scholarly journals 1,3,5-Trifluoro-2,4,6-triiodobenzene–piperazine (2/1)

IUCrData ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christelle Hajjar ◽  
Jeffrey S. Ovens ◽  
David L. Bryce

The single-crystal structure of the title compound, C4H10N2·2C6F3I3, features a moderately strong halogen bond between one of the three crystallographically distinct iodine atoms and the nitrogen atom. The iodine–nitrogen distance is 2.820 (3) Å, corresponding to 80% of the sum of their van der Waals radii. The C—I...N halogen bond angle is 178.0 (1)°, consistent with the linear interaction of nitrogen via a σ-hole opposite the carbon–iodine covalent bond. The other two iodine atoms do not engage in halogen bonding. Some weak C—H...F and —H...I interactions are also observed. The complete piperazine molecule is generated by symmetry.

2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. o572-o573
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Ishikawa

In the title compound, C10H5BrO3, a brominated 3-formylchromone, all atoms are essentially coplanar (r.m.s. = 0.0104 Å for the non-H atoms), with the largest deviation from the least-squares plane [0.028 (5) Å] being for one of the benzene C atoms. In the crystal, molecules are linked through C—H...O hydrogen bonds, which are further assembled by face-to-face π–π stacking interactions [centroid–centroid distance between the pyran rings = 3.854 (4) Å]. Shorter contacts than the sum of van der Waals radii are observed between the Br and formyl O atoms [Br...O = 3.046 (4) Å, C—Br...O = 175.23 (18)° and Br...O—C = 132.6 (3)°], features that do indicate halogen bonding.


Author(s):  
Rasha A. Azzam ◽  
Galal H. Elgemeie ◽  
Mona M. Seif ◽  
Peter G. Jones

In the molecule of the title compound, C16H13N3O2S, one hydrazinic nitrogen atom is essentially planar, but the other is slightly pyramidalized. The torsion angle about the hydrazinic bond is 66.44 (15)°. Both hydrazinic hydrogen atoms lie antiperiplanar to the oxygen of the adjacent carbonyl group. The molecular packing is a layer structure determined by two classical hydrogen bonds, N—H...O=C and N—H...Nthiazole. The space group is P1 with Z = 1, which is unusual for an achiral organic compound.


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (9) ◽  
pp. o905-o906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Serajul Haque Faizi ◽  
Ashraf Mashrai ◽  
Saleem Garandal ◽  
M. Shahid

In the title compound, C22H17N3, the dihedral angles between the central benzene ring and the terminal phenyl ring and quinoline ring system (r.m.s. deviation = 0.027 Å) are 44.72 (7) and 9.02 (4)°, respectively, and the bond-angle sum at the amine N atom is 359.9°. In the crystal, the N—H group is not involved in hydrogen bonding and the molecules are linked by weak C—H...π interactions, generating [010] chains.


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (11) ◽  
pp. o1163-o1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sambasivarao Kotha ◽  
Rama Gunta

The title compound C15H20O2S, was identified as a product of diallylation of themeso-isomer of the corresponding norbornene sulfone, and it is an achiral compound. The five-membered heterocycle adopts an envelope conformation with the S atom deviating by 0.795 (3) Å from the other atoms of the ring (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0131). Both allyl groups areanti-oriented relative to the S atom but their double bonds are directed in opposite directions relative to the plane of the heterocycle.


