Co‐branding: brand equity and trial effects

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 591-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith H. Washburn ◽  
Brian D. Till ◽  
Randi Priluck

Co‐branding is an increasingly popular technique marketers use in attempting to transfer the positive associations of the partner (constituent) brands to a newly formed co‐brand (composite brand). This research examines the effects of co‐branding on the brand equity of both the co‐branded product and the constituent brands that comprise it, both before and after product trial. It appears that co‐branding is a win/win strategy for both co‐branding partners regardless of whether the original brands are perceived by consumers as having high or low brand equity. Although low equity brands may benefit most from co‐branding, high equity brands are not denigrated even when paired with a low equity partner. Further, positive product trial seems to enhance consumers’ evaluations of co‐branded products, particularly those with a low equity constituent brand. Co‐branding strategies may be effective in exploiting a product performance advantage or in introducing a new product with an unfamiliar brand name.

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-68
Author(s):  
Winson Sinurat ◽  
I Made Bayu Dirgantara

Business competition in fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) products in Indonesia has increased due to industry growth in this sector. Companies must create new marketing strategies to maintain and gather a broader market share. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of brand equity, price, and brand proliferation on new product performance of FMCG products through product trial. This study uses quantitative analysis, which uses data analysis tools SPSS 26) to analyze the data with PROCESS macro analysis to analyze the mediator variables. This study showed that brand equity, product quality, and brand proliferation had a positive and significant effect on new product performance. The PROCESS analysis results also show mediating effects between brand equity, price, and brand proliferation on new product performance through product trial. These results also show that brand equity, price, and brand proliferation can predict new product performance in the FMCG industry in Indonesia.


