnel salary made up three quarters of NICU specific overhead. Laboratory investigation was the cost driver for consumables ranging from 29% (intensive care) to 84% (minimal care) of mean total consumables cost per infant. Gender, birth weight and length of stay were significant factors and cost prediction was developed with these variables.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadzri Zainal ◽  
Maznah Dahlui ◽  
Tin Tin Su

ABSTRACTPreterm birth incidence has risen globally and the high cost of initial hospitalization poses financial burden to the family. This study assessed family cost at neonatal intensive care units of two hospitals in the state of Kedah, Malaysia. Family’s expenditure was obtained using a structured questionnaire. 126 families who were government employed spent a mean total cost of MYR 549 (MYR 0 - MYR 4,700) compared to MYR 650 (MYR 40 – MYR 9,300) for 244 families who were not government employed. Mean income loss was MYR 310 (MYR 0 – MYR 15,000) and MYR 348 (MYR 0 – MYR 5,500) respectively. Travel expenses was the cost driver for all families. 15% of families in this study were already living below the income poverty line and majority were not government employed. For the rest of the families, 21% became impoverished when one month household income was used for hospitalization cost but this lowered to 9% with cumulative household income by length of hospital stay. Overall incidence of catastrophic health expenditure among families was 38%. Using multivariable logistic regression household income and residential location were predictive factors for catastrophic health expenditure. Despite universal health coverage through subsidy of direct medical (hospital) cost, the high incidence of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment among families of preterm infants was attributable to out of pocket payment for direct non-medical cost (such as travel and food) and indirect cost from income loss. Government employed families with an array of employment benefits appear better protected against financial hardship compared to those in private sector or self-employed. Remedial measures include improving neonatal intensive care unit rooming-in service for mothers, complementary financial assistance for families and enhancing universal health coverage through affordable social health insurance for infant healthcare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem M. Soliman ◽  
Fatma Alzahraah Mostafa ◽  
Antoine Abdelmassih ◽  
Elham Sultan ◽  
Dalia Mosallam

Abstract Background Patent ductus arteriosus poses diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma for clinicians, diagnosis of persistent PDA, and determination of its clinical and hemodynamic significance are challenging. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of PDA in preterm infants admitted to our NICU, to report cardiac and respiratory complications of PDA, and to study the management strategies and their subsequent outcomes. Result Echocardiography was done for 152 preterm babies admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) on day 3 of life. Eighty-seven (57.2%) preterms had PDA; 54 (62.1%) non-hemodynamically significant PDA (non-hsPDA), and 33 (37.9%) hemodynamically significant PDA. Hemodynamically significant PDA received medical treatment (paracetamol 15 mg/kg/6 h IV for 3 days). Follow-up echocadiography was done on day 7 of life. Four babies died before echo was done on day 7. Twenty babies (68.9%) achieved closure after 1st paracetamol course. Nine babies received 2nd course paracetamol. Follow-up echo done on day 11 of life showed 4 (13.7%) babies achieved successful medical closure after 2nd paracetamol course; 5 babies failed closure and were assigned for surgical ligation. The group of non-hsPDA showed spontaneous closure after conservative treatment. Pulmonary hemorrhage was significantly higher in hsPDA group. Mortality was higher in hsPDA group than non-hsPDA group. Conclusion Echocardiographic evaluation should be done for all preterms suspected clinically of having PDA. We should not expose vulnerable population of preterm infants to medication with known side effects unnecessarily; we should limit medical closure of PDA to hsPDA. Paracetamol offers several important therapeutic advantages options being well tolerated and having more favorable side effects profile.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Coutts ◽  
Alix Woldring ◽  
Ann Pederson ◽  
Julie De Salaberry ◽  
Horacio Osiovich ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The goal of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is to provide optimal care for preterm and sick infants while supporting their growth and development. The NICU environment can be stressful for preterm infants and often cannot adequately support their neurodevelopmental needs. Kangaroo Care (KC) is an evidence-based developmental care strategy that has been shown to be associated with improved short and long term neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm infants. Despite evidence for best practice, uptake of the practice of KC in resource supported settings remains low. The aim of this study was to identify and describe healthcare providers’ perspectives on the barriers and enablers of implementing KC. Methods This qualitative study was set in 11 NICUs in British Columbia, Canada, ranging in size from 6 to 70 beds, with mixed levels of care from the less acute up to the most complex acute neonatal care. A total of 35 semi-structured healthcare provider interviews were conducted to understand their experiences providing KC in the NICU. Data were coded and emerging themes were identified. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided our research methods. Results Four overarching themes were identified as barriers and enablers to KC by healthcare providers in their particular setting: 1) the NICU physical environment; 2) healthcare provider beliefs about KC; 3) clinical practice variation; and 4) parent presence. Depending on the specific features of a given site these factors functioned as an enabler or barrier to practicing KC. Conclusions A ‘one size fits all’ approach cannot be identified to guide Kangaroo Care implementation as it is a complex intervention and each NICU presents unique barriers and enablers to its uptake. Support for improving parental presence, shifting healthcare provider beliefs, identifying creative solutions to NICU design and space constraints, and the development of a provincial guideline for KC in NICUs may together provide the impetus to change practice and reduce barriers to KC for healthcare providers, families, and administrators at local and system levels.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asaph Rolnitsky ◽  
David Urbach ◽  
Sharon Unger ◽  
Chaim M. Bell

