The impact of life cycle on the value relevance of financial performance measures

Author(s):  
Shaw K. Chen ◽  
Yu-Lin Chang ◽  
Chung-Jen Fu
Author(s):  
Nripendra Kumar ◽  
Kunal K. Ganguly

PurposeThe purpose of this research paper is to identify the non-financial e-procurement performance measures and find out whether these non-financial performance measures are leading indicator of impact on firm financial performance by adoption of e-procurement in terms of reduction in production cost.Design/methodology/approachThe research model has been tested with the data collected from target procurement professionals in India. Structural equation modelling has been used for testing conceptual model hypotheses including mediation. The phantom model approach for testing multiple mediators has deployed.FindingsThe present empirical study found that non-financial performance measure of e-procurement, namely, transparency, coordination, efficiency and effectiveness are leading indicators of the impact of e-procurement adoption on production cost. This paper suggests that managers should try to design the e-procurement platform or opt for third party platform which reduces transaction cost to a minimum for enhanced coordination, work on transparency policy with maximum disclosure of information for enhanced transparency and ask for a fast and responsive system for enhanced efficiency and effectiveness.Originality/valueThis study, first time, attempted to identify non-financial performance measures of e-procurement and tried to understand how these intermediate non-financial performance measures impact the firm financial performance. The interdependence of non-financial performance measures has also been explored, and the research model has been developed to empirically examine the interdependence of these financial measures and its impact on production cost.


Author(s):  
Mojca Marc ◽  
Darja Peljhan ◽  
Nina Ponikvar ◽  
Aleksandra Sobota ◽  
Metka Tekavcic

The prevailing literature and empirical studies on management of organizational performance stress the increasing importance of non-financial performance measures and propose companies to implement some kind of integrated performance measurement system. The purpose of our study is to investigate the characteristics of performance measurement and management in large Slovenian companies, focusing also on the progress made in the 5-year period. The analysis is based on two surveys conducted in the spring 2003 and summer of 2008. We investigate what do companies understand by “successful performance”, what are the most and the least important performance measures for companies, and what performance measurement systems do companies use. By answering these questions we discuss the impact of our results on the future development and growth of firms. The research results show that large Slovenian companies consider “successful performance” mostly in terms of implementing the strategy, followed by pursuing the goals of the owners and achieving the goals of different stakeholders. Most large Slovenian companies perceive financial performance measures as more important than non-financial, although they claim they measure both perspectives of their business. Our research results also suggest that 68% of large Slovenian companies in our sample use balance scorecard or some other integrated performance measurement system. These findings are generally in line with the existing theory and empirical evidence from other countries. Our main conclusion is that the prevailing role of financial key performance indicators in large Slovenian companies is appropriate for monitoring the effects of the current financial crisis but if companies want to succeed in the long-run they have to base their decisions also on non-financial measures that enable monitoring of many important capabilities for achieving long-term strategic goals.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ката Шкарић Јовановић

Резиме: Више од једног вијека стара рацио анализа, упркос бројним промјенама које су настале, нарочито у посљедње двије деценије у окружењу и пословању компанија, показала се као једноставан и брз начин идентификовања квалитета финансијског положаја и успјешности. Почетак примјене „мјешовите” основе финансијског извјештавања донио је усљед примјене фер вриједности промјену у садржини резултата и сопственог капитала. Околност да резултат садржи нереализоване добитке чија се реализација може очекивати у релативно кратком року, претворила је реализовани добитак из концепта историјског трошка у резултат који би компанија остварила ако до тренутка продаје финансијских средстава која се вреднују по фер вриједности кроз резултат не би било промјена њихове фер вриједности. Како су таква очекивања нереална, корисно је утврдити учешће нереализованих добитака/губитака у резултату. Слична, али јача потреба постоји и када је ријеч о сопственом капиталу, који садржи нереализоване добитке чија реализација ће усљедити у дужем периоду, па је вјероватноћа да ће доћи до промјена фер вриједности средстава и обавеза који се вреднују по фер вриједности кроз Остали укупан резултат виша. Мјерила финансијских перформанси која се утврђују на основу наведених величина због овога могу имати другачију висину и тумачење. Потреба да се мјерила перформанси прилагоде потребама инвеститора и повјерилаца наметнула је захтјеве за стварањем нових и коришћењем нефинансијских мјерила перформанси заједно са одабраним мјерилима финансијских перформанси.Summary: Until today despite the many changes that have occurred, particularly in the last two decades, in the business environment and operations of companies, more than a century old ratio analysis proved to be a simple and quick way of identifying the quality of their financial position and successfulness. The beginning of the application of „mixed” basis of financial reporting brought change in the content of results and in the equity due to the application of the fair value. The circumstances in which the result includes unrealized gains whose realization can be expected in a relatively short time, turned a realized gain out of the concept of historical cost into the result that the company would achieve if, until the sale of financial assets that are measured at fair value per result, there would not be any changes in their fair value. As such expectations are unrealistic it is useful to determine the share of unrealized gains/losses in the result. There is also a similar but stronger need when it comes to the equity, which includes unrealized gains whose realization will occur in a longer period, so there is higher probability that changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value per other total result will happen. Because of this measures of financial performance, which are determined on the basis of the stated parameters, can have different values and interpretations. The need to adapt the performance measures to the needs of investors and creditors imposed the requirements for establishing new ones and using non-financial performance measures together with the selected measures of financial performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 101-121
Author(s):  
Marcos Dieste ◽  
Roberto Panizzolo ◽  
Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes

