Anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism compliance

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Senanu Mekpor
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Individual Country ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Financing Of Terrorism ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Mutual Evaluation

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how well countries comply with global anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regulations. Design/methodology/approach With the help of an AML/CFT compliance index composed by the author, this study is able to numerically quantify countries’ AML/CFT compliance levels. Countries were selected based on their membership with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), precisely members who have gone through at least one round mutual evaluation and have duly submitted a report to the task force. The AML/CFT index was composed by assigning numeric values to the individual country ratings across all 49 FATF recommendations contained in their mutual evaluation reports (MER). Findings Some notable findings include the yearly global level of AML/CFT compliance between the period 2004 and 2016, as well as compliance levels across continents for the same period. Compliance levels for the seven components of the FATF recommendations were also reported to help assess which set of recommendations countries comply with the most and why they do. It was also found that countries’ lack of compliance was as a result of high cost of compliance with FATF recommendations. Research limitations/implications The main limitation of this study was a lack of high-frequency AML data of countries, especially less-developed countries. Originality/value The uniqueness of this paper lies in the fact that the AML/CFT compliance index constructed and used in the study is the first of its kind.

Measuring Qatar’s compliance with international standards on money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Truby
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Research Field ◽  
International Standards ◽  
International Terrorism ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Financing Of Terrorism ◽  
Mutual Evaluation

Purpose Under scrutiny in light of the growing threat of international terrorism, Qatar faces pressure and accusations that it is not doing enough to counter terror financing and clamp down money laundering. The issue is not that Qatar is avoiding positive action, but that by the time measures are implemented, they become outdated because the international community has by then tightened its regulatory requirements. Qatar’s slow pace has led to a case of cat-and-mouse chase with respect to updating its standards, with a revised set of rules being required by the time Qatar implements the last set of international standards. This study aims to draw on lessons from the past to help Qatar avoid findings of it falling below international standards in the upcoming 2017 mutual evaluation. Design/methodology/approach The primary purpose of this article is to catalogue Qatar’s efforts to comply with international anti-money laundering (AML) and anti-terror finance standards. It demonstrates the real legislative progress post-2008 recorded by Qatar to minimize money laundering and terrorist financing. The paper also contests the view that Qatari law is insufficient. Findings The paper explains Qatar’s efforts to comply with the recommendations made by each evaluation by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). It also highlights the potential for Qatar to be caught out again by the evolution of international expectations in an upcoming review, which, it is understood, is likely to take place in 2017. Originality/value No article exists specifically on this research field. As Qatar prepares for its 2017 FATF evaluation, it should be reminded of the need to comply with all new standards.

Updates on Hong Kong’s anti-money laundering laws 2020

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Foster Hong-Cheuk Yim ◽  
Ian Philip Lee
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Task Force ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Evaluation Report ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Centre ◽  
Salient Points ◽  
Financing Of Terrorism ◽  
Mutual Evaluation

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the latest developments of anti-money laundering (AML) laws in terms of case law and to give meaningful response in relation to certain key findings (KFs) and recommendations by the financial action task force contained in its mutual evaluation report dated September 2019. Design/methodology/approach In terms of AML case law, the authors analyse the latest judgment from the Hong Kong (HK) court of final appeal. In terms of the evaluation report, the authors outline salient points from the KFs and recommendation, commenting on their likelihood of success. Findings With the developments in AML case law and the KFs identified, HK is expected to maintain its high standard in AML/counter financing of terrorism (CFT) compliance. Originality/value A robust AML/CFT regime is the bedrock of HK’s reputable status as an international financial centre. This study seeks to illicit meaningful interactions amongst all stakeholders.

Updates on Hong Kong’s anti-money laundering laws

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foster Hong-Cheuk Yim ◽  
Ian Philip Lee
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Legislative Council ◽  
Salient Points ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Mutual Evaluation ◽  
International Financial Center

Purpose The purpose of this study is to discuss the latest developments of anti-money laundering (AML) laws in terms of case law and intended legislation amendments. Design/methodology/approach In terms of AML case law, the authors analyze three judgments from the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal. In terms of the intended legislation amendments, the authors outline salient points from the two amendment bills submitted to the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Findings With the developments in AML case law and the intended legislation amendments, Hong Kong is expected to have a positive result in the Financial Action Task Force Mutual Evaluation in October/November 2018. Originality/value A robust AML/counter-terrorist financing regime is the bedrock of Hong Kong’s reputable status as an international financial center. This paper seeks to illicit meaningful interactions amongst all stakeholders.

