scholarly journals Disruption of origin chromatin structure by helicase activation in the absence of DNA replication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Hoffman ◽  
Heather K. MacAlpine ◽  
David M. MacAlpine
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Micrococcal Nuclease ◽  
Sequence Context ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Conditional Mutant ◽  
Local Sequence ◽  
Efficient Replication

Prior to initiation of DNA replication, the eukaryotic helicase, Mcm2-7, must be activated to unwind DNA at replication start sites in early S phase. To study helicase activation within origin chromatin, we constructed a conditional mutant of the polymerase α subunit Cdc17 (or Pol1) to prevent priming and block replication. Recovery of these cells at permissive conditions resulted in the generation of unreplicated gaps at origins, likely due to helicase activation prior to replication initiation. We used micrococcal nuclease (MNase)-based chromatin occupancy profiling under restrictive conditions to study chromatin dynamics associated with helicase activation. Helicase activation in the absence of DNA replication resulted in the disruption and disorganization of chromatin, which extends up to 1 kb from early, efficient replication origins. The CMG holohelicase complex also moves the same distance out from the origin, producing single-stranded DNA that activates the intra-S-phase checkpoint. Loss of the checkpoint did not regulate the progression and stalling of the CMG complex but rather resulted in the disruption of chromatin at both early and late origins. Finally, we found that the local sequence context regulates helicase progression in the absence of DNA replication, suggesting that the helicase is intrinsically less processive when uncoupled from replication.

scholarly journals Disruption of origin chromatin structure by helicase activation in the absence of DNA replication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Hoffman ◽  
David M. MacAlpine
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Micrococcal Nuclease ◽  
Sequence Context ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Conditional Mutant ◽  
Local Sequence ◽  
Efficient Replication

Prior to initiation of DNA replication, the eukaryotic helicase, Mcm2-7, must be activated to unwind DNA at replication start sites in early S-phase. To study helicase activation within origin chromatin, we constructed a conditional mutant of the polymerase α subunit Cdc17 (or Pol1) to prevent priming and block replication. Recovery of these cells at permissive conditions resulted in the generation of unreplicated gaps at origins, likely due to helicase activation prior to replication initiation. We used micrococcal nuclease (MNase)-based chromatin occupancy profiling under restrictive conditions to study chromatin dynamics associated with helicase activation. Helicase activation in the absence of DNA replication resulted in the disruption and disorganization of chromatin which extends up to one kilobase from early, efficient replication origins. The CMG holo-helicase complex also moves the same distance out from the origin, producing single-stranded DNA that activates the intra-S-phase checkpoint. Loss of the checkpoint did not regulate the progression and stalling of the CMG complex, but rather resulted in the disruption of chromatin at both early and late origins. Finally, we found that the local sequence context regulates helicase progression in the absence of DNA replication, suggesting that the helicase is intrinsically less processive when uncoupled from replication.

scholarly journals Regulation of DNA Replication Licensing and Re-Replication by Cdt1

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 5195
Author(s):  
Hui Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Repair Synthesis ◽  
Ubiquitin E3 Ligase

In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication licensing is precisely regulated to ensure that the initiation of genomic DNA replication in S phase occurs once and only once for each mitotic cell division. A key regulatory mechanism by which DNA re-replication is suppressed is the S phase-dependent proteolysis of Cdt1, an essential replication protein for licensing DNA replication origins by loading the Mcm2-7 replication helicase for DNA duplication in S phase. Cdt1 degradation is mediated by CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase, which further requires Cdt1 binding to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) through a PIP box domain in Cdt1 during DNA synthesis. Recent studies found that Cdt2, the specific subunit of CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase that targets Cdt1 for degradation, also contains an evolutionarily conserved PIP box-like domain that mediates the interaction with PCNA. These findings suggest that the initiation and elongation of DNA replication or DNA damage-induced repair synthesis provide a novel mechanism by which Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2 are both recruited onto the trimeric PCNA clamp encircling the replicating DNA strands to promote the interaction between Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2. The proximity of PCNA-bound Cdt1 to CRL4Cdt2 facilitates the destruction of Cdt1 in response to DNA damage or after DNA replication initiation to prevent DNA re-replication in the cell cycle. CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase may also regulate the degradation of other PIP box-containing proteins, such as CDK inhibitor p21 and histone methylase Set8, to regulate DNA replication licensing, cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and genome stability by directly interacting with PCNA during DNA replication and repair synthesis.

