scholarly journals Retinal horizontal cells use different synaptic sites for global feedforward and local feedback signaling

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Behrens ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Shubhash Chandra Yadav ◽  
Silke Haverkamp ◽  
Stephan Irsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Spatial Arrangement ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Gamma Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Specific Feedback ◽  
Local Feedback

AbstractIn the outer plexiform layer (OPL) of the mouse retina, two types of cone photoreceptors (cones) provide input to more than a dozen types of cone bipolar cells (CBCs). This transmission is modulated by a single horizontal cell (HC) type, the only interneuron in the outer retina. Horizontal cells form feedback synapses with cones and feedforward synapses with CBCs. However, the exact computational role of HCs is still debated. Along with performing global signaling within their laterally coupled network, HCs also provide local, cone-specific feedback. Specifically, it has not been clear which synaptic structures HCs use to provide local feedback to cones and global forward signaling to CBCs.Here, we reconstructed in a serial block-face electron microscopy volume the dendritic trees of five HCs as well as cone axon terminals and CBC dendrites to quantitatively analyze their connectivity. In addition to the fine HC dendritic tips invaginating cone axon terminals, we also identified “bulbs”, short segments of increased dendritic diameter on the primary dendrites of HCs. These bulbs are located well below the cone axon terminal base and make contact to other cells mostly identified as other HCs or CBCs. Using immunolabeling we show that HC bulbs express vesicular gamma-aminobutyric acid transporters and co-localize with GABA receptor γ2 subunits. Together, this suggests the existence of two synaptic strata in the mouse OPL, spatially separating cone-specific feedback and feedforward signaling to CBCs. A biophysics-based computational model of a HC dendritic branch supports the hypothesis that the spatial arrangement of synaptic contacts allows simultaneous local feedback and global feedforward signaling.

Receptive field of the retinal bipolar cell: a pharmacological study in the tiger salamander

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 2005-2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Hare ◽  
W. G. Owen
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Gaba Receptors ◽  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Pharmacological Study ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Gaba Uptake ◽  
Gamma Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Gabaergic Synapse

1. It is widely believed that signals contributing to the receptive field surrounds of retinal bipolar cells pass from horizontal cells to bipolar cells via GABAergic synapses. To test this notion, we applied gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonists and antagonists to isolated, perfused retinas of the salamander Ambystoma tigrinum while recording intracellularly from bipolar cells, horizontal cells, and photoreceptors. 2. As we previously reported, administration of the GABA analogue D-aminovaleric acid in concert with picrotoxin did not block horizontal cell responses or the center responses of bipolar cells but blocked the surround responses of both on-center and off-center bipolar cells. 3. Surround responses were not blocked by the GABA, antagonists picrotoxin or bicuculline, the GABAB agonist baclofen or the GABAB antagonist phaclofen, and the GABAC antagonists picrotoxin or cis-4-aminocrotonic acid. Combinations of these drugs were similarly ineffective. 4. GABA itself activated a powerful GABA uptake mechanism in horizontal cells for which nipecotic acid is a competitive agonist. It also activated, both in horizontal cells and bipolar cells, large GABAA conductances that shunted light responses but that could be blocked by picrotoxin or bicuculline. 5. GABA, administered together with picrotoxin to block the shunting effect of GABAA activation, did not eliminate bipolar cell surround responses at concentrations sufficient to saturate the known types of GABA receptors. 6. Surround responses were not blocked by glycine or its antagonist strychnine, or by combinations of drugs designed to eliminate GABAergic and glycinergic pathways simultaneously. 7. Although we cannot fully discount the involvement of a novel GABAergic synapse, the simplest explanation of our findings is that the primary pathway mediating the bipolar cell's surround is neither GABAergic nor glycinergic.

The interplexiform cell system II. Effects of dopamine on goldfish retinal neurones

1978 ◽  
Vol 201 (1142) ◽  
pp. 27-55 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell System ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Specific Effects ◽  
Β Blocker

The effects of atomized solutions of dopamine and certain related com­pounds have been tested on the intracellularly recorded activity of receptor, horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in the goldfish retina. Dopamine depolarizes the cone L-type horizontal cells and reduces the amplitude of light-evoked responses. These effects on L-type horizontal cells are completely abolished by the α-adrenergie blocker, phentolamine, but only partially depressed by the β-blocker, propanolol. L-Dopa, noradrenalin, and serotonin do not have effects on L-type horizontal cells when applied at concentrations similar to those that cause maximal dopamine effects. The results suggest that the effects of dopamine on L-type horizontal cells are specific, and we propose that they mimic the effects of interplexiform cell activity. Dopamine has no effects on rod horizontal cells in goldfish and variable effects on C-type horizontal cells. On bipolar cells, dopamine alters the dark membrane potential, enhances the central response to light, and depresses the surround response. Dopamine also decreases the horizontal cell feedback evident in cone responses. Finally, dopamine strongly depolarizes the transient type of amacrine cells, but it has no significant effect on the sustained type of amacrine cells. Assuming that dopamine is the transmitter of interplexiform cells, we suggest that these neurons regulate lateral inhibitory effects mediated by L-type horizontal cells in the outer plexiform layer and transient amacrine cells in the inner plexiform layer. In addition, it appears as if interplexiform cells have specific effects on bipolar cells and are capable of regulating centre-surround antagonism in these cells. The net effect of interplexiform cell activity is to isolate the bipolars from the influence of the surround.