2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1808-1811
Author(s):  
Jonas Hoffmann ◽  
Thomas J. Kuczmera ◽  
Enno Lork ◽  
Anne Staubitz

The title compound, C14H14N2S2, was obtained by transmetallation of 2,2′-bis(trimethylstannyl)azobenzene with methyl lithium, and subsequent quenching with dimethyl disulfide. The asymmetric unit comprises two half-molecules, the other halves being completed by inversion symmetry at the midpoint of the azo group. The two molecules show only slight differences with respect to N=N, S—N and aromatic C=C bonds or angles. Hirshfeld surface analysis reveals that except for one weak H...S interaction, intermolecular interactions are dominated by van der Waals forces only.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. o354-o355
Author(s):  
Kasirajan Gayathri ◽  
Palathurai S. Mohan ◽  
Judith A. K. Howard ◽  
Hazel A. Sparkes

In the title compound, C11H7Br3ClN, the quinoline ring system is approximately planar (r.m.s. = 0.011 Å). In the crystal, molecules are linked by C—H...Br interactions forming chains along [10-1]. The chains are linked by C—H...π and π–π interactions involving inversion-related pyridine rings [intercentroid distance = 3.608 (4) Å], forming sheets parallel to (10-1). Within the sheets, there are two significant short interactions involving a Br...Cl contact of 3.4904 (18) Å and a Br...N contact of 3.187 (6) Å, both of which are significantly shorter than the sum of their van der Waals radii.


1994 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 1444-1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Goesmann ◽  
Dieter Fenske

AbstractSingle crystals of the title compound have been prepared by the reaction of benzonitrile with LiN-(SiMe3)2 in hexane and subsequent evaporation of the solvent. Space group P21/n, Z = 4, structure solution with 7945 observed unique reflections. R = 0.052. Lattice dimensions at -70 °C: a = 1485.2(9); b = 2486.9(11); c = 1568.9(8) pm; β = 91.06(4)°. The compound forms a trimeric ion ensemble in which two of the lithium cations are coordinated by three nitrogen atoms of two phenylamidinate an ions, the other one by four nitrogen atoms of two chelating phenylaminidate anions and in addition by the nitrogen atom of a benzonitrile molecule.


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. o1133-o1134
Author(s):  
Julian Linshoeft ◽  
Christian Näther ◽  
Anne Staubitz

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C28H36I2S3, a terthiophene monomer, the central thiophene unit is arrangedanti-coplanar to the two outer thiophene rings. There are two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit, which show different conformations. In one molecule, the dihedral angles between the inner and the two outer thiophene rings are 15.7 (3) and 3.47 (3)°, whereas these values are 4.2 (3) and 11.3 (3)° for the second molecule. Differences are also found in the arrangement of the hexyl chains: in one of the two molecules, both chains are nearly in plane to the central moiety, whereas in the second molecule, only one chain is in plane and the other one is nearly perpendicular to the central moiety. Some of the C atoms are disordered and were refined using a split model with occupancy ratios of 0.65:0.35 and 0.70:0.30 in the two molecules.


2012 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. o2538-o2538
Author(s):  
Brandon W. Jenkins ◽  
Frank R. Fronczek ◽  
Steven F. Watkins

The previously reported room-temperature crystal structure [Jaud Baldy, Negrel, Poite & Chanon (1993).Z. Kristallogr.204, 289–291] of the title compound, C20H8Cl12, is monoclinic withZ′ = 1, whereas the 90 K structure reported herein is triclinic withZ′ = 2 and shows a 2% volume contraction. The crystallographically independent unit chosen consists of both enantiomers (Λ and Δ) of this propeller-like molecule. Both enantiomers display quasi-twofold symmetry, with average bond-length/bond-angle deviations of 0.0018 (4) Å and 0.41 (2)° for Λ, and 0.0026 (4) Å and 0.50 (2)° for Δ.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. o425-o425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farook Adam ◽  
Nadiah Ameram ◽  
Wai Mun Tan

There are two molecules in the asymmetric unit of the title compound, C9H10N2OS. In one, the dihedral angle between the aromatic ring and the carbamothioyl group is 52.31 (7)° and in the other it is 36.16 (6)°. Each molecule features an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond, which generates anS(6) ring and the O and S atoms have anantidisposition. In the crystal, molecules are linked by N—H...S and N—H...O hydrogen bonds, generating separate [130] and [1-30] infinite chains. Weak C—H...O and C—H...S interactions are also observed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document