Corporate governance failure at Ricoh India: rebuilding lost trust

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Sonu Goyal ◽  
Sanjay Dhamija

Subject area The case “Corporate Governance Failure at Ricoh India: Rebuilding Lost Trust” discusses the series of events post disclosure of falsification of the accounts and violation of accounting principles, leading to a loss of INR 11.23bn for the company, eroding over 75 per cent of its market cap (Financial Express, 2016). The case provides an opportunity for students to understand the key components of corporate governance structure and consequences of poor corporate governance. The case highlights the responsibility of the board of directors, audit committee and external auditors and discusses the changes required in the corporate governance structure necessary to ensure that such incidents do not take place. The case also delves into the classic dilemma of degree of control that needs to be exercised by the parent over its subsidiaries and freedom of independence given to the subsidiary board, which is a constant challenge all multinationals face. Such a dilemma often leads to the challenge of creating appropriate corporate governance structures for numerous subsidiaries. Study level/applicability The case is intended for MBA courses on corporate governance, business ethics and also for the strategic management courses in the context of multinational corporations. The case can be used to develop an understanding of the essential of corporate governance with special focus on the role of the board of directors, audit committee and external auditors. The case highlights the consequences and cost of poor corporate governance. The case can also be used for highlighting governance challenges in the parent subsidiary relationship for multinational corporations. The case can be used for executive training purposes on corporate governance and leadership with special focus on business ethics. Case overview This case presents the challenges faced by the newly appointed Chairman Noboru Akahane of Ricoh India. In July 2016, Ricoh India, the Indian arm of Japanese firm Ricoh, admitted that the company’s accounts had been falsified and accounting principles violated, leading to a loss of INR 11.23 bn for the financial year 2016. The minority shareholders were agitating against the board of directors of Ricoh India and were also holding the parent company responsible for not safeguarding their interest. Over a period of 18 months, Ricoh India had been in the eye of a storm that involved delayed reporting of financials, auditor red flags regarding accounting irregularities, a forensic audit, suspension of top officials and a police complaint lodged by Ricoh India against its own officials. Akahane needed to ensure continuity of Ricoh India’s business and also act quickly and decisively to manage the crisis and ensure that these incidents did not recur in the future. Expected learning outcomes The case provides an opportunity for students to understand the key components of corporate governance structure and consequences of poor corporate governance. More specifically, the case addresses the following objectives: provide an overview of corporate governance structure; highlight the role of board of directors, audit committee and external auditors; appreciate the rationale behind mandatory auditor rotation; appreciate the consequences of poor corporate structure; explore the interrelationship between sustainability reporting and transparency in financial disclosures of a corporation; understand management and governance of subsidiaries by multinational companies; and understand the response to a crisis situation. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Please contact your library to gain login details or email [email protected] to request teaching notes. Subject code CSS 11: Strategy.

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amira Jamil ◽  
Nazli Anum Mohd Ghazali ◽  
Sherliza Puat Nelson

Purpose Following the introduction of the revised Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance in 2012 (MCCG 2012), this study aims to investigate the influence of corporate governance structure on the quality of sustainability reporting from the perspectives of agency theory and resource dependence theory. Design/methodology/approach Based on an analysis of 126 firms’ annual reports for the year ended 2010 and 2014, this study analyses sustainability reporting quality before the introduction of MCCG, 2012 (year ended 2010) and after (year ended 2014). Findings The findings of the study show that there was a significant increase in the quality of sustainability reporting from 2010 to 2014. Results from multiple regression analyses indicate that the number of sustainability-related training attended by the board of directors and the percentage of directors with sustainability-related experience have a significant impact on the quality of sustainability reporting. Practical implications Observations from the study provide useful insights into the importance of the appointment of directors with sustainability-related experience as part of the criteria for directors’ appointment. Moreover, the board of directors is encouraged to attend sustainability-related training to help firms improve sustainability practices and reporting. Social implications The increase in the quality of sustainability reporting indicates that companies are committed in ensuring that environmental degradation is put at the minimum level if not eliminated. It appears that companies are embracing the concept of sustainability reporting, and hence, contributing to improving and enhancing social well-being. Originality/value This study contributes to the discussion of both internal mechanisms (board independence and board capital) and external mechanisms (compliance to the code on corporate governance) of corporate governance structure on the quality of sustainability reporting. The findings can be used to identify necessary mechanisms that should be enhanced to strengthen the practice of sustainability reporting.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Wan Adibah Binti Wan Ismail