Author(s):  
NICODEMUS B2041141022

Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif kausalitas dengan menggambarkan kondisi sebagaimana adanya berdasarkan data yang diperoleh pada saat penelitian pada stockiest Tupperware Jl.Danau Sentarum dan Jl. Sungai jawi kota  Pontianak. Dalam penelitian ini, sampel diambil sebanyak 100 responden yang menggunakan produk Tupperware. Teknik analisis data menggunaka analisis Regresi Bertahap (Analisis Jalur/Path Analysis), Analisis jalur tidak hanya menguji pengaruh langsung, tetapi juga menjelaskan tentang ada atau tidaknya pengaruh tidak langsung yang diberikan variabel bebas melalui variabel intervening terhadap variabel terikat.Dari hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kualitas produk (X1) dan citra merek (X2) tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keputusan pembelian (Y1) produk Tupperware, hal ini berarti H1 dan H2 ditolak. Sedangkan nilai emosional (X3) berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keputusan pembelian (Y1) produk Tupperware, hal ini berarti H3 terbukti (diterima).Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis, dapat diketahui bahwa citra merek (X2) dan nilai emosional (X3) tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kepuasan konsumen (Y2) produk Tupperware, hal ini berarti H5 dan H6 tidak terbukti (ditolak). Sedangkan kualitas produk (X1) berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kepuasan konsumen (Y2), hal ini berarti H4 terbukti (diterima). Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis keputusan pembelian (Y1) berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kepuasan konsumen (Y2) produk Tupperware, hal ini berarti H7 terbukti (diterima). Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa keputusan pembelian tidak memediasi kualitas produk dan citra merek terhadap kepuasan konsumen dari produk Tupperware. Kata kunci : kualitas produk, citra merek, nilai emosional, keputusan pembelian, kepuasan konsumen.DAFTAR PUSTAKA  Aaker, David A (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the value of Brand Name, Prentice Hill, New York Almaulidta, Suharyono dan Yulianto (2015). “Pengaruh Green Brand Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian dan Kepuasan Konsumen (Survei Pada Mahasiswa Program Strata 1 Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya yang Menggunakan Produk Elektronik Merek Sony”. Malang Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Vol. 3, No.1, 2015. Amirullah (2002). Perilaku Konsumen, Cetakan Pertama, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta. Anastasia dan Nurendah (2014). “Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Citra Merek Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen. Bogor: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan Vol. 2, No. 2, 2014. Atmaja dan Adiwinata (2013). “Pengaruh Produk, Harga, Lokasi, dan Kualitas Layanan Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian di Kopitiam Oey Surabaya”. Surabaya: Jurnal Hospitality dan Manajemen Jasa Vol. 1, No. 2, 2013. Engel, James, F, Roger D. Blackwell, dan Paul W. Miniard (1994). Perilaku Konsumen. Edisi Keenam. Jilid 1. Penerbit Binarupa Aksara. Jakarta Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Badan Peerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang. Giese & Cote. (2000). Academy of Marketing Science Review. Defining Consumer Satisfaction. Vol 2000 No. 1 Available: http://www.ams review.org/articlesgiese01-2000.pdf Haryadi Sarjono, Winda Julianit (2011). SPSS vs LISREL sebuah pengantar Aplikasi untuk Riset. Penerbit Salemba Empat. Jakarta. Heriyati dan Septi (2011). “Analisis Pengaruh Brand Image dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen pada Hanphone Nexian”. Jakarta: Jornal of Business Strategy and Excecuation Vol. 4, No. 1, 2012. https://metlitblog.wordpress.com/2016/11/25/pengertian-analisis-data-menurut-ahli/ Keller, Kevin L (1993). How to manage brand equity. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.Kotler,Philip dan Gary Amstrong (2001). Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran, jilid 2, edisi ke-8. Penerbit Erlangg, Jakarta.Kotler,Philip dan Kevin Lane Keller (2012). Marketing Management. New Jersey: Pearson Education Limited. Kotler,Philip, dan Gary Armstrong (2012). Principle of Marketing. Upper Sadle River, N.J : Pearson Prentice Hall. Kotler,Philip  (2005). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jilid II. Edisi Kesebelas. Alih Bahasa Benyamin Molan. Jakarta : Indeks. Loverlock, Christoper H dan Wright, Lauren K (2007). Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa, Jakarta : Indeks. Panjaitan (2012). “Pengaruh Harga, Kualitas Produk, Tempat dan Kualitas Layanan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen (Studi Kasus Pada Restoran Simpang Raya BSD)”. Jakarta : DeReMa Jurnal Manajemen Vol. 7, No. 2, 2012. Priansa. Donni Juni (2017). Perilaku Konsumen Dalam Persaingan Bisnis Kontemporer. Bandung: Alfabeta. Priyanto, Rosa, Syarif (2014). “Pengaruh Personal Selling dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian”. Bogor: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan Vol. 2 No.1, 2014. Rares dan Jorie (2015). “Pengaruh Harga, Promosi, Lokasi, Citra Merek dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen di Toko Bengkel Gaoel Manado Town Square”. Manado: Jurnal EMBA Vol. 3, No. 2, 2015. Rizan dan Anjarestu (2013). “Pengaruh kualitas Produk dan Personal Selling Terhadap Kepusasn Pelanggan Pada Majalah Info Bekasi (Studi Kasus PT.SIBK)”. Bekasi: Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia (JRMSI) Vol.4, No. 1, 2013. Setiadi, Nugroho J (2003). Perilaku Konsumen. Kencana. Jakarta.Stanton, William J (1991), Prinsip Pemasaran, Erlangga. Jakarta.Sugiono (2002). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung : CV AlfabetaTjiptono, Fandy (2001). Strategi Pemasaran. Edisi Kedua. Cetakan Keenam. Yogyakarta: Penerbit. Andy. Tjiptono, Fandy (2002). Strategi Pemasaran, Edisi Kedua. Penerbit Andi Offset, Yogyakarta. Tjiptono, Fandy (2006). Manajemen Jasa. Jogyakarta : AndiUmar, Husein (2009). Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers Yana, Suharyono, Abdillah (2015). “Pengaruh Citra Merek Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan dan Loyalitas Pelanggan. Malang : Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Vol. 21 No. 1, 2015. Zeithaml, V.A., & Bitner, M.J (2009). Service Marketing , Integrating Customer Focus Across Firm, Fifth Edition. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S126-S127
Author(s):  
Rebecca Coffey ◽  
Rachel Penny

Abstract Introduction Strategies to remove necrotic tissue from burn wounds include excisional and non-excisional debridement. Alternative treatments could promote burn wound healing while minimizing patient discomfort and the need for surgery. We evaluated the usage of a concentrated surfactant gel (CSG) to promote burn wound healing in those with indeterminate depth and full thickness burn injuries. Methods An IRB approved retrospective study was conducted during a 10-patient new product trial period with enrollment between September and October 2019. Patients included in this study had indeterminate or full thickness burn wounds and were treated with a concentrated surfactant-based gel. Patients with non-burn diagnoses were excluded. Data collected included demographic information, injury descriptors, and additional burn wound characteristics. Results A total of 10 patients were included in this study as part of a new product trial. The subjects were 80% male with an average TBSA of 7.5%. 40% had indeterminate and 60% had full thickness burn wounds. Prior to initiation of the CSG, the burn wounds had been open for an average of 41 days. There were no infections or complications with usage of the CSG. 90% of patients reported less pain than the standard of care topical agents for burns. Average duration of treatment with the CSG until healing was 28 days. After usage of the CSG, no patients required surgery. Conclusions Our findings support the usage of a concentrated surfactant-based gel in patients with burn wounds. Patients reported decreased pain during dressing changes and ease of use compared to the standard topical agent in burn care. It also prevented surgical debridement in those with indeterminate and full thickness burn injuries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Forti ◽  
Maurizio Sobrero ◽  
Andrea Vezzulli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document