Magnetization changes in 2% Mn pipeline steel induced by uniaxial tensile stress cycles of increasing amplitude

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 2510-2521 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Guo ◽  
D.L. Artherton
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Stress ◽  
Pipeline Steel ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Stress ◽  
Stress Cycles

scholarly journals Mechanical behaviour and structure of snow under uniaxial tensile stress

1980 ◽  
Vol 26 (94) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidek Narita
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Stress ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Mechanical Behaviour ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Strain Rates ◽  
Thin Sections ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Stress ◽  
Small Cracks

AbstractThe mechanical behaviour of snow was studied at — 10°C under uniaxial tensile stress in a range of cross-head speed 6.8 × 10–8to 3.1 × 10–4ms–1and snow density 240-470 kg m–3.It was found from the resisting force-deformation curves that the snow was deformed in two different ways: namely, brittle and ductile deformation at high and low strain-rates, respectively. The critical strain-rate dividing the two deformation modes was found to depend on the density of snow. In ductile deformation, many small cracks appeared throughout the entire specimen. Their features were observed by making thin sections and they were compared with small cracks formed in natural snow on a mountain slope.The maximum strength of snow was found to depend on strain-rate: at strain-rates above about 10–5s–1, the maximum strength increased with decreasing strain-rate but below 10–5s–1it decreased with decreasing strain-rate.

scholarly journals Mechanical behaviour and structure of snow under uniaxial tensile stress

1980 ◽  
Vol 26 (94) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidek Narita
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Stress ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Mechanical Behaviour ◽  
Maximum Strength ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Strain Rates ◽  
Thin Sections ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Stress ◽  
Small Cracks

AbstractThe mechanical behaviour of snow was studied at — 10°C under uniaxial tensile stress in a range of cross-head speed 6.8 × 10–8 to 3.1 × 10–4 ms–1 and snow density 240-470 kg m–3.It was found from the resisting force-deformation curves that the snow was deformed in two different ways: namely, brittle and ductile deformation at high and low strain-rates, respectively. The critical strain-rate dividing the two deformation modes was found to depend on the density of snow. In ductile deformation, many small cracks appeared throughout the entire specimen. Their features were observed by making thin sections and they were compared with small cracks formed in natural snow on a mountain slope.The maximum strength of snow was found to depend on strain-rate: at strain-rates above about 10–5 s –1, the maximum strength increased with decreasing strain-rate but below 10–5 s–1 it decreased with decreasing strain-rate.

The damage mechanism of 17vol.%SiCp/Al composite under uniaxial tensile stress

2020 ◽  
Vol 782 ◽  
pp. 139274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuyan Shen ◽  
Zhanwei Yuan ◽  
Huan Liu ◽  
Xuemin Zhang ◽  
Qinqin Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Stress ◽  
Damage Mechanism ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Al Composite ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Stress

scholarly journals Uniaxial Tensile Stress-Strain Relationships of RC Elements Strengthened with FRP Sheets

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 04015075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang Yang ◽  
Mehdi Zomorodian ◽  
Abdeldjelil Belarbi ◽  
Ashraf Ayoub
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Stress ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Stress Strain ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Stress

Deformation Plasticity Failure Assessment Diagram (DPFAD) for Materials With Non-Ramberg-Osgood Stress-Strain Curves

1995 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Stress ◽  
Manganese Steel ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
J Integral ◽  
Stress Strain ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Strain Data ◽  
Deformation Plasticity ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Stress

This paper presents a brief history of the evolution of the Central Electricity Generating Board’s (CEGB) R-6 failure assessment diagram (FAD) procedure used in assessing defects in structural components. The reader is taken from the original CEGB R-6 FAD strip yield model to the deformation plastic failure assessment diagram (DPFAD), which is dependent on Ramberg-Osgood (R-O) materials to general stress-strain curves. An extension of the DPFAD approach is given which allows the use of material stress-strain data which do not follow the R-O equation such as stainless steel or carbon manganese steel. The validity of the new approach coined piecewise failure assessment diagram (PWFAD) is demonstrated through comparisons with the J-integral responses (expressed in terms of failure assessment diagram curves) for several cracked configurations of non-R-O materials. The examples were taken from both finite element and experimental results. The comparisons with these test cases demonstrate the accuracy of PWFAD. The use of PWFAD requires the availability of deformation plasticity J-integral solutions for several values of the strain-hardening exponent as well as uniaxial tensile stress-strain data at the temperature of interest. Lacking this information, the original R-O DPFAD approach using known engineering yield and ultimate strengths would give the best available approximation. However, it is strongly recommended that actual uniaxial tensile stress-strain data be used when available.

scholarly journals Uniaxial Tensile Stress-Strain Response on the 3D Angle Interlock Woven Fabric Composite

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.14) ◽  
pp. 430
Author(s):  
F. M.Z. Nasrun ◽  
M. F. Yahya ◽  
M. R. Ahmad ◽  
S. A. Ghani
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Stress ◽  
The Other ◽  
Woven Fabric ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Strain Response ◽  
Woven Composite ◽  
Stress Strain ◽  
Fabric Composite ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Stress ◽  
Set Up

An experimental study have been performed to investigate the uniaxial tensile stress-strain response on the 3D angle interlock (3DAI) woven fabric composite. The tensile analysis were examined based on different woven fabric set-up parameter of draw-in plan ; pointed (DRW 1), broken (DRW 2), broken mirror (DRW 3), and straight (DRW 4). Meanwhile, the woven fabric composite were produced based on 22 and 25 pick.cm-1 of weft densities. The outcomes produced shown that woven composite sample with 25 pick.cm-1 on DRW 4 projected the highest stress response, 113 MPa. Extensive review indicated that DRW 1 and 4 gave better tensile stress-strain response than the other counterpart. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document