<p>This study investigates whether family ownership and control, and corporate governance are associated with earnings quality, and whether family influence in firms weakens the association between corporate governance and earnings quality. This study uses a panel sample of 527 publicly traded firms over the period 2003-2008 from the Malaysia Stock Exchange (Bursa Malaysia). Identifying family firms as firms in which family members hold a significant portion of shares and possess control over the board of directors, this study finds that family firms have significantly higher earnings quality. The results remain unchanged, even after using alternative measures of earnings quality and family influence. This study also finds that the earnings quality of firms in Malaysia is positively associated with the size and independence of the audit committee and negatively associated with the size of the board of directors. However, these relationships exist only for nonfamily firms. These results on the corporate governance variables suggest that the effectiveness of corporate governance could be mediated by family influence. Using multivariate regressions that include interaction variables for corporate governance and family firms, the study finds that the relationship between corporate governance and earnings quality is mediated by family ownership and control. The result is consistent with the argument that the monitoring role of corporate governance reduces when there is substantial control by family owners in a firm. Overall, this study concludes that family ownership and control drives higher quality earnings for firms regardless of their corporate governance structure.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1453
Author(s):  
Yelsa Yulia Efwita ◽  
Erinos NR

The purpose of the research is to know the corporate governance that is proxied by the board of commissioners, the effectiveness of the audit committee and the board of directors on the selection of external auditors. This study uses secondary data from the company's annual report for 2015-2017. The sampling method in this study used purposive sampling with a sample of 67 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-217. The analysis used in this study is logistic regression analysis. The results showed that the board of commissioners, the effectiveness of the audit committee had a significant positive effect on the selection of external auditors, while the board of directors did not influence the selection of quality external auditors.Keywords: auditor selection, big four, board of commissioners, board of directors


Author(s):  
Rina Mudjiyanti ◽  
Arini Hidayah ◽  
Erny Rachmawati

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of institutional ownership, board of directors, and audit committee, which are proxies of corporate governance structure, and firm size on firm performance. Company performance is measured using profitability. The sample of this study, companies listed in the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) from 2017 to 2018. The ROA data in this study ignores the positive and negative ROA values. Hypothesis testing using regression analysis found empirical evidence that institutional ownership and board of directors variables do not affect ROA. While the audit committee variable has a positive effect on ROA, the firm size variable negatively impacts ROA. Keywords                    : Institutional Ownership; Board Of Directors; Audit Committee; Company  Size; ProfitabilityCorrespondence to      : [email protected] Tujuan penelitian ini menguji pengaruh kepemilikan institusional, dewan direksi, dan komite audit yang merupakan proksi struktur corporate governance, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Kinerja perusahaan diukur menggunakan profitabilitas. Sampel penelitian ini, perusahaan yang terdaftar dalam Jakarta Islamic Indeks (JII) selama periode 2017 sampai 2018. Data ROA dalam penelitian ini mengabaikan nilai ROA positif dan negatif. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis regresi ditemukan bukti empiris bahwa variabel kepemilikan institusional dan dewan direksi tidak berpengaruh terhadap ROA. Sedangkan variabel komite audit berpengaruh positif terhadap ROA, dan variabel ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh negatif terhadap ROA.Kata kunci      : Kepemilikan Institusional; Dewan Direksi; Komite Audit; Ukuran Perusahaan; Profitabilitas


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Hee Choi ◽  
Samuel H. Szewczyk

Purpose When major reallocations of the firm’s assets are necessary, a balance in the corporate governance structure favoring the CEO can be a necessary condition for planning and initiating major strategic moves. The purpose of this paper is to examine firms making major acquisitions to identify corporate governance elements that are particular to undertaking major strategic initiatives. Design/methodology/approach The authors test the proposition that firms making major strategic acquisitions will exhibit a corporate governance structure that is different in a number of its governance elements from firms making other acquisition decisions. The authors categorize the elements of corporate governance structures into CEO characteristics, internal monitoring, external monitoring and CEO compensation. Findings The authors find the propensity of acquiring firms to make major strategic acquisitions is abetted by the CEO’s attributes and compensation, by the structure of the audit committee and compensation committee, and by the firm’s prior financial performance. Originality/value The analysis of firms making major acquisitions presents the corporate governance dynamics of an environment that is conducive to strategic risk taking.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Wan Adibah Binti Wan Ismail