Deficient regimes of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 663-675
Author(s):  
Sisira Dharmasri Jayasekara
Keyword(s):  
Economic Impact ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Risk Premium ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Economic Implications ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financing Of Terrorism ◽  
Mutual Evaluation

Purpose The purposes of this paper are to discuss the short-term economic impact of the jurisdictions that have been identified as deficient countries in terms of the regime of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism and to identify the probable reasons for the poor results of mutual evaluation reports of the deficient countries. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a case study approach to discuss the short-term economic impact of the countries that are under the International Co-operation Review Group (ICRG) process due to poor results of mutual evaluation reports. The sample of countries for the study was selected based on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) listing as of November 30, 2019. The objectives of the study are expected to be achieved by discussing the issues of these jurisdictions based on publicly available information. However, this study will not consider the long-term economic impact on the countries due to the observed short-term nature of the ICRG process. Findings This analysis reveals that the ICRG process affects countries in two different perspectives. First, there are implications on the financial system of a deficient country as a result of identifying it as a high-risk country. Second, there are some other forms of economic implications due to the rigorous ICRG process. The downgrading of the sovereign rating by international and credit rating agencies is one of such implications that result in adding a risk premium to the country. This results in increased transaction costs and borrowing costs of deficient countries. Besides, it appears that the ICRG process impacts the capital and currency markets of deficient countries as a result of enhanced due diligence process on fund transfers and limitations in corresponding banking relationships. However, despite these difficulties, some countries have been identified more than once for the ICRG process. Therefore, such countries have to take measures to strengthen the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime to avoid future listing. However, long-term sustainability of the countries that were removed from the FATF grey-listing is also questionable under the current FATF methodology of evaluating countries because of the level of effectiveness depends on the judgment of assessors on the risk and context of countries rather the technical compliance. Research limitations/implications This study was limited to the countries that were in the grey list as of November 30, 2019. The countries exited from the list have not been considered for the study. Originality/value This paper is an original work done by the author by discussing the issues of the ICRG process in respect of deficient countries in view of strengthening the AML/CFT regimes of such countries.

Legitimacy of the Summer 2017 GCC crisis and Qatar’s AML framework

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ahmad Naheem
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Terrorist Financing ◽  
The World ◽  
Regulatory Bodies ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Mutual Evaluation

Purpose In June 2017, members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) ended diplomatic ties with Qatar. There is a legitimate concern about the accusation levied on Qatar. This paper aims to analyse the progress Qatar’s financial system has made with respect to its anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CFT) regulations, which further serves as the country’s effort to combating the financing of terrorism (CTF). The paper further wishes to advance the discussion by considering the legitimate goals of the aforementioned bodies and their discourse on creating national and international obligations towards reducing terrorist financing through robust AML frameworks. Design/methodology/approach The paper analyses Qatar’s legislative and regulatory overhaul following the Financial Action Task Force’s Mutual Evaluation Report. Qatar had distinctively strengthened its approach against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing. The paper takes an ex ante approach by understanding Qatar’s “strategic deficiencies” before the FATF’s mutual evaluation. Subsequently, the paper studies independent international evaluations of Qatar’s AML/CTF legislation and regulation. Findings The paper finds Qatar in significant compliance to the recommendations of the various international bodies, including the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Basel AML Index, IMF’s financial sector reviews, United Nations and independent reports on AML progress from regulatory bodies around the world. None of these organizations present obligatory rules but have set and determined and international standard for AML/CTF laws. Originality/value The primary aim is to draw parallels between Qatar’s regulatory AML and CTF efforts through the country’s compliance with international initiatives, such as the FATF guidelines, Basel AML Index, IMF’s financial sector reviews, United Nations and independent reports on AML progress from regulatory bodies around the world.

Panama faces FATF greylisting

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Capital Flight ◽  
Content Type ◽  
National Assembly ◽  
Legislative Proposal ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Financing Of Terrorism

Significance The move comes despite the passing of a long-delayed legislative proposal by Panama’s National Assembly on January 31 to make tax evasion a criminal (rather than administrative) offence -- the latest in a series of efforts to improve Panama’s image. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) -- the international standard-setting body for anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) -- will publish an assessment of Panama this month, before deciding whether to 'greylist' it around June. Impacts Poor AML controls leave Panama vulnerable to the entrance of funds from the expanding cocaine trade in neighbouring Colombia. Greylisting would hit local financial institutions' access to US correspondent banks, raising international transaction and transfer costs. Capital flight is possible by financial institutions seeking to avoid international regulatory risks associated with Panamanian operations.