scholarly journals High-throughput analysis of DNA replication in single human cells reveals constrained variability in the location and timing of replication initiation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dashiell J Massey ◽  
Amnon Koren
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Origin ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
High Throughput Analysis ◽  
Timing Variability ◽  
Fixed Set ◽  
Fixed Order

DNA replication occurs throughout the S phase of the cell cycle, initiating from replication origin loci that fire at different times. Debate remains about whether origins are a fixed set of loci used across all cells or a loose agglomeration of potential origins used stochastically in individual cells, and about how consistent their firing time during S phase is across cells. Here, we develop an approach for profiling DNA replication in single human cells and apply it to 2,305 replicating cells spanning the entire S phase. The resolution and scale of the data enabled us to specifically analyze initiation sites and show that these sites have confined locations that are consistently used among individual cells. Further, we find that initiation sites are activated in a similar, albeit not fixed, order across cells. Taken together, our results suggest that replication timing variability is constrained both spatially and temporally, and that the degree of variation is consistent across human cell lines.

scholarly journals Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Mutants Defective in DNA Replication Initiation

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 4374-4382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Yin ◽  
Alexandra Monica Locovei ◽  
Gennaro D'Urso
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, blocks to DNA replication elongation trigger the intra-S phase checkpoint that leads to the activation of the Cds1 kinase. Cds1 is required to both prevent premature entry into mitosis and to stabilize paused replication forks. Interestingly, although Cds1 is essential to maintain the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication elongation, mutants defective in DNA replication initiation require the Chk1 kinase. This suggests that defects in DNA replication initiation can lead to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint independent of the intra-S phase checkpoint. This might result from reduced origin firing that leads to an increase in replication fork stalling or replication fork collapse that activates the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. We refer to the Chk1-dependent, Cds1-independent phenotype as the rid phenotype (for replication initiation defective). Chk1 is active in rid mutants, and rid mutant viability is dependent on the DNA damage checkpoint, and surprisingly Mrc1, a protein required for activation of Cds1. Mutations in Mrc1 that prevent activation of Cds1 have no effect on its ability to support rid mutant viability, suggesting that Mrc1 has a checkpoint-independent role in maintaining the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication initiation.

scholarly journals The role of DDK and Treslin-MTBP in coordinating replication licensing and pre-Initiation Complex formation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Volpi ◽  
Peter J. Gillespie ◽  
Gaganmeet Singh Chadha ◽  
J. Julian Blow
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Complex Formation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Initiation Complex ◽  
Crucial Step ◽  
Egg Extract ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication ◽  
Rate Limiting

AbstractTreslin/Ticrr is required for the initiation of DNA replication and binds to MTBP (Mdm2 Binding Protein). Here we show that in Xenopus egg extract, MTBP forms an elongated tetramer with Treslin containing two molecules of each protein. Immunodepletion and add-back experiments show that Treslin-MTBP is rate-limiting for replication initiation. It is recruited onto chromatin before S phase starts and recruitment continues during S phase. We show that DDK activity both increases and strengthens the interaction of Treslin-MTBP with licensed chromatin. We also show that DDK activity cooperates with CDK activity to drive the interaction of Treslin-MTBP with TopBP1 which is a regulated crucial step in pre-Initiation Complex formation. These results suggest how DDK works together with CDKs to regulate Treslin-MTBP and plays a crucial in selecting which origins will undergo initiation.

scholarly journals The role of DDK and Treslin–MTBP in coordinating replication licensing and pre-initiation complex formation

Open Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Volpi ◽  
Peter J. Gillespie ◽  
Gaganmeet Singh Chadha ◽  
J. Julian Blow
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Complex Formation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Initiation Complex ◽  
Crucial Step ◽  
Egg Extract ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication ◽  
Rate Limiting

Treslin/Ticrr is required for the initiation of DNA replication and binds to MTBP (Mdm2 Binding Protein). Here, we show that in Xenopus egg extract, MTBP forms an elongated tetramer with Treslin containing two molecules of each protein. Immunodepletion and add-back experiments show that Treslin–MTBP is rate limiting for replication initiation. It is recruited onto chromatin before S phase starts and recruitment continues during S phase. We show that DDK activity both increases and strengthens the interaction of Treslin–MTBP with licensed chromatin. We also show that DDK activity cooperates with CDK activity to drive the interaction of Treslin–MTBP with TopBP1 which is a regulated crucial step in pre-initiation complex formation. These results suggest how DDK works together with CDKs to regulate Treslin–MTBP and plays a crucial in selecting which origins will undergo initiation.

