The Role of the Third Party in Work Organisation Developement

1979 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
J.R.S. Bailey
Keyword(s):  
Third Party ◽  
Work Organisation ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Third Party

The Consequences of a Third Party Decision on Coopetition Strategies

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Fernandez ◽  
Francoise Pierrot
Keyword(s):  
Third Party ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Longitudinal Case Study ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
The Third ◽  
Setting Process ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
Accounting Standard Setting

Coopetition is a paradoxical strategy combining simultaneously cooperation and competition. Previous scholars investigated the role of the third-party in coopetition dynamics: it can initiate and drive the coopetition strategy or it can be involved in the management of the relationship. But the consequences of this involvement remain under-investigated. This research aims to fill this gap: what are the consequences of the involvement of a third-party in a coopetition strategy on the partners and their relationship? To answer this question, we conducted a longitudinal case study of coopetition strategies between two institutions the FASB and the IASB in the specific context of the global accounting standard-setting process and convergence process between the US GAAPs and the IFRSs.Our findings enable us to identify three different phases in the process. We provide evidence on the role of the third-party (the European Union in the case) in the evolution of the coopetition dynamic between the FASB and the IASB, and analyze the consequences on both partners and their relationship.

A synchronous quantum blind signature scheme with entanglement swapping

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950007
Author(s):  
Ling Fan ◽  
Cong Cao
Keyword(s):  
Entanglement Swapping ◽  
Quantum States ◽  
Blind Signature ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Signature Scheme ◽  
The Third ◽  
Quantum Blind Signature ◽  
The Third Party

We present an arbitrated quantum blind signature scheme by entanglement swapping, which is simplified from the preparation and operation of the quantum states. Compared with the classical blind signature, quantum arbitration has added the role of the third party arbitration, so the structure of the protocol has changed. The traceability depends on the third party arbitration, and the blind operation and the signature operation can be carried out simultaneously.

Disquieting experiences and conversation

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-877
Author(s):  
Lívia Mathias Simão
Keyword(s):  
Third Party ◽  
The Third ◽  
30Th Anniversary ◽  
Hermeneutic Inquiry ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
Other World ◽  
Do So

On the occasion of the 30th anniversary of Theory & Psychology, my aim in this article is to widen the discussion about one of the issues I consider foundational in the approach of I–other–world relations in subjectivation processes, that is to say, that of the disquieting experience, which we have been developing in the ambit of semiotic–cultural constructivism in psychology. First, I will make an exposition of the main aspects that characterise the notion of disquieting experience. I shall then seek to deepen some of the relations between disquieting experience, hermeneutic inquiry, and conversation. In order to do so, I will make use of articles published in Theory & Psychology that are fundamental to this deepening, due to leading us to the role of the third party in subjectivation processes.

scholarly journals The Upper Karabakh Predicament from the UN Resolutions to the Mediated Negotiations: Resolution or Hibernation?

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Ali Askerov ◽  
Thomas Matyok
Keyword(s):  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Regional Organizations ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Third Party

Despite the third party efforts of the significant international and regional organizations, such as the UN and the OSCE, the Upper Karabakh problem remains unresolved for over 20 years. Neither the four resolutions related to Armenia’s invasion of Azerbaijani lands adopted by the UN SC in the early 1990s have worked, nor the formal negotiations over this conflict that have taken place under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group for more than 20 years have reached any tangible results. These facts give rise to questions about effectiveness of the role of this institution in reaching a resolution to the conflict. The ceasefire regime is in effect since May 1994 without changing the situation, in which Armenia still keeps about 20 percent of Azerbaijani lands under invasion and is effectively involved in building a new state over the invaded lands. This paper analyzes the effectiveness of UN resolutions in liberating Azerbaijan’s invaded regions, both within and outside of Upper Karabakh, as well as the OSCE mediation efforts to resolve this conflict. It also discusses effectiveness of the negotiation process, and raises a question about impartiality of the mediators and usefulness of the mediation institution of the OSCE in general. It argues that the OSCE Minsk Group has failed to successfully establish and lead the process of negotiations, thus expecting a fruitful yield is not realistic.

scholarly journals The Upper Karabakh Predicament from the UN Resolutions to the Mediated Negotiations: Resolution or Hibernation?

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Ali Askerov ◽  
Thomas Matyok
Keyword(s):  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Regional Organizations ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Third Party

Despite the third party efforts of the significant international and regional organizations, such as the UN and the OSCE, the Upper Karabakh problem remains unresolved for over 20 years. Neither the four resolutions related to Armenia’s invasion of Azerbaijani lands adopted by the UN SC in the early 1990s have worked, nor the formal negotiations over this conflict that have taken place under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group for more than 20 years have reached any tangible results. These facts give rise to questions about effectiveness of the role of this institution in reaching a resolution to the conflict. The ceasefire regime is in effect since May 1994 without changing the situation, in which Armenia still keeps about 20 percent of Azerbaijani lands under invasion and is effectively involved in building a new state over the invaded lands. This paper analyzes the effectiveness of UN resolutions in liberating Azerbaijan’s invaded regions, both within and outside of Upper Karabakh, as well as the OSCE mediation efforts to resolve this conflict. It also discusses effectiveness of the negotiation process, and raises a question about impartiality of the mediators and usefulness of the mediation institution of the OSCE in general. It argues that the OSCE Minsk Group has failed to successfully establish and lead the process of negotiations, thus expecting a fruitful yield is not realistic.

Spillover Effect of Consumer Awareness on Third Parties’ Selling Strategies and Retailers’ Platform Openness

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Song ◽  
Jianqing Chen ◽  
Wenli Li
Keyword(s):  
Spillover Effect ◽  
The United States ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Interesting Phenomenon ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Past ◽  
Online Retailers ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
Selling Strategies

Global e-commerce sales have experienced unprecedented growth for the past years and have reached over $2 trillion annually. One interesting phenomenon along with this remarkable growth is that giant online retailers, such as Amazon.com in the United States and JD.com in China, open their platforms and allow third-party sellers to offer products there, thus inviting competition. We explore why an online retailer would open its platform and why a third-party seller would join the platform. We highlight the role of a spillover effect that, when the third-party seller joins the retailer’s platform, more consumers become aware of the third-party seller’s existence and its products which are not even listed on the retailer’s platform. We characterize how the third-party seller’s optimal selling strategies should vary with and how the retailer’s openness decision should be determined by the extent of the spillover effect and the retailer’s initial awareness advantage. Compared with the case without a spillover effect, the spillover effect makes the retailer less likely to open its platform, but it makes the third-party seller more likely to sell identical products on an open retailer platform; the spillover effect always (weakly) benefits the third-party seller, but it does not necessarily hurt the retailer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document