scholarly journals Synaptic Remodeling in the Cone Pathway After Early Postnatal Horizontal Cell Ablation

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Nemitz ◽  
Karin Dedek ◽  
Ulrike Janssen-Bienhold
Keyword(s):  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Outer Nuclear Layer ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Retina Development ◽  
Synaptic Remodeling ◽  
Cell Ablation ◽  
Cone Pathway

The first synapse of the visual pathway is formed by photoreceptors, horizontal cells and bipolar cells. While ON bipolar cells invaginate into the photoreceptor terminal and form synaptic triads together with invaginating horizontal cell processes, OFF bipolar cells make flat contacts at the base of the terminal. When horizontal cells are ablated during retina development, no invaginating synapses are formed in rod photoreceptors. However, how cone photoreceptors and their synaptic connections with bipolar cells react to this insult, is unclear so far. To answer this question, we specifically ablated horizontal cells from the developing mouse retina. Following ablation around postnatal day 4 (P4)/P5, cones initially exhibited a normal morphology and formed flat contacts with OFF bipolar cells, but only few invaginating contacts with ON bipolar cells. From P15 on, synaptic remodeling became obvious with clustering of cone terminals and mislocalized cone somata in the OPL. Adult cones (P56) finally displayed highly branched axons with numerous terminals which contained ribbons and vesicular glutamate transporters. Furthermore, type 3a, 3b, and 4 OFF bipolar cell dendrites sprouted into the outer nuclear layer and even expressed glutamate receptors at the base of newly formed cone terminals. These results indicate that cones may be able to form new synapses with OFF bipolar cells in adult mice. In contrast, cone terminals lost their invaginating contacts with ON bipolar cells, highlighting the importance of horizontal cells for synapse maintenance. Taken together, our data demonstrate that early postnatal horizontal cell ablation leads to differential remodeling in the cone pathway: whereas synapses between cones and ON bipolar cells were lost, new putative synapses were established between cones and OFF bipolar cells. These results suggest that synapse formation and maintenance are regulated very differently between flat and invaginating contacts at cone terminals.

Synaptic connexions made by horizontal cells within the outer plexiform layer of the retina of the cat and the rabbit

1974 ◽  
Vol 186 (1085) ◽  
pp. 317-331 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Outer Plexiform Layer ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Chemical Synapses

Two ultrastructurally distinctive types of horizontal cells are described in the retinae of the cat and the rabbit. Evidence is presented that they have different synaptic connexions in the outer plexiform layer. The majority of the presynaptic structures identified in the outer plexiform layer of the rabbit (as defined on page 320) belong to a neurofilamentous type of horizontal cell. It is suggested that the cat may be the same. No synapses have been identified on to, or from, the second, predominantly neurotubular, type of horizontal cell. No chemical synapses on to, or between, horizontal cells have been found. Thus input of this kind to both types of horizontal cells is as yet only known to be from the photoreceptors. All positively identified postsynaptic processes were the dendrites or perikarya of bipolar cells. Other cell types that are possibly pre- or postsynaptic in the outer plexiform layer are discussed.

Synaptic organization of cone cells in the turtle retina

1971 ◽  
Vol 262 (844) ◽  
pp. 365-381 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Intercellular Junctions ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Outer Plexiform Layer ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Synaptic Organization ◽  
Basal Surface ◽  
Cone Cells ◽  
Cell Processes

The intercellular junctions of cone pedicles in the turtle retina were studied electronmicroscopically in tissue prepared by conventional techniques or impregnated by the method of Golgi. Dendritic branchlets of bipolar cells make specialized contacts with the basal surface of the pedicles. Processes ending laterally to wedge-shaped projections (synaptic ridges) of the pedicles probably belong always to horizontal cells, and make proximal and distal (to the synaptic ridges) junctions with the pedicles. Processes ending opposite the apex of the synaptic ridges are engaged also in two kinds of specialized contacts, termed apical and distal junctions. Basal processes of the cone pedicles make specialized contacts with adjacent pedicles, and with unidentified processes at the outer plexiform layer; their endings abut upon horizontal cell processes lodged within the pedicles of other cone cells.

