scholarly journals Crystal structure of a tankyrase 1–telomere repeat factor 1 complex

Author(s):  
Bo Li ◽  
Ruihong Qiao ◽  
Zhizhi Wang ◽  
Weihong Zhou ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
...  

Telomere repeat factor 1 (TRF1) is a subunit of shelterin (also known as the telosome) and plays a critical role in inhibiting telomere elongation by telomerase. Tankyrase 1 (TNKS1) is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase that regulates the activity of TRF1 through poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation). PARylation of TRF1 by TNKS1 leads to the release of TRF1 from telomeres and allows telomerase to access telomeres. The interaction between TRF1 and TNKS1 is thus important for telomere stability and the mitotic cell cycle. Here, the crystal structure of a complex between the N-terminal acidic domain of TRF1 (residues 1–55) and a fragment of TNKS1 covering the second and third ankyrin-repeat clusters (ARC2-3) is presented at 2.2 Å resolution. The TNKS1–TRF1 complex crystals were optimized using an `oriented rescreening' strategy, in which the initial crystallization condition was used as a guide for a second round of large-scale sparse-matrix screening. This crystallographic and biochemical analysis provides a better understanding of the TRF1–TNKS1 interaction and the three-dimensional structure of the ankyrin-repeat domain of TNKS.

Author(s):  
David A. Agard ◽  
Yasushi Hiraoka ◽  
John W. Sedat

In an effort to understand the complex relationship between structure and biological function within the nucleus, we have embarked on a program to examine the three-dimensional structure and organization of Drosophila melanogaster embryonic chromosomes. Our overall goal is to determine how DNA and proteins are organized into complex and highly dynamic structures (chromosomes) and how these chromosomes are arranged in three dimensional space within the cell nucleus. Futher, we hope to be able to correlate structual data with such fundamental biological properties as stage in the mitotic cell cycle, developmental state and transcription at specific gene loci.Towards this end, we have been developing methodologies for the three-dimensional analysis of non-crystalline biological specimens using optical and electron microscopy. We feel that the combination of these two complementary techniques allows an unprecedented look at the structural organization of cellular components ranging in size from 100A to 100 microns.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 2505-2512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Schacherl ◽  
Angelika A. M. Montada ◽  
Elena Brunstein ◽  
Ulrich Baumann

The U32 family is a collection of over 2500 annotated peptidases in the MEROPS database with unknown catalytic mechanism. They mainly occur in bacteria and archaea, but a few representatives have also been identified in eukarya. Many of the U32 members have been linked to pathogenicity, such as proteins fromHelicobacterandSalmonella. The first crystal structure analysis of a U32 catalytic domain fromMethanopyrus kandleri(genemk0906) reveals a modified (βα)8TIM-barrel fold with some unique features. The connecting segment between strands β7 and β8 is extended and helix α7 is located on top of the C-terminal end of the barrel body. The protein exhibits a dimeric quaternary structure in which a zinc ion is symmetrically bound by histidine and cysteine side chains from both monomers. These residues reside in conserved sequence motifs. No typical proteolytic motifs are discernible in the three-dimensional structure, and biochemical assays failed to demonstrate proteolytic activity. A tunnel in which an acetate ion is bound is located in the C-terminal part of the β-barrel. Two hydrophobic grooves lead to a tunnel at the C-terminal end of the barrel in which an acetate ion is bound. One of the grooves binds to aStrep-Tag II of another dimer in the crystal lattice. Thus, these grooves may be binding sites for hydrophobic peptides or other ligands.


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (11) ◽  
pp. 1054-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Li ◽  
Hui-Ting Wang

A new cadmium dicyanamide complex, poly[tetramethylphosphonium [μ-chlorido-di-μ-dicyanamido-κ4N1:N5-cadmium(II)]], [(CH3)4P][Cd(NCNCN)2Cl], was synthesized by the reaction of tetramethylphosphonium chloride, cadmium nitrate tetrahydrate and sodium dicyanamide in aqueous solution. In the crystal structure, each CdIIatom is octahedrally coordinated by four terminal N atoms from four anionic dicyanamide (dca) ligands and by two chloride ligands. The dicyanamide ligands play two different roles in the building up of the structure; one role results in the formation of [Cd(dca)Cl]2building blocks, while the other links the building blocks into a three-dimensional structure. The anionic framework exhibits a solvent-accessible void of 673.8 Å3, amounting to 47.44% of the total unit-cell volume. The cavities in the network are occupied by pairs of tetramethylphosphonium cations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (12) ◽  
pp. 525-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Nagalakshmi ◽  
J. Suresh ◽  
S. Maharani ◽  
R. Ranjith Kumar ◽  
P. L. Nilantha Lakshman

The title compound, C25H25N3O, comprises a 2-aminopyridine ring fused with a cycloheptane ring, which adopts a chair conformation. The central pyridine ring (r.m.s. deviation = 0.013 Å) carries three substituents,viz.a benzylamino group, a methoxyphenyl ring and a carbonitrile group. The N atom of the carbonitrile group is significantly displaced [by 0.2247 (1) Å] from the plane of the pyridine ring, probably due to steric crowding involving the adjacent substituents. The phenyl and benzene rings are inclined to one another by 58.91 (7)° and to the pyridine ring by 76.68 (7) and 49.80 (6)°, respectively. In the crystal, inversion dimers linked by pairs of N—H...Nnitrilehydrogen bonds generateR22(14) loops. The dimers are linked by C—H...π and slipped parallel π–π interactions [centroid–centroid distance = 3.6532 (3) Å] into a three-dimensional structure.