Abstract Background Regional variation in cost of neonatal intensive care for extremely preterm infant is not documented. We sought to evaluate regional variation that may lead to benchmarking and cost saving. Methods An analysis of a Canadian national costing data from the payor perspective. We included all liveborn 23–28-week preterm infants in 2011–2015. We calculated variation in costs between provinces using non-parametric tests and a generalized linear model to evaluate cost variation after adjustment for gestational age, survival, and length of stay. Results We analysed 6932 infant records. The median total cost for all infants was $66,668 (Inter-Quartile Range (IQR): $4920–$125,551). Medians for the regions varied more than two-fold and ranged from $48,144 in Ontario to $122,526 in Saskatchewan. Median cost for infants who survived the first 3 days of life was $91,000 (IQR: $56,500–$188,757). Median daily cost for all infants was $1940 (IQR: $1518–$2619). Regional variation was significant after adjusting for survival more than 3 days, length of stay, gestational age, and year (pseudo-R2 = 0.9, p < 0.01). Applying the model on the second lowest-cost region to the rest of the regions resulted in a total savings of $71,768,361(95%CI: $65,527,634–$81,129,451) over the 5-year period ($14,353,672 annually), or over 11% savings for the total program cost of $643,837,303 over the study period. Conclusion Costs of neonatal intensive care are high. There is large regional variation that persists after adjustment for length of stay and survival. Our results can be used for benchmarking and as a target for focused cost optimization, savings, and investment in healthcare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Hoffsten ◽  
Laszlo Markasz ◽  
Katharina Ericson ◽  
Leif D. Nelin ◽  
Richard Sindelar

AbstractReliable data on causes of death (COD) in preterm infants are needed to assess perinatal care and current clinical guidelines. In this retrospective observational analysis of all deceased preterm infants born < 37 weeks’ gestational age (n = 278) at a Swedish tertiary neonatal intensive care unit, we compared preliminary COD from Medical Death Certificates with autopsy defined COD (2002–2018), and assessed changes in COD between two periods (period 1:2002–2009 vs. period 2:2011–2018; 2010 excluded due to centralized care and seasonal variation in COD). Autopsy was performed in 73% of all cases and was more than twice as high compared to national infant autopsy rates (33%). Autopsy revised or confirmed a suspected preliminary COD in 34.9% of the cases (23.6% and 11.3%, respectively). Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) as COD increased between Period 1 and 2 (5% vs. 26%). The autopsy rate did not change between the two study periods (75% vs. 71%). We conclude that autopsy determined the final COD in a third of cases, while the incidence of NEC as COD increased markedly during the study period. Since there is a high risk to determine COD incorrectly based on clinical findings in preterm infants, autopsy remains a valuable method to obtain reliable COD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document