scholarly journals Synaptic Scaffolds, Ion Channels and Polyamines in Mouse Photoreceptor Synapses: Anatomy of a Signaling Complex

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Vila ◽  
Eyad Shihabeddin ◽  
Zhijing Zhang ◽  
Abirami Santhanam ◽  
Christophe P. Ribelayga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ion Channels ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Pannexin 1 ◽  
Signaling Complex ◽  
Voltage Dependent ◽  
Polyamine Content ◽  
And Control

Synaptic signaling complexes are held together by scaffold proteins, each of which is selectively capable of interacting with a number of other proteins. In previous studies of rabbit retina, we found Synapse-Associated Protein-102 (SAP102) and Channel Associated Protein of Synapse-110 (Chapsyn110) selectively localized in the tips of horizontal cell processes at contacts with rod and cone photoreceptors, along with several interacting ion channels. We have examined the equivalent suites of proteins in mouse retina and found similarities and differences. In the mouse retina we identified Chapsyn110 as the scaffold selectively localized in the tips of horizontal cells contacting photoreceptors, with Sap102 more diffusely present. As in rabbit, the inward rectifier potassium channel Kir2.1 was present with Chapsyn110 on the tips of horizontal cell dendrites within photoreceptor invaginations, where it could provide a hyperpolarization-activated current that could contribute to ephaptic signaling in the photoreceptor synapses. Pannexin 1 and Pannexin 2, thought to play a role in ephaptic and/or pH mediated signaling, were present in the outer plexiform layer, but likely not in the horizontal cells. Polyamines regulate many ion channels and control the degree of rectification of Kir2.1 by imposing a voltage-dependent block. During the day polyamine immunolabeling was unexpectedly high in photoreceptor terminals compared to other areas of the retina. This content was significantly lower at night, when polyamine content was predominantly in Müller glia, indicating daily rhythms of polyamine content. Both rod and cone terminals displayed the same rhythm. While polyamine content was not prominent in horizontal cells, if polyamines are released, they may regulate the activity of Kir2.1 channels located in the tips of HCs. The rhythmic change in polyamine content of photoreceptor terminals suggests that a daily rhythm tunes the behavior of suites of ion channels within the photoreceptor synapses.

3H-adenosine uptake selectively labels rod horizontal cells in goldfish retina

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith M. Studholme ◽  
Stephen Yazulla
Keyword(s):  
Staining Pattern ◽  
Outer Nuclear Layer ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
The Other ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Adenosine Uptake ◽  
Double Label ◽  
Injection Methods ◽  
Goldfish Retina

AbstractThere are four types of horizontal cell in the goldfish retina, three cone- and one rod-type. The neurotransmitter of only one type, the H1 (cone) horizontal cell, has been identified as GABA. 3H-adenosine uptake was examined as a possible marker for the other classes of horizontal cell. Isolated goldfish retinae were incubated in 3H-adenosine (10–40 μCi) in HEPES-buffered saline for 30 min, then fixed, embedded in plastic, and processed for light-microscopic autoradiography (ARG). For double-label immuno/ARG studies, l-μm-thick sections were processed for GABA postembed immunocytochemistry, then for ARG. 3H-adenosine uptake was localized to cone photoreceptors, presumed precursor cells in the proximal outer nuclear layer, and to a single, continuous row of horizontal cell bodies in the inner nuclear layer. No uptake was localized to the region of horizontal cell axon terminals. 3H-adenosine uptake did not colocalize with GABA-IR in H1 horizontal cells, but it did colocalize with adenosine deaminase immunoreactivity. It is concluded that 3H-adenosine uptake selectively labels rod horizontal cells in the goldfish retina based on position and staining pattern, which are similar to rod horizontal cells stained by Golgi or HRP injection methods. The use of 3H-adenosine uptake may provide a useful tool to study other properties of rod horizontal cells (i.e. development) as well as provide clues as to the transmitter used by these interneurons.

The effects of glycine and GABA on isolated horizontal cells from the salamander retina

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 2002-2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Gilbertson ◽  
S. Borges ◽  
M. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Gamma Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Light Responses ◽  
Whole Cell Patch Clamp ◽  
Synaptic Interactions ◽  
Outward Currents ◽  
Na Currents ◽  
Inward Currents ◽  
Kinetics Of

1. Horizontal cells, identified by their morphology, were isolated from the salamander retina and examined in whole cell patch clamp. 2. All cells showed large outward currents activating positive to about -50 mV, and a minority of cells showed fast, tetrodotoxin-suppressible Na+ currents. Slow inward currents that might shape the light responses were never observed. 3. All cells showed conductance increases to both gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine that were completely blocked by bicuculline and strychnine, respectively. No cross-blocking by these antagonists was observed. Partial replacements of Cl- with large, impermeant anions indicated that both GABA- and glycine-evoked currents were carried by Cl- ions. 4. Responses to both GABA and glycine desensitized strongly with time constants of approximately 2 s. 5. Responses to glutamate were not enhanced by glycine. Similarly, responses to GABA were not enhanced by glutamate. 6. GABA-mediated synaptic interactions between horizontal cells may account for the changes in the kinetics of horizontal cell light responses seen when glycine is applied to the intact retina.