1999 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Scott

1. How do ribozymes work? 2412. The hammerhead RNA as a prototype ribozyme 2422.1 RNA enzymes 2422.2 Satellite self-cleaving RNAs 2422.3 Hammerhead RNAs and hammerhead ribozymes 2443. The chemical mechanism of hammerhead RNA self-cleavage 2463.1 Phosphodiester isomerization via an SN2(P) reaction 2473.2 The canonical role of divalent metal ions in the hammerhead ribozyme reaction 2513.3 The hammerhead ribozyme does not actually require metal ions for catalysis 2543.4 Hammerhead RNA enzyme kinetics 2574. Sequence requirements for hammerhead RNA self-cleavage 2604.1 The conserved core, mutagenesis and functional group modifications 2604.2 Ground-state vs. transition-state effects 2615. The three-dimensional structure of the hammerhead ribozyme 2625.1 Enzyme–inhibitor complexes 2625.2 Enzyme–substrate complex in the initial state 2645.3 Hammerhead ribozyme self-cleavage in the crystal 2645.4 The requirement for a conformational change 2655.5 Capture of conformational intermediates using crystallographic freeze-trapping 2665.6 The structure of a hammerhead ribozyme ‘early’ conformational intermediate 2675.7 The structure of a hammerhead ribozyme ‘later’ conformational intermediate 2685.8 Is the conformational change pH dependent? 2695.9 Isolating the structure of the cleavage product 2715.10 Evidence for and against additional large-scale conformation changes 2745.11 NMR spectroscopic studies of the hammerhead ribozyme 2786. Concluding remarks 2807. Acknowledgements 2818. References 2811. How do ribozymes work? 241The discovery that RNA can be an enzyme (Guerrier-Takada et al. 1983; Zaug & Cech, 1986) has created the fundamental question of how RNA enzymes work. Before this discovery, it was generally assumed that proteins were the only biopolymers that had sufficient complexity and chemical heterogeneity to catalyze biochemical reactions. Clearly, RNA can adopt sufficiently complex tertiary structures that make catalysis possible. How does the three- dimensional structure of an RNA endow it with catalytic activity? What structural and functional principles are unique to RNA enzymes (or ribozymes), and what principles are so fundamental that they are shared with protein enzymes?


Author(s):  
Jevgeņija Lugiņina ◽  
Vitālijs Rjabovs ◽  
Dmitrijs Stepanovs

The title compound, C13H21NO7{systematic name: (3aR,5S,6R,6aR)-5-[(R)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]-2,2-dimethyl-6-(nitromethyl)tetrahydrofuro[2,3-d][1,3]dioxole}, consists of a substituted 2,2-dimethyltetrahydrofuro[2,3-d][1,3]dioxolane skeleton. The furanose ringAadopts aoT4conformation. The fused dioxolane ringBand the substituent dioxolane ringCalso have twisted conformations. There are no strong hydrogen bonds in the crystal structure: only weak C—H...O contacts are present, which link the molecules to form a three-dimensional structure.


Author(s):  
Avijit Kumar Paul

The mixed-metal sulfate, KEu(SO4)2·H2O, has been obtained as a new polymorph using hydrothermal conditions. The crystal structure is isotypic with NaCe(SO4)2·H2O and shows a three-dimensional connectivity of the tetrahedral sulfate units with EuIII and KI ions. Tricapped trigonal–prismatic EuO9 units and square-antiprismatic KO8 units link the SO4 tetrahedra, building the three-dimensional structure. Topological analysis reveals the existence of two nodes with 6- and 10-connected nets. The compound was previously reported [Kazmierczak & Höppe (2010). J. Solid State Chem. 183, 2087–2094] in the monoclinic space group P21/c with a similar structural connectivity and coordination environments to the present compound.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sushant Kumar ◽  
Arif Harmanci ◽  
Jagath Vytheeswaran ◽  
Mark B. Gerstein

AbstractA rapid decline in sequencing cost has made large-scale genome sequencing studies feasible. One of the fundamental goals of these studies is to catalog all pathogenic variants. Numerous methods and tools have been developed to interpret point mutations and small insertions and deletions. However, there is a lack of approaches for identifying pathogenic genomic structural variations (SVs). That said, SVs are known to play a crucial role in many diseases by altering the sequence and three-dimensional structure of the genome. Previous studies have suggested a complex interplay of genomic and epigenomic features in the emergence and distribution of SVs. However, the exact mechanism of pathogenesis for SVs in different diseases is not straightforward to decipher. Thus, we built an agnostic machine-learning-based workflow, called SVFX, to assign a “pathogenicity score” to somatic and germline SVs in various diseases. In particular, we generated somatic and germline training models, which included genomic, epigenomic, and conservation-based features for SV call sets in diseased and healthy individuals. We then applied SVFX to SVs in six different cancer cohorts and a cardiovascular disease (CVD) cohort. Overall, SVFX achieved high accuracy in identifying pathogenic SVs. Moreover, we found that predicted pathogenic SVs in cancer cohorts were enriched among known cancer genes and many cancer-related pathways (including Wnt signaling, Ras signaling, DNA repair, and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis). Finally, we note that SVFX is flexible and can be easily extended to identify pathogenic SVs in additional disease cohorts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document