Three-dimensional image reconstruction of radiation-sensitive samples with x-ray diffraction microscopy

2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chien-Chun Chen ◽  
Chien-Hung Lu ◽  
D. Chien ◽  
Jianwei Miao ◽  
T. K. Lee
Nano Letters ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1922-1926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukio Takahashi ◽  
Nobuyuki Zettsu ◽  
Yoshinori Nishino ◽  
Ryosuke Tsutsumi ◽  
Eiichiro Matsubara ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-172
Author(s):  
W. Liu ◽  
G. E. Ice ◽  
W. Yang ◽  
J. Z. Tischler ◽  
B. C. Larson

1998 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hoenger ◽  
S. Sack ◽  
M. Thormählen ◽  
A. Marx ◽  
J. Müller ◽  
...  

We have decorated microtubules with monomeric and dimeric kinesin constructs, studied their structure by cryoelectron microscopy and three-dimensional image reconstruction, and compared the results with the x-ray crystal structure of monomeric and dimeric kinesin. A monomeric kinesin construct (rK354, containing only a short neck helix insufficient for coiled-coil formation) decorates microtubules with a stoichiometry of one kinesin head per tubulin subunit (α–β-heterodimer). The orientation of the kinesin head (an anterograde motor) on the microtubule surface is similar to that of ncd (a retrograde motor). A longer kinesin construct (rK379) forms a dimer because of the longer neck helix forming a coiled-coil. Unexpectedly, this construct also decorates the microtubule with a stoichiometry of one head per tubulin subunit, and the orientation is similar to that of the monomeric construct. This means that the interaction with microtubules causes the two heads of a kinesin dimer to separate sufficiently so that they can bind to two different tubulin subunits. This result is in contrast to recent models and can be explained by assuming that the tubulin–kinesin interaction is antagonistic to the coiled-coil interaction within a kinesin dimer.


2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry N. Chapman ◽  
Anton Barty ◽  
Stefano Marchesini ◽  
Aleksandr Noy ◽  
Stefan P. Hau-Riege ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1165-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Wielewski ◽  
D. B. Menasche ◽  
P. G. Callahan ◽  
R. M. Suter

Near-field high-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy has been used to characterize the three-dimensional (3-D) crystallographic orientation field of the hexagonal close-packed α phase in a bulk Ti–6Al–4V specimen with a lamellar (β-annealed) microstructure. These data have been segmented using a 3-D misorientation-based grain finding algorithm, providing unprecedented information about the complex 3-D morphologies and spatial misorientation distributions of the transformed α lamella colonies. A 3-D Burgers orientation relationship-based flood-fill algorithm has been implemented to reconstruct the morphologies and crystallographic orientations of the high-temperature body-centered cubic prior-β grains. The combination of these data has been used to gain an understanding of the role of the prior-β grain structure in the formation of specific morphologies and spatial misorientation distributions observed in the transformed α colony structures. It is hoped that this understanding can be used to develop transformation structures optimized for specific applications and to produce more physically realistic synthetic microstructures for use in simulations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document