Excitatory amino acid receptors of rod- and cone-driven horizontal cells in the rabbit retina

1987 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Massey ◽  
R. F. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Potential ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Excitatory Amino Acid ◽  
Direct Action ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Nmda Antagonist ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Rabbit Retina ◽  
Light Responses ◽  
Axon Terminals

Intracellular recordings were obtained from horizontal cells in the superfused retina-eyecup preparation of the rabbit. Rod- and cone-dominated horizontal cells were studied using bath-applied excitatory amino acid analogues. Cone-dominated horizontal cell somas were depolarized by kainate (KA) or quisqualate (QQ) and their light responses were reduced or abolished. They were not affected by N-methyl-DL-aspartate (NMDLA) at concentrations up to 2 mM or by 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate (APB), a selective agonist for the ON bipolar cell. When synaptic transmission was blocked with cobalt, horizontal cell somas were hyperpolarized. Under these conditions, KA and QQ caused large depolarizations suggesting that these agents have a direct action on horizontal cell somas. Excitatory amino acid antagonists such as cis-2,3-piperidine dicarboxylic acid (PDA) and kynurenic acid (Kyn) hyperpolarized horizontal cell somas to the level of the light-driven membrane potential. These antagonists blocked both the light-driven responses and the depolarizing action of KA. The specific NMDA antagonist 2-amino-7-phosphonoheptanoate (AP-7) had no effect on the membrane potential or light-driven responses of horizontal cell somas. In contrast to a previous report, we found no evidence that low concentrations of NMDLA could hyperpolarize horizontal cells or act as a KA antagonist in the rabbit retina. Rod-dominated axon terminals were identified by waveform, threshold, and the presence of a large rod after-potential evoked by high light intensity. These cells were depolarized by KA and their light responses were attenuated. NMDLA and APB had no effect on these cells. The general antagonists, PDA and Kyn, hyperpolarized axon terminals and blocked their light-evoked responses. The specific NMDA antagonist, AP-7, had no effect on these cells. These results suggest that the synaptic receptors that mediate light input to both rod- and cone-dominated horizontal cells are kainate or quisqualate receptors. This implies that the rod and cone transmitters of the rabbit retina are similar, with the characteristics of an excitatory amino acid, such as glutamate.

scholarly journals The Nature of Surround-Induced Depolarizing Responses in Goldfish Cones

1999 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.A. Kraaij ◽  
H. Spekreijse ◽  
M. Kamermans
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Potential ◽  
Neurotransmitter Release ◽  
Calcium Current ◽  
Calcium Influx ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Activation Function ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Calcium Dependent ◽  
Postsynaptic Cell

Cones in the vertebrate retina project to horizontal and bipolar cells and the horizontal cells feedback negatively to cones. This organization forms the basis for the center/surround organization of the bipolar cells, a fundamental step in the visual signal processing. Although the surround responses of bipolar cells have been recorded on many occasions, surprisingly, the underlying surround-induced responses in cones are not easily detected. In this paper, the nature of the surround-induced responses in cones is studied. Horizontal cells feed back to cones by shifting the activation function of the calcium current in cones to more negative potentials. This shift increases the calcium influx, which increases the neurotransmitter release of the cone. In this paper, we will show that under certain conditions, in addition to this increase of neurotransmitter release, a calcium-dependent chloride current will be activated, which polarizes the cone membrane potential. The question is, whether the modulation of the calcium current or the polarization of the cone membrane potential is the major determinant for feedback-mediated responses in second-order neurons. Depolarizing light responses of biphasic horizontal cells are generated by feedback from monophasic horizontal cells to cones. It was found that niflumic acid blocks the feedback-induced depolarizing responses in cones, while the shift of the calcium current activation function and the depolarizing biphasic horizontal cell responses remain intact. This shows that horizontal cells can feed back to cones, without inducing major changes in the cone membrane potential. This makes the feedback synapse from horizontal cells to cones a unique synapse. Polarization of the presynaptic (horizontal) cell leads to calcium influx in the postsynaptic cell (cone), but due to the combined activity of the calcium current and the calcium-dependent chloride current, the membrane potential of the postsynaptic cell will be hardly modulated, whereas the output of the postsynaptic cell will be strongly modulated. Since no polarization of the postsynaptic cell is needed for these feedback-mediated responses, this mechanism of synaptic transmission can modulate the neurotransmitter release in single synaptic terminals without affecting the membrane potential of the entire cell.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document