Comprehensive cross-border declaration system as money-laundering prevention mechanism

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-300
Author(s):  
Salwa Zolkaflil ◽  
Normah Omar ◽  
Sharifah Nazatul Faiza Syed Mustapha Nazri
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Evaluation Report ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Future Improvement ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Mutual Evaluation

Purpose This study aims to discuss the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Special Recommendation IX (SR IX) and the importance of complying with the recommendation, which focuses on cross-border declaration or disclosure with the objective to detect and prevent illicit cross-border transportation of cash and bearer negotiable instruments (BNIs). This study also looks into compliance ratings of Asia Pacific Group (APG) 40 countries on the FATF SR IX. Design/methodology/approach This study reviews the mutual evaluation reports issued by APG on money laundering from 2006 to 2012. Based on the mutual evaluation reports, this study also looks into recommendations and comments given by respective panels. The compliance ratings together with panel’s recommendations and comments compiled in this study will be helpful to relevant authorities for future improvement. Findings Complying to FATF SR IX helps relevant authorities in detecting and preventing illicit from cross-border transportation of cash and BNIs. Out of 40, only two countries received compliant rating, which shows the need of improvement to ensure that the country is compliant on FATF SR IX. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to the panel’s reviews and recommendations on mutual evaluation report and only focuses on FATF SR IX. Originality/value This paper analyzes the compliance characteristics of countries based on their FATF mutual evaluation report. It highlights the comments and recommendation for future improvement to ensure that these countries will comply with FATF SR IX.

Financial action task force and the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Pavlidis
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Financial Action Task Force ◽  
Content Type ◽  
30Th Anniversary ◽  
Open Source Data ◽  
Building Process ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Financing Of Terrorism ◽  
High Level

Purpose Thirty years after its creation, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has become a prime example of a norm-building process that transcends the traditional avenues of public international law, while compelling a high level of compliance and assuring quick adaptation to norms and practices that better address money laundering and the financing of terrorism in their evolving form. On the occasion of FATF’s 30th anniversary, this paper aims to revisit the unique characteristics of FATF and the factors behind FATF’s success as standard-setter and as implementation-reviewer in the anti-money laundering (AML)/CFT context. Design/methodology/approach This paper draws on primary sources of law, legal scholarship, reports and other open source data to analyse the FATF norm-building process and the factors behind its success. Findings Thirty years after its creation, the FATF has established itself as the key standard-setter, implementation-reviewer and force for reform in the AML/CFT context. Though the FATF norm-building process has been very successful, owing to its flexibility, adaptability and expansiveness, significant challenges lay ahead due to the evolving nature of money laundering and financing of terrorism. Originality/value This is a comprehensive study examining the achievements, impact, strengths and weaknesses of the FATF norm-building process on the occasion of the organisation’s 30th anniversary.

A critical approach to trade-based money laundering

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvin R.J. Soudijn
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Critical Approach ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Traded Goods ◽  
True Value ◽  
Police Investigations ◽  
Financial Action Task

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to broaden the discussion on trade-based money laundering (TBML). The literature is too narrowly focused on the misrepresentation of the value, quantity or quality of the traded goods. This focus leads to the analysis of price anomalies as a signal of over- or under-invoicing. However, TBML can also occur without manipulation of these factors. Design/methodology/approach – A review of the literature and case study of police investigations. Findings – Financial action task force (FATF) definitions are seriously flawed. The question of whether detecting TBML on the basis of statistical trade data is effective should be much more open to debate. Police investigations show that goods are shipped at their true value within the context of TBML. Research limitations/implications – Using outliers to identify and act on cases of TBML has often been propagated, but scarcely been used to actually show TBML. Real findings are needed. Practical implications – Goods intended for TBML can also be paid for in cash. These cash payments are often out of character with the normal clientele. This should alert companies and compliance sections of banks alike. Originality/value – The critique on the FATF definition opens the field for a more fitting definition. The description of actual TBML cases makes it possible to better understand this method of money laundering.

Tax evasion and money laundering: a complete framework

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deen Kemsley ◽  
Sean A. Kemsley ◽  
Frank T. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Single Process ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Tax Savings ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
Complete Framework

Purpose This paper aims to define the fundamental nexus between income tax evasion and money laundering. The G7 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) designates tax evasion as a predicate offense for money laundering. We determine whether this designation is complete from a conceptual standpoint, or whether there is a stronger connection between tax evasion and money laundering. Design/methodology/approach This paper applies the FATF definition for money laundering – as well as generally accepted definitions for tax evasion and for a standard predicate offense – to identify the necessary conditions for each crime. This paper then uses these conditions to test opposing hypotheses regarding the nexus between tax evasion and money laundering. Findings This paper demonstrates that tax evasion does not meet the conditions for a standard predicate offense, and treating it as if it were a standard predicate could be problematic in practice. Instead, it is concluded that the FATF’s predicate label for tax evasion, together with tax evasion methods and objectives, imply that all tax evasion constitutes money laundering. In a single process, tax evasion generates both criminal tax savings and launders those criminal proceeds by concealing or disguising their unlawful origin. Practical implications The FATF could strengthen its framework by explicitly defining all tax evasion as money laundering. This would enable regulatory agencies to draw upon the full combined resources dedicated to either offense. Originality/value The analysis demonstrates that tax evasion completely incorporates money laundering as currently defined by the FATF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document