PurposeThe lean philosophy has demonstrated its effectiveness to improve firms' operational performance. However, the impact of lean practices on financial performance is still unclear due to the poor understanding of the link between operational and financial measures and the conflictive results obtained by previous research. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic literature review to understand whether lean companies have improved their financial performance. Moreover, this article aims to uncover research gaps in the literature and examine which time spans of research have been considered to analyse both the degree of lean implementation and the measurement of financial outcomes.Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review has been conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles that analyse the effect of the lean production paradigm on the financial performance measures of manufacturing companies. Then, the identified articles were processed using a combination of descriptive and content analyses methods to draw new conclusions, uncover gaps and find novel paths for research.FindingsVarious authors indicate that lean initiatives lead to an enhancement of financial performance measures. JIT and TQM lean practice bundles are suggested as the best enablers of financial performance in terms of sales and profit. In contrast, according to some scholars, lean does not necessarily improve companies' financial results if it is not properly implemented.Originality/valueSeveral studies have focused on analysing the effects of lean on performance. However, only a small part of the literature has addressed the study of the effects of lean practices on financial performance metrics. The originality of this study lies in the investigation of the connections between lean practices and financial performance measures found in the literature. The outcome is the identification of various possible positive impacts of some lean practices on financial metrics.


Author(s):  
Emilyn Cabanda ◽  
Eleanor C. Domingo

Banking institutions, nowadays, serve as intermediaries of funds to a variety of clients, including the micro enterprisers. This study analyzes and measures the performance of rural and thrift banks with microfinance operations in the Philippines, using combined measures of data envelopment analysis and traditional financial performance indicators. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) method is employed to measure the productive efficiency of these banks under the production approach. The variable returns to scale is also used, with the assumption that not all banks are operating at optimal scale over the long-run period. DEA findings reveal that sample banks performed below the production frontier. The average technical efficiency score of these banks is 66.09% and additional 33.91% is needed to reach the production frontier. Overall, thrift banks are found to be more productively efficient than rural banks as depository banks. The authors have also found a strong relationship between financial performance measures and bank's productive efficiency. For thrift banks, sustainability, ROE and ROA measures showed a statistically significant positive correlation to the banks' productive efficiency while a negative relationship was observed in rural banks. Lastly, the authors can suggest that both DEA's productive efficiency and financial performance measures are consistently and strongly correlated when evaluating the overall performance of banks with microfinance operations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Annan ◽  
Nathaniel Boso ◽  
Dominic Essuman

Following the growing concerns on the inconsistent findings in previous research and drawing on the social exchange and networking theories, this study re-examined the impact of supply chain integration (SCI) on business performance (i.e. value creation and financial performance). The study argues that the impact of SCI on financial performance is through value creation and is depended upon longevity of product life cycle. Using primary data from 79 firms in Ghana, the study finds that value creation is a short-run consequence of SCI while financial performance is a long-run outcome of SCI. Additionally, results show that the financial performance outcome of SCI is experienced more from integrative efforts than from the value creation outcome. Results further indicate that firms whose products stay relatively shorter on the market are more likely to experience lower positive impact of SCI on value creation, and thus firms’ ability to become proactive, monitor, and collect market information on product performance throughout its life cycle is key for coming out with strategies that will enable them maximize product’s life span so as to experience greater benefits that come with pursuing integration with other channel members.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document