scholarly journals Human Mcm10 Regulates the Catalytic Subunit of DNA Polymerase-α and Prevents DNA Damage during Replication

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 4085-4095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharbani Chattopadhyay ◽  
Anja-Katrin Bielinsky
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Catalytic Subunit ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Phase Entry

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, minichromosome maintenance protein (Mcm) 10 interacts with DNA polymerase (pol)-α and functions as a nuclear chaperone for the catalytic subunit, which is rapidly degraded in the absence of Mcm10. We report here that the interaction between Mcm10 and pol-α is conserved in human cells. We used a small interfering RNA-based approach to deplete Mcm10 in HeLa cells, and we observed that the catalytic subunit of pol-α, p180, was degraded with similar kinetics as Mcm10, whereas the regulatory pol-α subunit, p68, remained unaffected. Simultaneous loss of Mcm10 and p180 inhibited S phase entry and led to an accumulation of already replicating cells in late S/G2 as a result of DNA damage, which triggered apoptosis in a subpopulation of cells. These phenotypes differed considerably from analogous studies in Drosophila embryo cells that did not exhibit a similar arrest. To further dissect the roles of Mcm10 and p180 in human cells, we depleted p180 alone and observed a significant delay in S phase entry and fork progression but little effect on cell viability. These results argue that cells can tolerate low levels of p180 as long as Mcm10 is present to “recycle” it. Thus, human Mcm10 regulates both replication initiation and elongation and maintains genome integrity.

scholarly journals Inhibition of Human Chk1 Causes Increased Initiation of DNA Replication, Phosphorylation of ATR Targets, and DNA Breakage

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 3553-3562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randi G. Syljuåsen ◽  
Claus Storgaard Sørensen ◽  
Lasse Tengbjerg Hansen ◽  
Kasper Fugger ◽  
Cecilia Lundin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Protein A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Dna Breakage ◽  
Histone H2ax ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Strand ◽  
Interfering Rna

ABSTRACT Human checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is an essential kinase required to preserve genome stability. Here, we show that Chk1 inhibition by two distinct drugs, UCN-01 and CEP-3891, or by Chk1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) leads to phosphorylation of ATR targets. Chk1-inhibition triggered rapid, pan-nuclear phosphorylation of histone H2AX, p53, Smc1, replication protein A, and Chk1 itself in human S-phase cells. These phosphorylations were inhibited by ATR siRNA and caffeine, but they occurred independently of ATM. Chk1 inhibition also caused an increased initiation of DNA replication, which was accompanied by increased amounts of nonextractable RPA protein, formation of single-stranded DNA, and induction of DNA strand breaks. Moreover, these responses were prevented by siRNA-mediated downregulation of Cdk2 or the replication initiation protein Cdc45, or by addition of the CDK inhibitor roscovitine. We propose that Chk1 is required during normal S phase to avoid aberrantly increased initiation of DNA replication, thereby protecting against DNA breakage. These results may help explain why Chk1 is an essential kinase and should be taken into account when drugs to inhibit this kinase are considered for use in cancer treatment.

scholarly journals Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response

2012 ◽  
Vol 443 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Jones ◽  
Eva Petermann
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Damage Response

Prevention and repair of DNA damage is essential for maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival. DNA replication during S-phase can be a source of DNA damage if endogenous or exogenous stresses impair the progression of replication forks. It has become increasingly clear that DNA-damage-response pathways do not only respond to the presence of damaged DNA, but also modulate DNA replication dynamics to prevent DNA damage formation during S-phase. Such observations may help explain the developmental defects or cancer predisposition caused by mutations in DNA-damage-response genes. The present review focuses on molecular mechanisms by which DNA-damage-response pathways control and promote replication dynamics in vertebrate cells. In particular, DNA damage pathways contribute to proper replication by regulating replication initiation, stabilizing transiently stalled forks, promoting replication restart and facilitating fork movement on difficult-to-replicate templates. If replication fork progression fails to be rescued, this may lead to DNA damage and genomic instability via nuclease processing of aberrant fork structures or incomplete sister chromatid separation during mitosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document