<p>This study investigates whether family ownership and control, and corporate governance are associated with earnings quality, and whether family influence in firms weakens the association between corporate governance and earnings quality. This study uses a panel sample of 527 publicly traded firms over the period 2003-2008 from the Malaysia Stock Exchange (Bursa Malaysia). Identifying family firms as firms in which family members hold a significant portion of shares and possess control over the board of directors, this study finds that family firms have significantly higher earnings quality. The results remain unchanged, even after using alternative measures of earnings quality and family influence. This study also finds that the earnings quality of firms in Malaysia is positively associated with the size and independence of the audit committee and negatively associated with the size of the board of directors. However, these relationships exist only for nonfamily firms. These results on the corporate governance variables suggest that the effectiveness of corporate governance could be mediated by family influence. Using multivariate regressions that include interaction variables for corporate governance and family firms, the study finds that the relationship between corporate governance and earnings quality is mediated by family ownership and control. The result is consistent with the argument that the monitoring role of corporate governance reduces when there is substantial control by family owners in a firm. Overall, this study concludes that family ownership and control drives higher quality earnings for firms regardless of their corporate governance structure.</p>


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-23
Author(s):  
Mohammad Istiaq Azim

This paper investigates the role of monitoring mechanisms in a corporate governance structure, focusing on listed companies in a developing country, Bangladesh. Specifically, it examines whether different interrelated monitoring mechanisms - board of directors and committee, management and external auditors - affect firm performance. This research found the possibility of having a substitution or complementary links in monitoring mechanisms that explain why there is no consistent empirical evidence between individual monitoring mechanisms and firm performance. This study has policy implications for the Bangladeshi corporate environment. Progress of implementation of the guidelines appears to be reasonable. However, credibility of the reported figures and quality of implementation remain open to discussion. To what extent these status reports reflect improved governance or are largely a form of paper compliance is a debatable issue. This research also suggests that when considering any change in corporate monitoring, the Bangladeshi government should take into account the nation‟s business, social structure, culture and legal practices.


2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet L. Colbert

Complaints relating to accounting, auditing, or internal control matters may periodically be received by corporations. Such matters may be submitted by a variety of parties including employees, vendors, customers, or others. Organizations should have in place, as a part of effective corporate governance, procedures for handling complaints. The Board of Directors, specifically the Audit Committee of the Board, should oversee the program, which is encompassed within the broader overall system of internal control. Management plays an important role in a corporate complaint program and both internal and external auditors can provide the Audit Committee with valuable information as that body monitors it.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 215-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul-Nasser El-Kassar ◽  
Walid ElGammal ◽  
Josiane Fahed-Sreih

Purpose With the increasing awareness and recognition of the importance of corporate governance (CG), its practices and mechanisms along with their effect on performance and general organization’s behavior have become of interest for many scholars. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between CG, with a focus on the board of directors (BOD) and the audit committee, and the level of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices toward health, refugees, community, and environment. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected through a questionnaire distributed to 203 employees working at family-owned enterprises (FOE) in Lebanon. SmartPLS 3.0, statistical software for structural equation modeling, was used to analyze data. Findings The results indicate that the audit committee component of CG has a significant positive impact on CSR dimension practices toward health, refugees, and community and environment. Furthermore, family members’ engagement in the board of directors and decision making plays a moderating role on the relationship between the audit committee and CSR practices toward health, community, and environment, as well as the relationship between the BOD and CSR toward community and environment. Originality/value The role of family members’ engagement in the effectiveness of CG and CSR practices FOE is studied.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meena Sharma ◽  
Rajbir Kaur

Purpose The paper aims to study the impact of corporate governance variables on the adoption of accounting conservatism by S&P BSE 500 index firms. Design/methodology/approach The period for the study is from 2010–2018. The data has been extracted from the BSE website, annual reports of the sample companies and the Prowess IQ database. Panel data methodology has been used to analyse the impact of the corporate governance variables on accounting conservatism. Accounting conservatism is the dependent variable, which has been measured by using the CONACCR (negative accruals) measure and the independent variables include the characteristics of the board of directors and the audit committee. Findings Overall, the relationship between accounting conservatism and corporate governance indicates a significant impact of corporate governance variables, namely, characteristics of the board of directors and the audit committee, on the accounting conservatism policy of the firm. Originality/value This research explores the benefits of conservatism in resolving agency conflict. Very few studies have captured the relationship of individual components of corporate governance with accounting conservatism. Moreover, this study contributes to the literature regarding the influence of corporate governance variables on the extent of conservatism used in accounting records.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document